Strategic Investments and Fiscal Challenges

Tanzania’s external debt, totaling USD 33.1 billion in November 2024, highlights a focus on infrastructure, social services, and energy projects, with the central government holding 76.8% of the debt. Multilateral creditors account for the majority, offering favorable terms, while commercial borrowing poses higher costs. Despite aligning debt use with development goals, currency risks and rising debt servicing obligations underscore the importance of prudent debt management and sustainable financing strategies.

1. External Debt Overview

As of November 2024, Tanzania's total external debt stock stood at USD 33,137.7 million, representing 72.1% of the country’s total national debt. This reflects a slight decrease of 0.6% compared to October 2024 due to debt service payments exceeding new disbursements.

2. External Debt Stock by Borrower

The distribution of external debt stock by borrower categories highlights the dominance of central government borrowing:

• Central Government: USD 25,433.6 million (76.8% of external debt).
• Private Sector: USD 7,700.3 million (23.2% of external debt).
• Public Corporations: USD 3.8 million (negligible share).

3. Distributed Outstanding Debt by Use of Funds

The allocation of external debt shows how the borrowed funds are utilized across various sectors:

• Transportation and Telecommunications: 21.4% (key investments in infrastructure).
• Social Welfare and Education: 20.4% (focus on improving public services).
• Energy and Mining: 15.0% (supporting energy production and mining activities).
• Balance of Payments (BoP) and Budget Support: 18.4%.
• Other sectors include:
  • Agriculture: 5.2%.
  • Finance and Insurance: 4.1%.
  • Real Estate and Construction: 4.7%.

4. Distributed Outstanding Debt by Creditor Composition

The distribution of external debt by creditor category as of November 2024 is as follows:

• Multilateral Institutions: USD 18,055.7 million (54.5%) – These include international financial institutions such as the World Bank and IMF.
• Commercial Creditors: USD 11,854.9 million (35.8%).
• Export Credit Agencies: USD 1,799.1 million (5.4%).
• Bilateral Creditors: USD 1,428.0 million (4.3%).

5. Currency Composition of External Debt

Tanzania’s external debt is mainly denominated in the following currencies:

• United States Dollar (USD): 68.2%.
• Euro: 16.2%.
• Chinese Yuan: 6.1%.
• Others: 9.6%.

Summary of Key Figures:

These figures reflect Tanzania’s strategy to invest heavily in infrastructure and social services while maintaining reliance on multilateral and commercial creditors for financial support​

The analysis of Tanzania's external debt and its distribution with important insights into the country's borrowing strategies and development priorities

1. High Reliance on Central Government Borrowing

• The central government accounts for the majority (76.8%) of external debt, indicating that the government is the primary entity responsible for securing and utilizing external financing.
• This reliance reflects the government’s role in funding large-scale projects, particularly in infrastructure and social development, which are critical for long-term growth.

Implication: The burden of repayment largely falls on public finances, emphasizing the need for sound debt management and productive use of borrowed funds.

2. Sectoral Distribution Aligns with Development Goals

• Significant portions of the debt are allocated to:
  • Transportation and Telecommunications (21.4%) to improve connectivity and trade.
  • Social Welfare and Education (20.4%) to enhance human capital.
  • Energy and Mining (15%) to address energy needs and exploit natural resources.
• The allocation highlights the government’s focus on infrastructure-driven growth and poverty reduction through investments in public services.

Implication: The focus on infrastructure and social services suggests a long-term strategy to stimulate economic growth and improve the standard of living.

3. Dominance of Multilateral Creditors

• With 54.5% of external debt owed to multilateral institutions, Tanzania benefits from concessional loans, which typically have lower interest rates and longer repayment periods.
• The reliance on commercial creditors (35.8%), however, reflects a shift toward costlier financing, possibly due to limited access to concessional funding.

Implication: While multilateral debt offers favorable terms, increasing commercial debt could raise debt servicing costs, adding pressure on public finances.

4. Currency Composition Risks

• The dominance of the US dollar (68.2%) in the debt portfolio exposes Tanzania to exchange rate risks. A depreciation of the Tanzanian shilling against the dollar could significantly increase repayment costs.
• Diversification into other currencies like the Euro and Chinese Yuan mitigates this risk to some extent but remains insufficient.

Implication: Exchange rate volatility poses a challenge, requiring careful monitoring and hedging strategies.

5. Debt Management and Sustainability Concerns

• Although the funds are directed toward productive sectors, the growing stock of external debt demands effective management to ensure it does not surpass sustainable levels.
• Increasing reliance on debt-financed projects must yield returns sufficient to cover repayment obligations.

Conclusion:
Tanzania’s external debt strategy reflects a focus on long-term development, prioritizing infrastructure, social services, and energy projects. However, the reliance on central government borrowing and commercial creditors, coupled with exchange rate risks, underscores the need for prudent debt management, enhanced domestic revenue mobilization, and productive utilization of borrowed funds.