🔄
Research Updated — February 2026: This report has been updated to incorporate 2025/26 developments including the Finance Act 2025, CAG March 2025 Performance Audit findings, IMF 2025 projections, Dira 2050 targets, and preliminary 2025/26 fiscal data. Government dividend target for 2025/26 is TZS 1.7 trillion (internal goal: TZS 2 trillion), representing a 65% increase over 2024/25.

Research Overview

State-owned enterprises (SOEs) remain at the core of Tanzania's economy, primarily delivering electricity, water, telecommunications and transport services. Yet most of these entities continue posting ongoing financial losses, are deeply dependent on government subsidies, and are operationally inefficient — making them a major driver of the government's fiscal deficit.

This research explores the feasibility of corporatisation — the application of private-sector corporate governance practices within public enterprises — as a pathway to financial sustainability. Using a mixed-methods design, the study examines secondary financial data from 2015 to 2026 for three selected SOEs: TANESCO, TTCL, and DAWASA/DAWASCO. Primary data was gathered through semi-structured interviews with 28 key informants and questionnaires administered to 50 managers.

Findings show that the main governance factors driving underperformance include political interference, lack of board independence, misaligned incentives, and soft budget constraints. Partial reforms implemented since 2020 — performance contracts and limited board restructuring — have reduced annual losses by 40–60% and contributed to a record sector-wide dividend of TZS 1.028 trillion in 2024/25, yet no utility SOE has achieved sustained profitability.

Grounded in Agency Theory, Public Choice Theory, and international benchmarks (Singapore's Temasek Holdings, China's gradual corporatisation, New Zealand's SOE Act), the research concludes that full corporatisation — rather than hybrid arrangements or privatisation — is the most politically and practically viable path to transforming Tanzania's SOEs into financially sustainable, efficient entities that contribute positively to national development goals. Eight prioritised policy recommendations are proposed.

State-Owned Enterprises Corporatisation Corporate Governance Financial Sustainability Public Sector Reform Tanzania New Public Management Dira 2050 ✦ New TISEZA ✦ New Finance Act 2025 ✦ New SOE Mergers ✦ New

Tanzania's Macroeconomic Landscape

6.1%
Real GDP Growth 2025
5.9%
Projected GDP Growth 2026
TZS 56.49T
National Budget 2025/26
3.0%
Budget Deficit / GDP (2025/26 target)
3–5%
Inflation Range 2025/26
4+ months
Foreign Reserve Cover (imports)

Tanzania's economy continues on a robust growth trajectory. The IMF projects real GDP growth of 6.1% in 2025 and 5.9% in 2026, supported by strong performances in tourism, agriculture, and natural resources. The 2025/26 national budget of TZS 56.49 trillion underscores ambitious public expenditure — with the proposed 2026/27 budget of TZS 61.9 trillion representing a 9.6% expansion, within which SOE efficiency improvements are expected to reduce subsidy burdens significantly.

Tanzania's 253 SOEs (35 commercial entities) contributed a record TZS 1.028 trillion in dividends and contributions to the government in FY2024/25 — a 68% increase from prior years — primarily driven by profit-generating entities in banking and ports. However, utility SOEs in energy, water and telecommunications continue to be net fiscal drains.

Tanzania Real GDP Growth Rate (%)
Historical trend and IMF projections — 2019 to 2026

Background of the Study

State-owned enterprises (SOEs) are enterprises controlled by the State — sometimes branded as public enterprises or parastatals. In most third-world countries, they are principally charged with delivery of electricity, water, transportation, telecommunications, and healthcare. Globally, the OECD estimates that SOEs represent more than 20% of total investments and 5% of total employment in most jurisdictions.

The rise of New Public Management (NPM) in the 1980s and 1990s proposed that the public sector adopt private-sector management practices — performance-based incentives, customer orientation, and accountability for results. One key NPM-inspired measure is corporatisation: restructuring public enterprises to operate as independent commercial entities, with the state retaining ownership, while introducing hard budget constraints and profit-oriented management — without full privatisation.

Tanzania's SOEs have been central to national economic development since independence, a direct consequence of the 1967 Arusha Declaration's socialist policies. By the 1980s, structural reforms revealed deep-rooted inefficiencies, with many SOEs depending on government subsidies. In 2022/23, a cohort of Tanzania SOEs posted combined losses of nearly TZS 400 billion due to operational inefficiencies and governance weaknesses.

✦ 2025 Policy Update — TISEZA

Tanzania's 2025 Investment and Special Economic Zones Act established TISEZA as a one-stop investor centre, promoting private-sector management practices in SOEs and streamlining regulatory frameworks. This is a significant structural development aligned with NPM principles and the Dira 2050 long-term economic vision.

International Corporatisation Success Stories

Global examples provide compelling evidence for the efficacy of corporatisation. In China, SOEs underwent corporatisation in the 1990s–2000s, resulting in significantly raised profitability and productivity through governance reforms alone — without transferring ownership to the private sector. In Singapore and New Zealand, public utilities were transformed into efficient, financially sustainable entities through independent boards and performance agreements.

These examples show that the key success factors are: legal separation from government, professional management, independent boards, and performance-based accountability — not necessarily ownership transfer.

ROA Improvement After Corporatisation — International Benchmarks
Return on Assets (%) before and after key governance reforms, selected countries

1.2 Problem Statement

According to IMF (2025), SOEs in Tanzania and other developing countries have generally maintained a negative trend of financial results despite their vital economic role. This trend is characterised by repeated losses, high debt levels, and reliance on government rescues. The CAG (2025) highlights losses at entities such as Air Tanzania Company Limited (TZS 99.8 billion in subsidies) and TTCL (TZS 27.7 billion loss) as significant fiscal risks.

Traditional bureaucratic management in SOEs focuses on political objectives at the expense of efficiency, producing agency problems where managers face little incentive to improve profitability. Although partial reforms have been undertaken since 2020, service-providing SOEs remain in a deep crisis of inefficiency due to insufficient implementation of sound corporate governance practices. The budget deficit is targeted to narrow to 3.0% of GDP in 2025/26 from 3.4% in 2024/25 — but this requires material improvements in SOE financial performance.

🔍 Fiscal Risk Snapshot — Selected Loss-Making SOEs (2024/25)

Air Tanzania: TZS 99.8bn in government subsidies  |  TTCL: TZS 27.7bn net loss  |  TANESCO: Government subsidies of ~TZS 400bn despite reforms  |  DAWASCO: Chronic losses averaging TZS 100–140bn per year

TANESCO Net Profit / Loss Trend (TZS Billions)
Showing the impact of partial governance reforms from 2020 onward

1.3 Research Objectives

General Objective: To examine how the adoption of corporate governance models can transform state-owned enterprises in Tanzania towards greater financial sustainability.

1
Analyse the current governance challenges facing Tanzania SOEs and their impact on financial performance.
2
Evaluate successful international models of corporatisation and corporate governance in public enterprises.
3
Assess the applicability of private-sector corporate governance practices (board independence, performance contracting) to Tanzania SOEs.
4
Propose policy recommendations for implementing corporate governance reforms in Tanzania SOEs to enhance profitability and efficiency.

1.4 Research Hypotheses

✅ Hypothesis H1 (Supported)
Stronger corporate governance practices — including independent boards and performance incentives — are positively associated with improved financial sustainability in SOEs. (r = 0.71, p<0.01)
H0 (Null Hypothesis — Rejected)
There is no significant relationship between corporate governance reforms and financial performance in public enterprises.

1.5 Selected Case Studies

Three strategically important Tanzania SOEs were selected because they represent critical infrastructure services, have rich reform histories, and allow examination of different governance arrangements — fully public, partially privatised, and failed PPP — while remaining under ultimate government control.

TANESCO
Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited
SectorEnergy
Net Loss (2023/24)(TZS 180bn)*
Subsidy (Govt)~TZS 400bn
Reform StatusBest Performer
Loss Reduction60% since 2020
TTCL
Tanzania Telecommunications Corporation Ltd
SectorTelecommunications
Net Loss (2023/24)(TZS 27.7bn)
Revenue Growth5% (stagnant)
Reform StatusMixed Outcomes
Key IssueBackbone cost surge
DAWASCO
Dar es Salaam Water and Sewerage Corp.
SectorWater / Sanitation
Net Loss (2023/24)(TZS 100bn)*
Collection Efficiency78% (↑ from 65%)
Reform StatusLeast Reformed
World Bank Project89% disbursed (Sep 2025)
Net Loss Comparison — TANESCO, TTCL & DAWASCO (2019/20–2023/24, TZS Billions)
All three SOEs show losses; TANESCO shows the strongest improvement trajectory following 2020 reforms
Total SOE Sector Dividend Contributions to Government (TZS Billions)
Sector-wide record driven by commercial SOEs (banks, ports) — utility SOEs still net drains

Financial Performance Summary — Selected SOEs (2019/20–2023/24)

SOEIndicator2019/202020/212021/222022/232023/24Trend
TANESCONet Profit/Loss (TZS bn)(450)(380)(320)(250)(180)*Improving ▲
Govt Subsidy (TZS bn)600550500450400Reducing ▲
Return on Assets (%)-4.2-3.8-3.1-2.5-1.8Improving ▲
TTCLNet Profit/Loss (TZS bn)(19)(15)(4.3)(0.9)(27.8)Deteriorating ▼
Revenue Growth (%)8%12%15%10%5%Stagnant ▼
DAWASCONet Profit/Loss (TZS bn)(120)(140)(130)(110)(100)*Gradual ▶
Collection Efficiency (%)65%68%72%75%78%Improving ▲

* Estimated based on partial data and trends; full 2024/25 reports pending. Sources: CAG Reports, Treasury Registrar, SOE Disclosures.

1.6 Significance & Scope

This research contributes evidence-based insights to the debate on public sector reform in the developing world, providing actionable recommendations for Tanzania's policymakers. If implemented successfully, corporatisation reforms could increase SOE revenue generation — moving from the current TZS 1 trillion dividend baseline toward the government's target of TZS 1.7–2 trillion annually by 2025/26, and a projected TZS 2 trillion+ by 2035.

The study is aligned with Tanzania's National Five-Year Development Plan (FYDP III, 2021/22–2025/26) and the longer-term Dira 2050 vision — which targets a US$1 trillion economy by 2050 and explicitly calls for SOEs to adopt transparent, merit-based governance frameworks as a prerequisite for economic transformation.

The research focuses on secondary data from 2015 to 2026 covering energy, transport, and telecommunications SOEs. Key limitations include reliance on publicly available financial reports, potential data gaps in less transparent entities, and the inherent challenges of primary data collection in politically sensitive reform areas.

📌 Finance Act 2025 — Key SOE Implications

The Finance Act 2025 widens the tax base and introduces CNG equipment exemptions for clean energy SOEs. Some measures take effect from January 2026. Underperforming SOEs face potential merger or dissolution if they miss 2025/26 dividend targets. Digital compliance (e-fiscal devices) targets 95% tax compliance by 2026, yielding TZS 32.26 trillion in 2024/25 government revenue.