
Tanzania’s domestic debt stood at TZS 37,459.1 billion in September 2025, marking a modest 0.9% month-on-month increase and reflecting a stable, well-diversified financing structure. The debt composition is dominated by long-term government bonds (73%), supported by institutional investors such as pension funds and insurance companies, while Treasury bills (27%) continue to attract commercial banks for liquidity management. Creditor distribution shows other financial institutions holding the largest share at 39.7%, followed by commercial banks at 36.4% and pension funds at 23.9%, demonstrating healthy diversification and reducing concentration risk. This structure enhances fiscal stability, supports predictable borrowing costs, and aligns with long-term investment strategies, while commercial bank participation ensures liquidity depth in the T-bill market. Overall, the domestic debt profile contributes positively to financing government operations, supports monetary policy implementation, and anchors market confidence—though continued vigilance is required to prevent crowding-out pressures on private-sector credit as government borrowing expands.
| Category | Value |
| Total domestic debt | TZS 37,459.1 billion |
| Monthly change | +0.9% |
| Composition | 73% government bonds, 27% Treasury bills |
The domestic debt is held by three main creditor groups:
Breakdown of Creditors
Debt Distribution by Creditor
| Creditor Category | Share (%) | Interpretation |
| Commercial banks | 36.4% | Largest holders; heavily involved in short- and medium-term securities |
| Pension funds | 23.9% | Prefer long-term instruments like government bonds |
| Other financial institutions | 39.7% | Includes BOT, insurance companies, and other non-bank lenders |
→ "Other financial institutions" hold the largest share at 39.7%, followed by commercial banks.
Although your question focuses on creditors, the internal structure helps interpret the creditor behaviour.
| Instrument | Share (%) | Notes |
| Government bonds | 73% | Dominated by long-term maturities |
| Treasury bills | 27% | Short-term, mostly preferred by commercial banks |
→ Pension funds favour longer-term bonds, aligning with their long-term liabilities.
→ Banks prefer T-bills due to short-term liquidity needs.
| Item | Value/Share | Notes |
| Total domestic debt | TZS 37,459.1 billion | Increased by 0.9% |
| Commercial banks | 36.4% | Active in T-bill market |
| Pension funds | 23.9% | Long-term investor group |
| Other financial institutions | 39.7% | Includes insurance, BOT, other funds |
| Bonds share | 73% | Dominated by long-term securities |
| T-bills share | 27% | Short-term instruments |
The domestic debt data for September 2025, detailed in Section 2.7 (Debt Developments) of the Bank of Tanzania's (BOT) Monthly Economic Review (October 2025), reveals a stable and diversified funding base totaling TZS 37,459.1 billion (+0.9% MoM), comprising 29.4% of overall public debt (TZS 127,474.5 billion; external 70.6%). Instruments are bond-heavy (73%, long-term maturities) versus T-bills (27%, short-term), held diversely by commercial banks (36.4%), pension funds (23.9%), and other financial institutions (39.7%, including BOT, insurers, and non-banks). This structure—financed via oversubscribed securities auctions (T-bills 2.4x, bonds mixed; Section 2.5)—supports fiscal needs (TZS 618.5 billion deficit) amid 6.3% Q2 GDP growth, 3.4% inflation, and shilling strength (+9.4% y/y; Section 2.5). Below, TICGL outline implications, categorized by creditor and instrument, with broader economic ties.
1. Creditor Composition: Diversification Enhances Stability
2. Instrument Breakdown: Bond Dominance for Long-Term Funding
3. Fiscal and Macroeconomic Linkages
4. Policy Context from the Review
| Category | Share (%) | Amount (TZS Billion, Est.) | Key Implication |
| Total Domestic Debt | 100% | 37,459.1 | +0.9% MoM; stable funding for deficit (TZS 618.5B). |
| Commercial Banks | 36.4% | ~13,626 | T-bill focus; liquidity tie, but crowding risk. |
| Pension Funds | 23.9% | ~8,947 | Bond preference; long-term stability for infra. |
| Other Financial Institutions | 39.7% | ~14,886 | Diverse (BOT/insurers); reduces concentration. |
| Government Bonds | 73% (of total) | ~27,349 | Duration lowers rollover; investor confidence. |
| Treasury Bills | 27% (of total) | ~10,110 | Short-term management; yield easing aids costs. |
In conclusion, September 2025's domestic debt composition implies a resilient, institutionally backed financing framework that underpins fiscal sustainability and growth, with diversification mitigating risks. Bond dominance and broad holders promote stability, but coordination to avoid private credit displacement is essential amid global headwinds—aligning with the Review's emphasis on prudent policies for 2026.