Tanzania Current Account Performance November 2025 | External Sector Analysis | TICGL
Tanzania Current Account Performance Analysis
External Sector Strengthens: 34.3% Year-on-Year Improvement in Current Account Deficit
📅 November 2025📊 Balance of Payments Report🏦 Bank of Tanzania Data
Introduction
Tanzania's external sector demonstrated remarkable resilience and improvement in November 2025, with the 12-month cumulative current account deficit narrowing substantially to USD 3.43 billion, representing a significant 34.3% year-on-year improvement from USD 5.22 billion recorded in November 2024. This positive trajectory was primarily driven by robust tourism receipts, enhanced transport services, and a strategic balance between export growth and import moderation.
Current Account Deficit
$3.43B
↓ 34.3% YoY
Tourism Receipts
$3.79B
55.8% Share
Net Services Balance
+$1.33B
Surplus
Services Receipts
$6.80B
Strong FX
1. Current Account Balance: Marked Improvement
The current account performance in November 2025 reflects a fundamental strengthening of Tanzania's external position. The substantial narrowing of the deficit from USD 5.22 billion to USD 3.43 billion demonstrates improved export competitiveness, particularly in service sectors, and effective economic policies that have enhanced external sustainability.
Period
Current Account Balance (USD Million)
Year-on-Year Change
November 2024
-5,217.3
—
October 2025
-3,622.4
+30.6%
November 2025
-3,425.7
+34.3%
Current Account Deficit Trend
2. Services Exports: Tourism-Led Generation
Services exports reached USD 6.80 billion for the 12-month period ending November 2025. Tourism dominated with USD 3.79 billion (55.8%), while transportation services contributed USD 2.08 billion (30.6%), reinforcing Tanzania's role as a regional logistics hub.
Service Category
Amount (USD Million)
Share
Travel (Tourism)
3,791.4
55.8%
Transportation
2,079.3
30.6%
Other Business Services
451.5
6.6%
Government Services
257.3
3.8%
Telecommunications & ICT
222.6
3.2%
Total
6,802.1
100%
Services Receipts by Category
3. Services Imports: Transport-Dominated
Services payments totaled USD 5.47 billion, with transportation accounting for USD 2.46 billion (44.9%), reflecting freight and logistics costs typical for a trade-dependent economy.
Service Category
Amount (USD Million)
Share
Transportation
2,458.9
44.9%
Other Business Services
1,333.7
24.4%
Travel
777.2
14.2%
Government Services
464.5
8.5%
Telecommunications & ICT
438.6
8.0%
Total
5,472.9
100%
Services Payments Breakdown
4. Net Services Balance: Surplus Position
Tanzania achieved a net services surplus of USD 1.33 billion, with receipts significantly exceeding payments. This surplus was crucial in offsetting the merchandise trade deficit.
Item
Amount (USD Million)
Total Services Receipts
6,802.1
Total Services Payments
5,472.9
Net Balance
+1,329.2
Services Trade Balance
5. Key Economic Insights
Macroeconomic Stability
Enhanced Sustainability: The 34.3% improvement significantly reduces external financing requirements.
Tourism Buffer: USD 3.79 billion in tourism receipts provide reliable foreign exchange.
Regional Hub: USD 2.08 billion in transport services confirms logistics gateway status.
Currency Stability: Improved metrics contributed to 8.1% TZS appreciation.
Investment Climate: Improved metrics attract foreign direct investment.
Regional Integration: Deep trade integration within East African Community.
Digital Transformation: Growing ICT payments indicate modernization.
Conclusion and Outlook
Tanzania's external sector performance in November 2025 represents a significant milestone. The 34.3% improvement in the current account deficit to USD 3.43 billion, driven by tourism-led services exports of USD 6.80 billion and a net surplus of USD 1.33 billion, demonstrates structural economic strengths and effective policy implementation.
Moving forward, sustaining this momentum requires continued investment in tourism infrastructure, competitive exchange rates, and policies supporting export competitiveness. The external sector's resilience provides a solid foundation for Tanzania's broader economic development objectives.
Tanzania Economic Growth vs Job Creation: Why Millions Remain Unemployed Despite 6% GDP Growth | TICGL
Why Are Millions Still Unemployed Despite Tanzania's Rising GDP?
A Comprehensive Analysis of Tanzania's Economic Growth vs Job Creation Paradox (2018-2026)
6.0%
GDP Growth Rate (2025)
900K+
New Job Seekers Annually
50-60K
Formal Jobs Created Yearly
800K+
Annual Job Gap
The Tanzania Employment Paradox
Over the past decade, Tanzania has consistently recorded strong economic growth, positioning itself among the fastest-growing economies in Sub-Saharan Africa. Between 2018 and 2025, the country's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) expanded at an average rate of around 5-7 percent, recovering steadily after the COVID-19 slowdown and reaching approximately 5.6 percent in 2024 with projections of 6.0 percent in 2025 and 6.3 percent in 2026.
However, despite this robust growth performance, Tanzania is creating far fewer jobs than the number of people entering the labour market each year. Recent data show that while 900,000 to 950,000 new job seekers—mostly youth—enter the labour force annually, the economy generates only about 600,000 to 700,000 jobs, the majority of which are informal and low-productivity.
Critical Employment Gap
The number of formal jobs created each year remains extremely low, at only 50,000-60,000, leaving an annual employment gap of 300,000-400,000 people, projected to widen further in 2026 if current trends persist.
Economic Growth vs Job Creation Trends (2018-2026)
Year
GDP Growth Rate
Jobs Created
Youth Unemployment
Annual Job Seekers
Job Gap
2018
7.0%
450,000
13.5%
800,000+
350,000
2019
7.0%
480,000
13.8%
800,000+
320,000
2020
4.8%
320,000
14.2%
800,000+
480,000
2021
4.9%
380,000
14.5%
800,000+
420,000
2022
4.7%
410,000
14.0%
800,000+
390,000
2023
5.1%
440,000
13.7%
800,000+
360,000
2024
5.6%
607,000+
13.7-14.0%
850,000+
243,000-293,000
2025
6.0%
650,000+
13.5-13.8%
900,000+
250,000-350,000
2026 (Forecast)
6.3%
700,000+
13.3-13.5%
950,000+
300,000-400,000
Sector Contribution: GDP vs Employment
The structure of Tanzania's growth largely explains the employment paradox. High-growth sectors are capital-intensive and technology-driven, contributing significantly to GDP but generating very few jobs.
Sector
GDP Share
Employment Share
Formal Jobs
Productivity
Job Creation Potential
Agriculture
25-26%
65%
15%
Low
Low (needs transformation; grew 3% in 2024-2025)
Mining & Quarrying
5-10%
1%
45%
Very High
Very Low (capital-intensive; 16.6% growth in 2024)
Manufacturing
8-9%
6-7%
55%
High
Medium (if expanded; stagnant share since mid-1990s)
Construction
12-13%
8%
35%
Medium
Medium-High (8% growth in 2024, projected 10% in 2025-2026)
Services
42-43%
28-29%
60%
High
Medium (tourism and telecom drive; 3.8% ICT contribution in 2024)
Key Insight: The Mining Paradox
Mining recorded growth of over 16% in 2024, yet employs only about 1% of the workforce. Meanwhile, agriculture employs about 65% of the population but contributes only 25-26% of GDP and has grown at a modest 3%.
Labor Market Statistics (2025 with 2026 Forecast)
Indicator
Value (2025)
Trend & 2026 Forecast
Working Age Population (15-64)
38.5 million
Growing 3% per year; projected 39.6 million in 2026
Total Labor Force
34-36 million
Rapidly increasing; 36-37 million forecast for 2026
Formal Employment
4.0-4.1 million (11-12%)
Slow growth; ~4.2 million projected in 2026
Informal Employment
28-30 million (76-80%)
Growing; expected to remain dominant at 78-82% in 2026
Unemployment Rate
8.7-9.3%
Stable but high; forecast 8.5% in 2026
Youth Unemployment
13.5-14.0%
Above average; slight decline to 13.3% forecast in 2026
Underemployment
35-40%
Very high; persistent in informal sectors
Annual New Job Seekers
900,000+
Increasing; 950,000+ forecast in 2026
Annual Formal Jobs Created
50,000-60,000
Insufficient; projected 60,000-70,000 in 2026 with reforms
Annual Job Gap
800,000+
Critical; widening to 850,000+ in 2026
Root Causes of the Jobs Crisis
Problem
What It Means
Impact
Severity
Capital-Intensive Growth
Growth from sectors like mining (16.6% in 2024) and telecom using automation
76-80% in informal jobs (up from 71% in 2023) with low pay/no security
Poor quality jobs, no advancement
High
Agricultural Underproductivity
65% employed but only 25-26% GDP; slow 3% growth in 2024-2025
Poverty trap, low incomes
Critical
Weak Industrialization
Manufacturing stagnant at 8-9% GDP/6-7% jobs despite 5-6% overall growth
Missing mass jobs opportunity
High
Youth Population Boom
900,000+ youth enter market yearly (2025), rising to 950,000+ in 2026
Growing crisis
Critical
Employment Breakdown (2025)
Employment Type
Number (2025)
Percentage
Characteristics
Formal Private Sector
2.8-2.9 million
8%
Stable, benefits, taxed
Public Sector
1.2-1.3 million
3-4%
Government jobs
Informal Sector
28-30 million
76-80%
No contracts, no benefits
Subsistence Agriculture
22-24 million
60-65%
Farming for own consumption
Unemployed
3-4 million
8-9%
Actively seeking work
Total Labor Force
34-36 million
100%
-
Proposed Solutions with 2026 Impact Forecast
Industrialization
Action: Build factories, process raw materials locally (e.g., agro-processing)
Impact: Create 100,000s manufacturing jobs
Timeline: Medium-term (5-10 years)
Skills Training
Action: Reform vocational schools, match to jobs (e.g., tech/digital focus)
Impact: Better employment for graduates
Timeline: Short-term (2-5 years)
SME Support
Action: Easier loans, less red tape, training
Impact: Small business growth; 500,000+ jobs by 2026
Timeline: Short-term (2-5 years)
Agricultural Transformation
Action: Modern farming, processing, value addition
Impact: Higher incomes, rural jobs
Timeline: Medium-term (5-10 years)
Digital Economy
Action: Internet access, tech training, startups
Impact: New jobs; 215,000 tech roles by 2026
Timeline: Short-term (2-5 years)
Conclusion: The Path Forward
Tanzania's experience clearly demonstrates that economic growth alone is not sufficient to solve unemployment. While GDP has continued to expand at 5-6 percent annually and is projected to reach 6.3 percent in 2026, the structure of this growth has failed to generate enough productive and decent jobs for the rapidly growing labour force.
With 900,000-950,000 new job seekers entering the market each year and only 50,000-70,000 formal jobs being created, the country faces a persistent and widening employment gap that leaves millions unemployed, underemployed, or confined to low-productivity informal activities.
The dominance of capital-intensive sectors, a stagnant manufacturing base, low agricultural productivity, and a skills mismatch between education and labour market needs has weakened the link between growth and job creation. As a result, the benefits of rising GDP remain unevenly distributed, particularly for young people, who continue to experience disproportionately high unemployment despite being the main drivers of labour supply.
Critical Reforms Needed
Addressing this challenge requires a fundamental shift in Tanzania's development strategy—from growth that prioritizes output to growth that prioritizes employment, productivity, and inclusion. Expanding labour-intensive industries, transforming agriculture, strengthening SMEs, and aligning skills development with market demand are no longer optional but urgent necessities.
Without such reforms, Tanzania risks sustaining impressive macroeconomic growth figures while the employment crisis deepens, undermining social stability and long-term economic sustainability.
AB
Amran Bhuzohera
Chief Economist & Research Lead
Over 10 years of experience in economic analysis across East Africa and international organizations, providing a unique blend of local insight and global economic perspective.
Related Resources & Data
Explore more insights and real-time data on Tanzania's economy:
In-depth analysis of Tanzania's labour market challenges and the structural factors affecting job creation capacity.
Why Tanzania's Economic Growth Has Not Been Sufficiently Inclusive | TICGL Economic Analysis 2025
Why Tanzania's Economic Growth Has Not Been Sufficiently Inclusive
A Comprehensive Analysis of GDP Growth, Inflation Disparities, and Structural Challenges in Tanzania's Economy
TICGL Economic Research DivisionPublished: December 2025 | Analysis Period: 2020-2025
📊 Related Analysis: For context on Tanzania's overall economic performance, read our companion article: Is Tanzania's Economy Growing?
Introduction
Tanzania's economic growth is real but excludes most citizens. While GDP expands at 5.5% annually, this prosperity fails to reach ordinary Tanzanians due to fundamental structural disconnects. The 65% of workers in agriculture experience only 3% sector growth, while capital-intensive sectors like mining and electricity—employing less than 2% of the workforce—grow at 16-19%. This analysis reveals nine critical factors explaining why economic expansion has not translated into inclusive development.
🔗 Background Reading: This report builds on our foundational analysis "Is Tanzania's Economy Growing?" which establishes that Tanzania's economy is indeed expanding. Here, we examine the critical question: Who benefits from this growth?
5.5%GDP Growth Rate 2024
49%Living Below $3/Day
65%Employed in Agriculture
0%Real Wage Growth
The Inflation Paradox: Hidden Burden on the Poor
Tanzania's official inflation figures suggest a relatively stable price environment, with headline inflation averaging around 3.2-3.4% in 2025. This aggregate number is often presented as a macroeconomic success. However, this masks a harsher reality faced by low-income households.
💡 Note: While our previous analysis "Is Tanzania's Economy Growing?" confirms robust GDP expansion, this report examines why that growth hasn't translated into improved living standards for most Tanzanians.
For the poorest 50% of Tanzanians, food accounts for 60-80% of total household expenditure, compared to just 20-30% for the wealthiest groups. During the same period when headline inflation remained low, food inflation surged to between 6.0% and 7.7%.
This means prices of essential staples such as maize, rice, cassava, and cooking oil rose at nearly twice the national inflation rate. As a result, the poor effectively experience an inflation rate of about 5.5-6.5%, far above the official figure reported by national statistics.
Table 1: Inflation Impact on Different Income Groups (2025)
Income Group
Effective Inflation Rate
Food Expenditure Share
Explanation
Bottom 50% (Poor)
5.5-6.5%
60-80%
Heavy food expenditure weight means food price increases disproportionately affect the poor
Middle 30%
4.0-4.5%
40-50%
Mixed food and other spending provides some buffer
Top 20% (Wealthy)
3.0-3.5%
20-30%
Low food share, asset appreciation shields from food inflation
Stagnant Real Incomes Compound the Problem
This disparity is compounded by stagnant real incomes. Between 2020 and 2025, Tanzania's GDP expanded by about 37.5% in nominal terms, and GDP per capita increased by roughly 24%. Yet average wages tell a different story: urban mean wages rose by only 5.3%, and rural mean wages by 4.9% over the same period—changes that are effectively zero in real terms after adjusting for inflation.
Table 2: GDP Growth vs. Real Wage Growth (2020-2025)
Indicator
2020
2025
Nominal Change
Real Change (After Inflation)
GDP (USD billions)
~$64
$88 (projected)
+37.5%
—
GDP per Capita (USD)
~$1,050
$1,302
+24%
+~18%
Urban Mean Wage (TZS)
~470,000
494,812
+5.3%
~0%
Rural Mean Wage (TZS)
~350,000
367,034
+4.9%
~0%
Minimum Wage - Public (TZS)
370,000
500,000 (July 2025)
+35%
Recent adjustment
Key Insight:
While GDP grew 37.5% in nominal terms (2020-2025), actual worker wages barely increased in real terms. The economy is expanding, but workers aren't capturing those gains—profits flow to capital owners, not labor.
With incomes barely moving while food prices rise rapidly, the purchasing power of poor households continues to erode. Consequently, even modest price increases translate into reduced meal quality, lower caloric intake, and heightened vulnerability to shocks.
1. Sectoral Growth Mismatch with Employment
Tanzania's fastest-growing sectors create minimal jobs while the majority of the population remains employed in slow-growing sectors. This fundamental disconnect between where growth happens and where people work is the primary driver of non-inclusive growth.
Table 3: Sector Growth vs. Employment Distribution (2024)
Sector
Growth Rate (Q3 2024)
GDP Contribution
Employment Share
Inclusivity Gap
Electricity Generation
19.0%
Minor
<1%
Very high growth, negligible jobs
Mining & Quarrying
16.6%
5-9.8%
~1%
Capital-intensive, few workers
Financial Services
15.4%
Part of 38-40% services
~3-5%
Urban-focused, skilled labor only
Agriculture
3.0%
26-30%
65%
Majority employed, slowest growth
Manufacturing
Stagnant
8-9%
6.8%
No expansion for decades
Key Insight:
The 65% of Tanzanians working in agriculture experience only 3% sector growth, while capital-intensive sectors (mining, electricity) grow at 16-19% but employ less than 2% of the workforce. This creates a fundamental disconnect between where growth happens and where people work.
2. Extreme Concentration of Income Gains
Economic growth has disproportionately benefited the wealthy, leaving the majority behind. The distribution of income gains reveals a deeply unequal pattern that prevents GDP growth from translating into broad-based prosperity.
Table 4: Income Distribution and Inequality (2023-2024)
Income Group
Share of Total Income
Approximate Population
Per Capita Implication
Top 1%
17.9%
~650,000 people
Capture nearly 1/5 of all income
Top 10%
~35-40% (estimated)
~6.5 million
Control over 1/3 of income
Bottom 50%
14.1%
~32.5 million
Share less than top 1%
Gini Coefficient
40.5 (2018)
—
Moderate-high inequality
Key Insight:
The top 1% (about 650,000 people) earn more total income than the bottom 50% (about 32.5 million people). When GDP grows by 5.5%, the benefits flow overwhelmingly to those already wealthy.
3. Poverty Reduction Lagging Far Behind GDP Growth
Despite two decades of 4.5-7.7% annual GDP growth, poverty has barely declined. This demonstrates that economic expansion alone, without deliberate inclusive policies, does not automatically reduce poverty.
Table 5: GDP Growth vs. Poverty Reduction (2011-2024)
Period
Average Annual GDP Growth
National Poverty Rate
International Poverty Line ($3/day)
Change in Poverty
2011/12
~6-7%
28.2%
—
Baseline
2017/18
~6-7%
26.4%
—
Only -1.8 percentage points in 6 years
2020
2.0% (COVID)
27.7%
—
Poverty increased
2024
5.5%
~26-27% (est.)
49%
Minimal improvement
Key Insight:
Over 13 years of strong GDP growth (2011-2024), national poverty declined by only about 1-2 percentage points. Nearly half the population (49%) still lives below $3/day, meaning GDP growth of 5-6% annually has barely touched poverty levels.
4. Employment Quality: Informal and Vulnerable Jobs
Most employment is informal, low-productivity, and lacks social protection. This means that even when jobs are created, they don't provide pathways to middle-class prosperity or economic security.
Table 6: Employment Structure and Quality (2024-2025)
Employment Category
Share of Workforce
Characteristics
Income Level
Informal Employment
76-80%
No contracts, no benefits, vulnerable
Low, unstable
Formal Private Sector
~10-12%
Contracts, some benefits
Moderate
Public Sector
~8-10%
Stable, benefits, pensions
Moderate-High
Agriculture (mostly informal)
65%
Subsistence, weather-dependent
Very Low
Youth Unemployment/Underemployment
>10%
Skills mismatch, limited opportunities
—
Key Insight:
Four out of five workers are in informal jobs with low pay and no security. GDP growth creates formal sector opportunities for only a small minority, while the majority remain trapped in vulnerable, low-productivity work.
5. Population Growth Dilutes Per Capita Gains
Rapid population growth means GDP gains are spread across more people, reducing individual benefit. Tanzania's 3% annual population growth rate significantly diminishes the per capita impact of economic expansion.
Table 7: Population Growth vs. GDP Growth (2020-2025)
Year
GDP Growth Rate
Population Growth Rate
GDP Per Capita Growth
Real Impact
2020
2.0%
~3.0%
-1.0%
People got poorer
2021
4.3%
~3.0%
~1.3%
Minimal gain
2022
4.7%
~3.0%
~1.7%
Modest gain
2023
5.3%
~3.0%
~2.3%
Moderate gain
2024
5.5%
~3.0%
~2.5%
Moderate gain
Key Insight:
Tanzania's 5.5% GDP growth translates to only 2.5% per capita growth after accounting for population increase. With most gains going to the top, the average person sees minimal improvement.
6. Structural Transformation Failure
The economy hasn't shifted workers from low-productivity agriculture to higher-productivity manufacturing. This represents a fundamental failure of economic transformation that has prevented Tanzania from achieving the kind of rapid poverty reduction seen in successful Asian economies.
Key Insight:
While 20% of workers left agriculture over 30 years, manufacturing's share of GDP hasn't grown at all. Workers moved mostly to informal urban services (petty trade, transport), not productive manufacturing—this is "pseudo-transformation" without real productivity gains.
7. Limited Government Capacity to Redistribute
Low tax revenue restricts the government's ability to fund social services and inclusive programs. Without adequate fiscal resources, the government cannot effectively buffer inequality or provide the public services necessary for inclusive development.
Table 9: Fiscal Capacity for Inclusive Policies (2024)
Indicator
Tanzania
Regional Comparator Average
Implication
Tax Revenue (% of GDP)
13.1%
15-18% (EAC average)
Limited fiscal space
Public Spending on Health
~3-4% of GDP
5-6% recommended
Underfunded
Public Spending on Education
~3.5% of GDP
4-6% recommended
Underfunded
Social Protection Coverage
<10% of poor
15-25% (better performers)
Minimal safety nets
Key Insight:
With only 13.1% of GDP in tax revenue, the government cannot adequately fund health, education, or social protection programs that would make growth more inclusive. Better-performing countries collect 17-20% of GDP.
Summary: Why Growth Hasn't Been Inclusive
Table 10: Key Exclusion Factors and Their Mechanisms
Exclusion Factor
Mechanism
Result
Growth in capital-intensive sectors
Mining, electricity, finance grow fast but employ <3%
65% in slow-growing agriculture see no benefit
Extreme income concentration
Top 1% capture 17.9% of income; bottom 50% get 14.1%
GDP growth flows to wealthy, not workers
Wage stagnation
Real wages flat despite 37% GDP growth (2020-2025)
Workers don't share in prosperity
Food price inflation
Food costs rise 6-7.7% vs. 3.3% headline inflation
Poor (80% income on food) get effectively poorer
Informal employment dominance
76-80% in vulnerable, low-wage jobs
No pathway to middle class for majority
Population growth
3% annual increase dilutes per capita gains
5.5% GDP growth → only 2.5% per person
Manufacturing stagnation
Stuck at 8-9% of GDP for 30 years
No structural transformation, no productivity leap
Weak redistribution
Only 13.1% tax revenue limits social spending
Government can't buffer inequality
Conclusion: The Path Forward
Tanzania's economic growth is real but excludes most citizens because it occurs in sectors that employ few people, concentrates income among elites, fails to raise wages, and doesn't transform the economy structurally. The challenge isn't achieving growth—Tanzania does that well. The challenge is making growth work for ordinary Tanzanians.
Critical Policy Imperatives
Without deliberate policies to create quality jobs, raise agricultural productivity, expand manufacturing, strengthen tax collection, and invest in social protection, GDP growth will continue leaving the majority behind. Specific interventions must include:
1. Contain Food Price Volatility: Implement strategic grain reserves, improve agricultural supply chains, and reduce post-harvest losses to stabilize food prices for poor consumers.
2. Raise Agricultural Productivity: Invest in irrigation, improved seeds, mechanization, and extension services to boost the 3% growth rate in agriculture where 65% work.
3. Strengthen Real Wage Growth: Enforce minimum wage regulations, support collective bargaining, and link wages to productivity gains rather than capital accumulation.
4. Expand Manufacturing: Create industrial zones, improve infrastructure, reduce bureaucracy, and provide targeted incentives to move manufacturing from 8% to 15-20% of GDP.
5. Strengthen Tax Collection: Broaden the tax base from 13.1% to 17-20% of GDP to fund education, healthcare, and social protection without external dependency.
6. Expand Targeted Social Protection: Increase coverage from <10% to at least 25% of the poor through cash transfers, school feeding programs, and health insurance.
As long as inflation is measured and communicated as a single national average, it will continue to conceal deep distributional pressures. For low-income households, rising food prices combined with weak income growth are effectively pushing them further into vulnerability, despite "low inflation" headlines. Tanzania risks sustaining macroeconomic stability while allowing poverty to persist, reinforcing the paradox of low inflation alongside worsening living standards for the poor.
Is Tanzania's Economy Growing? 2025 Economic Analysis & GDP Growth Report
Is Tanzania's Economy Growing?
A Comprehensive Analysis of Economic Performance, Growth Drivers, and Structural Challenges
Report Period: 1999-2025
Latest Data: 2025
Source: TICGL Economic Research
Introduction
Over the past two decades, Tanzania has emerged as one of East Africa's most consistently growing economies, demonstrating resilience amid global and regional economic shocks. Since 1999, the country has recorded annual GDP growth ranging between 4.5% and 7.7%, with only one major disruption in 2020 when growth slowed to 2.0% due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Growth has rebounded strongly to 4.3% in 2021, 4.7% in 2022, 5.3% in 2023, and 5.5% in 2024, with Q1 2025 recording 5.4% growth driven primarily by mining, electricity generation, and financial services. Tanzania's GDP has expanded from USD 75.5 billion in 2022 to an estimated USD 78.8-83 billion in 2024, projected to reach USD 88 billion in 2025.
Key Finding: While Tanzania's economy is undeniably growing with strong macroeconomic fundamentals, the central challenge remains translating sustained expansion into faster structural transformation, stronger domestic revenue mobilization, and broader improvements in living standards.
Tanzania has demonstrated consistent economic growth for over two decades, with growth rates between 4.5% and 7.7% annually from 1999-2024. The only significant disruption occurred in 2020 due to COVID-19. The average annual GDP growth from 2000-2024 stands at approximately 6.2%.
Economic Size and Regional Position
Tanzania's GDP Evolution
Metric
2022
2024
2025 (Projected)
GDP (Current USD)
$75.5 billion
$78.8-83 billion
$88 billion
GDP Per Capita
—
$1,215
$1,302
Regional Ranking
2nd in East Africa
2nd in East Africa
2nd in East Africa
Sub-Saharan Africa Ranking
7th largest
7th largest
7th largest
Tanzania has firmly positioned itself as the second-largest economy in East Africa after Kenya and the seventh largest in Sub-Saharan Africa. GDP per capita has risen to approximately $1,215 in 2024 and is expected to reach $1,302 in 2025, reflecting gradual but sustained improvements in average income levels.
Economic Structure and Sectoral Performance
Major Sectors by GDP Share (2024)
Sector
Share of GDP
Key Activities
Services
38-40%
Wholesale/retail trade (12%), Public administration (6%), Transport (5%)
Industry
28-30%
Construction (16%), Manufacturing (9%), Mining (5-9.8%)
Agriculture
26-30%
Crops (14-18%), Livestock (8%), Forestry, Fishing
Tourism
5.7%
Accommodation, food services (recovering from COVID)
Sector Growth Rates (Q3 2024)
Sector
Growth Rate
Notable Performance
Electricity
19.0%
Julius Nyerere Hydropower Plant impact
Mining & Quarrying
16.6%
Gold prices, natural gas development
Financial Services
15.4%
Banking sector expansion
Forestry
6.2%
Timber and non-wood products
Professional Services
4.2%
Technical, scientific services
Agriculture
3.0%
Crops and livestock production
Tanzania's growth is underpinned by a diversified economic structure. The services sector contributes about 38-40% of GDP, followed by industry at 28-30% and agriculture at 26-30%. However, agriculture still employs around 65% of the population, highlighting the structural transformation challenge.
Macroeconomic Stability
Inflation Performance
Year
Inflation Rate
Target/Note
2020
3.3%
Low due to pandemic
2021
3.7%
Moderate increase
2022
4.3%
Post-pandemic adjustment
2023
3.8%
Below 5% target
2024
3.3%
Well-controlled
2025
3.4% (projected)
Within 3-5% target range
Fiscal and Debt Indicators
Indicator
2022/23
2023/24
2024
Status
Fiscal Deficit (% of GDP)
3.5%
3.2%
2.5%
Improving, approaching 3% target
Tax Revenue (% of GDP)
—
—
13.1%
Low compared to peers
Public Debt (% of GDP)
43.6%
45.5%
~50%
Contained, moderate risk
Current Account Deficit
3.8%
—
2.6%
Sustainable
Banking Sector Health (2024)
Indicator
Value
Benchmark
Non-Performing Loans (NPL)
4.3%
Below 5% target ✓
Core Capital Adequacy
Well-capitalized
—
Foreign Exchange Reserves
4.5 months
Target: 4+ months ✓
Central Bank Rate
5.75%
Reduced from 6.00%
Macroeconomic stability has reinforced Tanzania's growth trajectory. Inflation has remained well contained below 5%, declining from 4.3% in 2022 to 3.3% in 2024. Fiscal performance has improved with the deficit narrowing from 3.5% of GDP in 2022/23 to about 2.5% in 2024, while public debt remains moderate at around 50% of GDP.
Primary Growth Drivers (2024-2025)
1. Infrastructure Investment
Julius Nyerere Hydropower Dam
Standard Gauge Railway (SGR)
East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP)
Bridges, flyovers, and transport infrastructure
2. Natural Resources Development
Gold mining expansion (89% of mineral exports)
Natural gas development (Ntorya gas field - 25-year license)
Diamonds and tanzanite extraction
Rising commodity prices
3. Tourism Recovery
Strong visitor arrivals post-COVID
Accommodation and food services (15.3% contribution to growth)
4. Agricultural Development
Employs 65% of population
Crops and livestock production improvements
Weather-dependent but showing resilience
5. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
Improved business environment
Growing FDI in productive sectors
Political stability attracting investment
Employment and Income Dynamics
Labor Market Evolution
Period
Agriculture Employment
Industry Employment
Services Employment
Early 1990s
84.8%
2.6%
12.6%
2022
65.0%
6.8%
29.0%
Wage Trends (2025)
Category
Mean Wage (TZS)
USD Equivalent
Change from 2020
Urban Wage
494,812
$189
Small increase
Rural Wage
367,034
$140
Small increase
Minimum Wage (Public)
500,000
$191
Raised from 370,000 (July 2025)
Unemployment Trends
Year
Official Rate
Notes
2014
10.5%
—
2021/22
9.3%
—
2024-2025
~2.5-2.6%
Low due to informal sector absorption (76-80% informal employment)
Poverty and Inequality
Poverty Indicators
Metric
Value (Latest)
Notes
National Poverty Rate
26-27%
Slower reduction in rural areas
Multidimensional Poverty Rate
~47-50% (2022-2024)
Includes health, education, living standards deprivations
Extreme Poverty ($2.15/day)
~40-43% (2023-2024)
~25-26 million people
Lower-Middle Poverty ($3-$5.50/day)
~49-70% (2024 est.)
Matches ~49% below $3/day PPP
Income Inequality (2023)
Indicator
Value
Comparison/Notes
Gini Coefficient
40.5-41 (2018-2024 est.)
Moderate-high; higher in urban areas
Top 1% Share of Income
~17.9% (2023)
Bottom 50% share only ~14.1%
Rural-Urban Gap
Significant
Urban per capita higher; rural poverty more persistent
Cost of Living Pressures (2025)
Period/Metric
Headline Inflation
Food Inflation
Notes
Overall 2025 (avg.)
~3.2-3.4%
~6.0-7.7%
Food weighs heavily in household budgets
May-August 2025
3.2-3.4%
5.6-7.7%
Staples like rice, maize, cassava drove rises
Impact on Households
Low headline masks food/energy strains
Hits poor hardest (80% informal sector)
Regional and Global Position
Wealth Rankings (2025)
Metric
Tanzania's Position
Africa's Wealthiest Countries
12th
East Africa Ranking
3rd
USD Millionaires
2,100
Centi-millionaires ($100M+)
5
Billionaires
1 (Mohammed Dewji)
Growth in Millionaires (2015-2025)
+17% (vs. Africa avg: -5%)
Vision 2050 and Future Outlook
Government Economic Targets
Vision 2050 Goals:
Achieve upper-middle-income status by 2050
Target: $1 trillion economy
Focus areas: STEM education, manufacturing, digital skills, green industries
Medium-term Projections (2025-2030)
Year
Projected GDP (Current Prices)
2025
$88 billion
2030
$117 billion
Average CAGR
5.7%
Structural Challenges and Risks
Economic Constraints
1. Revenue Generation
Tax revenue at only 13.1% of GDP (low compared to peers)
Narrow tax base
2. Structural Issues
Manufacturing share stuck at ~8% since mid-1990s
Slow structural transformation
Heavy agriculture dependence (vulnerable to climate)
3. External Risks
Geopolitical tensions
Global economic slowdown
Climate shocks
Foreign exchange shortages (Shilling depreciated 8% in 2023)
4. Infrastructure Gaps
Energy and transport bottlenecks
Need for continued investment
5. Governance Issues
Corruption challenges (though improving in 2025 indices)
Weak governance ratings
Why Do Tanzanians Experience Economic Difficulties Despite GDP Growth?
Yes, Tanzania's economy is growing steadily (around 5.5% in 2024 and projected 6% in 2025), but this headline growth has not translated into widespread improvements in living standards for most citizens. While GDP expands, poverty reduction lags, manufacturing stagnates, and growth remains non-inclusive.
Key Reasons for Persistent Economic Hardship:
High Poverty Levels: Nearly half the population lives in poverty, with limited access to basic needs
Income Inequality: Growth benefits concentrate among the wealthy and urban areas (Top 1% capture ~17.9% of income while bottom 50% receive only ~14.1%)
Cost of Living Pressures: Food prices rise faster than overall inflation (6-7.7% vs 3.3-3.4%), hitting low-income households hardest
Employment Challenges: Most jobs are informal (76-80%), low-wage, and vulnerable, especially in agriculture
Population Growth: Rapid increase (~3% annually) dilutes per capita gains
Structural Issues: Slow shift from agriculture to higher-productivity sectors limits broad prosperity
Limited Social Services: Low tax revenue (13.1% of GDP) constrains government capacity to expand social protection
Economic growth has been uneven, capital-intensive, and slow to transform livelihoods, particularly for rural and low-income populations. Growth is concentrated in sectors like mining, electricity, and finance, which generate limited employment compared to their GDP contribution.
Conclusion: Is Tanzania's Economy Growing—and Why Do Economic Hardships Persist?
The evidence clearly confirms that Tanzania's economy is growing. Over the last two decades, the country has sustained average annual GDP growth of about 6.2%, with growth rebounding strongly after the COVID-19 shock—from 2.0% in 2020 to 5.3% in 2023, 5.5% in 2024, and 5.4% in Q1 2025. In absolute terms, Tanzania's economic size has expanded from USD 75.5 billion in 2022 to a projected USD 88 billion in 2025, consolidating its position as the second-largest economy in East Africa.
Inflation has remained stable at around 3.3-3.4%, fiscal deficits have narrowed to about 2.5% of GDP, and public debt remains moderate at around 50% of GDP. By macroeconomic standards, Tanzania is therefore experiencing real, steady, and resilient economic growth.
However, the same data explains why most Tanzanians continue to experience economic difficulties despite this growth.
First, economic expansion has not been sufficiently inclusive. Although GDP per capita has risen to about USD 1,215 in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 1,302 in 2025, these gains are diluted by rapid population growth and concentrated in capital-intensive sectors such as mining, electricity, and finance, which generate limited employment. Agriculture still employs around 65% of the population, yet grows slowly (about 3.0%) and remains vulnerable to climate shocks.
Second, poverty reduction has lagged behind GDP growth. While national poverty has declined only gradually, an estimated 49% of Tanzanians still live below the international USD 3-a-day poverty line, indicating that nearly half of the population has not meaningfully benefited from aggregate growth. Income inequality further deepens this gap: the top 1% capture about 17.9% of total income, while the bottom 50% receive only 14.1%.
Third, employment and income dynamics remain weak. Most jobs are informal and low-productivity, particularly in rural areas. Mean monthly wages remain modest—about TZS 495,000 (USD 189) in urban areas and TZS 367,000 (USD 140) in rural areas—and have increased only marginally over time. Even with controlled headline inflation, food prices rise faster than overall inflation (6-7.7% vs 3.3-3.4%), placing disproportionate pressure on low-income households.
Finally, structural transformation has been slow. Manufacturing's contribution has stagnated at around 8-9% of GDP for decades, while tax revenue remains low at 13.1% of GDP, limiting the government's capacity to expand social services, support productive sectors, and cushion vulnerable groups.
In conclusion, Tanzania's economy is undeniably growing, supported by strong macroeconomic fundamentals, infrastructure investment, and sectoral diversification. However, the persistence of economic hardship among the majority of Tanzanians reflects the nature—not the absence—of growth. Growth has been uneven, capital-intensive, and slow to transform livelihoods, particularly for rural and low-income populations.
The core challenge ahead is therefore not achieving growth per se, but making growth more inclusive, employment-creating, and structurally transformative, so that rising GDP is matched by tangible improvements in living standards for the broader population.
Related Resources
💱
Why is the Tanzania Shilling Lagging Behind Africa's Strongest Currencies?
The Tanzania Shilling (TZS) continues to rank among the weaker currencies in Africa when measured by its nominal exchange rate against the US dollar. Explore the factors behind Tanzania's currency performance.
The Tanzania Shilling (TZS) continues to rank among the weaker currencies in Africa when measured
by its nominal exchange rate against the US dollar, raising an important economic question about
why it trails far behind Africa's strongest currencies such as the Tunisian Dinar (TND) and
Libyan Dinar (LYD). This comprehensive analysis examines the structural, policy-related, and
global factors shaping Tanzania's foreign exchange dynamics, providing insights for policymakers,
investors, businesses, and the public.
Current Exchange Rate (December 2025)
1 USD = 2,473 TZS
1 TZS ≈ 0.0004 USD
Understanding the Currency Gap
As of December 2025, 1 USD exchanges for approximately 2,473 TZS, meaning
1 TZS is worth about 0.0004 USD. In stark contrast, 1 Tunisian Dinar
equals 0.34 USD and 1 Libyan Dinar equals 0.18 USD. This wide gap
highlights not just currency performance differences, but also deeper structural and policy-related
factors shaping Tanzania's foreign exchange dynamics.
Key Factors Behind the Shilling's Position
At the core of the shilling's weakness is Tanzania's import-dependent growth model.
In 2025, the economy grew by about 6%, driven largely by infrastructure expansion,
energy projects, mining, and urban development. While this growth is positive, it has significantly
increased demand for foreign currency to pay for fuel, machinery, capital goods, and construction
materials.
Important Note: Imports rose by an estimated 5% year-on-year in 2025, intensifying
pressure on the shilling as demand for US dollars consistently outpaced supply.
Another key factor is the current account deficit, projected at around
3.2% of GDP in 2025, reflecting a persistent imbalance between export earnings
and import payments. Although Tanzania performed strongly in gold exports—earning approximately
USD 4.59 billion by October 2025—and saw recovery in tourism, these inflows
were still insufficient to fully offset the growing import bill.
Africa's Strongest Currencies: The Top 10
According to the latest data from December 2025, the currency landscape in Africa shows
significant disparities. The Tunisian Dinar (TND) leads as the strongest
currency in Africa, with 1 TND ≈ 0.34 USD (or approximately 1 USD ≈ 2.94 TND).
This strength is attributed to Tunisia's monetary discipline, controlled inflation, and restrictions
on capital outflows.
Rank
Currency
Code
Country/Region
Value (1 unit = USD)
1
Tunisian Dinar
TND
Tunisia
0.34
2
Libyan Dinar
LYD
Libya
0.18
3
Moroccan Dirham
MAD
Morocco
0.11
4
Ghanaian Cedi
GHS
Ghana
0.087
5
Botswana Pula
BWP
Botswana
0.074
6
Seychelles Rupee
SCR
Seychelles
0.070
7
Eritrean Nakfa
ERN
Eritrea
0.066
8
Namibian Dollar / Swazi Lilangeni
NAD / SZL
Namibia / Eswatini
0.060
9
Lesotho Loti
LSL
Lesotho
0.058
10
South African Rand
ZAR
South Africa
0.058
Important Clarification: Currency "strength" here refers to nominal exchange
rate value against the USD (how much USD one unit of local currency buys). It does not
necessarily reflect purchasing power, economic stability, or real-world usability.
Tanzania Shilling's Position in Africa and East Africa
The Tanzania Shilling (TZS) is among the weaker currencies in Africa nominally.
As of late December 2025, 1 USD ≈ 2,473 TZS (or 1 TZS ≈ 0.000404 USD).
This places it far below the top ranks, even weaker than lower entries like the Kenyan Shilling
at approximately 0.0077 USD per unit.
Comparison with East African and Selected African Currencies
Country
Currency
Code
1 unit = USD
1 USD = local units
Position in Africa
Tunisia
Tunisian Dinar
TND
0.34
~2.94
Strongest
Libya
Libyan Dinar
LYD
0.18
~5.41
2nd
Morocco
Moroccan Dirham
MAD
0.11
~9.09
3rd
South Africa
South African Rand
ZAR
0.058
~17.24
~10th
Kenya
Kenyan Shilling
KES
0.0077
~129.87
Lower mid
Tanzania
Tanzania Shilling
TZS
0.000404
~2,473
Weak
Rwanda
Rwandan Franc
RWF
0.00069
~1,449
Weak
In East Africa (EAC members): TZS is relatively stable but nominally weaker
than the Kenyan Shilling (KES). Uganda (UGX) and Burundi (BIF) are even weaker, with typical
values of 1 UGX ≈ 0.00027 USD. Ethiopia's Birr is also considered weak in nominal terms.
The 2025 Volatility: A Year of Challenges and Stabilization
The Tanzania Shilling (TZS) experienced notable volatility throughout 2025,
weakening significantly in the first half of the year before stabilizing and even slightly
appreciating toward the end. The shilling peaked at around 1 USD ≈ 2,700 TZS in
mid-2025, making it briefly the world's worst-performing currency,
before recovering to approximately 2,473 TZS by late December 2025. This represents an overall
annual depreciation of about 3.5% compared to the start of the year.
Main Reasons for the Weakening Throughout 2025
Several interconnected factors drove the day-to-day and monthly pressures on the TZS:
High Demand for Imports: Tanzania's rapid economic growth (around 6% GDP
in 2025) and major infrastructure projects led to a surge in imports of capital goods, fuel,
machinery, and consumer items. Imports rose by about 5% year-on-year early in 2025, creating
persistent dollar demand and straining foreign exchange reserves.
Seasonal and Cyclical Pressures: Periodic spikes occurred due to seasonal
factors, such as increased imports ahead of Ramadan, Chinese New Year supply chains, or
post-tourism peak lulls in forex inflows from tourism and cash crops.
Widening Current Account Deficit: Projected at around 3.2% of GDP in 2025,
driven by higher imports outpacing export growth despite strong performances in gold (up 38%
in value) and other commodities.
Global USD Strength and External Shocks: Lingering effects from prior US
interest rate hikes and geopolitical tensions made the dollar stronger globally, putting
pressure on emerging market currencies like the TZS.
Infrastructure-Driven Debt and Spending: Aggressive public investments
increased national debt servicing needs (much in USD) and import bills, compounding forex
outflows.
Important Note: The shilling did not weaken continuously "day by day." It
depreciated sharply in Q1-Q2 2025 but stabilized from mid-year onward thanks to proactive measures.
Factors That Helped Stabilization in Late 2025
Bank of Tanzania (BoT) Interventions: The central bank injected over
USD 175 million via forex auctions and sales, building reserves to
comfortable levels (covering approximately 4-5 months of imports).
Surge in Export Earnings: Particularly gold (reaching USD 4.59 billion
by October) and tourism recovery, boosting forex inflows.
Policy Measures: Bans on dollarization (requiring local transactions in
TZS only) and prudent monetary policy (holding policy rate at 5.75%) helped curb speculation
and maintain low inflation (approximately 3-3.5%).
Outlook for 2026: What Can We Expect?
The outlook is generally positive for relative stability or modest depreciation, supported by
Tanzania's strong fundamentals:
Key Projections and Drivers
Continued Economic Growth: IMF and World Bank project GDP growth of
6.0-6.4% in 2026, driven by infrastructure completion, mining expansion
(new gold mines), natural gas projects, and agriculture/tourism.
Expected Depreciation Rate: Analysts forecast a milder approximately
3-4% weakening (similar to or less than 2025), assuming no major shocks.
Supporting Factors for 2026
Higher export revenues from commodities and FDI inflows
Adequate forex reserves and ongoing BoT vigilance
Low and stable inflation (target 3-5%)
Potential benefits from global easing if US rates fall further
Risks to Watch in 2026
Global commodity price drops or renewed USD strength
Delays in major projects increasing import/debt pressures
Overall, while the TZS is likely to face some ongoing nominal weakening due to Tanzania's
import-dependent growth model, 2026 should see greater stability than the volatile first half
of 2025, with long-term benefits from investments potentially strengthening the currency in
real terms over time.
Global and Regional Context
Global factors have also played a significant role in the shilling's performance. The continued
strength of the US dollar, driven by high interest rates and global risk
aversion, placed pressure on emerging and frontier market currencies throughout 2025. Tanzania
was not immune to these global dynamics.
Countries with stronger currencies, such as Tunisia and Libya, rely heavily on controlled
foreign exchange systems, oil revenues, or strict limits on currency convertibility,
which support nominal currency strength but do not necessarily reflect broader economic
resilience or long-term sustainability.
The Trade-Off: Currency Strength vs. Economic Flexibility
Importantly, the shilling's weaker position does not necessarily imply economic failure. Unlike
some of Africa's strongest currencies, Tanzania operates a more flexible and
market-responsive exchange rate system, which absorbs shocks rather than masking them.
Key indicators of macroeconomic stability in 2025 include:
Inflation: Remained relatively low at around 3-3.5%
Foreign Exchange Reserves: Improved to cover 4-5 months of imports
GDP Growth: Strong at approximately 6%
Gold Exports: Reached USD 4.59 billion by October 2025
Therefore, the gap between the Tanzania Shilling and Africa's strongest currencies is best
explained by structural trade dynamics, policy choices, and openness to global
markets, rather than short-term mismanagement.
Policy Implications and the Path Forward
Understanding why the Tanzania Shilling lags behind Africa's strongest currencies is essential
not only for policymakers, but also for investors, businesses, and the public. It underscores
the trade-offs between currency strength, economic openness, and long-term growth,
and frames the broader debate on whether nominal currency strength should be the ultimate
benchmark for economic success in Tanzania's development trajectory.
Key Policy Considerations
Export Diversification: While gold exports have been strong, Tanzania needs
to diversify its export base to reduce dependence on commodity price fluctuations.
Import Substitution: Strategic investments in local manufacturing and
production capacity could reduce the persistent demand for foreign exchange.
Infrastructure Completion: Completing ongoing infrastructure projects will
eventually reduce import demand for capital goods and machinery.
Tourism Enhancement: Continued recovery and growth in tourism provides
valuable foreign exchange inflows.
Monetary Policy Balance: The Bank of Tanzania's interventions and prudent
monetary policy have proven effective in maintaining stability.
Conclusion: Strength Beyond the Exchange Rate
In conclusion, the Tanzania Shilling's position behind Africa's strongest currencies is largely
the result of structural economic realities rather than economic weakness.
Tanzania's import-driven growth model, expanding infrastructure investments, and rising demand
for foreign exchange naturally exert downward pressure on the shilling, while countries with
stronger nominal currencies often rely on strict currency controls, limited
convertibility, or resource-based inflows that artificially support exchange rates.
Despite episodes of volatility in 2025, the shilling demonstrated resilience through effective
Bank of Tanzania interventions, low and stable inflation of around
3-3.5%, improving foreign exchange reserves covering 4-5 months of
imports, and strong export performance in gold and tourism.
Therefore, while the TZS remains weak in nominal terms, it reflects a more open,
flexible, and growth-oriented economy. The real policy challenge for Tanzania is not
merely strengthening the currency's face value, but deepening export diversification,
reducing import dependence, and sustaining macroeconomic stability, which over time
will enhance the shilling's real strength and long-term economic credibility.
✅ Thank you for supporting TICGL Publication!
You now have full access to this premium economic analysis.
🔒 Unlock Full Analysis
Get complete access to comprehensive data, detailed analysis, and expert insights including:
✓ Complete currency comparison tables
✓ Detailed 2025 volatility analysis
✓ 2026 economic outlook and projections
✓ Policy implications and recommendations
✓ Expert economic insights
TZS 20,000
One-time payment for lifetime access
💳 Complete Your Payment
Step 1: Send Payment
Send TZS 20,000 to the M-Pesa number below
📱 0740900752
Send exactly TZS 20,000
Step 2: Submit Payment Details
Fill in your information below after completing the payment
🔑 Enter Your Access Code
Enter the 6-digit access code sent to you by our admin team:
⏳ Payment Details Submitted Successfully!
Your payment is being verified by our admin team.
Reference Number:
You will receive a 6-digit access code via SMS within 24 hours.
Once you receive the code, click the button below to unlock the article.
Tanzania is facing a deepening affordability challenge as the gap between household incomes and the cost of living continues to widen. In 2025, the average monthly salary stands at TSh 637,226, yet a single person requires approximately TSh 1.25 million per month to meet basic living expenses—equivalent to 196% of the average salary. This leaves an income shortfall of nearly TSh 612,000, meaning the typical worker earns only 51% of what is needed to live modestly. The situation is far more severe for families: a household of four needs about TSh 4.75 million per month for a moderate lifestyle and closer to TSh 5.5 million to remain financially stable—an amount equal to the combined earnings of 8–9 average workers. Looking ahead to 2026, projections suggest the crisis will intensify. Under the baseline scenario, salaries rise marginally to TSh 650,000 (+2%), while living costs for a single person increase to TSh 1.36 million, widening the deficit to -109% of salary. In an adverse scenario, workers may earn only 43% of their basic needs, with family living costs exceeding TSh 6.6 million per month. These figures highlight a structural imbalance where economic growth and wage adjustments are failing to keep pace with rising living costs—signaling an urgent need for policy action on wages, housing affordability, and food security. More On This Topic:Is the Cost of Living in Tanzania Outpacing Incomes as We Enter 2026?
Current Reality (2025)
Single Person Budget Gap
Category
Amount (TSh)
% of Salary
Average Monthly Salary
637,226
100%
Monthly Living Cost
1,249,000
196%
Income Shortfall
-611,774
-96%
Key Insight: A single person needs to earn nearly double the average salary just to cover basic expenses.
Family of Four Budget Gap
Category
Amount (TSh)
Equivalent Salaries Needed
Single Average Salary
637,226
1 person
Family Monthly Cost
4,750,000
7.5 people
Required Household Income
5,500,000
8.6 people
Key Insight: A family needs the combined income of 8-9 average workers to live moderately—typically requiring 2 high-earning adults plus additional income sources.
2026 Projections: The Gap Widens
Scenario Comparison
Metric
2025
2026 Baseline
2026 Adverse
Avg. Monthly Salary
637,226
650,000 (+2%)
640,000 (+0.4%)
Single Person Cost
1,249,000
1,360,000
1,500,000
Income Shortfall
-611,774 (-96%)
-710,000 (-109%)
-860,000 (-134%)
Salary Coverage
51% of needs
48% of needs
43% of needs
What This Means
2026 Baseline Scenario (60% probability):
Workers will earn even LESS relative to their needs
The gap increases from -96% to -109%
Families will need 6M TSh/month instead of 5.5M
2026 Adverse Scenario (40% probability):
Crisis deepens significantly
Workers earn only 43% of what they need
The shortfall reaches -134% of salary
Families face costs exceeding 6.6M TSh/month
Critical Takeaway
The average Tanzanian worker currently earns only 51% of what's needed for basic living. By 2026, this could drop to 48% (baseline) or 43% (adverse scenario).
This isn't just an income problem—it's a structural crisis requiring urgent policy action on wages, housing affordability, and food security.
Conclusion
Tanzania's deepening cost-of-living crisis reveals a profound structural disconnect between wages and essential expenses. In 2025, the average monthly salary of TSh 637,226 covers only 51% of a single person's basic needs (TSh 1.25 million) and forces families of four to rely on the equivalent of 8–9 average incomes to achieve modest financial stability (TSh 5.5 million). Projections for 2026 indicate further deterioration: under the baseline scenario, salary coverage falls to 48% for individuals, with family costs rising toward TSh 6 million; in the adverse scenario, workers may earn just 43% of their needs, pushing family expenses beyond TSh 6.6 million.
These trends signal that economic growth and wage adjustments are failing to keep pace with inflation in housing, food, and other essentials. Without urgent, targeted policy interventions—raising living wages, improving housing affordability, strengthening food security, and promoting inclusive growth—the affordability gap will widen further, eroding living standards and deepening inequality for millions of Tanzanians. Addressing this crisis is not only an economic imperative but a moral one, essential for building a more equitable and sustainable future.
The cost of living has become one of the most pressing economic realities shaping everyday life in Tanzania. While the country continues to post relatively strong macroeconomic indicators—such as GDP growth of 5.6% in 2025—these headline figures mask a growing disconnect between household incomes and the actual cost of meeting basic needs. For millions of Tanzanians, especially salaried workers, small entrepreneurs, and urban households, affordability is no longer just a concern—it is a structural challenge.
According to the 2025 Cost of Living Analysis, Tanzania remains 61.2% cheaper overall than the United States, with rent costs approximately 78.3% lower. However, this international comparison obscures a more critical domestic reality: local wages have not kept pace with the rising cost of housing, food, utilities, and essential services.
In 2025, the average monthly salary is estimated at 637,226 Tanzanian Shillings (TSh). Against this income, the estimated monthly cost of living for a single person—excluding rent—stands at 1,152,096 TSh, while a family of four requires approximately 4.1 million TSh per month to meet basic needs.
This means that even before accounting for rent, the average worker earns less than half of what is required to sustain a modest standard of living.
Where the Pressure Is Coming From
Food and dining account for the largest share of household expenditure, consuming 40–45% of monthly income. A simple inexpensive meal costs around 7,000 TSh, equivalent to 33% of an average daily wage, while a mid-range meal for two can exceed 50,000 TSh, or more than two full days of income for many workers.
Even staple grocery items—though relatively affordable individually—accumulate into a significant monthly burden, especially for families.
Housing costs present an even deeper structural challenge. Renting a one-bedroom apartment in a city centre costs approximately 1.19 million TSh per month, representing 187% of the average monthly salary. Even outside city centres, rent for a modest one-bedroom unit consumes over 70% of average income, while three-bedroom family housing exceeds total earnings entirely.
Utilities and internet add a further 300,000 TSh per month, reinforcing the affordability gap.
Transportation remains relatively affordable—public transport costs around 39,000 TSh per month, or about 6% of salary—but private vehicle ownership is increasingly out of reach, with the cost of a new compact car equivalent to nearly 70 months of income.
The Bigger Picture: Living Costs vs. Earnings
When all expenses are combined, a budget-conscious single person requires approximately 1.25 million TSh per month, nearly double the average salary. For a family of four, sustainable living requires a household income of 4.8–5.5 million TSh per month, typically achievable only with two high-earning adults or external income sources.
This growing income–cost gap explains rising household debt, reduced savings, informal coping strategies, and increasing vulnerability among urban populations. It also places pressure on businesses, as workers demand higher wages while firms face higher operating costs.
Looking Ahead to 2026: What to Expect
The outlook for 2026 presents both risk and uncertainty. Under the baseline scenario—where political and economic conditions stabilize—overall inflation is projected to rise to 4.3%, with food inflation averaging 7.1% and peaking as high as 8.5% mid-year. The Tanzanian Shilling is expected to depreciate by about 4%, pushing up the cost of imported goods, fuel, and agricultural inputs.
In this scenario, average monthly salaries are projected to rise marginally to around 650,000 TSh, while the monthly cost of living for a single person climbs to 1.36 million TSh—deepening the affordability gap rather than closing it. Families would require close to 6 million TSh per month to maintain a moderate standard of living.
Under an adverse scenario, characterized by prolonged political or economic disruptions, inflation could rise to 6.5–7.0%, food prices could increase by 10–12%, and the currency could depreciate by up to 14%. This would push the monthly cost of living for a single person to 1.5 million TSh, while families could face costs exceeding 5.7 million TSh, further increasing poverty and inequality.
Why This Matters
The data sends a clear message: Tanzania’s cost-of-living challenge is no longer about prices alone—it is about income adequacy, economic structure, and policy choices. Without deliberate action on wages, housing supply, food systems, and productivity, economic growth risks becoming disconnected from lived reality. As the country looks toward 2026 and beyond, addressing the cost of living is not just an economic necessity—it is a social and political imperative.
Tanzania offers a significantly lower cost of living compared to the United States, making it an affordable destination for both residents and expatriates. The data shows Tanzania is 61.2% cheaper overall than the US, with rent being 78.3% lower. More on This Topic:Will Tanzania's Robust Central Bank Position Ensure Continued Growth Through 2026?
Monthly Budget Overview
Household Type
Monthly Cost (Excluding Rent)
USD Equivalent*
Family of Four
4,110,219 TSh
~$1,644
Single Person
1,152,096 TSh
~$461
*Based on approximate exchange rate of 2,500 TSh = 1 USD
Detailed Cost Breakdown by Category
1. Food & Dining (40-45% of monthly expenses)
Restaurant Dining
Item
Average Cost
Price Range
% of Daily Wage**
Inexpensive Meal
7,000 TSh
3,000-15,000
33%
Mid-Range Meal (2 people)
50,000 TSh
30,000-120,000
235%
Fast Food Combo
20,000 TSh
15,000-25,000
94%
Cappuccino
5,149 TSh
2,000-7,500
24%
Local Beer (0.5L)
2,500 TSh
2,000-5,000
12%
**Based on average daily wage of ~21,241 TSh (637,226/30 days)
Market/Grocery Costs
Category
Item
Cost
Budget Impact
Staples
White Rice (1kg)
2,711 TSh
Low
Fresh Bread (500g)
1,986 TSh
Low
Eggs (12)
5,291 TSh
Low
Protein
Chicken (1kg)
12,346 TSh
Medium
Beef (1kg)
10,500 TSh
Medium
Local Cheese (1kg)
22,125 TSh
High
Produce
Bananas (1kg)
2,527 TSh
Low
Tomatoes (1kg)
2,406 TSh
Low
Apples (1kg)
6,167 TSh
Medium
Weekly grocery budget for single person: ~60,000-80,000 TSh (26-35% of monthly food costs)
2. Housing & Utilities (35-40% of monthly expenses)
Rental Costs
Type
Location
Monthly Rent
Annual Cost
% of Avg Salary
1-Bedroom
City Centre
1,194,740 TSh
14,336,880
187%
1-Bedroom
Outside Centre
452,967 TSh
5,435,604
71%
3-Bedroom
City Centre
2,060,000 TSh
24,720,000
323%
3-Bedroom
Outside Centre
822,208 TSh
9,866,496
129%
Key Insight: Living outside the city centre saves approximately 62% on rent for 1-bedroom apartments and 60% for 3-bedroom apartments.
Monthly Utilities (85m² Apartment)
Service
Average Cost
Range
% of Rent (1BR Outside)
Electricity, Water, Gas, Garbage
181,593 TSh
120,000-300,000
40%
Internet (60+ Mbps)
99,923 TSh
50,000-150,000
22%
Mobile Phone (10GB+)
28,294 TSh
10,000-50,000
6%
Total Utilities
309,810 TSh
-
68%
3. Transportation (10-15% of monthly expenses)
Transport Type
Cost
Monthly Impact
Public Transport
One-way ticket: 650 TSh
Monthly pass: 39,000 TSh
6% of salary
Private Transport
Gasoline (1L): 2,979 TSh
New Compact Car: 44,297,674 TSh
69.5 months salary
Taxi Services
Start fare: 4,000 TSh
Per km: 4,000 TSh
Budget Recommendation: Public transport is highly affordable at 39,000 TSh/month. For car owners, factor in ~50,000-80,000 TSh monthly for fuel (based on average commuting).
4. Lifestyle & Recreation (5-10% of monthly expenses)
Category
Item
Cost
Affordability
Fitness
Gym Membership
145,556 TSh
23% of salary
Entertainment
Cinema Ticket
12,000 TSh
2% of salary
Tennis Court (1hr)
16,250 TSh
3% of salary
Clothing
Jeans (Levi's)
39,375 TSh
6% of salary
Running Shoes
83,571 TSh
13% of salary
5. Childcare & Education (Variable, can be 30-50% for families)
Service
Annual Cost
Monthly Equivalent
% of Annual Salary
Preschool/Kindergarten
18,617,766 TSh
1,551,480 TSh
243%
International Primary School
31,434,444 TSh
2,619,537 TSh
411%
Critical Note: International schooling is extremely expensive relative to local salaries, typically requiring expatriate-level income or significant family savings.
Monthly Budget Examples
Single Person (Budget-Conscious)
Expense Category
Monthly Cost
% of Total
Rent (1BR outside centre)
450,000 TSh
36%
Utilities
310,000 TSh
25%
Food (groceries + occasional dining)
280,000 TSh
22%
Transportation (public)
39,000 TSh
3%
Mobile/Internet
50,000 TSh
4%
Entertainment/Misc
120,000 TSh
10%
TOTAL
1,249,000 TSh
100%
Budget vs Average Salary: 196% (requires income above average)
Family of Four (Moderate Lifestyle)
Expense Category
Monthly Cost
% of Total
Rent (3BR outside centre)
850,000 TSh
18%
Utilities
350,000 TSh
7%
Food (groceries + dining)
1,200,000 TSh
25%
Transportation (car + fuel)
200,000 TSh
4%
Education (2 children, local school)
500,000 TSh
11%
Healthcare/Insurance
300,000 TSh
6%
Entertainment/Misc
350,000 TSh
7%
Savings
1,000,000 TSh
21%
TOTAL
4,750,000 TSh
100%
Household Income Needed: ~4,800,000-5,500,000 TSh/month (2 working adults)
Projected Economic Impact on Cost of Living (2026)
Assumption: Unrest continues into mid-2026, broader sanctions imposed
Economic Indicator
2026 Adverse Projection
Change from Baseline
GDP Growth
4.0%
-1.8%
Overall Inflation
6.5-7.0%
+2.2-2.7%
Food Inflation
10-12%
+2.9-4.9%
Currency (TSh/USD)
2,950-3,100
-9-14% depreciation
FDI Inflows
50% reduction
-$1.5B
Poverty Rate
26% (from 25%)
+1%
Income vs. Cost Gap Analysis (2026)
Current Reality Check
Category
2025
2026 Baseline
2026 Adverse
Average Monthly Salary
637,226 TSh
650,000 TSh (+2%)
640,000 TSh (+0.4%)
Single Person Monthly Costs
1,249,000 TSh
1,360,000 TSh
1,500,000 TSh
Income Shortfall (Single)
-611,774 TSh (-96%)
-710,000 TSh (-109%)
-860,000 TSh (-134%)
Family of Four Costs
4,750,000 TSh
5,175,000 TSh
5,700,000 TSh
Required Household Income
~5,500,000 TSh
~6,000,000 TSh
~6,600,000 TSh
Critical Finding: The average salary falls significantly below estimated costs, with shortfalls ranging from 546,679 TSh for single persons to over 3.6 million TSh for families with one earner.
Evidence from 2010–2025
Fiscal decentralization in Tanzania, pursued through the policy of Decentralization by Devolution (D by D), aims to empower Local Government Authorities (LGAs) with greater financial autonomy to fund and manage local development effectively. A key measure of success is the extent to which LGAs can rely on own-source revenue—locally generated through property rates, fees, licenses, and service levies—rather than central government transfers. The core question is whether this policy has meaningfully improved the financial sustainability of LGAs, enabling them to independently finance the bulk of grassroots projects such as roads, schools, health centers, water supply, and sanitation.
Evidence from LGA revenue data spanning 2010 to 2025 indicates that fiscal decentralization has not significantly enhanced financial sustainability. While own-source revenue has grown substantially in absolute terms—from TZS 13.9 billion in 2010 to TZS 147.8 billion in 2025 (a more than tenfold increase)—this has failed to reduce heavy dependence on central transfers. The own-source share of total LGA revenue averaged only 2.8% over the period (excluding the anomalous 0.5% in 2016), ranging from a low of 1.9% in 2012 to a high of 4.1% in 2025. In recent years, despite own-source collections reaching TZS 121.9 billion in 2024 and TZS 147.8 billion in 2025, the share remained modest at 3–4%. This means central government transfers continued to account for 96–98% of total LGA revenue, which expanded from TZS 609.7 billion in 2010 to TZS 3,570.4 billion in 2025.
This persistently low own-source contribution highlights limited progress toward true fiscal autonomy. LGAs, despite implementing most development projects critical to national goals like the Five-Year Development Plans and Sustainable Development Goals, lack the financial independence needed for proactive, timely, and locally prioritized planning. Delays in project execution and resource inefficiencies often result from this dependency.
Several structural challenges explain the stagnation:
Inconsistent revenue collection: Sharp fluctuations—such as drops to TZS 17.2 billion in 2012 and TZS 69.1 billion in 2022—reveal weaknesses in administrative systems and enforcement.
Inadequate tracking and transparency: Incomplete data records, particularly pre-2010 and in certain years, signal systemic monitoring gaps that hinder accountability and mobilization.
Constrained revenue bases: Outdated property valuations, underutilized levies, and leakages from manual processes limit potential yields.
Disincentives from transfer reliance: Predetermined central allocations reduce motivation for local revenue innovation.
Recent trends offer cautious optimism, with own-source growth accelerating in 2023–2025 and the share reaching 4.1% in 2025—the highest in the period. However, this remains far below levels needed for genuine sustainability.
To achieve meaningful enhancement through fiscal decentralization, targeted reforms are required. Priorities include digitalizing revenue administration (e.g., electronic billing and mobile payments), conducting regular property revaluations, building staff capacity, and introducing incentives for high-performing LGAs, such as greater autonomy or matching grants. Linking revenue strategies to local economic drivers—like agriculture, tourism, and small industries—could further boost collections organically. A medium-term target of 10–15% own-source share would better align resources with community needs, foster decentralized development, and build resilience against fiscal shocks.
In summary, while absolute own-source revenue has risen impressively, the low and stagnant share over 2010–2025 demonstrates that fiscal decentralization has yet to deliver substantial financial sustainability for Tanzania’s LGAs. Sustained, bold reforms are essential to realize the full potential of devolution.
Note: The 2016 data point shows Own Sources as 0.0B (likely a recording error or missing data, as noted in the document's limitations). It is treated as anomalous in trend calculations. The "Non-Tax Revenue" column does not factor into the LGA Share % and appears unrelated to the core self-reliance metric (possibly national non-tax figures or a separate category). Read More:Local Government Revenue Collections in Tanzania
Data Table (in billions TZS)
Year
Own Sources (B TZS)
Total Revenue (B TZS)
LGA Share (%)
2010
13.9
609.7
2.3
2011
20.0
722.0
2.8
2012
17.2
909.4
1.9
2013
27.2
1,041.8
2.6
2014
23.3
1,112.9
2.1
2015
41.0
1,478.9
2.8
2016
0.0
1,394.8
0.5
2017
44.6
1,781.9
2.5
2018
58.9
1,817.5
3.2
2019
61.7
2,180.4
2.8
2020
86.1
2,354.8
3.7
2021
82.8
2,545.8
3.3
2022
69.1
3,085.7
2.2
2023
100.8
3,110.9
3.2
2024
121.9
3,877.4
3.1
2025
147.8
3,570.4
4.1
Key Trends and Insights
Absolute Growth in Own Sources — Own-source revenue grew strongly from 13.9B TZS in 2010 to 147.8B TZS in 2025 (over 10x increase). Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR, excluding 2016): 18.4%.
Growth in Total Revenue — Total LGA revenue (largely driven by central transfers) rose from 609.7B to 3,570.4B TZS (about 6x increase). CAGR: 13.5%.
LGA Share % (Self-Reliance Indicator):
Average (2010–2025, excluding 2016): 2.8%.
Range: Low of 1.9% (2012) to high of 4.1% (2025).
Trend: Mild upward linear trend (+0.08 percentage points per year), explaining about 43% of variation (moderate positive progress).
Recent years (2020–2025) show volatility but improvement: Peak at 3.7% (2020), dip to 2.2% (2022), then recovery to 4.1% (2025) — driven by strong own-source growth (+46% in 2023, +21% in 2024–2025) while total revenue slowed or declined in 2025.
Implications for LGA Economic Self-Reliance
The revenue data from 2010 to 2025 clearly illustrates that Tanzania's Local Government Authorities (LGAs) remain heavily dependent on central government transfers, which consistently account for 95–98% of total revenue. Even at the highest point in the period—4.1% own-source share in 2025 (TZS 147.8 billion out of TZS 3,570.4 billion total)—locally generated funds cover only a marginal fraction of budgetary needs. This structural dependency severely constrains fiscal autonomy at the local level, where the majority of development projects are executed, including critical infrastructure such as roads, schools, health centers, and water supply systems.
Positive Developments
Despite the overall low share, several encouraging trends emerge:
Own-source revenue has grown substantially faster than total revenue, increasing more than tenfold from TZS 13.9 billion in 2010 to TZS 147.8 billion in 2025, compared to total revenue rising approximately sixfold over the same period.
A notable acceleration in recent years (2023–2025), with own-source collections rising from TZS 100.8 billion (3.2% share) in 2023 to TZS 121.9 billion (3.1%) in 2024 and TZS 147.8 billion (4.1%) in 2025, marking the strongest upward momentum in the dataset.
These gains suggest that, with continued effort, higher levels of self-reliance are achievable.
Persistent Challenges
The data also exposes significant obstacles that hinder progress:
Volatility in collections: Sharp declines, such as own-source revenue falling to TZS 17.2 billion (1.9% share) in 2012 and TZS 69.1 billion (2.2%) in 2022, indicate inconsistent enforcement and administrative weaknesses.
Systemic deficiencies in tracking: As highlighted in the dataset limitations, incomplete records and poor monitoring mechanisms undermine accountability and effective revenue mobilization, creating a self-reinforcing barrier to improvement.
Pathways to Greater Economic Self-Reliance
To build on recent progress and reduce reliance on central transfers, LGAs must pursue targeted, sustained reforms that address both administrative and structural constraints:
Strengthen Revenue Collection Systems Invest in digital tools—such as electronic billing, mobile money integration, and automated tracking—and provide staff training to minimize leakages and enhance efficiency, directly tackling the poor tracking mechanisms noted in the data.
Broaden and Enforce Revenue Bases Prioritize high-yield sources including property rates, business licenses, service levies, and market fees. Implementing regular property revaluations, especially in rapidly growing urban and peri-urban areas, could support sustained annual growth of 15–20% in own-source revenue.
Enhance Capacity Building and Incentives Offer targeted technical and financial support to underperforming LGAs while introducing performance-based incentives—such as increased autonomy or matching grants—for those demonstrating strong collection improvements.
Link Revenue to Local Economic Growth Promote investments in sector-specific opportunities (e.g., agriculture processing, tourism, and small-scale industries) to organically expand the taxable base and generate higher local returns.
Establish Clear Policy Targets Set ambitious yet realistic medium-term goals, such as progressively raising the own-source share to 10–15%, to provide a measurable roadmap for shifting project financing toward locally determined priorities.
In conclusion, while absolute own-source revenue has shown impressive growth and recent trends are promising, true economic self-reliance demands accelerating the own-source share well beyond the current low single digits. Without comprehensive reforms to address volatility, administrative gaps, and narrow revenue bases, LGAs will continue to face limited fiscal space. The upward trajectory since 2020 demonstrates potential, but only deliberate policy action will close the gap and enable LGAs to finance local development more independently and effectively.
National Consumer Price Index (NCPI) - Food & Non-Alcoholic Beverages
Report Period: 2021-2025 (Historical) | 2026 (Forecast) Base Year: 2020 = 100 Weight in Consumer Basket: 28.2% Date Prepared: December 2025
Lead Analyst: Amran Bhuzohera
Tanzania’s food inflation landscape has undergone significant fluctuations over the past five years, shaped by global shocks, domestic supply constraints, and structural market inefficiencies. Between 2021 and 2025, food inflation averaged 5.2%, but the trend reveals pronounced volatility—rising from 3.7% in 2021 to a crisis peak of 7.3% in 2022, driven largely by fuel cost surges (energy inflation averaged 9.1% in 2022) and supply chain disruptions. Although 2024 marked a period of exceptional stability with food inflation dropping to 2.1%, households have since faced renewed pressure in 2025 as inflation accelerated sharply to an average of 6.0%. This rise reflects persistent cost-push factors, including elevated transport index levels that climbed from 103.34 (2021) to 121.50 (2025)—a cumulative increase of 17.6%, directly increasing food distribution expenses.
By November 2025, food inflation reached 6.6%, nearly double the national headline inflation of 3.4%, underscoring the disproportionate burden food prices impose on household purchasing power. Food prices have risen cumulatively by 31.5% since the 2020 base year, intensifying affordability challenges, particularly for low-income urban households and regions dependent on purchased food. Unprocessed and food crop categories—which are highly weather-sensitive—remain the most volatile, with swings as wide as 10.2 percentage points between June 2024 (-1.3%) and July 2025 (8.9%). This volatility reflects structural weaknesses such as low agricultural mechanization, post-harvest losses, long supply chains, and limited storage facilities.
Looking ahead, the 2026 forecast indicates continued upward pressure, with food inflation expected to average 7.1%, peaking at 8.5% in July, driven by seasonal supply shortages, lean-season stress, and higher input costs. Critical food categories such as food crops and unprocessed food are projected to hit peaks of 11.0% and 11.5%, respectively. With Tanzania’s population and urbanization steadily growing, combined with elevated energy and transport costs projected to rise to 6.5–8.0% in 2026, food price stability remains a central macroeconomic concern. Close monitoring and policy interventions—particularly in agricultural productivity, logistics, and market efficiency—will be essential to mitigate risks and sustain household welfare. Read More: Tanzania’s Inflation Path in 2025
Key Highlights
Food prices have risen cumulatively by 31.5% since 2020, significantly reducing household purchasing power and widening the gap between food inflation (6.6%) and overall inflation (3.4%) as of November 2025.
2024 was the most stable year with only 2.1% food inflation, but this reversed sharply in 2025, where food inflation averaged ~6.0%, marking a 3.9 percentage-point surge from the previous year.
2022 remains the crisis year, with food inflation peaking at 9.7%, unprocessed food at 12.7%, and food crops at 14.2%, driven by high fuel costs and supply chain disturbances.
Unprocessed and food crop categories remain the most volatile, showing swings of up to 10.2 percentage points between 2024 and 2025 due to climate variability, seasonal shortages, and production instability.
2026 food inflation is forecasted to average 7.1%, with a seasonal high of 8.5% in July, reflecting continued pressure from input costs, transport inflation, and recurring supply-side constraints.
1. HISTORICAL ANALYSIS (2021-2025)
1.1 Five-Year Trend Overview
Year
Average Annual Inflation
Status
Year-on-Year Change
2021
3.7%
Moderate/Baseline
-
2022
7.3%
Very High
+3.6 pp
2023
6.8%
High
-0.5 pp
2024
2.1%
Low/Stable
-4.7 pp
2025 (Jan-Nov)
~6.0%
Rising
+3.9 pp
Key Observation: The data reveals a cyclical pattern with a major spike in 2022, gradual decline through 2023-2024, and a sharp rebound in 2025.
1.2 Food Price Index Evolution
The table below shows how food prices have increased relative to the 2020 base year:
Month
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
January
100.60
106.99
117.57
119.39
125.77
March
103.93
110.64
121.39
123.05
129.75
June
106.46
112.71
121.49
122.58
131.53
September
103.30
111.89
118.17
121.17
129.70
December
105.90
116.15
118.83
124.27
-
Cumulative Increase
+5.9%
+16.2%
+18.8%
+24.3%
+31.5% (Nov)
Analysis: Food prices have increased by 31.5% cumulatively since the 2020 base year, representing significant erosion of purchasing power for households.
1.3 Crisis Period Analysis - 2022
The year 2022 represented the peak of food inflation pressure:
Category
Peak Inflation Rate
Month Recorded
Food & Non-Alcoholic Beverages
9.7%
December 2022
Unprocessed Food
12.7%
December 2022
Food Crops & Related Items
14.2%
December 2022
Impact: The 2022 crisis saw double-digit inflation in key food categories, severely impacting household budgets and food security.
1.4 Recovery Period - 2023-2024
2023 - Gradual Stabilization:
Started at 9.7% (January) - carryover from 2022 crisis
Ended at 2.3% (December) - significant improvement
Annual average: 6.8%
Pattern: Steady monthly decline throughout the year
2024 - Exceptional Stability:
Annual average: 2.1% - the lowest in the five-year period
Monthly range: 0.9% (June) to 4.6% (December)
Food crops showed negative inflation (-0.4%) - actual price decreases
This period represented optimal conditions for food affordability
1.5 Current Situation - 2025
Monthly Inflation Rates - 2025:
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
5.3%
5.0%
5.4%
5.3%
5.6%
7.3%
7.6%
7.7%
7.0%
7.4%
6.6%
Key Characteristics:
Consistency: All months above 5% - no relief periods
Peak Period: June-August showing 7.3-7.7%
Acceleration: Sharp increase from 2024's 2.1% to current 6.0%
Pattern: Mid-year peaks align with seasonal agricultural cycles
2. CATEGORY BREAKDOWN ANALYSIS
2.1 Food Categories Performance
Category
2022 Peak
2023 Avg
2024 Avg
2025 (Nov)
Volatility
Food & Non-Alcoholic Beverages
9.7%
6.8%
2.1%
6.6%
High
Food Crops & Related Items
14.2%
11.3%
-0.4%
5.4%
Very High
Unprocessed Food
12.7%
9.5%
0.3%
7.0%
Very High
Processed Food (implied)
~6-7%
~5%
~3%
~6%
Moderate
2.2 Most Volatile Components
Unprocessed Food - 2024-2025 Volatility:
Period
Inflation Rate
Change
June 2024
-1.3%
Price decreases
July 2025
8.9%
Sharp spike
Total Swing
10.2 percentage points
Extreme volatility
Food Crops Index - Monthly Pattern:
Month
2024
2025
Difference
January
0.7%
-1.5%
-2.2 pp
April
0.8%
-0.9%
-1.7 pp
July
-0.9%
3.5%
+4.4 pp
November
-4.0%
5.4%
+9.4 pp
Insight: Food crops show extreme seasonal and year-to-year variations, making them the primary driver of overall food inflation volatility.
2.3 Comparison with Overall Inflation
Measure
Food Inflation
Overall (All Items) Inflation
Gap
November 2025
6.6%
3.4%
+3.2 pp
2025 Average
~6.0%
~3.3%
+2.7 pp
Critical Finding: Food inflation is running at nearly DOUBLE the overall inflation rate, indicating specific supply-side pressures in the food sector.
3. UNDERLYING FACTORS & CHALLENGES
3.1 Cost-Push Factors
Energy & Fuel Impact:
Year/Period
Energy & Fuel Inflation
Impact on Food
2022
9.1% annual average
High transport costs
2023
2.3% annual average
Stabilizing
2024
9.3% annual average
Rising pressure
2025 (Nov)
3.8%
Moderate pressure
Transport Costs:
Index Level
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025 (Nov)
Transport Index
103.34
109.63
112.72
117.42
121.50
Year-on-Year Change
-
+6.1%
+2.8%
+4.2%
+3.5%
Impact: Rising energy and transport costs directly increase food distribution expenses, passed on to consumers.
3.2 Supply-Side Challenges
Agricultural Production Instability:
Climate Dependency: Sharp swings in unprocessed food prices correlate with seasonal rainfall patterns
Post-Harvest Losses: Infrastructure gaps lead to wastage and supply constraints
Input Costs: Fertilizer and seed prices remain elevated
Infrastructure: Poor rural roads increase transport costs
3.3 Demand-Side Factors
Factor
Impact Level
Description
Population Growth
Medium
Steady demand increase 2-3% annually
Urbanization
Medium
Shift to purchased food vs subsistence
Income Growth
Low-Medium
Changing consumption patterns
Dietary Changes
Low
Gradual shift to processed foods
4. IDENTIFIED PROBLEMS & RISKS
4.1 Current Critical Issues
Problem
Evidence
Severity
Trend
Persistent High Inflation
6+ consecutive months above 6.5% in 2025
HIGH
Worsening
Extreme Volatility
Unprocessed food: -1.3% to +8.9% swing
HIGH
Stable
Energy Cost Pressure
Fuel inflation 3.5-7.9% range
MEDIUM
Fluctuating
Food-Overall Gap
Food 6.6% vs Overall 3.4%
MEDIUM-HIGH
Widening
Seasonal Vulnerability
Consistent Jun-Aug peaks
MEDIUM
Predictable
5. 2026 FORECAST - DETAILED PROJECTIONS
5.1 Base Case Monthly Forecast - 2026
Detailed Monthly Projections:
Month
Forecast
Range
Key Drivers
Risk Level
January
6.8%
6.5-7.0%
Post-holiday demand, carryover from 2025
Medium
February
6.2%
5.8-6.5%
Pre-harvest tightening, seasonal low
Medium
March
6.5%
6.2-6.8%
Supply anticipation, input cost increases
Medium
April
7.0%
6.7-7.3%
Lean season begins, stocks depleting
Medium-High
May
7.5%
7.2-7.8%
Peak lean season, pre-harvest price spikes
Medium-High
June
8.0%
7.5-8.5%
Supply tightening, early harvest delays
High
July
8.5%
8.0-9.0%
ANNUAL PEAK - typical seasonal high
High
August
8.0%
7.5-8.5%
New harvest begins, gradual easing
High
September
7.2%
6.8-7.5%
Harvest supplies increase, prices moderate
Medium-High
October
6.8%
6.5-7.2%
Post-harvest stabilization
Medium
November
6.5%
6.2-6.8%
Abundant supply, festival demand
Medium
December
6.8%
6.5-7.2%
Year-end demand, holiday effects
Medium
Quarterly Summary:
Quarter
Average
Peak
Status
Q1 2026
6.5%
6.8% (Jan)
Moderate start
Q2 2026
7.5%
8.0% (Jun)
Rising pressure
Q3 2026
7.9%
8.5% (Jul)
CRITICAL PERIOD
Q4 2026
6.7%
6.8% (Oct/Dec)
Stabilizing
ANNUAL
7.1%
8.5% (Jul)
Moderate-High
5.2 Category-Specific Forecasts
Food Categories - 2026 Projections:
Category
Annual Avg
Peak Month
Volatility
Key Factors
Food & Non-Alcoholic Beverages
7.1%
8.5% (Jul)
High
Overall basket driver
Food Crops
8.5%
11.0% (Jul)
Very High
Weather dependency
Unprocessed Food
9.0%
11.5% (Jul-Aug)
Very High
Seasonal production
Processed Food
5.5%
6.5% (Jun)
Moderate
Input cost driven
Restaurants/Accommodation
4.5%
5.0% (Dec)
Low
Service component
Other Influential Categories:
Category
2026 Forecast
Impact on Food
Energy & Fuel
6.5-8.0%
High - transport costs
Transport
4.0-5.0%
High - distribution
Housing/Utilities
4.5-5.5%
Medium - overhead costs
The relationship between government revenue and borrowing in Tanzania from 2020 to 2025 reveals how fiscal policy has been used strategically to stabilize the economy, finance development, and manage shocks. Over this period, Tanzania’s revenue grew significantly—from TZS 21.81 trillion in 2020 to TZS 31.49 trillion in 2024, representing a 44.4% increase, driven by stronger tax administration, digital systems at TRA, expanding mining exports, and a recovering services sector. The projected TZS 32.77 trillion in 2025 (annualized from January–September data) shows slower growth of 4.1%, reflecting election-year disruptions and agricultural impacts from El Niño. Read More: Tanzania Government Revenue at 87.2% of Target, Spending at 71.9%
Despite this progress, revenue growth alone was insufficient to cover rising expenditures on infrastructure, social services, and economic recovery. As a result, borrowing became a critical fiscal tool, totaling approximately TZS 56.5 trillion between 2020 and 2024. Borrowing peaked in 2021 at 49.2% of revenue due to COVID-19 recovery spending, then stabilized around 33–36% in later years as revenue improved and the economy regained momentum—reaching 5.5% growth in 2024, with 6% projected for 2025.
A statistical analysis shows a moderate positive correlation of 0.63 (63%) between revenue and borrowing from 2020–2025, meaning that about 40% of changes in borrowing are explained by changes in revenue. This indicates that as revenue increases, borrowing capacity strengthens because lenders view rising revenue as a sign of repayment ability. At the same time, borrowing fills revenue gaps to sustain public investment, creating a growth loop where debt-financed projects expand future revenue potential.
This relationship has been central to financing major development priorities. Borrowing funded large-scale infrastructure such as railways, energy projects, and port modernization, which collectively accounted for 60% of development expenditure. These investments helped reduce poverty—from 27% in 2022 to 25% in 2024—and improved human capital outcomes. However, rising domestic borrowing at interest rates of 13–15% poses risks of crowding out private sector credit, while revenue-to-GDP ratios (14–15%) remain below the Sub-Saharan African average (16%), highlighting structural constraints like informality.
Overall, Tanzania’s revenue–borrowing interaction during 2020–2025 shows a carefully managed fiscal balance: borrowing enabled continued development and shock absorption while staying within sustainable debt limits (public debt at 48% of GDP, below the IMF’s 55% benchmark). Strengthening domestic revenue—especially through improved compliance, digital taxation, and property tax reforms—remains essential for reducing borrowing dependence and enhancing long-term economic sustainability.
Year
Total Revenue (Trillion TZS)
% Change YoY
Revenue as % of GDP
Total Borrowing (Trillion TZS)
Borrowing as % of Revenue
Borrowing as % of GDP
Fiscal Deficit (% GDP)
Nominal GDP (Trillion TZS)
2020
21.81
-
15.8%
5.99
27.5%
4.3%
-4.5%
138.0
2021
23.98
+9.9%
15.0%
11.80
49.2%
7.4%
-6.8%
160.0
2022
25.92
+8.1%
14.7%
9.00
34.7%
5.1%
-3.5%
176.0
2023
28.45
+9.8%
14.2%
10.18
35.8%
5.1%
-3.0%
200.0
2024
31.49
+10.7%
14.0%
10.54
33.5%
4.7%
-2.5%
225.0
2025*
32.77 (proj.)
+4.1%
13.7% (proj.)
11.72 (proj.)
35.8%
4.6% (proj.)
-3.0% (proj.)
255.0 (proj.)
*2025: Annualized from Jan-Sept data (revenue: 24.58T × 12/9; borrowing: 8.79T × 12/9). GDP projections assume 6% real growth + 3.5% inflation; fiscal deficit per IMF. Sources: Document data; GDP/fiscal metrics from World Bank, Bank of Tanzania, and IMF estimates.
Revenue Composition and Growth Drivers
Cumulative Growth: 44.4% from 2020-2024, with steady 8-11% YoY increases. Taxes formed ~80% of revenue, boosted by base-broadening (e.g., property and carbon taxes) and ICT investments at the Tanzania Revenue Authority, including the Tanzania Customs Integrated System (TANCIS). Nontax revenues (e.g., SOE dividends, grants) contributed 2-3% of GDP. 2024's 10.7% rise was linked to mining royalties and improved VAT collection efficiency (~40%).
2025 Partial Data: The 24.58 trillion TZS for Jan-Sept indicates tempered growth, possibly due to delayed collections from the October 2025 elections and El Niño effects on agriculture. Annualized projections suggest tax-to-GDP at ~15%, but risks include softer global commodity prices.
Challenges: High informality (>50% of the economy) limits upside; grants declined to 0.3% of GDP after 2023 as donors pivoted to loans.
Borrowing Composition and Sources
Foreign Borrowing (Cumulative 2020-2024: ~29T, 58%): Focused on development projects (80-85%, e.g., 4.84 trillion TZS in 2024 for ports and rail). Program loans (15-20%) provided budget support. Mostly concessional (grant element >40%) from multilaterals like the World Bank, with low interest (~1.5%). In Jan-Sept 2025, 5.79 trillion TZS leaned toward programs (37%) tied to reforms.
Domestic Borrowing (Cumulative: ~21.5T, 42%): Through Treasury bills and bonds; it peaked in 2022 (4.69T) amid liquidity strains but fell in 2023 and 2025 with stronger revenues. 2024 saw 4.25 trillion TZS at rates of 13-15%. Domestic debt service rose to 31% of revenue in FY2023/24 and is projected at 34% for FY2024/25.
Overall Trend: Borrowing fell -23.7% YoY from 2021-2022, then grew modestly (+3.6% in 2023-2024), supporting infrastructure (e.g., Julius Nyerere Hydropower Project, targeting 2.1GW completion by late 2025). 2025 trends mirror this, with foreign outpacing domestic (66:34 split).
The Relationship Between Revenue and Borrowing
This relationship illustrates how Tanzania's government uses borrowing to close budget gaps, enabling development investments without compromising fiscal stability. The data shows a strategic, symbiotic dynamic: borrowing covered 27-49% of revenues, funding development spending (8-10% of GDP) while revenues gradually strengthened to reduce dependency.
Deficit Financing Role: Borrowing filled 27-49% of revenue shortfalls, allowing total expenditures of 18-20% of GDP (recurrent: 11%, development: 8%). Absent this, development outlays would have been slashed—as in 2021's 49.2% ratio, which financed stimulus for health and social aid, aiding GDP rebound from 4.8% (2020) to 5.5% (2024). In 2024, the lower 33.5% ratio reflected revenue buoyancy, narrowing the deficit to -2.5% of GDP; 2025 projections hold at -3% amid supplementary spending.
Counter-Cyclical Function: Borrowing surged +96.9% from 2020-2021 (vs. +10% revenue growth) during shocks, then stabilized (-14.5 percentage points drop 2021-2022). This buffered volatility, with foreign development loans yielding high multipliers (1.8x GDP impact per IMF estimates) in productive areas like energy, where demand grew 7% YoY in 2024.
Sustainability and Risks: The ~35% ratio stabilization post-2021 demonstrates prudence, with public debt at 48% of GDP in 2024 (below thresholds). Debt service remains manageable at ~12% of revenue, but domestic borrowing elevates costs (crowding out private sector; FDI at 1.5% of GDP in 2024). Analyses suggest reaching 16% revenue-to-GDP via reforms could cut borrowing needs to <30%, supporting 7% growth.
Equity and Growth Linkages: Borrowing prioritized sectors like health/education (7% of GDP in 2024, +6% YoY), trimming poverty from 27% (2022) to 25% (2024) and improving equity (post-transfer Gini at 0.33). However, inefficiencies (15% spending waste) and regressive subsidies limit poverty reduction to 2-3% annually. Productive debt use has enhanced human capital (HCI score to 0.42 in 2024).
Implications for Tanzania's Economic Development
The revenue-borrowing nexus has been a catalyst for shared growth, positioning Tanzania for middle-income status (projected GDP per capita ~USD 1,400 by 2025 end).
Positive Enablers: Combined, they fueled an infrastructure surge (60% of development spend), lifting exports to 16% of GDP in 2024 and employment growth (4% in 2023-2024). Debt-financed projects aligned with 6%+ GDP targets, gradually easing poverty through social programs.
Challenges and Reforms: Revenue weaknesses (tax gap: 6% of GDP) compel borrowing, but high ratios during shocks pushed debt to 48% of GDP, squeezing space amid global tightening. Domestic borrowing crowded out private credit (growth slowed to 15% in 2024 from 20%), impeding diversification (agriculture still 28% of GDP).
Forward Outlook (2026+): With debt at ~49% of GDP and reserves covering 5 months of imports, sustainability is viable if revenues reach 15.5% of GDP through digital taxation and property reforms. Emphasizing concessional loans for climate-resilient projects could boost growth to 7%, trimming borrowing to <30% of revenue.
In summary, the interplay between revenue and borrowing has enabled growth by financing deficits for development while upholding sustainability. Strengthening domestic revenues is essential to lessen reliance, ensuring long-term fiscal health and equitable progress. For FY2025/26 updates (post-October elections), consult Ministry of Finance or Bank of Tanzania reports.
Correlation Between Government Revenue and Borrowing in Tanzania (2020-2025)
To address the query—"Does what we borrow and collect (revenue) have a correlation? What is the correlation percentage, and what does it mean economically?"—this section analyzes the statistical relationship between total annual revenue and total borrowing using the provided data. A Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated, which measures the linear relationship between the two variables on a scale from -1 (perfect negative) to +1 (perfect positive). The analysis uses full-year data for 2020-2024 and annualized figures for 2025 (based on January-September data multiplied by 12/9 to estimate the full year).
Data Table
The table below presents the key figures in trillions of TZS for readability (original data in millions TZS, divided by 1,000,000). This allows clear visualization of trends alongside the correlation computation.
Year
Total Revenue (Trillion TZS)
Total Borrowing (Trillion TZS)
Borrowing as % of Revenue
2020
21.81
5.99
27.5%
2021
23.98
11.80
49.2%
2022
25.92
9.00
34.7%
2023
28.45
10.18
35.8%
2024
31.49
10.54
33.5%
2025*
32.77
11.72
35.8%
*2025: Annualized from January-September data. Sources: Provided document; calculations via statistical analysis.
Correlation Analysis
Does a Correlation Exist? Yes, there is a moderate positive correlation between revenue and borrowing. As revenues increase over time, borrowing tends to rise as well, though not in lockstep.
Correlation Percentage: The Pearson correlation coefficient is 0.63, equivalent to 63% (rounded to two decimals). This indicates a moderately strong linear relationship—about 40% of the variation in borrowing can be explained by changes in revenue (R² = 0.63² ≈ 0.40).
Interpretation: Values above 0.5 suggest a meaningful positive link, but below 0.8-0.9 means other factors (e.g., economic shocks, policy decisions) also influence borrowing.
Economic Meaning
Economically, this 63% correlation highlights a symbiotic but balanced fiscal dynamic in Tanzania's development trajectory:
Complementary Growth Driver: Higher revenues (from taxes and economic expansion) enable more borrowing capacity without distress, as lenders view stronger collections as a repayment buffer. Conversely, borrowing fills revenue gaps to fund essential investments (e.g., infrastructure, health), boosting GDP growth (5-6% annually) and future revenues in a virtuous cycle. For instance, the 2021 spike (revenue +10%, borrowing +97%) shows borrowing amplifying recovery efforts during low-revenue shocks.
Sustainability Signal: The moderate strength (not >80%) implies prudent management—borrowing doesn't balloon unchecked with revenues but stabilizes (~35% ratio post-2021), keeping debt at sustainable levels (48% of GDP in 2024). This avoids "debt traps" common in low-income countries, where weak correlations lead to over-reliance (e.g., >50% ratios persisting).
Development Implications: In Tanzania's context, it supports inclusive growth: Productive borrowing (e.g., foreign loans for projects with 1.5-2x GDP multipliers) enhances revenue potential via job creation and exports, reducing poverty (down ~2% annually). However, pushing the correlation higher through revenue reforms (to 16% of GDP) could lower borrowing needs, freeing space for private investment and accelerating middle-income transition (projected USD 1,400 per capita by 2026).
Risks if Unaddressed: A weakening correlation (e.g., if revenues stagnate due to informality) could signal fiscal strain, raising costs (domestic rates 13-15%) and crowding out private credit, slowing diversification from agriculture (28% of GDP).
This correlation underscores borrowing as a strategic tool—not a crutch—for sustaining development amid revenue constraints, with ongoing reforms key to strengthening the link for long-term resilience.