As of June 2025, the Tanzanian Shilling (TZS) depreciated by 9.6% year-on-year against the US dollar, from 2,345.38 (June 2024) to 2,569.46, reflecting sustained import demand, foreign currency shortages, and global USD strength. Despite this, the monthly change was only -0.2%, signaling short-term exchange rate stability. The Bureau de Change market showed a tight spread (Buy: 2,574.33 / Sell: 2,582.67), reinforcing retail-level confidence. The Shilling also weakened against other major currencies: EUR (-10.4%), GBP (-9.7%), CNY (-10.2%), and JPY (-10.3%). Meanwhile, BoT interventions (e.g., USD 7 million in January) and robust foreign reserves (USD 5.3 billion, 4.3 months import cover) helped maintain market orderliness. However, strong imports (e.g., Zanzibar: USD 459.5 million, driven by infrastructure goods) and falling exports (e.g., cloves: -27.2%) kept pressure on the TZS. To counter depreciation risks, policy must focus on export diversification, import substitution, and regional trade resilience.

1. Overview: Exchange Rate Performance (as of June 2025)

The Tanzanian Shilling’s exchange rate performance reflects its value against major currencies in the Interbank Foreign Exchange Market (IFEM) and Bureau de Change markets, influenced by domestic and global economic factors.

• Official Market (IFEM):
  • USD/TZS Rate:
    • June 2024: 2,345.38
    • May 2025: 2,565.08
    • June 2025: 2,569.46
    • 12-Month Change: -9.6% (depreciation, i.e., more TZS per USD).
  • Monthly Change: -0.2% from May 2025 (2,565.08 to 2,569.46), indicating relative short-term stability.
  • Context: The 9.6% year-on-year depreciation aligns with earlier trends, such as a 9% depreciation in 2024 and an 8% depreciation in 2023. However, the TZS showed signs of stabilization in late 2024, with a slight appreciation of 0.28% in October 2024 and a 2.6% annual appreciation by January 2025, driven by improved export inflows (e.g., gold, cashew nuts, tourism). The June 2025 depreciation reflects renewed pressures from import demand and global USD strength.
  • Drivers:
    • Strong Import Demand: Imports of goods rose to USD 459.5 million in Zanzibar alone, driven by capital goods (USD 222.5 million) for infrastructure projects like the Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) and port expansions. Mainland Tanzania’s imports also increased, with capital and intermediate goods dominating.
    • Lower-than-Expected Forex Inflows: Goods exports in Zanzibar fell to USD 150.3 million (-11.9%), particularly cloves (-27.2%). While Mainland Tanzania’s exports grew 16.8% to USD 16.7 billion by April 2025, inflows from gold (USD 3,369.7 million) and tourism (USD 6,948.2 million) were insufficient to offset import pressures.
    • Global USD Strengthening: The USD appreciated globally due to U.S. monetary tightening and demand for USD-denominated assets, impacting emerging market currencies like the TZS.
  • Stability Assessment: Despite the 9.6% depreciation, the TZS remained “orderly and market-driven,” with no sharp volatility, as noted in the BoT review. BoT interventions, such as selling USD 7 million in January 2025, and robust reserves (USD 5,307.7 million, 4.3 months of import cover) supported stability.
• Bureau de Change Market:
  • June 2025 Rates:
    • Buying Rate: 2,574.33 TZS/USD
    • Selling Rate: 2,582.67 TZS/USD
  • Context: The narrow spread (0.3%) between buying and selling rates indicates a liquid and stable retail market, consistent with earlier data (e.g., 2,454.04 TZS/USD in January 2025). The slightly higher Bureau rates compared to IFEM (2,569.46) reflect retail markups but align with market-driven pricing.
  • Implications: The stable Bureau market supports confidence in the TZS for domestic transactions, with only 3.2% of Mainland businesses and 4.5% in Zanzibar quoting in USD, indicating low dollarization.
• Interpretation:
  • The 9.6% depreciation reflects structural pressures from import reliance and global USD strength, but short-term stability (-0.2% monthly change) and BoT interventions mitigate volatility.
  • The TZS’s performance aligns with regional trends, where currencies like Kenya’s Shilling (9% depreciation in 2024) faced similar pressures, though Tanzania’s stability is notable compared to Burundi’s significant depreciation.
  • Policy measures, including export promotion and reserve management, are critical to manage depreciation pressures.

2. Other Currency Exchange Rates (June 2025)

The TZS’s performance against other major currencies provides a broader view of its depreciation trend.

• Exchange Rates (June 2025):

• Context:
  • EUR/TZS: The 10.4% depreciation is slightly higher than USD/TZS, reflecting Eurozone economic resilience and demand for EUR-denominated assets. In April 2023, EUR/TZS was 2,549.80, indicating a gradual weakening.
  • GBP/TZS: The 9.7% depreciation aligns with USD trends, with GBP/TZS at 2,876.45 in April 2023, showing consistent TZS weakening.
  • JPY/TZS: The 10.3% depreciation reflects Japan’s monetary policy shifts, with JPY/TZS not detailed in earlier reports but consistent with global trends.
  • CNY/TZS: The 10.2% depreciation aligns with China’s economic slowdown and reduced demand for TZS in bilateral trade, compared to 334.23 CNY/TZS in April 2023.
  • Estimated June 2024 Rates (based on Y-o-Y changes):
    • EUR: ~2,503 TZS (from summary table).
    • GBP: ~2,961 TZS.
    • CNY: ~320.9 TZS.
  • Regional Comparison: The TZS’s broad-based depreciation contrasts with Rwanda’s Franc appreciation and Uganda’s Shilling stability (2020–2023), highlighting Tanzania’s import-driven pressures.
• Drivers:
  • Global Currency Strength: Major currencies appreciated due to tighter monetary policies in the U.S., Eurozone, and Japan, increasing demand for USD, EUR, and GBP.
  • Trade Dynamics: Tanzania’s trade with China (6.3% of external debt in CNY) and Europe (16.1% in EUR) increased TZS demand for imports, weakening the currency.
  • Export Shortfalls: Zanzibar’s clove exports fell 27.2% to USD 66.4 million, and while Mainland exports grew, they couldn’t fully offset import costs.
• Implications:
  • The broad-based depreciation (-9.6% to -10.4%) indicates systemic pressures rather than USD-specific factors, impacting import costs (e.g., petroleum, machinery).
  • The TZS’s stability against regional currencies (e.g., Kenyan Shilling) supports Tanzania’s competitiveness in East African trade, but global depreciation raises debt servicing costs (68.1% USD-denominated debt).

3. Forex Market Activity

Forex market activity in the IFEM reflects demand and supply dynamics for foreign exchange, influencing TZS stability.

• Interbank Foreign Exchange Market (IFEM):
  • Transaction Volume (June 2025): USD 65.4 million.
  • Change: +12.6% from USD 58.1 million in May 2025.
  • Year-on-Year: Compared to USD 16.3 million in January 2025 and USD 95.7 million in December 2024, June 2025’s volume indicates seasonal peaks, likely tied to trade settlements and imports.
  • Context: Increased volume reflects heightened demand for USD, driven by:
    • Trade Settlements: Imports of capital goods (USD 222.5 million in Zanzibar) and consumer goods for Q2 2025 trade.
    • Seasonal Imports: Agricultural inputs and infrastructure-related imports (e.g., SGR, TAZARA Railway).
    • Debt Servicing: External debt servicing (USD 32,090.0 million disbursed) requires USD inflows.
  • BoT Interventions: The BoT sold USD 7 million in January 2025 to stabilize the TZS, and similar interventions likely occurred in June 2025, given the orderly market noted in the review.
• Implications:
  • The 12.6% volume increase signals robust market activity but also pressure on the TZS, as higher USD demand drives depreciation.
  • BoT’s reserve management (USD 5,307.7 million) and interventions ensure stability, but sustained import demand requires export growth to balance forex flows.
  • The liquid IFEM and Bureau markets support confidence, with no evidence of dollarization (only 0.1% of Mainland businesses prefer USD payments).

Summary Table: TZS Exchange Rate Trends

Key Insights and Policy Implications

1. Moderate Depreciation:
   • The TZS’s 9.6% depreciation against the USD and 9.7%–10.4% against other currencies reflects structural import reliance and global USD strength. However, the -0.2% monthly change from May to June 2025 indicates short-term stability, supported by BoT interventions.
   • Policy: Enhance export diversification (e.g., seafood, manufactured goods) to boost forex inflows, as per Zanzibar’s USD 2 billion plan. Leverage AfCFTA to expand markets.
2. Market Stability:
   • The orderly, market-driven TZS performance, with no sharp volatility, aligns with earlier stabilization (e.g., 0.28% appreciation in October 2024). Robust reserves (USD 5,307.7 million) and a liquid IFEM (USD 65.4 million volume) support confidence.
   • Policy: Continue BoT interventions (e.g., USD sales) and reserve accumulation to manage seasonal pressures, as seen in January 2025.
3. Import-Driven Pressures:
   • Strong import demand (USD 459.5 million in Zanzibar, Mainland capital goods) outpaced export growth, driving depreciation. Zanzibar’s 27.2% clove export drop exacerbated pressures.
   • Policy: Promote import substitution (e.g., local manufacturing) and agricultural productivity to reduce reliance on imported goods, aligning with Vision 2050.
4. Global and Regional Context:
   • The TZS’s depreciation mirrors regional trends (e.g., Kenya’s 9% depreciation in 2024), but Tanzania’s stability contrasts with Burundi’s significant depreciation. Global USD strength, driven by U.S. policy, impacts emerging markets broadly.
   • Policy: Strengthen trade ties with EAC partners (e.g., Rwanda, Uganda) to stabilize TZS against regional currencies.
5. Economic Impacts:
   • Debt Servicing: With 68.1% of external debt in USD (USD 33,905.1 million), depreciation raises servicing costs, absorbing ~40% of government expenditures.
   • Inflation: Depreciation contributed to Zanzibar’s 3.4% inflation (June 2025) and Mainland’s 3.2% (May 2025), driven by imported goods like petroleum.
   • Trade Competitiveness: Depreciation enhances export competitiveness (e.g., gold, cashew nuts), but falling clove exports limit gains.
   • Policy: Maintain the 6% Central Bank Rate to control inflation (3%–4% target in 2025) and explore debt restructuring to ease USD pressures.
6. Economic Context:
   • GDP Growth: Tanzania’s 5.6% growth in 2024 and projected 6% in 2025 support export performance, driven by tourism (2.2 million arrivals) and infrastructure.
   • Reserves: USD 5,307.7 million (4.3 months of import cover) provide a buffer against volatility, up from USD 5,323.6 million in January 2025.
   • Risks: Global commodity price volatility, USD strength, and election-related uncertainties (October 2025) pose risks to TZS stability.
   • Opportunities: Tourism receipts (USD 6,948.2 million), FDI (USD 3.7 billion in 2025), and IMF disbursements (USD 148.6 million in 2024) support forex inflows.

In June 2025, Tanzania’s national debt reached TZS 116.6 trillion (USD 45.4 billion), a 13.5% increase from TZS 102.8 trillion in June 2024, driven by external borrowing (70.7% of total, TZS 82.4 trillion) for infrastructure and fiscal deficits. The Tanzania Shilling (TZS) depreciated by 9.6% year-on-year against the USD (2,569.46 TZS/USD), raising external debt servicing costs (USD 1–2 billion annually), despite robust reserves of USD 5,307.7 million (4.3 months of import cover). Supported by tourism receipts (USD 7,104 million) and a moderate debt-to-GDP ratio (~44.3%), Tanzania’s debt and TZS remain sustainable in the short term, but import reliance and USD exposure (67.6% of external debt) pose long-term challenges.

Tanzania National Debt Overview (June 2025)

Tanzania’s national debt encompasses public debt (domestic and external) and private sector external debt, critical for assessing fiscal sustainability. The attached document and provided data offer insights into debt stock, composition, and servicing, which are analyzed below.

• Total National Debt:
  • Value: TZS 116.6 trillion (USD 45.4 billion at 2,569.46 TZS/USD).
  • Annual Increase: +13.5% from TZS 102.8 trillion (USD 43.8 billion at 2,345.38 TZS/USD) in June 2024.
  • Context: The document notes the national debt stock at USD 45,586.6 million (~TZS 117.1 trillion) in June 2025, aligning closely with the provided TZS 116.6 trillion. The 13.5% increase reflects increased borrowing for infrastructure (e.g., Standard Gauge Railway, Julius Nyerere Hydropower Plant) and fiscal deficits (2.5% of GDP in 2024/25). Earlier data shows USD 48,479.9 million in April 2025 and USD 48,217.0 million in February 2025, suggesting a slight decline by June due to repayments or exchange rate effects.
  • Debt-to-GDP Ratio: Estimated at ~44.3% based on a GDP of ~USD 102.6 billion (2022 GDP of USD 105.1 billion, adjusted for 5.6% growth in 2024 and 6% in 2025). The IMF’s 2024 Debt Sustainability Analysis (DSA) reports a public debt-to-GDP ratio of 35%, below the 55% benchmark for low-income countries, indicating moderate distress risk. However, World Economics estimates a higher GDP (~USD 155.5 billion), implying a lower ratio of ~29.2%, highlighting data variability.
  • Implications: The 13.5% debt increase supports growth-enhancing projects but raises servicing costs (~40% of government expenditures, per IMF). The moderate debt-to-GDP ratio suggests sustainability, but TZS depreciation (9.6% against USD) increases external debt burdens.
• Domestic Debt:
  • Stock: TZS 35.5 trillion (USD ~13.8 billion, 29.3% of total debt).
  • Annual Increase: +11.1% from TZS 32.0 trillion in June 2024.
  • Monthly Increase: +0.9% from May 2025 (~TZS 35.2 trillion, based on April 2025’s TZS 34,759.9 billion).
  • By Instrument:

By Creditor:

• Context: The document confirms TZS 85.9 billion raised via bonds in June 2025, with TZS 93.96 billion spent on debt service (TZS 60.13 billion principal, TZS 33.83 billion interest, correcting the document’s typo of TZS 276.8 billion). The 11.1% annual growth reflects financing of fiscal deficits (e.g., TZS 270.2 billion in May 2025 for Mainland Tanzania). Treasury bonds’ 83.2% share aligns with a shift to long-term instruments, reducing refinancing risks.
• Implications: The diversified creditor base (28.6% banks, 26.1% pension funds) and long-term bond dominance enhance stability, but high borrowing rates (15.5% lending rates) crowd out private sector credit, which weakened in Q4 2024. The document’s note on retail investor participation via TIPS (18.1% “Others”) supports financial inclusion.
• External Debt:
  • Stock: TZS 82.4 trillion (USD 33.0 billion, 70.7% of total debt).
  • Annual Increase: +14.8% from TZS 71.8 trillion (USD 30.6 billion) in June 2024.
  • By Borrower:

By Use of Funds:

By Currency:

• Context: The document’s tables (e.g., Table 2.2, 2.3, 2.4) confirm the external debt stock and composition, with USD 109.9 million disbursed in April 2025 for projects like SGR and TAZARA Railway (25.4% transport). The 14.8% increase reflects concessional loans (e.g., IMF’s USD 441 million ECF/RSF, World Bank’s USD 527 million) and non-concessional borrowing (34% of external debt). The 67.6% USD share amplifies risks from the 9.6% TZS depreciation.
• Implications: The central government’s 85.4% share aligns debt with development priorities (e.g., Vision 2050), but low industry (4%) and agriculture (6.5%) allocations limit structural transformation. High USD exposure increases servicing costs (USD 80.9 million in April 2025), with external debt service at ~2.89% of GNI in 2023.
• Debt Servicing:
  • Domestic: TZS 93.96 billion in June 2025 (TZS 60.13 billion principal, TZS 33.83 billion interest), per the document. Annual servicing was TZS 890.9 billion in February 2025 (TZS 609.9 billion principal, TZS 281 billion interest).
  • External: USD 80.9 million in April 2025, with annual estimates of USD 1–2 billion, driven by USD-denominated debt (67.6%) and TZS depreciation.
  • Context: Servicing absorbs ~40% of government expenditures, per IMF, straining fiscal space. Concessional loans (e.g., World Bank, 48% of external debt) mitigate costs, but non-concessional borrowing raises concerns.
  • Implications: High servicing costs limit development spending (33.7% of Zanzibar’s budget), necessitating revenue mobilization (TZS 2,689.2 billion in May 2025, 3.1% above target) and export growth.

Tanzania Shilling (TZS) Sustainability

The TZS’s sustainability is assessed through its exchange rate stability, depreciation trends, and impact on debt servicing, drawing from the provided data and document’s external sector insights (e.g., Charts 2.7.1–2.7.3, Table 2.7.1).

• Exchange Rate Performance:
  • USD/TZS (IFEM):
    • June 2024: 2,345.38
    • May 2025: 2,565.08
    • June 2025: 2,569.46
    • Annual Depreciation: -9.6%
    • Monthly Change: -0.2% (May to June 2025)
  • Bureau de Change:
    • Buying Rate: 2,574.33 TZS/USD
    • Selling Rate: 2,582.67 TZS/USD
  • Other Currencies:

• Context: The document notes improved IFEM liquidity in June 2025, driven by seasonal cash crop exports (e.g., cashew nuts, tobacco) and gold exports (USD 3,369.7 million annually). The 9.6% depreciation aligns with earlier trends (9% in 2024, 8% in 2023), but a slight 0.28% appreciation in October 2024 and 2.6% by January 2025 indicate periods of stability. The BoT’s USD 7 million intervention in January 2025 and reserves of USD 5,307.7 million (4.3 months of import cover) support orderly markets.
• Drivers:
  • Import Demand: Goods imports rose to USD 459.5 million in Zanzibar and USD 13,040.7 million for Tanzania (Table A7), driven by capital goods (e.g., SGR, hydropower).
  • Export Shortfalls: Zanzibar’s exports fell to USD 150.3 million (-11.9%), with cloves down 27.2%. Tanzania’s goods exports grew to USD 1,036 million (Table 2.7.1), led by gold and cereals (USD 501.3 million), but were insufficient to offset imports.
  • Global USD Strength: U.S. monetary tightening increased USD demand, impacting emerging market currencies like the TZS.
• Implications: The 9.6% depreciation raises import and debt servicing costs, contributing to inflation (3.4% in Zanzibar, 3.2% in Mainland). The narrow Bureau spread (0.3%) and low dollarization (3.2% of Mainland businesses use USD) indicate market confidence, but sustained depreciation pressures reserves.
• Forex Market Activity:
  • IFEM Volume: USD 65.4 million in June 2025, +12.6% from USD 58.1 million in May 2025 (document, Page 10). This reflects trade settlements and seasonal imports, compared to USD 95.7 million in December 2024.
  • Reserves: USD 5,307.7 million (Chart 2.7.1), covering 4.3 months of imports, down slightly from USD 5,323.6 million in January 2025 but sufficient per IMF’s 4-month threshold.
  • Implications: Increased IFEM activity signals robust demand, but reserves and BoT interventions (e.g., USD sales) ensure stability. Service receipts (USD 7,104 million, driven by tourism’s 10% arrival increase to 2,333,322) bolster forex inflows.
• TZS Sustainability:
  • Stability: The TZS’s “orderly and market-driven” performance (document, Page 10) and minimal monthly depreciation (-0.2%) indicate short-term stability, supported by reserves and interventions.
  • Risks: The 9.6% annual depreciation and high USD debt exposure (67.6%) increase servicing costs, with external debt service at USD 1–2 billion annually. Import reliance (USD 13,040.7 million) and export volatility (e.g., cloves) strain reserves.
  • Mitigating Factors: Tourism receipts (USD 7,104 million), FDI (USD 3.7 billion), and concessional financing (e.g., IMF’s USD 441 million) support forex inflows. The BoT’s 6% Central Bank Rate (Page 7) controls inflation (3%–5% target), stabilizing the TZS.
  • Implications: The TZS is sustainable in the short term, but long-term pressures from depreciation and import growth require export diversification (e.g., cereals, manufactured goods) and reserve accumulation.

Debt and TZS Sustainability Metrics

Key Insights and Policy Implications

1. Debt Sustainability:
   • Status: The TZS 116.6 trillion debt (44.3% of GDP) is sustainable per the IMF’s DSA (below 55% benchmark), with moderate distress risk. External debt’s 70.7% share and 14.8% growth support infrastructure (25.4% transport) but increase servicing costs (USD 1–2 billion annually).
   • Policy: Prioritize concessional financing (e.g., World Bank’s USD 527 million) and revenue mobilization (TZS 2,339.2 billion tax revenue in May 2025, 4.1% above target) to reduce non-concessional borrowing (34% of external debt).
2. TZS Sustainability:
   • Status: The 9.6% depreciation and stable monthly performance (-0.2%) indicate short-term TZS stability, supported by reserves (USD 5,307.7 million) and tourism receipts (USD 7,104 million). However, import reliance and USD debt exposure pose long-term risks.
   • Policy: Boost exports (e.g., cereals, USD 501.3 million; manufactured goods) via AfCFTA and diversify debt currencies to mitigate USD risks (67.6% share).
3. Debt-TZS Nexus:
   • Impact: TZS depreciation increases external debt servicing costs, with USD 22.3 billion (67.6%) in USD-denominated debt. This contributes to inflation (3.4% in Zanzibar) and fiscal pressure.
   • Policy: Strengthen reserves through FDI (USD 3.7 billion) and tourism (2.3 million arrivals) to stabilize the TZS and reduce servicing costs.
4. Economic Context:
   • Growth: 5.6% GDP growth in 2024 and 6% projected for 2025 support debt absorption, driven by tourism and infrastructure.
   • Risks: TZS depreciation, global USD strength, and export volatility (e.g., cloves -27.2%) threaten sustainability. Climate shocks and election uncertainties (October 2025) add risks.
   • Opportunities: Vision 2050, MKUMBI II reforms, and digital financial inclusion (TIPS, 453.7 million transactions) enhance fiscal and TZS resilience.

Critical Examination of the Establishment Narrative

• Debt Optimism: The BoT and IMF emphasize sustainability (35% debt-to-GDP), but the 13.5% debt increase and 9.6% TZS depreciation raise servicing concerns, especially with USD debt (67.6%). The IMF’s moderate risk rating may understate long-term vulnerabilities if exports (e.g., cloves) or tourism falter.
• TZS Stability: The BoT’s “orderly market” narrative (Page 10) is supported by reserves and interventions, but high import demand (USD 13,040.7 million) and global USD strength challenge long-term TZS sustainability. X posts on regional debt (e.g., Kenya’s unsustainable levels) suggest broader risks.
• Crowding Out: The narrative overlooks domestic borrowing’s crowding-out effect (15.5% lending rates), limiting private sector credit (12.8% growth in January 2025) and Vision 2050’s private sector-led goals.

The Tanzania Shilling's dramatic strengthening to TZS 2,631.56 per USD in June 2025 from TZS 2,698.42 in May delivered immediate and substantial fiscal relief for Tanzania's external debt management, generating savings of approximately TZS 70 billion for every USD 1 billion in debt serviced during the month. This currency appreciation, which reduced the annual depreciation rate from a concerning 12.5% in June 2024 to just 0.21% in June 2025—a remarkable 60-fold improvement—provided critical breathing room for a country carrying external debt of USD 33.9-35.0 billion representing 72.1% of its total national debt stock. The strengthening was underpinned by robust market fundamentals, including enhanced foreign exchange market liquidity with IFEM turnover rising to USD 121.50 million from USD 110.8 million in May, while Bank of Tanzania intervention needs plummeted to USD 6.3 million from USD 53 million, demonstrating market-driven stability. With 67.4% of external debt denominated in USD, this currency performance significantly reduced the local currency burden of debt service obligations, while foreign exchange reserves maintaining 4.5+ months of import coverage provided additional buffer against payment shocks, positioning Tanzania favorably for sustained debt sustainability amid its medium-term development objectives.

1. Currency Strengthening and National Debt Context

In June 2025, the Tanzania Shilling demonstrated remarkable resilience, strengthening to an average of TZS 2,631.56 per USD from TZS 2,698.42 in May, representing a significant improvement that drove the annual depreciation rate down dramatically to 0.21% from 3.82% in May and a concerning 12.5% in June 2024. This currency performance occurred within the context of Tanzania's substantial national debt profile, with external debt reaching USD 35,039.80 million in February 2025, while recent data indicates external debt stood at USD 33,905.1 million in January 2025, reflecting a 0.5% decline from December 2024. The total national debt structure shows the government holding 76.4% (USD 25,896.7 million) of the total external debt, while the private sector's share dropped to 23.6% (USD 8,004.7 million).

Recent Debt Profile Analysis:

• External Debt Composition: As of November 2024, Tanzania's total external debt stock stood at USD 33,137.7 million, representing 72.1% of the country's total national debt
• Domestic Debt Position: Total Domestic Debt Stock (Sept 2024): TZS 32,615.7 billion, with Treasury Bonds comprising 78.9% – dominating domestic debt instruments, preferred for their longer maturity periods
• Currency Exposure: The debt portfolio shows significant USD exposure at 67.4%, followed by Euro at 16.6%, Chinese Yuan at 6.3%, and Other Currencies at 9.7%

2. Drivers of Currency Strengthening and Enhanced FX Market Liquidity

A. Seasonal Export Performance and FX Inflows:

Agricultural and Commodity Exports: The onset of Tanzania's cash crop export season provided substantial foreign exchange supply, with traditional exports including coffee, cashew nuts, and tobacco contributing to currency stability. Gold exports remained a critical driver, with stable growth but high USD exposure characterizing the external debt portfolio.

Tourism and Service Receipts: Strong performance in the service sector, particularly tourism, contributed significantly to foreign currency availability and supported the shilling's appreciation trajectory.

B. Interbank Foreign Exchange Market (IFEM) Development:

Enhanced Market Liquidity: The IFEM demonstrated improved functioning with turnover rising to USD 121.50 million in June from USD 110.8 million in May, indicating deeper market liquidity and more efficient price discovery mechanisms.

Reduced Central Bank Intervention: The Bank of Tanzania's intervention needs decreased dramatically to USD 6.3 million in June compared to USD 53 million in May, demonstrating market-driven stability and reduced pressure on official reserves. This aligns with the BoT Act requirement to maintain adequate official foreign exchange reserve equivalent to at least four months imports.

C. Reserve Management and Import Coverage:

Adequate Reserve Position: The Bank of Tanzania aims to strengthen the management of foreign exchange reserves, ensuring at least four months of import cover by 2029/30, while reserves declined from 4.7 months of import cover in 2022 to 4.5 months in 2023, explained by the authorities' response to the foreign exchange shortage.

3. Impact on National Debt Management and Servicing Costs

A. External Debt Servicing Benefits:

Reduced Local Currency Costs: With the majority of Tanzania's external debt denominated in USD (67.4% of external debt portfolio), the stronger shilling significantly reduced the local currency cost of debt servicing. For illustration:

• June 2025 Exchange Rate Impact: Servicing USD 1 billion of external debt in June cost approximately TZS 2.63 trillion compared to TZS 2.70 trillion in May
• Monthly Savings: This represents a nominal saving of approximately TZS 70 billion per USD 1 billion of debt serviced
• Budget Protection: The stronger currency helps shield the government budget from exchange rate-driven debt service escalations

B. Domestic Debt Market Stability:

Government Securities Performance: Currency stability supported investor confidence in government securities, helping to contain pressure on domestic interest rates. Most of the domestic debt stock is held by commercial banks with a share of 33.1 percent, followed by social security funds with holdings of 26.7 percent.

Long-term Bond Market: With Treasury Bonds comprising 78.9% of domestic debt instruments, exchange rate stability helps anchor inflation expectations, which in turn supports manageable domestic borrowing costs and maintains investor appetite for government securities.

C. Inflation and Interest Rate Dynamics:

Inflation Expectations: The stable currency contributed to controlled inflation expectations, supporting the central bank's target of maintaining inflation within the 3-5% range. The Bank of Tanzania's Strategic Plan 2025–2030 targets 3%–5% inflation.

Interest Rate Environment: The overall T-Bills interest rate rose significantly over the past 12 months from 5.8 percent in March, but currency stability helped moderate further increases in borrowing costs.

4. Debt Sustainability and Risk Assessment

A. Positive Sustainability Indicators:

Enhanced Repayment Capacity: The combination of stronger currency and improved foreign exchange inflows enhanced Tanzania's short-term capacity to meet external debt obligations without aggressive drawdown of reserves.

Reserve Buffer: With foreign exchange reserves providing adequate import coverage, Tanzania maintains a buffer against debt payment shocks and external sector volatility.

Institutional Support: The IMF and Tanzania authorities reached staff-level agreement, with Tanzania gaining access to US$441 million in financing once approved by the IMF Executive Board, providing additional financial backstop.

Economic Growth Foundation: Economic conditions have continued to improve, with robust growth and macrofinancial stability underpinned by prudent macroeconomic management. The medium-term outlook is favorable, contingent on sustained reform implementation.

B. Ongoing Risk Factors:

Debt Stock Magnitude: Despite currency improvements, the overall debt stock remains substantial, with external debt representing over 70% of total national debt, requiring sustained export growth and fiscal discipline.

Export Dependency: The heavy reliance on commodity exports (particularly gold) and tourism makes currency stability vulnerable to global price volatility and external demand shocks.

Reform Implementation: Downside risks remain, including from an uncertain external environment or reform delays. Challenges to meet SDG targets and reduce poverty are daunting, especially considering that the population size is expected to double by 2050.

Banking Sector Exposure: The banking sector, which accounts for 71% of financial assets, remained sound with the ratio of nonperforming loans to gross loans declining, but continued monitoring is essential given significant government securities holdings.

5. Strategic Debt Management Implications

A. Currency Risk Mitigation:

Natural Hedging: The strong export base in USD-earning sectors (gold, tourism, agricultural commodities) provides natural hedging against USD-denominated debt obligations.

Policy Coordination: Effective coordination between monetary policy (exchange rate management) and fiscal policy (debt issuance strategy) supports overall debt sustainability objectives.

B. Market Development Benefits:

Capital Market Deepening: Stable currency conditions support domestic capital market development, enhancing the government's ability to finance development through local currency bonds.

Investor Confidence: Reduced exchange rate volatility attracts both domestic and foreign investors to Tanzania's debt instruments, potentially lowering borrowing costs over time.

C. Fiscal Space Preservation:

Debt Service Efficiency: Lower debt servicing costs due to currency appreciation preserve fiscal space for development spending and poverty reduction programs.

Budget Predictability: Exchange rate stability enhances budget planning and execution, reducing the need for contingency allocations for currency-related debt service variations.

Summary Assessment

Strategic Recommendations

Short-term Actions:

1. Capitalize on Currency Strength: Use the favorable exchange rate environment to prepay or restructure high-cost external debt where feasible
2. Strengthen Reserve Management: Build on current reserve adequacy to enhance buffer against external shocks
3. Optimize Debt Issuance: Take advantage of stable domestic market conditions to extend debt maturity profile

Medium-term Strategies:

1. Diversify Export Base: Reduce dependency on gold and tourism through manufacturing and service sector development
2. Develop Local Currency Markets: Enhance domestic capital market depth to reduce foreign exchange exposure
3. Implement Fiscal Consolidation: Maintain debt sustainability through prudent fiscal management and revenue enhancement

Conclusion

The strengthening of the Tanzania Shilling in June 2025—driven by improved foreign exchange market liquidity, robust seasonal export inflows, and reduced central bank intervention—provided immediate and significant relief in external debt servicing costs while supporting stable domestic borrowing conditions. With external debt of approximately USD 33.9-35.0 billion representing 72.1% of total national debt, the currency appreciation delivered substantial fiscal benefits, reducing the local currency cost of USD-denominated debt service by approximately TZS 70 billion per USD 1 billion serviced.

While this performance bodes well for short-term debt sustainability and supports Tanzania's medium-term economic outlook, the long-term ability to meet debt obligations will depend on sustained reform implementation, particularly to strengthen the business environment and support a more dynamic private sector. The combination of adequate foreign exchange reserves (4.5+ months import cover), institutional support from the IMF (USD 441 million financing access), and a stable domestic debt market dominated by long-term bonds (78.9%) provides a solid foundation for debt sustainability, contingent on maintaining export competitiveness, fiscal discipline, and continued macroeconomic stability.

Key Figures – June 2025 Shilling Strength & Debt Impact

Key Drivers and Regional Alignment

In June 2025, Tanzania's headline inflation edged up slightly to 3.3% from 3.2% in May, driven primarily by a sharp rise in food and non-alcoholic beverages inflation to 7.3% (up from 5.6%), with unprocessed foods surging to 8.6% from 5.5%, as reported by the Bank of Tanzania's July 2025 Monthly Economic Review. This increase, fueled by higher prices for staples like maize flour, millet flour, beef, and fish, was partially offset by a decline in energy, fuel, and utilities inflation to 2.1% from 6.1%, reflecting softer wood charcoal and petroleum prices. Despite the uptick, the 3.3% rate remains well within Tanzania’s 3–5% national target and aligns with East African Community (EAC) and Southern African Development Community (SADC) benchmarks, supported by robust food reserves of 477,923 tonnes after a 32,414-tonne maize release by the National Food Reserve Agency.

1. Primary Drivers of the Slight Uptick in Headline Inflation to 3.3% in June 2025

Based on the Bank of Tanzania's Monthly Economic Review for July 2025, headline inflation experienced a modest increase to 3.3% in June 2025 from 3.2% in May, primarily due to upward pressures from food prices amid adequate overall supply conditions. This aligns with broader trends where food-related volatility has been a key factor in recent months. Here's a detailed breakdown:

• Food and Non-Alcoholic Beverages: This category, weighted at 28.2% in the Consumer Price Index (CPI, base 2020=100), was the main culprit behind the uptick. Annual inflation rose sharply from 5.6% in May to 7.3% in June, driven by higher prices for staple foods such as maize flour, millet flour, beef, and fish. Wholesale price data from the Ministry of Industries and Trade shows annual changes in staple food crops (e.g., maize and millet) contributing to this surge, with alternative foods like beans and sorghum also seeing price increases. To mitigate this, the National Food Reserve Agency (NFRA) released a net 32,414 tonnes of maize in June, reducing reserves from 509,990 tonnes in May to 477,923 tonnes (after a minor stock adjustment increase of 347 tonnes). Despite the drawdown, reserves remained robust—well above the 340,479 tonnes recorded in June 2024—helping to stabilize supply but not fully offsetting the price pressures.
• Unprocessed Food Prices: Inflation for non-core items (weighted at 26.1%) jumped to 7.1% in June from 5.6% in May, with unprocessed foods specifically surging to 8.6% from 5.5%. This subcategory was the primary driver of overall headline inflation, as highlighted in the contribution charts, underscoring the vulnerability of Tanzania's inflation to agricultural supply fluctuations, including seasonal factors and demand for alternatives to staples.
• Energy, Fuel & Utilities: Providing a counterbalancing effect, inflation in this category (weighted at 5.7%) decelerated significantly to 2.1% in June from 6.1% in May. The decline was mainly due to softening prices for wood charcoal and a continued downward trend in key petroleum products (petrol, diesel, and kerosene) since April 2025, mirroring global oil market developments. Domestic prices for these fuels, as tracked by the National Bureau of Statistics, have stabilized, helping to contain broader inflationary pressures.

Additional context from recent data (sourced via web searches on official sites like the Bank of Tanzania and National Bureau of Statistics as of August 2025): Tanzania's food inflation trends align with regional patterns, where rising global commodity prices (e.g., wheat up due to strong demand) have influenced imports, but domestic interventions like NFRA releases have prevented sharper spikes. Core inflation (weighted at 73.9%, excluding volatile items) eased to 1.9% from 2.1%, indicating underlying stability despite food volatility.

Overall, the slight headline uptick reflects food-driven pressures but was tempered by easing energy costs, keeping inflation low and contained.

2. Alignment with Tanzania's National Target and Regional Benchmarks

Tanzania's inflation performance in June 2025 remains strong, aligning well with both domestic and regional goals, as emphasized in the Bank of Tanzania report. This stability supports monetary policy objectives amid global uncertainties like geopolitical tensions and trade tariffs.

• Tanzania’s National Target: The medium-term inflation target is 3–5%, as outlined in the Bank's monetary policy framework. At 3.3%, June's headline rate is comfortably within this band, reflecting effective policy implementation, including maintaining the Central Bank Rate (CBR) at 6% to anchor expectations and sustain private sector credit growth. This low inflation environment also aligns with the broader goal of price stability to support economic growth, with the report noting resilience despite external headwinds.
• EAC and SADC Regional Benchmarks: Inflation trends in the East African Community (EAC) and Southern African Development Community (SADC) have generally stayed aligned with convergence criteria, though some member states faced elevated rates due to food price rises. Tanzania's 3.3% rate tracks closely with these benchmarks—the EAC macroeconomic convergence criterion targets headline inflation below 8% (with a medium-term aim around 5%), while SADC's is 3–7%. Charts in the report (e.g., Chart 1.3 for EAC and Chart 1.4 for SADC) show Tanzania's inflation below the dotted-line targets, indicating compliance. For instance, in EAC peers like Kenya and Uganda, inflation hovered around 4–6% in mid-2025 (per recent IMF and World Bank updates accessed via web search), while SADC averages were 4–5%, with outliers like Zimbabwe higher due to food issues.

Internet-sourced updates (e.g., from the EAC Secretariat and SADC websites as of August 2025) confirm Tanzania's alignment: The EAC's 2025 Monetary Affairs Committee report praises Tanzania's low inflation for aiding regional integration, and SADC's latest macroeconomic surveillance notes Tanzania's rate as a positive outlier amid global commodity volatility. This positions Tanzania favorably for regional trade and investment.

In summary, the 3.3% rate not only meets national targets but also supports EAC/SADC convergence, highlighting effective domestic policies amid contained global price pressures.

Summary Table

In Conclusion

The modest rise in Tanzania's headline inflation to 3.3% in June 2025 was predominantly fueled by escalating food prices, especially in unprocessed staples like maize and millet, despite proactive measures such as NFRA maize releases that maintained ample reserves. This was partially offset by declining energy and fuel inflation, aligning with global oil trends. Critically, the rate stays well within Tanzania's 3–5% national target and harmonizes with EAC and SADC regional benchmarks, underscoring the economy's resilience to external shocks like geopolitical tensions. Ongoing monetary policy stability and food supply interventions should continue to keep inflation contained, supporting sustained growth.

The Tanzania Shilling achieved a dramatic turnaround in June 2025, strengthening to TZS 2,631.56 per USD from TZS 2,698.42 in May, marking a remarkable shift from chronic depreciation to currency appreciation. This performance represented a stunning reversal of fortunes, with the annual depreciation rate plummeting from a concerning 12.5% in June 2024 to just 0.21% in June 2025—a 60-fold improvement that positioned the shilling among the best-performing African currencies. The stabilization was underpinned by robust seasonal foreign exchange inflows, including gold exports worth USD 3.66 billion and tourism receipts of USD 3.83 billion from 2.2 million visitors, while enhanced interbank foreign exchange market liquidity saw turnover increase to USD 121.50 million in June from USD 110.8 million in May. Critically, the Bank of Tanzania's intervention needs dropped dramatically to just USD 6.3 million in net sales compared to USD 53 million in May, demonstrating market-driven stability that coincided with inflation remaining controlled at 3.3%—well within the 3-5% target range—despite food price pressures, as the stronger currency helped offset imported inflation and contributed to energy inflation declining from 6.1% to 2.1%.

1. Tanzania Shilling Strengthening: Key Performance Indicators

In June 2025, the Tanzania Shilling (TZS) demonstrated remarkable resilience, strengthening significantly against major currencies with the exchange rate averaging TZS 2,631.56 per USD, representing a substantial improvement from TZS 2,698.42 in May 2025. This performance marked a dramatic turnaround, with the annual depreciation rate plummeting to just 0.21% from 3.82% in May and a concerning 12.5% in June 2024. Recent data indicates the shilling's continued strength, with the USD/TZS exchange rate falling to 2,470.0000 on August 7, 2025, and the Tanzania Shilling strengthening 6.44% over the past month.

Key Drivers of Currency Stabilization:

A. Seasonal Foreign Exchange Inflows:

• Cash Crop Export Surge: The onset of Tanzania's primary cash crop export season provided substantial foreign exchange supply, with traditional exports including cashew nuts, coffee, and tobacco showing robust performance
• Gold Export Earnings: Gold exports reached USD 3.66 billion, contributing significantly to foreign exchange reserves and supporting currency stability
• Agricultural Performance: Enhanced agricultural productivity supported both domestic food security and export earnings

B. Enhanced Interbank Foreign Exchange Market (IFEM) Liquidity:

• Increased Market Turnover: Foreign exchange turnover in IFEM reached USD 121.50 million in June 2025, compared to USD 110.8 million in May, indicating improved market depth and liquidity
• Reduced Central Bank Intervention: The Bank of Tanzania's intervention decreased dramatically to only USD 6.3 million in net sales during June, down from USD 53 million in May, demonstrating market-driven stability
• Market Confidence: Reduced intervention reflects improved market confidence and natural supply-demand equilibrium

C. Robust External Sector Performance:

• Export Growth: Tourism recorded significant growth, with 2.2 million tourists visiting Tanzania and injecting $3.83 billion into the economy, while overall exports reached USD 16.93 billion with a year-on-year growth of 17.7%
• Diversified Revenue Streams: Tanzania largely depends on tourism earnings and exports of gold and traditional crops for its foreign exchange earnings, providing multiple sources of foreign currency inflows
• Import Coverage: Strong foreign exchange reserves covering approximately 4.8 months of imports enhanced external sector resilience

2. Inflation Dynamics and Currency Interaction

Inflation Trends:

Marginal Inflation Increase: Headline inflation rose slightly to 3.2% in February 2025, up from 3% in the corresponding period in 2024, with June 2025 recording 3.3% compared to 3.2% in May. The increase was primarily attributed to:

• Food Price Pressures: Surging prices of staple foods including maize flour, millet flour, beef, and fish
• Unprocessed Food Inflation: Climbing to 8.6%, reflecting seasonal and supply chain factors
• Beverage Price Increases: Non-alcoholic beverage prices contributing to overall inflation pressure

Mitigating Currency Effects:

• Import Cost Reduction: The stronger shilling reduced imported inflationary pressures, particularly affecting petroleum products and manufactured goods
• Energy Sector Stabilization: Energy, fuel, and utilities inflation declined from 6.1% to 2.1%, partly due to both falling global oil prices and reduced import costs from currency appreciation
• Inflation Target Compliance: Headline inflation averaged 3.2 percent, remaining within the target of three percent to five percent and consistent with the convergence criteria for regional economic integration

3. Monetary Policy and Economic Stability Framework

Central Bank Policy Stance:

• Interest Rate Stability: The Bank of Tanzania maintained the Central Bank Rate (CBR) at 6%, providing policy anchor and supporting interbank market stability
• Prudent Monetary Management: Inflation rates remained low, a situation the central bank attributes to prudent monetary policy and a continued moderation in non-food and energy prices
• Market Confidence: Steady policy stance anchored inflation expectations and maintained financial sector stability

External Reserves and Liquidity:

• Reserve Adequacy: Foreign exchange reserves of approximately USD 5.97 billion provided coverage for 4.8 months of imports, exceeding international adequacy benchmarks
• Liquidity Management: Enhanced interbank market functioning reduced volatility and supported currency stability
• Risk Mitigation: Adequate reserves provided buffer against external shocks and supported investor confidence

4. Economic Growth and Sectoral Performance

GDP Growth Trajectory:

• Robust Economic Performance: Mainland Tanzania's GDP grew 5.6% in Jan-Sep 2024, estimated at 5.6% for the full year, with projections for continued growth
• Sectoral Drivers: Real GDP grew 5.3% in 2023, up from 4.7% in 2022, driven by agriculture, construction, and manufacturing on the supply side and private investments on the demand side
• Long-term Outlook: Tanzania is projected to grow at an average rate of around 6% over the long-term

Export Performance:

• Agricultural Exports: Tanzania's January 2025 economic review highlights a 15.1% export growth driven by gold, cashew nuts, and tourism
• Mining Sector: Gold exports registered an annual increase of 7% to USD 2,859.6 million in previous periods, with continued strong performance
• Tourism Recovery: Significant tourism revenue contribution supporting service sector growth and foreign exchange earnings

5. Implications for Overall Economic Stability

Positive Stability Indicators:

A. Price and Monetary Stability:

• Inflation Control: Headline inflation consistently maintained within the 3-5% national target range, supporting purchasing power and economic planning
• Regional Convergence: Inflation rates aligned with East African Community (EAC) and Southern African Development Community (SADC) convergence criteria
• Monetary Credibility: Consistent central bank policy enhanced institutional credibility and market confidence

B. External Sector Resilience:

• Balance of Payments: Strong export performance and tourism earnings improved current account dynamics
• Currency Stability: Reduced exchange rate volatility lowered business uncertainty and import costs
• Investment Climate: Public debt levels remain nevertheless contained at around half of GDP, supporting macroeconomic stability

C. Financial Sector Development:

• Credit Growth: Private sector credit expanded by 12.8%, supporting business investment and economic expansion
• Market Liquidity: Enhanced foreign exchange market functioning improved financial intermediation
• Banking Stability: Reduced currency risk supported banking sector performance and lending capacity

Growth Support Mechanisms:

• Business Environment: Stable exchange rates reduced uncertainty for traders, manufacturers, and investors, supporting long-term planning
• Investment Incentives: Controlled inflation and currency stability attracted both domestic and foreign investment
• Purchasing Power: Real income protection through inflation control sustained consumer demand and economic momentum

Summary Assessment

Conclusion

The stabilization of the Tanzania Shilling in June 2025 represents a confluence of positive economic fundamentals, including robust seasonal export inflows from gold and agricultural commodities, enhanced foreign exchange market liquidity, and prudent monetary policy management. The Tanzania Shilling has strengthened 6.44% over the past month, and is up by 8.34% over the last 12 months, demonstrating sustained improvement in currency performance.

This currency strength, combined with controlled inflation averaging 3.2-3.3% within the target range, has created a stable macroeconomic environment supporting Tanzania's economic growth trajectory. The reduced need for central bank intervention, strong external reserves, and diversified export base provide a solid foundation for continued currency stability and economic expansion, positioning Tanzania favorably for sustained development and regional economic integration objectives.

Key Figures Table

Infrastructure Push Meets Rising Servicing Costs Amid Depreciation Pressures

As of June 2025, Tanzania’s total public debt stock reached TZS 116.6 trillion (approx. USD 45.4 billion at an exchange rate of TZS 2,569.46/USD), marking a 13.5% annual increase from TZS 102.8 trillion in June 2024. This growth reflects continued borrowing to fund major infrastructure projects like the Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) and Julius Nyerere Hydropower Plant, along with the financing of a fiscal deficit projected at 2.5% of GDP. The debt is composed of 70.7% external debt (TZS 82.4 trillion) and 29.3% domestic debt (TZS 35.5 trillion). While the external debt grew faster at 14.8%, concerns are rising over exchange rate vulnerability, as 67.6% of it is USD-denominated amid a 9.6% depreciation of the TZS. On the domestic side, long-term Treasury bonds dominate (83.2% of domestic debt), but heavy reliance on commercial banks (28.6%) is contributing to elevated lending rates of 15.5%, crowding out private sector credit. Despite being below the IMF’s 55% debt-to-GDP sustainability threshold, the growing debt servicing burden—absorbing ~40% of government expenditure— highlights the need for careful fiscal and monetary coordination.

Total Public Debt Stock

• Total National Debt:
  • Value: TZS 116.6 trillion (USD 45.4 billion at ~TZS 2,569.46/USD, per the provided exchange rate).
  • Annual Increase: +13.5% from TZS 102.8 trillion in June 2024 (USD 43.8 billion at June 2024’s 2,345.38 TZS/USD).
  • Context: The 13.5% increase aligns with earlier trends, with the national debt at USD 48,479.9 million (TZS ~124.5 trillion at 2,565.08 TZS/USD) in April 2025 and USD 48,217.0 million in February 2025. The rise reflects increased borrowing for infrastructure and fiscal deficits, supported by a 13.4% planned spending increase to TZS 57.04 trillion in FY 2025/26.
  • Debt-to-GDP Ratio: Estimated at ~44.3% in June 2025, based on Tanzania’s GDP of ~USD 105.1 billion in 2022, adjusted for 5.6% growth in 2024 and 6% projected for 2025 (~USD 102.6 billion). This is lower than the 47.36% reported for 2023 (USD 37,478 million), suggesting a slight decline in the debt-to-GDP ratio, as forecasted by Statista to reach 40.84% by 2029. However, World Economics estimates a higher GDP ($0.353 trillion), implying a lower ratio of ~29.2%, highlighting data inconsistencies.
  • Implications: The 13.5% increase reflects Tanzania’s ambitious infrastructure agenda (e.g., Standard Gauge Railway, Julius Nyerere Hydropower Plant) and fiscal deficits (2.5% of GDP projected for 2024/25). While sustainable per the IMF’s Debt Sustainability Analysis (DSA) (35% public debt-to-GDP, below the 55% benchmark), the rapid rise raises concerns about servicing costs, which absorb ~40% of government expenditures.

1. Domestic Debt

Domestic debt represents borrowing within Tanzania, primarily through Treasury bonds and bills, held by local creditors.

• Stock of Domestic Debt:
  • Value: TZS 35.5 trillion (USD ~13.8 billion) in June 2025.
  • Annual Increase: +11.1% from TZS 32.0 trillion in June 2024.
  • Monthly Increase: +0.9% from May 2025 (estimated at ~TZS 35.2 trillion, based on April 2025’s TZS 34,759.9 billion).
  • Context: The 11.1% rise follows a 1.5% monthly increase in April 2025 (TZS 34,759.9 billion) and a decline to TZS 34,014.1 billion in February 2025 due to reduced overdraft use. The increase reflects financing of a TZS 248.5 billion fiscal deficit in Zanzibar and Mainland deficits, with TZS 625.5 billion mobilized in April 2025 (TZS 421.7 billion in bonds, TZS 203.8 billion in bills).
  • Implications: The moderate 11.1% growth (vs. 14.8% for external debt) reflects fiscal prudence, with long-term bonds dominating to extend maturity profiles. However, high domestic borrowing (29% by commercial banks) raises lending rates to 15.5%, crowding out private sector credit, which weakened in Q4 2024.
• Domestic Debt by Instrument:

• Context: Treasury bonds’ dominance (83.2%) aligns with earlier trends (e.g., April 2025), reflecting a shift to long-term instruments to reduce refinancing risks. Treasury bill yields rose to 11.7% by March 2024, and bond yields (e.g., 5-year bonds) increased by 40 basis points, indicating higher borrowing costs.
• Implications: The long-term bond focus improves debt sustainability by extending maturities, but rising yields strain fiscal resources, with TZS 890.9 billion allocated for domestic debt servicing in February 2025 (TZS 609.9 billion principal, TZS 281 billion interest).
• Domestic Debt by Creditor Category:

• Context: Commercial banks (28.6%) and pension funds (26.1%) remain key creditors, consistent with March 2025 (29% and 26.5%, respectively). The BoT’s 20.2% share reflects its role in liquidity management, while “Others” (18.1%) include growing retail investor participation via digital platforms like the Tanzania Instant Payment System (TIPS).
• Implications: The diversified creditor base reduces reliance on any single group, but high bank holdings limit private sector lending, with credit growth weakening in Q4 2024. Pension funds’ role supports financial inclusion (65% formal service adoption by 2021), but high yields risk fiscal strain.

2. External Debt

External debt comprises borrowing from foreign creditors, primarily for development projects, and is sensitive to exchange rate fluctuations.

• Stock of External Debt:
  • Value: TZS 82.4 trillion (USD 33.0 billion at 2,569.46 TZS/USD).
  • Annual Increase: +14.8% from TZS 71.8 trillion (USD ~30.6 billion) in June 2024.
  • Context: The USD 33.0 billion aligns with February 2025’s USD 35,039.8 million and April 2025’s USD 35,505.9 million, reflecting steady growth. The 14.8% increase is driven by disbursements (USD 109.9 million in April 2025) for infrastructure and budget support, with 78.3% held by the central government.
  • Implications: The faster growth of external debt (14.8% vs. 11.1% for domestic) reflects reliance on foreign financing for projects like SGR and hydropower, boosting long-term growth (6% GDP projected for 2025). However, the 9.6% TZS depreciation against the USD increases servicing costs, with USD 80.9 million serviced in April 2025. The IMF’s DSA rates external debt distress risk as moderate, with indicators below thresholds.
• External Debt by Borrower:

• Context: The central government’s 85.4% share (USD ~28.2 billion) aligns with March 2025’s 78.3%, reflecting its role in funding infrastructure (48% of World Bank’s USD 10 billion portfolio). Private sector debt (14.6%) supports FDI-driven projects (USD 3.7 billion registered in 2025), while public corporations’ negligible share (e.g., TZS 84 billion for SOEs in February 2025) indicates limited exposure.
• Implications: The government’s dominance ensures alignment with development goals, but private sector debt growth supports diversification (e.g., manufacturing, 156 projects in 2025). Negligible SOE debt reduces fiscal risk, per the IMF’s DSA.
• Disbursed External Debt by Use of Funds:

• Context: Transport (25.4%) includes SGR and TAZARA Railway (USD 1.4 billion from China), while social welfare (21.3%) and energy (16.4%) align with World Bank projects (USD 300 million for disaster preparedness, USD 227 million for conservation). Budget support (15.2%) reflects IMF’s USD 441 million ECF/RSF disbursements.
• Implications: The allocation prioritizes growth-enhancing sectors, supporting Vision 2050’s USD 1 trillion GDP target. However, low industry (4%) and agriculture (6.5%) shares limit structural transformation, with agriculture’s GDP share at 26% in 2022.
• External Debt by Currency Composition:

• Context: The USD’s 67.6% share (USD ~22.3 billion) is slightly lower than March 2025’s 67.7% and 2023’s 68.9%, reflecting efforts to diversify borrowings. EUR (17.2%) and CNY (3.4%) align with trade and financing from Europe and China, respectively. The 9.6% TZS depreciation against the USD and 10.4% against the EUR amplify servicing costs.
• Implications: High USD exposure (67.6%) increases vulnerability to TZS depreciation, with annual external debt service estimated at USD 1–2 billion. Concessional financing (e.g., IMF, World Bank) mitigates risks, but diversification into local currency debt is needed.

Summary Table: Tanzania National Debt (June 2025)

Key Insights and Policy Implications

1. Rising Debt Levels:
   • The TZS 116.6 trillion (USD 45.4 billion) debt, up 13.5%, reflects infrastructure investments (e.g., SGR, hydropower) and fiscal deficits (2.5% of GDP). While sustainable (35% debt-to-GDP per IMF), servicing costs (~40% of expenditures) strain fiscal space.
   • Policy: Enhance revenue mobilization (TZS 2,697.8 billion collected in January 2025, 98.3% of target) and prioritize concessional financing (e.g., IMF’s USD 441 million ECF/RSF) to reduce costs.
2. External Debt Dominance:
   • External debt (TZS 82.4 trillion, 70.7%) drives the increase, with 85.4% held by the central government for transport (25.4%) and social welfare (21.3%). The 67.6% USD share and 9.6% TZS depreciation raise servicing costs (USD 80.9 million in April 2025).
   • Policy: Diversify currency composition (e.g., increase CNY, SDR shares) and boost export earnings (USD 16,737.6 million in February 2025, +18.8%) to mitigate exchange rate risks.
3. Domestic Debt Stability:
   • Domestic debt (TZS 35.5 trillion, +11.1%) is dominated by long-term bonds (83.2%), reducing refinancing risks. Commercial banks (28.6%) and pension funds (26.1%) are key creditors, but high borrowing crowds out private credit.
   • Policy: Lower domestic borrowing rates (15.5% lending rates) via the 6% Central Bank Rate and expand retail bond markets via TIPS to diversify creditors.
4. Development Alignment:
   • External debt funds growth-enhancing sectors (transport, energy, social welfare), supporting Vision 2050’s USD 1 trillion GDP target. However, low industry (4%) and agriculture (6.5%) shares limit structural transformation.
   • Policy: Increase investments in agriculture (26% of GDP) and industry via MKUMBI II reforms to boost competitiveness and job creation (41,117 jobs projected in 2025).
5. Exchange Rate Risks:
   • The 9.6% TZS depreciation against the USD and high USD debt exposure (67.6%) increase servicing costs, with external debt service at ~2.89% of GNI in 2023.
   • Policy: Strengthen reserves (USD 5,307.7 million, 4.3 months of import cover) and promote tourism (USD 6,948.2 million in receipts) to stabilize the TZS.
6. Economic Context:
   • GDP Growth: 5.6% in 2024, projected at 6% in 2025, driven by agriculture, tourism, and infrastructure. Debt supports growth but diverts resources from social services.
   • Fiscal Deficit: 2.5% of GDP in 2024/25, financed by domestic and external borrowing, with TZS 1 trillion in arrears cleared annually.
   • Risks: TZS depreciation, global USD strength, and climate shocks (e.g., weather-induced food price volatility) increase debt costs.
   • Opportunities: FDI (USD 3.7 billion in 2025), tourism (2.2 million arrivals), and concessional financing (e.g., World Bank’s USD 527 million in 2025) support debt sustainability.

Critical Examination of the Establishment Narrative

• Official Data Optimism: The BoT and IMF emphasize debt sustainability (35% debt-to-GDP, moderate distress risk), but the 13.5% debt increase and 9.6% TZS depreciation raise concerns about servicing costs, especially with USD-denominated debt (67.6%). The IMF’s DSA may understate risks if global interest rates rise or export growth (e.g., cloves -27.2% in Zanzibar) falters.
• Growth vs. Crowding Out: The narrative of debt-funded growth (e.g., 6% GDP in 2025) overlooks crowding-out effects, with high domestic borrowing (TZS 35.5 trillion) limiting private sector credit and raising lending rates (15.5%). This could hinder Vision 2050’s private sector-led goals.
• Concessional Financing: The reliance on concessional loans (e.g., IMF, World Bank) is presented as a strength, but increasing non-concessional borrowing (34% of external debt) raises costs, especially with TZS depreciation.
• Alternative Perspective: While the BoT highlights orderly TZS performance, X posts on regional debt (e.g., Kenya’s unsustainable debt) suggest broader vulnerabilities. Tanzania’s moderate risk rating may mask long-term challenges if exports or tourism underperform.

Central Government Dominates Borrowing as USD Exposure Heightens Currency Risks

As of June 2025, Tanzania’s external debt stock stood at USD 32,955.5 million (approximately TZS 82.4 trillion, assuming an exchange rate of TZS 2,500/USD), reflecting a marginal increase of 0.1% from the previous month. This external debt comprises about 70.7% of the total national debt, highlighting the country's continued reliance on foreign financing. The central government remains the primary borrower, holding 85.4% of the external debt (USD 28.1 billion), followed by the private sector with 14.6% (USD 4.8 billion), while public corporations account for a negligible share. Most of the disbursed debt is allocated to priority sectors such as transport & telecommunications (25.4%), social welfare & education (21.3%), and energy & mining (16.4%). However, 67.6% of the debt is denominated in USD, exposing the country to significant exchange rate risks amid recent currency depreciation. Despite prudent debt servicing—interest arrears are relatively low—the narrow fiscal space underscores the need for careful management and stronger domestic revenue mobilization.

1. External Debt Stock by Borrower – June 2025

The external debt stock represents the total outstanding debt owed to foreign creditors, including principal and interest arrears. As of June 2025, Tanzania’s external debt stock stood at USD 32,955.5 million (approximately TZS 82.4 trillion, assuming an exchange rate of ~TZS 2,500/USD, consistent with recent BoT reports). This reflects a marginal monthly increase of 0.1% from May 2025 and accounts for approximately 70.7% of Tanzania’s total national debt (external and domestic combined).

Total External Debt

• Amount: USD 32,955.5 million
• Monthly Increase: +0.1% (approximately USD 32.9 million, assuming May 2025 debt was ~USD 32,922.6 million).
• Share of Total National Debt: ~70.7%, indicating a significant reliance on external financing compared to domestic debt (e.g., TZS 32,615.7 billion in September 2024, per TICGL).
• Context: The slight increase aligns with trends observed in earlier months, such as a 0.5% decline from December 2024 to January 2025 (USD 33,905.1 million to USD 33,137.7 million), followed by an increase to USD 35,039.8 million by February 2025, reflecting fluctuations due to new disbursements and debt servicing. The African Development Bank notes that Tanzania’s fiscal deficit, projected at 2.5% of GDP in FY 2024/25, is partly financed by external borrowing, supporting this trend.

Breakdown by Borrower

The following table summarizes the external debt stock by borrower category for June 2025:

• Central Government:
  • Amount: USD 28,133.7 million (85.4% of total external debt).
  • Disbursed Outstanding Debt (DOD): USD 28,055.0 million, indicating that nearly all central government debt is disbursed and actively financing projects.
  • Interest Arrears: USD 78.7 million, a minor portion (0.28% of central government debt), suggesting effective debt servicing for public debt.
  • Context: The central government’s dominance (85.4%) is consistent with historical trends, with shares of 76.8% in November 2024 and 78.1% in September 2024. This reflects the government’s role in funding major infrastructure projects (e.g., Standard Gauge Railway, Julius Nyerere Hydropower Project) and social services, as noted in the FY 2024/25 budget allocating TZS 14.08 trillion for development expenditure.
  • Implications: The high share underscores the public sector’s reliance on external financing for development goals, placing a significant repayment burden on public finances. The low interest arrears indicate prudent debt management, supported by multilateral concessional loans (54.5% of external debt in November 2024).
• Private Sector:
  • Amount: USD 4,820.6 million (14.6% of total external debt).
  • DOD: USD 4,630.7 million, with interest arrears of USD 189.9 million (3.9% of private sector debt).
  • Context: The private sector’s share has declined slightly from 23.6% in January 2025 (USD 8,004.7 million) and 21% in December 2019, reflecting reduced access to foreign credit, possibly due to tighter global lending conditions or currency risks. The World Bank notes that private sector borrowing constraints may hinder economic diversification.
  • Implications: The higher interest arrears (relative to the central government) suggest challenges in private sector debt servicing, potentially due to exchange rate fluctuations (67.6% USD-denominated debt) or weaker cash flows in sectors like agriculture and industry.
• Public Corporations:
  • Amount: USD 1.3 million (negligible share).
  • Context: Public corporations (e.g., TANESCO, Tanzania Ports Authority) have minimal external debt exposure, consistent with January 2025 (USD 3.8 million). This reduces government liability risks from state-owned enterprises.
  • Implications: The negligible share reflects a deliberate strategy to limit public corporation borrowing, aligning with fiscal reforms to improve state-owned enterprise performance, as evidenced by TZS 1.028 trillion in dividends collected in FY 2024/25.

Key Takeaway

• The central government’s 85.4% share of external debt highlights its role in driving debt-financed development, particularly in infrastructure and social services. The private sector’s reduced share and higher arrears indicate challenges in accessing and servicing foreign credit. The negligible debt of public corporations minimizes fiscal risks but limits their role in external financing.

2. Disbursed Outstanding Debt (DOD) by Use of Funds – % Share

The DOD represents the portion of external debt that has been disbursed and is actively funding projects or sectors. The allocation of DOD reflects Tanzania’s development priorities under Vision 2050 and the Third Five-Year Development Plan (FYDP III).

Breakdown by Use of Funds

The following table summarizes the percentage share of DOD by sector for June 2025:

• Transport & Telecommunication (25.4%):
  • Context: This sector receives the largest share, consistent with historical trends (21.4% in November 2024, 21.5% in September 2024). Key projects include the Standard Gauge Railway (SGR), port expansions, and ICT infrastructure, aligning with Tanzania’s goal to enhance connectivity and trade under FYDP III.
  • Implications: Investments in transport (e.g., SGR, Dar es Salaam port) and telecommunications (e.g., 5G networks) support economic growth by improving logistics and digital access. However, the high allocation may crowd out funding for other sectors like agriculture.
• Social Welfare & Education (21.3%):
  • Context: This sector’s significant share (20.4% in November 2024, 20.8% in September 2024) reflects investments in human capital, such as free education programs and healthcare infrastructure. The World Bank’s USD 227 million financing for climate and marine conservation in June 2025 also supports social welfare.
  • Implications: Funding education and social welfare enhances workforce development and poverty reduction, critical for long-term growth. However, recurrent costs (e.g., teacher salaries) may compete with capital investments.
• Energy & Mining (16.4%):
  • Context: Investments in energy (e.g., Julius Nyerere Hydropower Plant) and mining (e.g., gold, critical minerals) align with Tanzania’s energy access goals and export growth (gold exports up 24.5% in April 2025). The sector’s share is slightly higher than November 2024 (15%).
  • Implications: Energy investments address power shortages, supporting industrial growth, while mining boosts export revenues. However, environmental and governance risks in mining require careful management.
• Budget Support (15.2%):
  • Context: This share (19.9% in January 2025) reflects external loans used to finance recurrent expenditures, such as salaries and debt servicing. The African Development Bank notes that reliance on budget support poses fiscal risks if external financing decreases.
  • Implications: High budget support allocation indicates fiscal pressures, as seen in the TZS 270.2 billion deficit in May 2025. Reducing reliance on external budget support through domestic revenue mobilization (e.g., TZS 2,880.2 billion in May 2025) is critical.
• Agriculture (6.5%):
  • Context: The low share (5.1% in September 2024) is surprising given agriculture’s role in Tanzania’s economy (25% of GDP, 65% of employment). Investments support irrigation and agribusiness but are limited compared to infrastructure.
  • Implications: Underfunding agriculture may constrain rural development and food security, despite export growth in cashew nuts (141% in April 2025).
• Finance & Insurance (5.1%) and Industry (4.0%):
  • Context: These sectors receive minimal allocations (4.0% for industry in January 2025), reflecting limited focus on manufacturing and financial sector development. The World Bank highlights declining industrial productivity as a constraint on economic diversification.
  • Implications: Low funding may hinder Tanzania’s industrialization goals under Vision 2050, limiting job creation and export diversification.
• Others (6.1%):
  • Context: Includes water, balance of payments support, and miscellaneous projects. The World Bank’s USD 300 million financing for disaster preparedness in June 2025 may contribute to this category.
  • Implications: Diverse allocations support resilience but dilute focus on priority sectors.

Key Takeaway

• The focus on Transport & Telecommunication (25.4%) and Social Welfare & Education (21.3%) reflects Tanzania’s commitment to infrastructure-driven growth and human capital development. However, the low shares for agriculture (6.5%) and industry (4.0%) may limit inclusive growth, given their economic significance.

3. DOD by Currency Composition – % Share

The currency composition of DOD indicates the foreign currencies in which Tanzania’s external debt is denominated, exposing the country to exchange rate risks.

Breakdown by Currency

The following table summarizes the percentage share of DOD by currency for June 2025:

• US Dollar (USD) (67.6%):
  • Context: The USD’s dominance is consistent with historical trends (67.4% in September 2024, 68.1% in January 2025). This reflects borrowing from multilateral institutions (e.g., World Bank, IMF) and commercial creditors, often denominated in USD.
  • Implications: High USD exposure makes Tanzania vulnerable to exchange rate fluctuations. The Tanzanian Shilling depreciated by 8% in 2023, increasing debt servicing costs. A stronger USD in 2025 could further strain public finances, as noted by The Citizen.
• Euro (EUR) (17.2%):
  • Context: Euro-denominated debt (16.1% in January 2025) reflects loans from European institutions (e.g., European Investment Bank). The slight increase may indicate new Euro-based financing.
  • Implications: Diversification into Euros reduces USD reliance but exposes Tanzania to Eurozone economic conditions.
• Japanese Yen (JPY) (4.9%) and Chinese Yuan (CNY) (3.4%):
  • Context: JPY and CNY shares align with bilateral loans from Japan and China, supporting infrastructure projects like the SGR. The CNY share is lower than in January 2025 (6.3%), possibly due to reduced Chinese lending.
  • Implications: These currencies provide some diversification, but their small shares limit risk mitigation.
• Special Drawing Rights (SDR) (3.0%) and Others (3.9%):
  • Context: SDRs are used by multilateral institutions like the IMF, while “Others” include British Pound and minor currencies. The low SDR share reflects limited IMF financing in June 2025.
  • Implications: Diversified borrowing in SDRs and other currencies offers some stability but is insufficient to offset USD risks.

Key Takeaway

• The 67.6% USD share exposes Tanzania to significant exchange rate risks, particularly with Shilling depreciation. Diversification into Euros, JPY, and CNY helps but is limited by their smaller shares. Prudent debt management and revenue mobilization are critical to mitigate currency risks.

The following table consolidates the key figures for June 2025:

Policy Implications and Insights

1. Central Government Borrowing:
   • The central government’s 85.4% share of external debt aligns with its role in funding infrastructure and social services, as seen in the TZS 937.3 billion development expenditure in May 2025. However, this concentrates repayment risks on public finances, requiring robust revenue mobilization (e.g., TZS 2,880.2 billion in May 2025).
   • The low interest arrears (USD 78.7 million) indicate effective debt management, supported by concessional loans from multilateral creditors (54.5% of debt).
2. Private Sector Constraints:
   • The private sector’s 14.6% share and higher arrears (USD 189.9 million) suggest challenges in accessing and servicing foreign credit, potentially due to USD appreciation or global tightening. This aligns with TICGL’s observation of declining private sector borrowing slowing economic diversification.
3. Sectoral Allocation:
   • The focus on Transport & Telecommunication (25.4%) and Social Welfare & Education (21.3%) supports Tanzania’s Vision 2050 goals of connectivity and human capital development. However, the low shares for agriculture (6.5%) and industry (4.0%) may hinder inclusive growth, given agriculture’s role in employment and GDP.
4. Currency Risks:
   • The 67.6% USD share exposes Tanzania to exchange rate risks, as noted by The Citizen, with Shilling depreciation increasing debt servicing costs. The African Development Bank emphasizes the need for domestic revenue mobilization to mitigate these risks.
   • Diversification into Euros (17.2%) and other currencies is positive but insufficient to offset USD dominance.
5. Debt Sustainability:
   • The IMF’s 2024 Debt Sustainability Analysis (DSA) indicates a moderate risk of external debt distress, with public debt at 45.5% of GDP in 2022/23, well below the 55% benchmark. The slight debt increase in June 2025 suggests controlled borrowing, but monitoring debt servicing capacity is critical, given annual costs absorb ~40% of expenditures.

Strong tax revenue performance (TZS 2,339.7 billion in May 2025, 4.1% above target) supports debt servicing but requires sustained efforts to reduce reliance on budget support loans (15.2%)

Pension Funds, Banks, and Retail Investors Drive Diversification

As of June 2025, Tanzania’s domestic debt stock (excluding liquidity papers) rose to TZS 35,502.8 billion, marking a monthly increase of 0.9% (TZS 301.7 billion) and an annual growth of 11.1% (TZS 3,551.6 billion) from June 2024. This expansion aligns with the government's fiscal strategy to fund the 2.5% of GDP budget deficit, primarily through long-term Treasury bonds. Notably, no Treasury bills were auctioned in June, emphasizing the shift toward longer-term instruments. Domestic debt now accounts for approximately 29.3% of the total national debt (estimated at TZS 121.2 trillion), reflecting a balanced mix of domestic and external financing. The creditor landscape has evolved, with commercial banks holding 28.6%, pension funds 26.1%, and a rapidly expanding “Others” category (18.1%), highlighting increased participation from retail and non-traditional investors. This diversification reduces concentration risks and demonstrates growing confidence in government securities amid stable macroeconomic conditions.

Government Domestic Debt – Overview

The domestic debt stock, excluding liquidity papers (e.g., short-term instruments used for monetary policy), represents funds borrowed by the Tanzanian government from domestic creditors, primarily through Treasury bonds and bills. As of June 2025, the total domestic debt stock was TZS 35,502.8 billion, reflecting steady growth and a diversified creditor base.

• Total Domestic Debt Stock:
  • June 2025: TZS 35,502.8 billion
  • Monthly Increase: +0.9% from TZS 35,201.1 billion in May 2025 (an increase of TZS 301.7 billion).
  • Year-on-Year Increase: +11.1% from TZS 31,951.2 billion in June 2024 (an increase of TZS 3,551.6 billion).
  • Context: The year-on-year growth aligns with Tanzania’s fiscal strategy to finance the FY 2024/25 budget deficit (projected at 2.5% of GDP, per the African Development Bank) through domestic borrowing, particularly Treasury bonds. The absence of Treasury bill auctions in June 2025 (as noted in your earlier query) suggests a focus on long-term borrowing, contributing to the debt stock increase.
• Share of National Debt: Domestic debt constitutes approximately 29.3% of Tanzania’s total national debt (assuming total debt is ~TZS 121.2 trillion, combining domestic debt of TZS 35,502.8 billion and external debt of ~TZS 82.4 trillion or USD 32,955.5 million from June 2025). This reflects a balanced reliance on domestic and external financing.

Government Domestic Debt by Creditor Category

The domestic debt is distributed across various creditor categories, including commercial banks, the Bank of Tanzania (BoT), pension funds, insurance companies, BoT special funds, and others (e.g., public institutions, private companies, individuals). The following table summarizes the debt stock by creditor for June 2024, May 2025, and June 2025, with shares for June 2025:

Detailed Analysis by Creditor

1. Commercial Banks:
   • June 2025: TZS 10,161.5 billion (28.6% share).
   • Change:
     • Monthly: +0.2% from TZS 10,138.2 billion in May 2025 (TZS 23.3 billion increase).
     • Year-on-Year: +1.7% from TZS 9,996.1 billion in June 2024 (TZS 165.4 billion increase).
   • Share Trend: Declined from 31.3% in June 2024 to 28.6% in June 2025, indicating a reduced relative reliance on banks.
   • Context: Commercial banks are major holders of Treasury bonds (e.g., TZS 322.4 billion accepted in June 2025 auctions), reflecting their role as key financiers of government borrowing. The modest monthly growth suggests banks maintained stable investments, possibly due to high yields (14.50% for 20-year bonds, 14.80% for 25-year bonds). The year-on-year decline in share may reflect banks’ diversification into private sector lending or liquidity constraints, as noted in the interbank cash market’s TZS 2,873.9 billion turnover in June 2025.
   • Implications: Banks’ significant share (28.6%) underscores their systemic importance, but the declining share suggests a broadening creditor base, reducing concentration risks.
2. Bank of Tanzania (BoT):
   • June 2025: TZS 7,174.1 billion (20.2% share).
   • Change:
     • Monthly: +0.2% from TZS 7,158.2 billion in May 2025 (TZS 15.9 billion increase).
     • Year-on-Year: +8.2% from TZS 6,626.2 billion in June 2024 (TZS 547.9 billion increase).
   • Share Trend: Slightly increased from 20.7% in June 2024 to 20.2% in June 2025, reflecting steady BoT participation.
   • Context: The BoT’s holdings include government securities used for monetary policy operations or direct financing (e.g., overdraft facilities). The significant year-on-year increase aligns with the BoT’s role in supporting fiscal deficits, as seen in the TZS 270.2 billion deficit in May 2025. The BoT’s February 2025 report noted a TZS 140.8 billion reduction in domestic debt due to lower overdraft use, suggesting cautious central bank lending.
   • Implications: Rising BoT holdings indicate central bank support for liquidity management, but excessive reliance could blur fiscal-monetary boundaries, potentially affecting monetary policy credibility.
3. Pension Funds:
   • June 2025: TZS 9,265.7 billion (26.1% share).
   • Change:
     • Monthly: +0.7% from TZS 9,203.9 billion in May 2025 (TZS 61.8 billion increase).
     • Year-on-Year: +6.0% from TZS 8,744.9 billion in June 2024 (TZS 520.8 billion increase).
   • Share Trend: Increased from 27.4% in June 2024 to 26.1% in June 2025, remaining a major creditor.
   • Context: Pension funds (e.g., NSSF, PSSSF) are key investors in Treasury bonds due to their long-term investment horizons and need for stable returns. The oversubscription of June 2025 bond auctions (TZS 1,232.9 billion in tenders vs. TZS 638.7 billion offered) reflects strong pension fund demand. The World Bank notes pension funds’ growing role in domestic debt markets as a sign of financial deepening.
   • Implications: The steady share (26.1%) supports fiscal financing but ties pension fund liquidity to government debt, posing risks if debt servicing pressures arise.
4. Insurance Companies:
   • June 2025: TZS 1,843.0 billion (5.2% share).
   • Change:
     • Monthly: +0.2% from TZS 1,840.0 billion in May 2025 (TZS 3.0 billion increase).
     • Year-on-Year: +1.5% from TZS 1,815.7 billion in June 2024 (TZS 27.3 billion increase).
   • Share Trend: Stable at 5.7% in June 2024 to 5.2% in June 2025.
   • Context: Insurance companies invest in government securities for stable returns, but their small share reflects limited market participation compared to banks and pension funds. The stable share aligns with their conservative investment strategies.
   • Implications: The modest role of insurance companies limits their exposure to government debt risks but also restricts their contribution to fiscal financing.
5. BoT Special Funds:
   • June 2025: TZS 638.1 billion (1.8% share).
   • Change:
     • Monthly: +3.5% from TZS 616.3 billion in May 2025 (TZS 21.8 billion increase).
     • Year-on-Year: +98.7% from TZS 321.2 billion in June 2024 (TZS 316.9 billion increase).
   • Share Trend: Increased significantly from 1.0% in June 2024 to 1.8% in June 2025.
   • Context: BoT special funds (e.g., for specific development or liquidity purposes) have a small but growing role, possibly reflecting targeted government borrowing for priority projects. The sharp year-on-year increase suggests new fund allocations or reclassification of debt holdings.
   • Implications: The small share minimizes fiscal risks, but the rapid growth warrants monitoring to ensure alignment with fiscal objectives.
6. Others:
   • June 2025: TZS 6,420.4 billion (18.1% share).
   • Change:
     • Monthly: +2.8% from TZS 6,244.5 billion in May 2025 (TZS 175.9 billion increase).
     • Year-on-Year: +44.3% from TZS 4,447.2 billion in June 2024 (TZS 1,973.2 billion increase).
   • Share Trend: Increased significantly from 13.9% in June 2024 to 18.1% in June 2025.
   • Context: The “Others” category includes public institutions, private companies, and individuals, reflecting growing retail and non-traditional investor participation in government securities. The BoT’s efforts to deepen the domestic debt market, including retail bond issuance, likely drove this growth. The oversubscription of June 2025 bond auctions indicates strong demand from diverse investors.
   • Implications: The rising share signals increased domestic investor confidence and financial inclusion, but the heterogeneous nature of this category requires monitoring for credit quality and liquidity risks.

Observations and Trends

1. Commercial Banks’ Declining Share:
   • The share dropped from 31.3% in June 2024 to 28.6% in June 2025, despite a slight absolute increase (TZS 10,161.5 billion). This reflects banks’ cautious approach amid high lending rates (15.23% overall in June 2025) and competition from other creditors like pension funds and the “Others” category.
   • Implication: Reduced bank reliance diversifies the creditor base but may strain bank liquidity if government borrowing competes with private sector lending.
2. Pension Funds’ Steady Role:
   • The steady 26.1% share (TZS 9,265.7 billion) underscores pension funds’ critical role in financing long-term government borrowing, driven by high bond yields (14.50%–14.80%). The 6.0% year-on-year growth reflects their growing asset base and demand for secure investments.
   • Implication: Pension funds’ exposure to government debt links retiree savings to fiscal health, requiring robust debt servicing capacity.
3. BoT’s Growing Holdings:
   • The BoT’s 20.2% share (TZS 7,174.1 billion) and 8.2% year-on-year growth suggest active central bank support for fiscal deficits, possibly through bond purchases or liquidity facilities. The stable monthly growth (+0.2%) indicates controlled intervention.
   • Implication: Increased BoT holdings could support liquidity but risk monetary policy credibility if perceived as fiscal financing.
4. Rise of “Others” Category:
   • The 44.3% year-on-year increase (TZS 6,420.4 billion, 18.1% share) reflects growing participation from public institutions, private firms, and retail investors, likely driven by accessible bond markets and high yields.
   • Implication: This diversification enhances fiscal resilience but requires regulatory oversight to manage retail investor risks.
5. Stable Minor Creditors:
   • Insurance companies (5.2%) and BoT special funds (1.8%) maintain small, stable shares, reflecting limited but consistent participation.
   • Implication: Their minor roles limit systemic risks but also constrain their contribution to debt financing.

Insights and Implications

1. Diversified Creditor Base:
   • The spread across commercial banks (28.6%), pension funds (26.1%), BoT (20.2%), and others (18.1%) indicates a diversified domestic debt market, reducing reliance on any single creditor group. The rising “Others” share (18.1%) reflects financial deepening, as retail and non-traditional investors participate more actively.
   • Implication: Diversification enhances fiscal resilience but requires robust market infrastructure to manage retail investor risks and ensure liquidity.
2. Systemic Interconnectedness:
   • The significant shares held by commercial banks and pension funds (54.7% combined) tie the financial sector’s stability to government debt. A fiscal shock (e.g., delayed debt servicing) could impact bank liquidity and pension fund returns, as noted by the World Bank’s concerns about financial sector exposure.
   • Implication: Strong revenue performance (e.g., TZS 2,880.2 billion in May 2025, 3.1% above target) and prudent debt management are critical to mitigate systemic risks.
3. BoT’s Role in Financing:
   • The BoT’s growing holdings (TZS 7,174.1 billion, +8.2% year-on-year) suggest active support for fiscal deficits, possibly through bond purchases or liquidity facilities. This aligns with the absence of Treasury bill auctions in June 2025, indicating reliance on longer-term financing.
   • Implication: While supporting liquidity, excessive BoT involvement could raise concerns about monetary-fiscal coordination, potentially affecting inflation (3.2% in May 2025, within the 3%–5% target).
4. Growing Retail Participation:
   • The “Others” category’s 44.3% year-on-year growth reflects increased retail and institutional investor appetite, driven by high bond yields (14.50%–14.80%) and BoT efforts to promote bond market access. This aligns with the oversubscription of June 2025 bond auctions.
   • Implication: Expanding retail participation supports financial inclusion but requires investor education and market stability to prevent volatility.
5. Fiscal Sustainability:
   • The 11.1% year-on-year debt increase (TZS 35,502.8 billion) is moderate compared to the fiscal deficit (TZS 270.2 billion in May 2025). The IMF’s 2024 Debt Sustainability Analysis indicates a moderate risk of debt distress, with public debt at 45.5% of GDP in 2022/23, below the 55% benchmark.
   • Implication: Strong tax revenue (TZS 2,339.7 billion in May 2025, 4.1% above target) and controlled borrowing support sustainability, but rising debt requires careful servicing management, given external debt servicing absorbs ~40% of expenditures.
6. Economic Context:
   • GDP Growth: Tanzania’s 6.0% projected growth in 2025, driven by agriculture, manufacturing, and tourism, supports debt servicing capacity through revenue growth.
   • Monetary Policy: The BoT’s 6% Central Bank Rate in Q2 2025 and stable interbank rates (7.93% in June 2025) ensure liquidity, facilitating domestic borrowing.
   • External Debt Complement: Domestic debt (29.3% of total debt) complements external debt (70.7%, USD 32,955.5 million), balancing currency risks with local financing.

In June 2025, Tanzania’s government securities market demonstrated strong investor confidence, with TZS 1.23 trillion in bids received for Treasury bonds—nearly double the TZS 638.7 billion on offer—indicating a 93% oversubscription rate. The BoT selectively accepted TZS 322.4 billion to manage borrowing costs, with yields of 14.50% for 20-year bonds and 14.80% for 25-year bonds, reflecting inflation expectations and long-term risk premiums. Notably, no Treasury bills were issued, signaling the government’s strong cash position and preference for long-term financing. Meanwhile, the interbank cash market (IBCM) remained active and stable, with TZS 2.87 trillion in transactions—up 125% year-on-year—and a marginally lower average rate of 7.93%, indicating healthy liquidity and effective monetary policy transmission by the BoT.

Government Securities Market and the Interbank Cash Market June

1. Government Securities Market

The Government Securities Market in Tanzania serves as a cornerstone for domestic financing, allowing the government to raise funds for budgetary needs while providing investors with secure, long-term investment opportunities. The market primarily consists of Treasury bonds (long-term securities) and Treasury bills (short-term securities). In June 2025, the market dynamics reflected strategic fiscal management and strong investor confidence.

Treasury Bonds

Treasury bonds are long-term debt instruments issued by the Bank of Tanzania (BoT) on behalf of the government to finance fiscal deficits and infrastructure projects. The bonds are typically offered with maturities ranging from 2 to 25 years, and their yields are influenced by market demand, inflation expectations, and monetary policy conditions.

• June 2025 Auctions:
  • The BoT conducted auctions for 20-year and 25-year Treasury bonds, reflecting a focus on long-term financing to support infrastructure and development projects under the FY 2024/25 budget.
  • Total tenders received: TZS 1,232.9 billion, indicating robust investor interest.
  • Accepted bids: TZS 322.4 billion, showing selective acceptance to manage borrowing costs and align with fiscal targets.
  • Amount offered: TZS 638.7 billion, meaning the auctions were oversubscribed (tenders exceeded the offered amount by approximately 93%). This oversubscription highlights strong investor confidence in Tanzania’s fiscal stability and the attractiveness of long-term government securities.
  • Yields:
    • 20-year bond: 14.50%, reflecting a competitive return for long-term investors amid prevailing economic conditions.
    • 25-year bond: 14.80%, slightly higher due to the longer maturity and associated risks, such as inflation and interest rate volatility over an extended period.
• Context and Insights:
  • The high oversubscription rate suggests that institutional investors, such as pension funds, insurance companies, and commercial banks, view Treasury bonds as safe and lucrative investments. This is likely driven by Tanzania’s stable macroeconomic environment and the BoT’s credible monetary policy framework.
  • The yields (14.50% for 20-year and 14.80% for 25-year bonds) are elevated compared to shorter-term securities, reflecting the term premium demanded by investors for locking in funds over extended periods. These yields also align with Tanzania’s inflation trends and the BoT’s efforts to balance borrowing costs with investor expectations.
  • The focus on long-term bonds indicates a strategic shift toward financing projects with longer gestation periods, such as infrastructure development, which is critical for Tanzania’s economic growth targets under its Development Vision 2025.

Treasury Bills

Treasury bills are short-term securities (typically with maturities of 35, 91, 182, or 364 days) used to manage short-term liquidity needs of the government. Unlike Treasury bonds, no auctions for Treasury bills were held in June 2025.

• Reason for No Auctions:
  • The domestic financing requirement for FY 2024/25 had already been met by June 2025, likely due to successful bond auctions earlier in the fiscal year and prudent fiscal management.
  • This absence reflects confidence in the government’s cash flow position, reducing the need for short-term borrowing. It also suggests that the government prioritized long-term financing through bonds to avoid frequent rollovers associated with short-term bills.
• Context and Insights:
  • The lack of Treasury bill auctions could indicate that the government met its short-term financing needs through other sources, such as revenue collection or external financing (e.g., concessional loans or grants).
  • By avoiding short-term borrowing, the BoT may be aiming to reduce refinancing risks and stabilize the yield curve, focusing on longer-term securities to lock in funding at predictable rates.

2. Interbank Cash Market (IBCM)

The Interbank Cash Market (IBCM) is a critical component of Tanzania’s financial system, enabling banks to lend and borrow short-term funds to manage liquidity. It supports monetary policy transmission by ensuring banks have access to liquidity, which influences credit availability and economic activity.

Transactions

• Turnover in June 2025: TZS 2,873.9 billion, a significant volume but lower than TZS 3,267 billion in May 2025 (a decrease of approximately 12%). However, it was substantially higher than TZS 1,277.6 billion in June 2024 (a year-on-year increase of 125%).
• Dominant Trades:
  • Overnight placements: Accounted for 37.3% of total volume, reflecting banks’ preference for ultra-short-term liquidity management to meet immediate cash flow needs.
  • 7-day tenors: Contributed 26.5% of total volume, indicating demand for slightly longer liquidity buffers, likely to manage weekly operational cycles.
• Context and Insights:
  • The high turnover (TZS 2,873.9 billion) underscores a vibrant interbank market, where banks actively manage liquidity surpluses and deficits. The year-on-year increase from June 2024 suggests growing confidence in the banking sector and increased economic activity.
  • The slight decline from May 2025 could be attributed to seasonal factors, such as reduced liquidity needs at the end of the fiscal year, or banks adjusting their portfolios after meeting reserve requirements.
  • The dominance of overnight and 7-day tenors reflects a cautious approach by banks, prioritizing flexibility in a dynamic economic environment. These short tenors are typical in markets with stable but fluctuating liquidity conditions.

Interest Rates

• Overall IBCM rate:
  • June 2025: 7.93%
  • May 2025: 7.98%
• The marginal decline (0.05 percentage points) indicates a stable liquidity environment, with banks able to access funds at slightly lower costs.
• Context and Insights:
  • The IBCM interest rate is influenced by the BoT’s monetary policy stance, particularly the Central Bank Rate (CBR), which was likely maintained at a level to ensure price stability and support economic growth.
  • The slight decline in the IBCM rate suggests adequate liquidity in the banking system, reducing competition for interbank funds. This aligns with the BoT’s efforts to maintain a balanced monetary policy, ensuring liquidity without triggering inflationary pressures.
  • The rate of 7.93% is relatively low compared to Treasury bond yields (14.50%–14.80%), reflecting the lower risk and shorter duration of interbank transactions compared to long-term government securities.

Summary Table

Insights and Broader Implications

1. Robust Demand for Government Securities:
   • The oversubscription of Treasury bond auctions (TZS 1,232.9 billion in tenders vs. TZS 638.7 billion offered) reflects strong investor confidence in Tanzania’s fiscal and monetary policy framework. This demand is likely driven by institutional investors seeking stable, high-yield assets amid global economic uncertainties.
   • The high yields (14.50% for 20-year and 14.80% for 25-year bonds) indicate that investors are pricing in inflation risks and long-term uncertainties, but the oversubscription suggests these yields are competitive compared to alternative investments.
2. Fiscal Prudence in Treasury Bill Strategy:
   • The absence of Treasury bill auctions in June 2025 signals that the government has effectively managed its short-term financing needs, possibly through higher-than-expected revenue collection or earlier borrowing. This reduces rollover risks and borrowing costs, contributing to fiscal sustainability.
   • The focus on long-term bonds aligns with Tanzania’s development agenda, prioritizing investments in infrastructure and other capital-intensive projects.
3. Healthy Interbank Market:
   • The IBCM’s high turnover (TZS 2,873.9 billion) and stable interest rates (7.93%) indicate a well-functioning banking system with adequate liquidity. The dominance of overnight and 7-day tenors suggests banks are managing liquidity efficiently, balancing short-term needs with operational flexibility.
   • The slight decline in IBCM rates from May to June 2025 reflects a stable monetary environment, supported by the BoT’s effective liquidity management tools, such as open market operations and reserve requirements.
4. Monetary Policy Transmission:
   • The active IBCM and stable interest rates facilitate the transmission of the BoT’s monetary policy, ensuring that changes in the policy rate (e.g., CBR) influence lending and borrowing behavior across the economy.
   • The high turnover in the IBCM compared to June 2024 (125% increase) suggests growing economic activity and banking sector confidence, which supports credit creation and private sector growth.
5. Economic Context:
   • Tanzania’s financial markets are operating in a context of steady economic growth, with the BoT projecting GDP growth of around 5.5%–6% for 2025, driven by sectors like agriculture, mining, and infrastructure.
   • Inflation remains a key consideration, with the BoT targeting a range of 3%–5%. The high bond yields and stable IBCM rates suggest that inflationary pressures are manageable but warrant close monitoring.

Strong Tax Revenue Spurs Resilience Amid Budget Deficit Pressures

In May 2025, Tanzania's central government revenue collection reached TZS 2,880.2 billion, surpassing the target by 3.1% (approximately TZS 86.9 billion above expectations). This robust performance was primarily fueled by strong tax revenue of TZS 2,339.7 billion, which exceeded its target by 4.1% (TZS 92.1 billion above target), highlighting the success of digital tax reforms and compliance enforcement. Meanwhile, non-tax revenue underperformed slightly, reaching TZS 428.8 billion, just 2.1% below its TZS 437.8 billion target. On the expenditure side, the government spent TZS 3,150.4 billion, with 70.3% allocated to recurrent expenses and 29.7% to development projects. This resulted in a budget deficit of TZS 270.2 billion, likely covered through borrowing. Despite the deficit, the strong tax performance underscores Tanzania’s steady progress toward fiscal sustainability and development financing aligned with Vision 2050.

1. Central Government Revenues – May 2025

Central government revenue collection is a critical indicator of Tanzania’s fiscal health and its ability to finance public services and development projects. In May 2025, the central government’s revenue performance was robust, exceeding the target by 3.1%, driven primarily by strong tax revenue collection.

Total Revenue Collection

• Total Revenue: TZS 2,880.2 billion
• Performance vs. Target: Exceeded the target by 3.1% (approximately TZS 86.9 billion above the estimated target of TZS 2,793.3 billion, calculated as 2,880.2 ÷ 1.031).
• Context: This strong performance aligns with Tanzania’s ongoing efforts to enhance domestic revenue mobilization, a key priority to reduce reliance on external borrowing and donor funding. The African Development Bank notes that Tanzania’s fiscal policy has focused on improving revenue performance to narrow the fiscal deficit, projected at 2.5% of GDP in FY 2024/25.

Revenue Breakdown

The following table summarizes the revenue components for May 2025:

• Central Government Revenue:
  • Amount: TZS 2,768.5 billion, accounting for 96.1% of total revenue.
  • Performance: Exceeded the target, reflecting effective revenue collection strategies. The strong performance is consistent with earlier reports, such as the February 2025 Monthly Economic Review, which noted tax revenue reaching TZS 2,222.3 billion in January 2025, surpassing the monthly target by 0.3%.
  • Context: The central government’s revenue includes taxes (e.g., VAT, income tax, corporate tax) and non-tax sources (e.g., fees, dividends from state-owned enterprises). The high share of central government revenue underscores its dominance in overall revenue collection.
• Tax Revenue:
  • Amount: TZS 2,339.7 billion, representing 81.2% of total revenue.
  • Performance: Exceeded the target by 4.1% (approximately TZS 92.1 billion above the estimated target of TZS 2,247.6 billion, calculated as 2,339.7 ÷ 1.041).
  • Key Drivers: Enhanced tax administration and compliance efforts, including digital tax collection systems and broader tax base initiatives, have boosted revenue. The World Bank highlights Tanzania’s progress in rationalizing tax expenditures and leveraging digital technologies to reduce compliance gaps, contributing to progressive tax collection.
  • Context: The strong tax performance aligns with Tanzania’s FY 2024/25 budget strategy, which aims to raise TZS 34.61 trillion in domestic revenues (70.1% of the TZS 49.35 trillion budget). Key sectors driving tax revenue include manufacturing, agriculture, and tourism, supported by export growth in gold and cash crops.
• Non-Tax Revenue:
  • Amount: TZS 428.8 billion, representing 14.9% of total revenue.
  • Performance: Slightly underperformed, missing the target of TZS 437.8 billion by TZS 9 billion (approximately 2.1% below target).
  • Context: Non-tax revenue includes dividends from state-owned enterprises, fees, and other government income. The underperformance may reflect lower-than-expected dividends or fees, possibly due to seasonal variations or operational challenges in public entities. For instance, in FY 2024/25, Tanzania collected a record TZS 1.028 trillion in dividends from state-owned enterprises, indicating strong potential but possible fluctuations in monthly collections.
  • Implications: While non-tax revenue missed the target, its contribution remains significant, and efforts to improve collections (e.g., through public enterprise reforms) could address future shortfalls.

Key Takeaway

• Tax Revenue as the Main Driver: The 4.1% overperformance in tax revenue reflects Tanzania’s success in strengthening tax administration, including digitalization and compliance enforcement. This aligns with the government’s goal of increasing domestic revenue to 15.7% of GDP in FY 2024/25.
• Non-Tax Revenue Shortfall: The slight underperformance in non-tax revenue suggests room for improvement in diversifying revenue sources, such as enhancing dividend collections from state-owned enterprises or streamlining fee structures.
• Economic Implications: The strong revenue performance supports fiscal sustainability, reducing reliance on borrowing and enabling investments in priority areas like infrastructure and social services.

2. Central Government Expenditure – May 2025

Central government expenditure reflects Tanzania’s fiscal priorities, balancing recurrent obligations (e.g., salaries, debt servicing) with development spending (e.g., infrastructure, social projects). In May 2025, the government aligned expenditures with available resources, maintaining fiscal prudence.

Total Expenditure

• Total Spending: TZS 3,150.4 billion
• Context: This expenditure level is consistent with Tanzania’s FY 2024/25 budget, which allocates TZS 49.35 trillion, with 68% (TZS 30.31 trillion) for recurrent expenditure and 32% (TZS 14.08 trillion) for development expenditure. The May 2025 spending aligns with the government’s strategy to match expenditures with revenue and borrowing capacity, as noted in the BoT’s emphasis on fiscal prudence.

Expenditure Breakdown

The following table summarizes the expenditure components for May 2025:

• Recurrent Expenditure:
  • Amount: TZS 2,213.1 billion, accounting for 70.3% of total expenditure.
  • Components: Includes salaries, interest payments on public debt, and essential services (e.g., healthcare, education operations). The high share reflects the government’s priority to maintain operational stability and meet obligatory payments.
  • Context: Recurrent expenditure aligns with the FY 2024/25 budget, which allocates TZS 30.31 trillion for recurrent costs, including wages, debt servicing, and election-related expenses (e.g., 2024 local elections, 2025 general election preparations). For instance, in January 2025, recurrent expenditure was TZS 2,358.0 billion, indicating consistent spending patterns.
  • Debt Servicing: The BoT notes that domestic debt servicing in February 2025 amounted to TZS 890.9 billion (TZS 609.9 billion for principal repayment, TZS 281 billion for interest). A portion of May’s recurrent expenditure likely includes similar debt servicing costs, given Tanzania’s external debt of $7.9 billion, which absorbs about 40% of government expenditures annually.
• Development Expenditure:
  • Amount: TZS 937.3 billion, representing 29.7% of total expenditure.
  • Components: Includes investments in infrastructure (e.g., Standard Gauge Railway, Julius Nyerere Hydropower Project), social services (e.g., education, health), and other development projects. The FY 2024/25 budget prioritizes flagship projects like the SGR, hydropower plants, and roads.
  • Context: Development spending in May 2025 is slightly lower than January 2025 (TZS 1,218.1 billion), reflecting seasonal variations or project-specific disbursements. The focus on development aligns with Tanzania’s Vision 2050 and Third Five-Year Development Plan (FYDP III), which emphasize infrastructure and industrial growth.
  • Implications: While development spending is significant, its share (29.7%) remains below the 32% target for FY 2024/25, indicating potential constraints in scaling up capital investments due to revenue limitations or prioritization of recurrent costs.

Key Takeaway

• Recurrent Spending Dominance: The 70.3% share of recurrent expenditure underscores the government’s focus on operational stability, including salaries and debt servicing. However, this limits the fiscal space for development projects critical for long-term growth.
• Development Investment: The 29.7% share for development expenditure supports key infrastructure projects, but its lower proportion suggests challenges in balancing short-term obligations with long-term investments.
• Fiscal Prudence: The alignment of expenditures with available resources reflects Tanzania’s commitment to sustainable fiscal management, as noted by the BoT’s Monetary Policy Committee.

Summary Table: Central Government Budget (May 2025)

The following table consolidates the revenue and expenditure data for May 2025:

Insights and Broader Implications

1. Budget Deficit:
   • Revenue–Expenditure Gap: The deficit of TZS 270.2 billion in May 2025 (expenditure of TZS 3,150.4 billion vs. revenue of TZS 2,880.2 billion) indicates that the government relied on borrowing or reserves to finance the shortfall. This aligns with the African Development Bank’s projection of a fiscal deficit of 2.5% of GDP in FY 2024/25, financed by domestic and external borrowing.
   • Financing Strategy: The deficit was likely covered through domestic borrowing, such as Treasury bonds (e.g., TZS 394.1 billion raised in February 2025) or external loans. The BoT notes that domestic debt decreased by TZS 140.8 billion in February 2025 due to reduced use of overdraft facilities, suggesting a cautious approach to borrowing.
   • Implications: While the deficit is manageable, sustained deficits could increase public debt (45.5% of GDP in 2022/23), requiring careful debt management to maintain sustainability.
2. Strong Tax Revenue Performance:
   • The 4.1% overperformance in tax revenue reflects Tanzania’s success in broadening the tax base and improving compliance, as highlighted by the World Bank. Initiatives like digital tax collection and rationalizing tax expenditures have boosted collections, supporting the FY 2024/25 target of TZS 34.61 trillion in domestic revenue.
   • Sectoral Contributions: Key sectors driving tax revenue include manufacturing, agriculture, and tourism, with export growth in gold (24.5%), cashew nuts (141%), and tourism receipts (7.0%) in the year ending April 2025.
   • Implications: Strong tax performance reduces reliance on external financing, enhancing fiscal autonomy and supporting investments in social services and infrastructure.
3. Expenditure Priorities:
   • Recurrent Spending: The dominance of recurrent expenditure (70.3%) reflects the government’s focus on operational stability, including salaries, debt servicing, and election-related costs. However, this limits fiscal space for development projects, as noted by the World Bank’s observation that Tanzania’s public spending (18.2% of GDP in 2020/21) is below the average for lower-middle-income countries.
   • Development Spending: The 29.7% share for development expenditure supports flagship projects like the Julius Nyerere Hydropower Project and Standard Gauge Railway, aligning with Vision 2050’s focus on industrial and infrastructure growth.
   • Implications: Balancing recurrent and development spending is critical to achieving Tanzania’s long-term development goals, including a USD 1 trillion GDP by 2050.
4. Economic Context:
   • GDP Growth: Tanzania’s economy grew by 5.6% in January–September 2024, with projections of 6.0% in 2025, driven by agriculture, manufacturing, and tourism. Strong revenue performance supports this growth by funding public investments.
   • Inflation: Inflation remained stable at 3.2% in May 2025, within the BoT’s 3%–5% target, supporting fiscal stability and purchasing power.
   • Monetary Policy: The BoT maintained the Central Bank Rate at 6% for Q2 2025, ensuring liquidity and supporting economic growth while controlling inflation.
5. Fiscal Sustainability:
   • The BoT’s Monetary Policy Committee notes that public debt remains sustainable with a moderate risk of debt distress, reflecting fiscal prudence. The strong revenue performance and controlled expenditure in May 2025 reinforce this sustainability.
   • Challenges: The World Bank highlights the need to further broaden the tax base and improve spending efficiency, particularly in social sectors like education (3.3% of GDP) and healthcare (1.2% of GDP), to close service delivery gaps.