Tanzania's macroeconomic position in November 2025 demonstrated remarkable resilience, characterized by a strengthening shilling and prudent debt management. The Tanzanian Shilling appreciated significantly from TZS 2,460.54/USD in October to TZS 2,444.81/USD in November, representing a monthly gain of TZS 15.73. More impressively, the currency recorded an 8.1% year-on-year appreciation, reversing the 6.3% depreciation witnessed in late 2024.
This currency stability was underpinned by robust export performance, particularly gold exports which surged 42.1%, alongside overall export growth of 13.1%. The Interbank Foreign Exchange Market (IFEM) showed increased activity with turnover rising to USD 158.7 million, while the Bank of Tanzania strategically sold USD 52.5 million net to smooth market volatility without distorting fundamentals.
National debt management remained disciplined, with total debt standing at USD 51.9 billion and recording modest monthly growth of just 0.4%. Although external debt accounts for 69.7% of the total—predominantly USD-denominated—the appreciating shilling has reduced exchange-rate risks and debt-servicing pressures. Strong foreign reserves of USD 6.43 billion, equivalent to 4.9 months of import cover, ensure debt service obligations are comfortably met.
✅ Positive Reinforcement Cycle
Strong exports → FX inflows → Shilling appreciation → Lower debt servicing costs → Increased confidence → More investment
This virtuous cycle demonstrates effective policy coordination between export promotion, currency management, and fiscal discipline.
Tanzania Shilling Exchange Rate Performance
Indicator
October 2025
November 2025
Change
Average Exchange Rate (TZS/USD)
2,460.54
2,444.81
▼ 15.73 (Appreciation)
Month-on-Month Change
—
Shilling Strengthened by 0.64%
Year-on-Year Change
—
+8.1% Appreciation (Reversed 6.3% depreciation from Nov 2024)
📈 Exchange Rate Analysis
Sustained Appreciation Trend: The TZS gained 8.1% year-on-year, reversing previous depreciation and signaling restored confidence
High USD Exposure (66.8%): Makes shilling stability critical for debt sustainability. Every 1% depreciation increases TZS-equivalent debt servicing costs.
Current Mitigation: The 8.1% shilling appreciation has reduced exchange rate risk and lowered the TZS cost of servicing USD-denominated debt, creating favorable conditions for debt management.
The November 2025 data reveals a robust and mutually reinforcing relationship between Tanzania's currency stability and national debt management. The Tanzanian Shilling's 8.1% year-on-year appreciation, driven by strong export performance—particularly the 42.1% surge in gold exports—has created favorable conditions for managing the country's USD 51.9 billion debt portfolio.
Key achievements include:
Currency Strength
The appreciating shilling reduces the TZS-equivalent cost of servicing USD-denominated external debt (66.8% of external debt), directly improving debt sustainability metrics.
Controlled Debt Growth
Modest 0.4% monthly debt accumulation demonstrates fiscal discipline while meeting development financing needs through positive net flows.
Export-Driven Resilience
Strong export earnings (13.1% growth) generate sufficient FX to comfortably meet debt service obligations without depleting reserves.
Strategic Diversification
Increasing domestic financing (30.3% of total debt) through long-term TZS bonds reduces exchange rate vulnerability and rollover risks.
🌟 The Virtuous Cycle of Stability
Strong exports → FX inflows → Shilling appreciation → Lower debt servicing costs → Improved fiscal space → Increased investor confidence → More foreign investment → Further economic growth
This positive reinforcement cycle, supported by prudent monetary policy, adequate foreign reserves (USD 6.43 billion), and effective Bank of Tanzania interventions, positions Tanzania favorably for sustained macroeconomic stability. The country's financial architecture demonstrates resilience against external shocks while maintaining the flexibility needed for continued development financing.
As of November 2025, Tanzania's government domestic debt stands at TZS 38.36 trillion, supported by a stable and diversified creditor base that ensures predictable budget financing and fiscal resilience. The debt structure is dominated by institutional investors, with commercial banks (28.6%) and pension funds (27.4%) collectively holding 56.0% of total domestic debt, providing market depth and long-term stability.
Key Structural Advantage
All domestic debt instruments are denominated in Tanzania shillings, completely eliminating foreign exchange risk and providing a crucial buffer against the currency vulnerabilities present in external debt (which is 66.8% USD-denominated). This structure, combined with growing retail investor participation (14.6%), demonstrates a mature and sustainable domestic financing framework.
Strategic Importance:
Tanzania's domestic debt market serves as a cornerstone of fiscal stability, reducing dependence on external financing while mobilizing domestic savings. The institutional dominance and zero FX risk position make it a strategic asset for sustainable budget financing and macroeconomic stability.
1. Creditor Composition Analysis
The creditor structure reveals a well-balanced distribution across institutional investors, the central bank, and retail participants, creating a resilient and diversified funding base.
Creditor Category
Amount (TZS Billion)
Percentage Share
Commercial Banks
10,979.9
28.6%
Pension Funds
10,503.3
27.4%
Retail Investors
5,609.8
14.6%
Bank of Tanzania (BoT)
5,671.5
14.8%
Other Financial Institutions
5,596.8
14.6%
Total Domestic Debt
38,361.3
100%
Market Structure:
The combined 56% share held by commercial banks and pension funds represents a stable, long-term investor base that aligns with Tanzania's increasing reliance on longer-tenor Treasury bonds. This institutional dominance significantly reduces rollover and refinancing risks compared to short-term or volatile holders.
2. Creditor Role & Market Implications
Each creditor category plays a distinct role in maintaining the stability and functionality of Tanzania's domestic debt market.
Creditor Group
Role in Market
Fiscal & Financial Implication
Commercial Banks
Largest single holder providing liquidity
Ensures market depth but requires monitoring for potential crowding-out of private credit
Pension Funds
Long-term institutional investors
Supports longer-term debt sustainability through stable, patient capital
Bank of Tanzania
Monetary authority operations
Reflects liquidity management rather than fiscal monetization
Other Financial Institutions
Insurance & investment entities
Enhances overall market depth and diversification
Retail Investors
Individuals & small investors
Promotes financial inclusion and domestic savings mobilization
3. Key Structural Indicators
Critical metrics that define the health and sustainability of Tanzania's domestic debt market.
✓ Positive Indicators
Institutional Holdings56.0%
Retail Participation14.6%
FX RiskZero
Creditor DiversificationAdequate
⚠ Monitoring Areas
Central Bank Exposure14.8%
Bank Dependence28.6%
Crowding-Out RiskModerate
AssessmentContained
Balanced Assessment:
While commercial banks hold a significant 28.6% share, the strong private sector credit growth of 18.1% (as of November 2025) suggests that crowding-out effects are currently contained. The moderate BoT holding of 14.8% indicates limited inflationary monetary financing risk.
4. Sustainability Assessment Framework
Sustainability Dimension
Assessment
Policy Implication
Creditor Diversification
Adequate
Reduces refinancing risk through multiple funding sources
Dependence on Banks
Moderate
Requires ongoing monitoring of crowding-out effects on private credit
Pension Fund Role
Strong
Supports long-term stability through patient institutional capital
Foreign Exchange Risk
None
Shields domestic debt from exchange-rate shocks and currency volatility
Retail Participation
Growing
Broadens savings mobilization and enhances financial inclusion
Market Depth
Substantial
Supports predictable budget financing and market stability
5. Strategic Strengths & Considerations
Core Strengths
Stable investor base with 56% institutional holdings
Zero foreign exchange risk through TZS denomination
Strong pension fund involvement ensuring long-term stability
Limited monetary financing risk from central bank
Monitoring Priorities
Commercial bank holdings at 28.6% requiring crowding-out vigilance
Balance between government borrowing and private sector credit
Maintaining competitive yields to sustain investor demand
Continued development of retail investor participation channels
Refinancing capacity during periods of fiscal pressure
Coordination between fiscal policy and monetary operations
6. Integration with Broader Fiscal Framework
Complementing External Debt Profile
Tanzania's domestic debt structure provides a crucial counterbalance to external debt dynamics. While external debt (USD 36.1 billion) carries significant currency risk with 66.8% USD denomination, the domestic debt market offers a risk-free alternative in currency terms. This dual structure enables:
Risk Diversification: Balancing FX-exposed external debt with TZS-denominated domestic obligations
Fiscal Flexibility: Multiple funding sources reducing dependence on any single market
Market Development: Deepening domestic capital markets and financial intermediation
Savings Mobilization: Channeling domestic savings into productive government investment
Alignment with November 2025 Macro Trends
The domestic debt structure aligns with broader positive macroeconomic trends observed in November 2025: high demand and oversubscription in government securities auctions, reliance on domestic financing for 82.3% of development spending, ample banking system liquidity, falling bond yields, and strong private sector credit growth of 18.1%. These factors collectively reinforce fiscal sustainability and reduce external financing vulnerabilities.
Contribution to Overall Debt Sustainability
With total national debt at approximately TZS 126.7 trillion (combining external and domestic), the domestic component represents roughly 30% of total obligations. This balanced portfolio, combined with the structural strengths identified above, supports Tanzania's overall debt sustainability framework and reduces vulnerability to external shocks.
7. Policy Recommendations & Outlook
Continue Current Practices
Maintain institutional investor engagement through competitive pricing
Expand retail investor channels and financial literacy programs
Preserve TZS denomination to eliminate FX risk
Support longer-tenor bond issuance matching investor preferences
Ensure transparent and predictable debt management operations
Areas for Enhancement
Monitor and manage potential crowding-out of private credit
Further diversify creditor base beyond current concentrations
Develop secondary market liquidity for government securities
Strengthen coordination between fiscal and monetary authorities
Enhance debt management capacity and risk monitoring systems
Tanzania's government domestic debt structure as of November 2025 represents a mature, well-diversified, and sustainable financing framework. With total domestic debt of TZS 38.36 trillion, the market is characterized by strong institutional participation (56% from banks and pension funds), growing retail investor engagement (14.6%), and complete insulation from foreign exchange risk through TZS denomination.
The moderate 14.8% Bank of Tanzania holding reflects prudent liquidity management rather than inflationary monetary financing, while the 28.6% commercial bank share, though substantial, has not prevented robust private sector credit growth of 18.1%. This balance demonstrates effective fiscal management that supports both government financing needs and private sector development.
Looking forward, maintaining this stable creditor structure, expanding retail participation, and ensuring continued institutional confidence through transparent debt management will be essential. The domestic debt market serves as a strategic complement to external financing, providing a currency risk-free buffer that strengthens Tanzania's overall fiscal resilience and macroeconomic stability. When combined with disciplined fiscal policy and strong export performance, Tanzania's domestic debt framework positions the country well for sustainable economic development and financial stability.
How Policy Reforms and Sectoral Performance Shield Tanzania's Economy in 2024/25
Strategic economic management drives resilience amid global uncertainty, delivering robust growth and macroeconomic stability
5.5%Real GDP Growth
3.1%Average Inflation
2.7%Fiscal Deficit
4.8Months Import Cover
In an era marked by global economic fragility, high interest rates, geopolitical tensions, and climate-related shocks, Tanzania demonstrated remarkable economic resilience in 2024/25. The country achieved real GDP growth of 5.5 percent, up from 5.1 percent in the previous year, while maintaining low inflation averaging 3.1 percent and improving its fiscal and external positions. This performance reflects the success of deliberate policy reforms and strong sectoral contributions across agriculture, mining, construction, and services.
Overview: Tanzania's Economic Performance in 2024/25
Tanzania outperformed several peer economies in Sub-Saharan Africa despite challenging global conditions. The economy's resilience was built on coordinated policy responses between monetary and fiscal authorities, enhanced financial sector regulation, and broad-based sectoral growth. The Bank of Tanzania maintained a balanced monetary stance with the Central Bank Rate at 6 percent, supporting private sector credit growth of 15.4 percent without triggering inflation.
Key Achievement: Tanzania successfully balanced growth acceleration with price stability, reduced fiscal imbalances, and strengthened external buffers—demonstrating that well-calibrated policies and diversified growth can shield economies from global volatility.
Five Pillars of Tanzania's Economic Resilience
1. Policy Reforms & Business Environment
Implementation of reforms enhanced the business climate through better governance, infrastructure investments, and improved policy coordination. The introduction of fintech regulatory sandboxes and financial complaints resolution systems deepened financial inclusion, with the Financial Inclusion Index rising to 0.81 from 0.72.
Impact: Sovereign credit ratings affirmed at Moody's B1 (stable) and Fitch B+ (stable), reflecting enhanced policy credibility.
2. Robust Sectoral Performance
Agriculture benefited from favorable weather and government interventions for productivity. Mining expanded with increased gold output supporting export earnings. Construction remained strong through sustained public infrastructure investment. Services, particularly tourism and digital finance, recorded significant expansion.
Impact: Tourist arrivals increased 10 percent to 2,193,322, strengthening services exports and the balance of payments.
3. Prudent Monetary & Fiscal Policy
Coordinated policies maintained low and stable inflation while the Central Bank Rate remained at 6 percent. Fiscal alignment focused on priorities and deficit reduction through improved revenue mobilization.
Impact: Tax revenue to GDP rose to 13.1 percent from 12.5 percent, while fiscal deficit narrowed to 2.7 percent from 3.1 percent of GDP.
4. Improved External Sector
Export earnings rose sharply to USD 9.9 billion, driven by gold, tourism, manufactured goods, and agricultural commodities. Imports moderated due to stable global prices, while foreign reserves strengthened significantly.
Impact: Current account deficit narrowed to 2.4 percent from 3.4 percent of GDP, with reserves providing 4.8 months of import cover.
5. Stable Financial Sector
Sound banking sector with improved asset quality, profitability, and regulatory oversight. Advancements in microfinance and digital lending expanded financial access.
Impact: Non-performing loans fell to 3.3 percent from 4.1 percent, while return on assets reached 5.4 percent and commercial banks increased to 35.
Key Economic Indicators: 2023/24 vs 2024/25
Indicator
2023/24
2024/25
Change
Real GDP Growth (Mainland)
5.1%
5.5%
+0.4 pp
Headline Inflation (annual avg)
3.1%
3.1%
Stable
Current Account Deficit (% GDP)
-3.4%
-2.4%
Improved by 1.0 pp
Fiscal Deficit (% GDP)
3.1%
2.7%
Narrowed by 0.4 pp
Foreign Reserves (USD million)
5,345.5
5,971.5
+626 million
Import Cover (months)
4.0
4.8
+0.8 months
Exchange Rate Depreciation
8.5%
4.6%
Slowed by 3.9 pp
Private Sector Credit Growth
—
15.4%
Strong expansion
Tax Revenue (% GDP)
12.5%
13.1%
+0.6 pp
External Sector Performance
Tanzania's external position improved markedly in 2024/25, reflecting both policy effectiveness and favorable sectoral dynamics. Export diversification and tourism growth contributed to a significant reduction in the current account deficit.
USD 9.9BTotal Export Earnings (up from USD 7.8B)
USD 4.0BGold Exports (up from USD 3.1B)
-2.4%Current Account Deficit to GDP (improved from -3.4%)
2.19MTourist Arrivals (10% increase)
Financial Sector Stability and Inclusion
The financial sector demonstrated resilience with improved soundness indicators. Key regulatory reforms, including fintech frameworks and consumer protection measures, enhanced market efficiency and deepened financial inclusion.
Financial Soundness Ratio
2024
2025
Benchmark
Tier 1 Capital/TRWA+OBSE
18.6%
18.8%
Well above minimum
Total Capital/TRWA+OBSE
19.3%
19.4%
Strong capitalization
Gross NPLs to Gross Loans
4.1%
3.3%
Improved asset quality
Return on Assets
5.7%
5.4%
Healthy profitability
Return on Equity
27.3%
25.0%
Strong returns
Financial Inclusion Index (TanFiX)
0.72
0.81
Significant improvement
Sectoral Contributions to Growth
Tanzania's growth was broad-based, with multiple sectors contributing to the 5.5 percent GDP expansion. Agriculture remained a primary driver benefiting from favorable weather, while mining saw increased output particularly in gold production. Construction activity was boosted by public infrastructure investments, and the services sector expanded significantly.
Tourism Highlight: The sector recorded a 10 percent increase in arrivals to 2,193,322 visitors, contributing approximately 20 percent to overall growth and significantly strengthening services exports and the balance of payments position.
Monetary and Fiscal Policy Coordination
The success of Tanzania's economic performance in 2024/25 rested heavily on effective coordination between monetary and fiscal authorities. The Bank of Tanzania maintained the Central Bank Rate at 6 percent throughout the year, supporting credit expansion while keeping inflation anchored. Meanwhile, fiscal reforms improved domestic revenue mobilization, allowing the government to fund priority spending while reducing the deficit.
Inflation Component (Annual %)
2023/24
2024/25
Headline Inflation
3.1
3.1
Core Inflation
3.1
2.7
Food Inflation
3.0
4.2
Non-food Inflation
3.2
2.7
Energy and Fuel Inflation
5.3
7.5
Policy Reforms and Their Impact
Several targeted policy reforms contributed to the improved business environment and economic resilience:
Reform Initiative
Description
Impact/Outcome
Fintech Regulatory Sandbox
Testing ground for innovative financial technologies in controlled environment
Enhanced interoperability and efficiency; contributed to TanFiX rising to 0.81 from 0.72
Financial Complaints Resolution System
System for resolving consumer complaints in financial sector
Improved affordability, price transparency, and consumer protection
Guidelines on Fees and Charges
Standardized pricing for banks and financial institutions
Promoted transparency and reduced costs for consumers
Structural Monetary Policy Reforms
Deepening financial markets and enhancing policy transparency
Supported GDP growth of 5.5%; sovereign ratings affirmed
Outlook and Implications
Tanzania's experience in 2024/25 demonstrates that developing economies can maintain resilience amid global uncertainty through well-calibrated policy reforms and diversified sectoral growth. The country's success in balancing growth acceleration with price stability, reducing fiscal imbalances, and strengthening external buffers provides a model for sustainable economic management.
Looking ahead, projections indicate continued momentum with GDP growth expected to reach 6 percent in 2025, supported by sustained policy coordination, ongoing infrastructure investments, and continued sectoral diversification. The strengthened foreign reserves position and improved current account balance provide crucial buffers against potential external shocks.
Key Takeaway: Rather than relying on a single growth driver, Tanzania leveraged coordinated policies, improved institutional frameworks, and broad-based sectoral contributions to sustain growth, maintain stability, and strengthen confidence in its economic outlook. This multi-faceted approach proved critical in navigating global headwinds while advancing domestic development priorities.
This comprehensive analysis is based on data from the Bank of Tanzania Annual Report 2024/25. For detailed insights on Tanzania's economic performance, policy frameworks, and development strategies, explore our complete research library at TICGL.
Is Tanzania's Economy Growing? 2025 Economic Analysis & GDP Growth Report
Is Tanzania's Economy Growing?
A Comprehensive Analysis of Economic Performance, Growth Drivers, and Structural Challenges
Report Period: 1999-2025
Latest Data: 2025
Source: TICGL Economic Research
Introduction
Over the past two decades, Tanzania has emerged as one of East Africa's most consistently growing economies, demonstrating resilience amid global and regional economic shocks. Since 1999, the country has recorded annual GDP growth ranging between 4.5% and 7.7%, with only one major disruption in 2020 when growth slowed to 2.0% due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Growth has rebounded strongly to 4.3% in 2021, 4.7% in 2022, 5.3% in 2023, and 5.5% in 2024, with Q1 2025 recording 5.4% growth driven primarily by mining, electricity generation, and financial services. Tanzania's GDP has expanded from USD 75.5 billion in 2022 to an estimated USD 78.8-83 billion in 2024, projected to reach USD 88 billion in 2025.
Key Finding: While Tanzania's economy is undeniably growing with strong macroeconomic fundamentals, the central challenge remains translating sustained expansion into faster structural transformation, stronger domestic revenue mobilization, and broader improvements in living standards.
Tanzania has demonstrated consistent economic growth for over two decades, with growth rates between 4.5% and 7.7% annually from 1999-2024. The only significant disruption occurred in 2020 due to COVID-19. The average annual GDP growth from 2000-2024 stands at approximately 6.2%.
Economic Size and Regional Position
Tanzania's GDP Evolution
Metric
2022
2024
2025 (Projected)
GDP (Current USD)
$75.5 billion
$78.8-83 billion
$88 billion
GDP Per Capita
—
$1,215
$1,302
Regional Ranking
2nd in East Africa
2nd in East Africa
2nd in East Africa
Sub-Saharan Africa Ranking
7th largest
7th largest
7th largest
Tanzania has firmly positioned itself as the second-largest economy in East Africa after Kenya and the seventh largest in Sub-Saharan Africa. GDP per capita has risen to approximately $1,215 in 2024 and is expected to reach $1,302 in 2025, reflecting gradual but sustained improvements in average income levels.
Economic Structure and Sectoral Performance
Major Sectors by GDP Share (2024)
Sector
Share of GDP
Key Activities
Services
38-40%
Wholesale/retail trade (12%), Public administration (6%), Transport (5%)
Industry
28-30%
Construction (16%), Manufacturing (9%), Mining (5-9.8%)
Agriculture
26-30%
Crops (14-18%), Livestock (8%), Forestry, Fishing
Tourism
5.7%
Accommodation, food services (recovering from COVID)
Sector Growth Rates (Q3 2024)
Sector
Growth Rate
Notable Performance
Electricity
19.0%
Julius Nyerere Hydropower Plant impact
Mining & Quarrying
16.6%
Gold prices, natural gas development
Financial Services
15.4%
Banking sector expansion
Forestry
6.2%
Timber and non-wood products
Professional Services
4.2%
Technical, scientific services
Agriculture
3.0%
Crops and livestock production
Tanzania's growth is underpinned by a diversified economic structure. The services sector contributes about 38-40% of GDP, followed by industry at 28-30% and agriculture at 26-30%. However, agriculture still employs around 65% of the population, highlighting the structural transformation challenge.
Macroeconomic Stability
Inflation Performance
Year
Inflation Rate
Target/Note
2020
3.3%
Low due to pandemic
2021
3.7%
Moderate increase
2022
4.3%
Post-pandemic adjustment
2023
3.8%
Below 5% target
2024
3.3%
Well-controlled
2025
3.4% (projected)
Within 3-5% target range
Fiscal and Debt Indicators
Indicator
2022/23
2023/24
2024
Status
Fiscal Deficit (% of GDP)
3.5%
3.2%
2.5%
Improving, approaching 3% target
Tax Revenue (% of GDP)
—
—
13.1%
Low compared to peers
Public Debt (% of GDP)
43.6%
45.5%
~50%
Contained, moderate risk
Current Account Deficit
3.8%
—
2.6%
Sustainable
Banking Sector Health (2024)
Indicator
Value
Benchmark
Non-Performing Loans (NPL)
4.3%
Below 5% target ✓
Core Capital Adequacy
Well-capitalized
—
Foreign Exchange Reserves
4.5 months
Target: 4+ months ✓
Central Bank Rate
5.75%
Reduced from 6.00%
Macroeconomic stability has reinforced Tanzania's growth trajectory. Inflation has remained well contained below 5%, declining from 4.3% in 2022 to 3.3% in 2024. Fiscal performance has improved with the deficit narrowing from 3.5% of GDP in 2022/23 to about 2.5% in 2024, while public debt remains moderate at around 50% of GDP.
Primary Growth Drivers (2024-2025)
1. Infrastructure Investment
Julius Nyerere Hydropower Dam
Standard Gauge Railway (SGR)
East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP)
Bridges, flyovers, and transport infrastructure
2. Natural Resources Development
Gold mining expansion (89% of mineral exports)
Natural gas development (Ntorya gas field - 25-year license)
Diamonds and tanzanite extraction
Rising commodity prices
3. Tourism Recovery
Strong visitor arrivals post-COVID
Accommodation and food services (15.3% contribution to growth)
4. Agricultural Development
Employs 65% of population
Crops and livestock production improvements
Weather-dependent but showing resilience
5. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
Improved business environment
Growing FDI in productive sectors
Political stability attracting investment
Employment and Income Dynamics
Labor Market Evolution
Period
Agriculture Employment
Industry Employment
Services Employment
Early 1990s
84.8%
2.6%
12.6%
2022
65.0%
6.8%
29.0%
Wage Trends (2025)
Category
Mean Wage (TZS)
USD Equivalent
Change from 2020
Urban Wage
494,812
$189
Small increase
Rural Wage
367,034
$140
Small increase
Minimum Wage (Public)
500,000
$191
Raised from 370,000 (July 2025)
Unemployment Trends
Year
Official Rate
Notes
2014
10.5%
—
2021/22
9.3%
—
2024-2025
~2.5-2.6%
Low due to informal sector absorption (76-80% informal employment)
Poverty and Inequality
Poverty Indicators
Metric
Value (Latest)
Notes
National Poverty Rate
26-27%
Slower reduction in rural areas
Multidimensional Poverty Rate
~47-50% (2022-2024)
Includes health, education, living standards deprivations
Extreme Poverty ($2.15/day)
~40-43% (2023-2024)
~25-26 million people
Lower-Middle Poverty ($3-$5.50/day)
~49-70% (2024 est.)
Matches ~49% below $3/day PPP
Income Inequality (2023)
Indicator
Value
Comparison/Notes
Gini Coefficient
40.5-41 (2018-2024 est.)
Moderate-high; higher in urban areas
Top 1% Share of Income
~17.9% (2023)
Bottom 50% share only ~14.1%
Rural-Urban Gap
Significant
Urban per capita higher; rural poverty more persistent
Cost of Living Pressures (2025)
Period/Metric
Headline Inflation
Food Inflation
Notes
Overall 2025 (avg.)
~3.2-3.4%
~6.0-7.7%
Food weighs heavily in household budgets
May-August 2025
3.2-3.4%
5.6-7.7%
Staples like rice, maize, cassava drove rises
Impact on Households
Low headline masks food/energy strains
Hits poor hardest (80% informal sector)
Regional and Global Position
Wealth Rankings (2025)
Metric
Tanzania's Position
Africa's Wealthiest Countries
12th
East Africa Ranking
3rd
USD Millionaires
2,100
Centi-millionaires ($100M+)
5
Billionaires
1 (Mohammed Dewji)
Growth in Millionaires (2015-2025)
+17% (vs. Africa avg: -5%)
Vision 2050 and Future Outlook
Government Economic Targets
Vision 2050 Goals:
Achieve upper-middle-income status by 2050
Target: $1 trillion economy
Focus areas: STEM education, manufacturing, digital skills, green industries
Medium-term Projections (2025-2030)
Year
Projected GDP (Current Prices)
2025
$88 billion
2030
$117 billion
Average CAGR
5.7%
Structural Challenges and Risks
Economic Constraints
1. Revenue Generation
Tax revenue at only 13.1% of GDP (low compared to peers)
Narrow tax base
2. Structural Issues
Manufacturing share stuck at ~8% since mid-1990s
Slow structural transformation
Heavy agriculture dependence (vulnerable to climate)
3. External Risks
Geopolitical tensions
Global economic slowdown
Climate shocks
Foreign exchange shortages (Shilling depreciated 8% in 2023)
4. Infrastructure Gaps
Energy and transport bottlenecks
Need for continued investment
5. Governance Issues
Corruption challenges (though improving in 2025 indices)
Weak governance ratings
Why Do Tanzanians Experience Economic Difficulties Despite GDP Growth?
Yes, Tanzania's economy is growing steadily (around 5.5% in 2024 and projected 6% in 2025), but this headline growth has not translated into widespread improvements in living standards for most citizens. While GDP expands, poverty reduction lags, manufacturing stagnates, and growth remains non-inclusive.
Key Reasons for Persistent Economic Hardship:
High Poverty Levels: Nearly half the population lives in poverty, with limited access to basic needs
Income Inequality: Growth benefits concentrate among the wealthy and urban areas (Top 1% capture ~17.9% of income while bottom 50% receive only ~14.1%)
Cost of Living Pressures: Food prices rise faster than overall inflation (6-7.7% vs 3.3-3.4%), hitting low-income households hardest
Employment Challenges: Most jobs are informal (76-80%), low-wage, and vulnerable, especially in agriculture
Population Growth: Rapid increase (~3% annually) dilutes per capita gains
Structural Issues: Slow shift from agriculture to higher-productivity sectors limits broad prosperity
Limited Social Services: Low tax revenue (13.1% of GDP) constrains government capacity to expand social protection
Economic growth has been uneven, capital-intensive, and slow to transform livelihoods, particularly for rural and low-income populations. Growth is concentrated in sectors like mining, electricity, and finance, which generate limited employment compared to their GDP contribution.
Conclusion: Is Tanzania's Economy Growing—and Why Do Economic Hardships Persist?
The evidence clearly confirms that Tanzania's economy is growing. Over the last two decades, the country has sustained average annual GDP growth of about 6.2%, with growth rebounding strongly after the COVID-19 shock—from 2.0% in 2020 to 5.3% in 2023, 5.5% in 2024, and 5.4% in Q1 2025. In absolute terms, Tanzania's economic size has expanded from USD 75.5 billion in 2022 to a projected USD 88 billion in 2025, consolidating its position as the second-largest economy in East Africa.
Inflation has remained stable at around 3.3-3.4%, fiscal deficits have narrowed to about 2.5% of GDP, and public debt remains moderate at around 50% of GDP. By macroeconomic standards, Tanzania is therefore experiencing real, steady, and resilient economic growth.
However, the same data explains why most Tanzanians continue to experience economic difficulties despite this growth.
First, economic expansion has not been sufficiently inclusive. Although GDP per capita has risen to about USD 1,215 in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 1,302 in 2025, these gains are diluted by rapid population growth and concentrated in capital-intensive sectors such as mining, electricity, and finance, which generate limited employment. Agriculture still employs around 65% of the population, yet grows slowly (about 3.0%) and remains vulnerable to climate shocks.
Second, poverty reduction has lagged behind GDP growth. While national poverty has declined only gradually, an estimated 49% of Tanzanians still live below the international USD 3-a-day poverty line, indicating that nearly half of the population has not meaningfully benefited from aggregate growth. Income inequality further deepens this gap: the top 1% capture about 17.9% of total income, while the bottom 50% receive only 14.1%.
Third, employment and income dynamics remain weak. Most jobs are informal and low-productivity, particularly in rural areas. Mean monthly wages remain modest—about TZS 495,000 (USD 189) in urban areas and TZS 367,000 (USD 140) in rural areas—and have increased only marginally over time. Even with controlled headline inflation, food prices rise faster than overall inflation (6-7.7% vs 3.3-3.4%), placing disproportionate pressure on low-income households.
Finally, structural transformation has been slow. Manufacturing's contribution has stagnated at around 8-9% of GDP for decades, while tax revenue remains low at 13.1% of GDP, limiting the government's capacity to expand social services, support productive sectors, and cushion vulnerable groups.
In conclusion, Tanzania's economy is undeniably growing, supported by strong macroeconomic fundamentals, infrastructure investment, and sectoral diversification. However, the persistence of economic hardship among the majority of Tanzanians reflects the nature—not the absence—of growth. Growth has been uneven, capital-intensive, and slow to transform livelihoods, particularly for rural and low-income populations.
The core challenge ahead is therefore not achieving growth per se, but making growth more inclusive, employment-creating, and structurally transformative, so that rising GDP is matched by tangible improvements in living standards for the broader population.
Related Resources
💱
Why is the Tanzania Shilling Lagging Behind Africa's Strongest Currencies?
The Tanzania Shilling (TZS) continues to rank among the weaker currencies in Africa when measured by its nominal exchange rate against the US dollar. Explore the factors behind Tanzania's currency performance.
Tanzania's Public Finance Framework: Sustainability & Long-Term Development | TICGL
Tanzania's Public Finance Framework
Assessing Long-Term Sustainability and Development Potential for 2026 and Beyond
Introduction
The sustainability of public finances is increasingly critical to Tanzania's long-term development agenda as the country seeks to finance economic transformation, social development, and climate resilience while maintaining macroeconomic stability. Over the past decade, Tanzania has recorded relatively strong economic performance, with average GDP growth ranging between 6-7 percent prior to the COVID-19 shock and projected to stabilize at around 6.1-6.3 percent by 2026.
This growth has supported public revenue mobilization and allowed the government to scale up public investment, particularly in transport, energy, water, and social infrastructure. However, sustaining this momentum places growing pressure on public finances, especially in the context of rising expenditure needs and exposure to external shocks.
Key Financial Indicators (2025-2026)
Public Debt-to-GDP Ratio
49.6%
2025 (Projected decline to 48.3% in 2026)
Fiscal Deficit
-2.8%
Of GDP, stabilizing through 2026
GDP Growth Projection
6.1-6.3%
For 2026, driven by infrastructure and tourism
Government Revenue
16.8%
Of GDP in 2025/26 fiscal year
Debt Sustainability Analysis
Current Debt Position
Public debt levels in Tanzania remain manageable but have followed an upward trajectory. The public debt-to-GDP ratio increased from about 27.6 percent in 2010 to approximately 49.6 percent in 2025, reflecting expanded infrastructure investment, pandemic-related spending, and global financing conditions.
Projections indicate a modest decline to around 48.3 percent in 2026, assuming continued fiscal discipline and stable growth. While this level remains below commonly observed risk thresholds for developing economies, it narrows fiscal space and increases sensitivity to interest rate movements, exchange rate fluctuations, and revenue shortfalls.
Historical Debt Trends (2010-2026)
Key Observation: Tanzania's public debt remains sustainable, with IMF assessments as of mid-2025 indicating low distress risk, supported by concessional loans and 6-7% annual GDP growth.
Fiscal Balance Performance
Fiscal balances highlight the sustainability challenge. Tanzania has maintained fiscal deficits averaging around -2.8 percent of GDP over recent years, widening to nearly -3.9 percent in 2022 before gradually narrowing toward -2.8 percent by 2026. Although these deficits are relatively moderate, they occur alongside rising spending pressures driven by rapid population growth of over 3 percent annually, expanding demand for education, health, and urban services, and increasing costs associated with climate adaptation and infrastructure maintenance.
Fiscal Balance Trends (2010-2026)
Note: Data sourced from IMF, World Bank, and other reports; positive change indicates narrower deficit.
Analysis: Fiscal deficits have averaged -2.8% of GDP through 2023, below Sub-Saharan averages, with post-2020 widening due to pandemic support narrowing via reforms. Projections for 2026 indicate stabilization around -2.8% to -3.0%, reflecting contained deficits amid infrastructure spending.
Revenue Mobilization Progress
On the revenue side, domestic revenue mobilization has improved, with government revenues reaching approximately 16.8 percent of GDP in the 2025/26 fiscal year. Despite this progress, revenue growth continues to lag behind expenditure demands, particularly in capital-intensive sectors and social protection.
This imbalance underscores that fiscal sustainability in Tanzania cannot rely solely on revenue-enhancing measures or ad hoc spending controls, but must be anchored in stronger medium-term fiscal planning and continuous reassessment of public spending priorities.
2026 Economic Outlook
Growth Drivers and Projections
GDP Growth: 6.1-6.3% (current estimates: 6.0-6.4%)
Inflation: Approximately 3.3% (recent estimates: 3-4%)
Foreign Reserves: Around $6 billion
Tourism Rebound: Expected +20% growth
Key Sectors: Infrastructure, exports, tourism, and services
Risk Assessment: Post-2025 election turbulence could reduce growth by 5-10% if unrest occurs, impacting tourism and stability. The 2025 general elections, marked by President Samia Suluhu Hassan's landslide re-election with over 97% of the vote, have introduced uncertainties including opposition exclusions, allegations of irregularities, and post-election protests with reported violence. While the ruling CCM's strong mandate may facilitate policy continuity, political tensions could deter investment and disrupt key economic drivers.
Expenditure Pressures and Challenges
Without improvements in expenditure efficiency and prioritization, several pressures risk entrenching structural deficits over the medium term:
Rapid Population Growth: Over 3% annually, driving demand for education, health, and urban services
Climate Adaptation Costs: Up to $233 million annually in infrastructure losses
Infrastructure Maintenance: Increasing costs for transport, energy, and water systems
Social Protection: Expanding needs for vulnerable populations
Debt Servicing: Sensitivity to interest rate movements and exchange rate fluctuations
Strategic Recommendations for 2026 and Beyond
TICGL emphasizes a strategic shift toward adaptive fiscal management to balance debt sustainability with development needs, especially as 2026 approaches (post-2025 elections). Key recommendations include:
Strengthen Budget Credibility and Medium-Term Fiscal Planning
Move beyond episodic consolidation to continuous reassessment, using frameworks like FYDP III (Five-Year Development Plan III) to manage trade-offs effectively.
Improve Efficiency and Prioritization of Public Expenditure
Conduct comprehensive spending reviews, redirect resources to high-impact sectors (e.g., climate adaptation, education/health for the young population, infrastructure maintenance), and focus on "strategic reallocations" rather than broad cuts.
Enhance Domestic Revenue Mobilization
Build on progress (to 16.8% of GDP in 2025/26) with "growth-friendly" measures to close the revenue-expenditure gap without stifling economic activity.
Reinforce Institutions for Resilience
Tackle spending rigidities, improve transparency and accountability mechanisms, and evolve toward "state redesign" to better handle shocks such as commodity price fluctuations and climate-related costs.
Ensure Post-Election Stability
Prudent execution of reforms is critical; any unrest could derail projections, widening deficits and slowing growth. Swift restoration of political stability is essential for maintaining investor confidence.
Tanzania's public finance framework has demonstrated remarkable resilience in recent years, supporting robust economic growth averaging around 6% in 2024-2025 while maintaining macroeconomic stability amid global and domestic challenges. As of late 2025, public debt stands at approximately 46-48% of GDP (down slightly from peaks near 50% projected earlier), with IMF assessments confirming low risk of debt distress due to concessional financing and prudent management.
These achievements align closely with pre-2025 projections: debt stabilizing near 48%, deficits contained at -2.8 to -3.0%, and GDP growth projected at 6.1-6.3% for 2026. Revenue progress to approximately 16.8% of GDP has helped close gaps, enabling continued investment in infrastructure, education, health, and climate adaptation without breaching sustainability thresholds.
Looking Forward
As Tanzania moves toward 2026 and beyond, sustaining public finances will require a strategic shift toward more adaptive fiscal management—one that balances debt sustainability with development imperatives. Strengthening budget credibility, improving the efficiency of public expenditure, and ensuring that limited fiscal resources are consistently redirected toward high-impact sectors will be essential.
Achieving this balance will not only safeguard macroeconomic stability but also ensure that public finances remain a reliable instrument for supporting inclusive growth, economic resilience, and long-term national development. With projected GDP growth of 6.0-6.4%, low inflation (approximately 3-4%), and adequate reserves, public finances remain a solid foundation for inclusive development—if post-election stability is swiftly restored and reforms deepened.
Ultimately, evolving toward "state redesign" with greater institutional resilience will ensure Tanzania's framework not only withstands shocks but actively drives long-term transformation, safeguarding macroeconomic stability and equitable growth for its rapidly expanding population.
Conclusion
Tanzania's public finance framework stands at a critical juncture. The country has successfully maintained macroeconomic stability and achieved consistent growth while investing heavily in development infrastructure. However, the path forward requires careful navigation of competing pressures: rising expenditure needs driven by demographics and climate change, the imperative to maintain debt sustainability, and the need to expand fiscal space for development investments.
The outlook is optimistic if reforms are sustained and deepened. Achieving debt stabilization at approximately 48.3%, containing deficits at -2.8%, and supporting resilient 6+% growth in 2026 will make public finances a reliable driver for long-term development. However, vulnerabilities remain without deeper institutional changes and continued commitment to adaptive fiscal management.
The key question remains: Is Tanzania's public finance framework strong enough for long-term development? The answer is cautiously affirmative—the framework is resilient and has demonstrated capacity to support sustained growth, but its long-term strength will depend on the government's ability to implement recommended reforms, navigate post-election political dynamics, and evolve institutional capacity to meet emerging challenges.
Why Is the Tanzania Shilling Lagging Behind Africa's Strongest Currencies? - TICGL
📊 TICGL
Why Is the Tanzania Shilling Lagging Behind Africa's Strongest Currencies?
📅 December 26, 2025✍️ By TICGL Economic Research📖 Premium Economic Analysis
The Tanzania Shilling (TZS) continues to rank among the weaker currencies in Africa when measured
by its nominal exchange rate against the US dollar, raising an important economic question about
why it trails far behind Africa's strongest currencies such as the Tunisian Dinar (TND) and
Libyan Dinar (LYD). This comprehensive analysis examines the structural, policy-related, and
global factors shaping Tanzania's foreign exchange dynamics, providing insights for policymakers,
investors, businesses, and the public.
Current Exchange Rate (December 2025)
1 USD = 2,473 TZS
1 TZS ≈ 0.0004 USD
Understanding the Currency Gap
As of December 2025, 1 USD exchanges for approximately 2,473 TZS, meaning
1 TZS is worth about 0.0004 USD. In stark contrast, 1 Tunisian Dinar
equals 0.34 USD and 1 Libyan Dinar equals 0.18 USD. This wide gap
highlights not just currency performance differences, but also deeper structural and policy-related
factors shaping Tanzania's foreign exchange dynamics.
Key Factors Behind the Shilling's Position
At the core of the shilling's weakness is Tanzania's import-dependent growth model.
In 2025, the economy grew by about 6%, driven largely by infrastructure expansion,
energy projects, mining, and urban development. While this growth is positive, it has significantly
increased demand for foreign currency to pay for fuel, machinery, capital goods, and construction
materials.
Important Note: Imports rose by an estimated 5% year-on-year in 2025, intensifying
pressure on the shilling as demand for US dollars consistently outpaced supply.
Another key factor is the current account deficit, projected at around
3.2% of GDP in 2025, reflecting a persistent imbalance between export earnings
and import payments. Although Tanzania performed strongly in gold exports—earning approximately
USD 4.59 billion by October 2025—and saw recovery in tourism, these inflows
were still insufficient to fully offset the growing import bill.
Africa's Strongest Currencies: The Top 10
According to the latest data from December 2025, the currency landscape in Africa shows
significant disparities. The Tunisian Dinar (TND) leads as the strongest
currency in Africa, with 1 TND ≈ 0.34 USD (or approximately 1 USD ≈ 2.94 TND).
This strength is attributed to Tunisia's monetary discipline, controlled inflation, and restrictions
on capital outflows.
Rank
Currency
Code
Country/Region
Value (1 unit = USD)
1
Tunisian Dinar
TND
Tunisia
0.34
2
Libyan Dinar
LYD
Libya
0.18
3
Moroccan Dirham
MAD
Morocco
0.11
4
Ghanaian Cedi
GHS
Ghana
0.087
5
Botswana Pula
BWP
Botswana
0.074
6
Seychelles Rupee
SCR
Seychelles
0.070
7
Eritrean Nakfa
ERN
Eritrea
0.066
8
Namibian Dollar / Swazi Lilangeni
NAD / SZL
Namibia / Eswatini
0.060
9
Lesotho Loti
LSL
Lesotho
0.058
10
South African Rand
ZAR
South Africa
0.058
Important Clarification: Currency "strength" here refers to nominal exchange
rate value against the USD (how much USD one unit of local currency buys). It does not
necessarily reflect purchasing power, economic stability, or real-world usability.
Tanzania Shilling's Position in Africa and East Africa
The Tanzania Shilling (TZS) is among the weaker currencies in Africa nominally.
As of late December 2025, 1 USD ≈ 2,473 TZS (or 1 TZS ≈ 0.000404 USD).
This places it far below the top ranks, even weaker than lower entries like the Kenyan Shilling
at approximately 0.0077 USD per unit.
Comparison with East African and Selected African Currencies
Country
Currency
Code
1 unit = USD
1 USD = local units
Position in Africa
Tunisia
Tunisian Dinar
TND
0.34
~2.94
Strongest
Libya
Libyan Dinar
LYD
0.18
~5.41
2nd
Morocco
Moroccan Dirham
MAD
0.11
~9.09
3rd
South Africa
South African Rand
ZAR
0.058
~17.24
~10th
Kenya
Kenyan Shilling
KES
0.0077
~129.87
Lower mid
Tanzania
Tanzania Shilling
TZS
0.000404
~2,473
Weak
Rwanda
Rwandan Franc
RWF
0.00069
~1,449
Weak
In East Africa (EAC members): TZS is relatively stable but nominally weaker
than the Kenyan Shilling (KES). Uganda (UGX) and Burundi (BIF) are even weaker, with typical
values of 1 UGX ≈ 0.00027 USD. Ethiopia's Birr is also considered weak in nominal terms.
The 2025 Volatility: A Year of Challenges and Stabilization
The Tanzania Shilling (TZS) experienced notable volatility throughout 2025,
weakening significantly in the first half of the year before stabilizing and even slightly
appreciating toward the end. The shilling peaked at around 1 USD ≈ 2,700 TZS in
mid-2025, making it briefly the world's worst-performing currency,
before recovering to approximately 2,473 TZS by late December 2025. This represents an overall
annual depreciation of about 3.5% compared to the start of the year.
Main Reasons for the Weakening Throughout 2025
Several interconnected factors drove the day-to-day and monthly pressures on the TZS:
High Demand for Imports: Tanzania's rapid economic growth (around 6% GDP
in 2025) and major infrastructure projects led to a surge in imports of capital goods, fuel,
machinery, and consumer items. Imports rose by about 5% year-on-year early in 2025, creating
persistent dollar demand and straining foreign exchange reserves.
Seasonal and Cyclical Pressures: Periodic spikes occurred due to seasonal
factors, such as increased imports ahead of Ramadan, Chinese New Year supply chains, or
post-tourism peak lulls in forex inflows from tourism and cash crops.
Widening Current Account Deficit: Projected at around 3.2% of GDP in 2025,
driven by higher imports outpacing export growth despite strong performances in gold (up 38%
in value) and other commodities.
Global USD Strength and External Shocks: Lingering effects from prior US
interest rate hikes and geopolitical tensions made the dollar stronger globally, putting
pressure on emerging market currencies like the TZS.
Infrastructure-Driven Debt and Spending: Aggressive public investments
increased national debt servicing needs (much in USD) and import bills, compounding forex
outflows.
Important Note: The shilling did not weaken continuously "day by day." It
depreciated sharply in Q1-Q2 2025 but stabilized from mid-year onward thanks to proactive measures.
Factors That Helped Stabilization in Late 2025
Bank of Tanzania (BoT) Interventions: The central bank injected over
USD 175 million via forex auctions and sales, building reserves to
comfortable levels (covering approximately 4-5 months of imports).
Surge in Export Earnings: Particularly gold (reaching USD 4.59 billion
by October) and tourism recovery, boosting forex inflows.
Policy Measures: Bans on dollarization (requiring local transactions in
TZS only) and prudent monetary policy (holding policy rate at 5.75%) helped curb speculation
and maintain low inflation (approximately 3-3.5%).
Outlook for 2026: What Can We Expect?
The outlook is generally positive for relative stability or modest depreciation, supported by
Tanzania's strong fundamentals:
Key Projections and Drivers
Continued Economic Growth: IMF and World Bank project GDP growth of
6.0-6.4% in 2026, driven by infrastructure completion, mining expansion
(new gold mines), natural gas projects, and agriculture/tourism.
Expected Depreciation Rate: Analysts forecast a milder approximately
3-4% weakening (similar to or less than 2025), assuming no major shocks.
Supporting Factors for 2026
Higher export revenues from commodities and FDI inflows
Adequate forex reserves and ongoing BoT vigilance
Low and stable inflation (target 3-5%)
Potential benefits from global easing if US rates fall further
Risks to Watch in 2026
Global commodity price drops or renewed USD strength
Delays in major projects increasing import/debt pressures
Overall, while the TZS is likely to face some ongoing nominal weakening due to Tanzania's
import-dependent growth model, 2026 should see greater stability than the volatile first half
of 2025, with long-term benefits from investments potentially strengthening the currency in
real terms over time.
Global and Regional Context
Global factors have also played a significant role in the shilling's performance. The continued
strength of the US dollar, driven by high interest rates and global risk
aversion, placed pressure on emerging and frontier market currencies throughout 2025. Tanzania
was not immune to these global dynamics.
Countries with stronger currencies, such as Tunisia and Libya, rely heavily on controlled
foreign exchange systems, oil revenues, or strict limits on currency convertibility,
which support nominal currency strength but do not necessarily reflect broader economic
resilience or long-term sustainability.
The Trade-Off: Currency Strength vs. Economic Flexibility
Importantly, the shilling's weaker position does not necessarily imply economic failure. Unlike
some of Africa's strongest currencies, Tanzania operates a more flexible and
market-responsive exchange rate system, which absorbs shocks rather than masking them.
Key indicators of macroeconomic stability in 2025 include:
Inflation: Remained relatively low at around 3-3.5%
Foreign Exchange Reserves: Improved to cover 4-5 months of imports
GDP Growth: Strong at approximately 6%
Gold Exports: Reached USD 4.59 billion by October 2025
Therefore, the gap between the Tanzania Shilling and Africa's strongest currencies is best
explained by structural trade dynamics, policy choices, and openness to global
markets, rather than short-term mismanagement.
Policy Implications and the Path Forward
Understanding why the Tanzania Shilling lags behind Africa's strongest currencies is essential
not only for policymakers, but also for investors, businesses, and the public. It underscores
the trade-offs between currency strength, economic openness, and long-term growth,
and frames the broader debate on whether nominal currency strength should be the ultimate
benchmark for economic success in Tanzania's development trajectory.
Key Policy Considerations
Export Diversification: While gold exports have been strong, Tanzania needs
to diversify its export base to reduce dependence on commodity price fluctuations.
Import Substitution: Strategic investments in local manufacturing and
production capacity could reduce the persistent demand for foreign exchange.
Infrastructure Completion: Completing ongoing infrastructure projects will
eventually reduce import demand for capital goods and machinery.
Tourism Enhancement: Continued recovery and growth in tourism provides
valuable foreign exchange inflows.
Monetary Policy Balance: The Bank of Tanzania's interventions and prudent
monetary policy have proven effective in maintaining stability.
Conclusion: Strength Beyond the Exchange Rate
In conclusion, the Tanzania Shilling's position behind Africa's strongest currencies is largely
the result of structural economic realities rather than economic weakness.
Tanzania's import-driven growth model, expanding infrastructure investments, and rising demand
for foreign exchange naturally exert downward pressure on the shilling, while countries with
stronger nominal currencies often rely on strict currency controls, limited
convertibility, or resource-based inflows that artificially support exchange rates.
Despite episodes of volatility in 2025, the shilling demonstrated resilience through effective
Bank of Tanzania interventions, low and stable inflation of around
3-3.5%, improving foreign exchange reserves covering 4-5 months of
imports, and strong export performance in gold and tourism.
Therefore, while the TZS remains weak in nominal terms, it reflects a more open,
flexible, and growth-oriented economy. The real policy challenge for Tanzania is not
merely strengthening the currency's face value, but deepening export diversification,
reducing import dependence, and sustaining macroeconomic stability, which over time
will enhance the shilling's real strength and long-term economic credibility.
✅ Thank you for supporting TICGL Publication!
You now have full access to this premium economic analysis.
🔒 Unlock Full Analysis
Get complete access to comprehensive data, detailed analysis, and expert insights including:
✓ Complete currency comparison tables
✓ Detailed 2025 volatility analysis
✓ 2026 economic outlook and projections
✓ Policy implications and recommendations
✓ Expert economic insights
TZS 20,000
One-time payment for lifetime access
💳 Complete Your Payment
Step 1: Send Payment
Send TZS 20,000 to the M-Pesa number below
📱 0740900752
Send exactly TZS 20,000
Step 2: Submit Payment Details
Fill in your information below after completing the payment
🔑 Enter Your Access Code
Enter the 6-digit access code sent to you by our admin team:
⏳ Payment Details Submitted Successfully!
Your payment is being verified by our admin team.
Reference Number:
You will receive a 6-digit access code via SMS within 24 hours.
Once you receive the code, click the button below to unlock the article.
Over the past decade, Tanzania’s external debt has expanded rapidly, reflecting both the country’s ambitious development agenda and growing reliance on external financing to bridge fiscal and infrastructure gaps. According to the International Debt Report 2025, Tanzania’s total external debt stock increased more than fourfold—from US$8.9 billion in 2010 to US$36.3 billion by end-2024. This sharp rise underscores the scale of public investment undertaken during this period, particularly in transport infrastructure, energy, and social sectors, but it also raises important questions regarding debt sustainability and regional competitiveness.
In East Africa, Tanzania currently ranks among the top three most indebted countries in absolute terms, alongside Kenya and Ethiopia. By end-2024, Kenya recorded the highest external debt stock at US$42.9 billion, followed by Ethiopia (US$36.5 billion) and Tanzania (US$36.3 billion). While Tanzania’s debt level is lower than Kenya’s, it is significantly higher than that of Uganda (US$20.5 billion), Rwanda (US$13.1 billion), and the Democratic Republic of Congo (US$12.5 billion). This positioning places Tanzania as a major regional borrower, reflecting the relative size of its economy and its sustained access to concessional and semi-concessional financing.
From a debt burden perspective, Tanzania’s external debt stood at 47% of Gross National Income (GNI) in 2024—moderate by regional standards. This ratio is similar to Burundi (47%) but substantially lower than Rwanda’s 94%, indicating comparatively lower vulnerability than some peers. However, when measured against export earnings, Tanzania’s external debt reached 222% of exports, signaling a high exposure to external shocks, especially fluctuations in commodity prices and global demand. This ratio is higher than Uganda’s (184%) and Kenya’s (206%), though still below Ethiopia’s elevated level of 311%.
Debt servicing pressures in Tanzania remain relatively manageable compared to other East African economies. In 2024, debt service payments accounted for 3% of GNI and 12% of export earnings, significantly lower than Kenya, where debt service absorbed 27% of exports, and comparable to Rwanda’s levels. This reflects Tanzania’s continued reliance on multilateral creditors, which account for approximately 64% of public and publicly guaranteed (PPG) external debt, with the World Bank alone representing nearly half of total PPG debt. Such creditor composition has helped moderate repayment pressures through longer maturities and concessional terms.
Nevertheless, Tanzania recorded the highest net external debt inflows in East Africa in 2024, at US$3.1 billion, exceeding Ethiopia (US$2.8 billion) and Rwanda (US$1.9 billion). This trend highlights ongoing financing needs and signals that debt accumulation is likely to persist in the medium term. As regional peers increasingly face tightening global financial conditions, Tanzania’s future debt trajectory will depend heavily on export performance, fiscal discipline, and the productivity of debt-financed investments.
Overall, Tanzania’s external debt position reflects a delicate balance: stronger than highly indebted peers such as Rwanda and Kenya in terms of servicing capacity, yet more exposed than Uganda and DRC when viewed through export and inflow dynamics. This evolving landscape makes continuous debt monitoring, regional benchmarking, and strategic borrowing essential for safeguarding macroeconomic stability and sustaining long-term growth. Read More of This Topic: Who Is Financing Tanzania’s Public Debt in 2024—and What Does It Mean for Sustainability?
External Debt Data for Tanzania (2010–2024)
The following table summarizes Tanzania's external debt data across key years, as extracted from the International Debt Report 2025. All figures are in US$ million unless otherwise noted.
Indicator
2010
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Total external debt stocks
8,940
25,772
28,818
30,444
34,585
36,343
Long-term external debt stocks
6,904
22,055
23,589
24,533
28,271
30,898
Public and publicly guaranteed debt from:
Official creditors
5,546
15,355
15,502
16,308
18,296
20,005
Multilateral
4,391
11,243
11,526
12,615
14,655
16,435
of which: World Bank
3,248
8,148
8,290
9,228
10,989
12,097
Bilateral
1,155
4,112
3,975
3,693
3,641
3,571
Private creditors
135
2,209
3,436
3,244
4,090
4,272
Bondholders
..
..
..
..
..
..
Commercial banks and others
135
2,209
3,436
3,244
4,090
4,272
Private nonguaranteed debt from:
1,224
4,491
4,651
4,981
5,886
6,621
Bondholders
..
..
..
..
..
..
Commercial banks and others
1,224
4,491
4,651
4,981
5,886
6,621
Use of IMF credit and SDR allocations
647
274
1,357
1,444
1,760
2,062
IMF credit
354
0
557
683
993
1,316
SDR allocations
293
274
800
761
767
746
Short-term external debt stocks
1,389
3,442
3,872
4,467
4,554
3,383
Disbursements, long-term
1,361
1,459
3,049
3,104
5,200
4,112
Public and publicly guaranteed sector
1,145
1,181
2,865
2,421
4,030
3,500
Private sector not guaranteed
216
279
184
683
1,171
612
Principal repayments, long-term
134
984
1,142
1,533
1,547
1,204
Public and publicly guaranteed sector
55
968
1,118
1,179
1,282
1,126
Private sector not guaranteed
79
15
25
353
266
78
Interest payments, long-term
51
365
319
429
603
725
Public and publicly guaranteed sector
34
363
315
377
547
691
Private sector not guaranteed
17
2
4
52
56
34
Public and Publicly Guaranteed (PPG) Debt for Tanzania in 2024, by Creditor and Creditor Type (Including IMF Credit)
The table below focuses on PPG debt in 2024, broken down by creditor type and key creditors where specified. Note that IMF credit is reported separately in the raw data but is included here as part of overall PPG (under multilateral creditors) per the report's figure, which explicitly incorporates it. The total PPG debt (including IMF credit) is approximately $25,593 million (long-term PPG $24,277 + IMF credit $1,316). Specific creditor breakdowns (e.g., China, AfDB) are derived from the report's Figure 1, which provides a visual pie chart; percentages are approximate and may reflect rounded values.
Creditor Type
Sub-Creditor/Creditor
Amount (US$ million)
% of Total PPG (incl. IMF)
Multilateral (excl. IMF)
Total Multilateral (excl. IMF)
16,435
~64%
World Bank
12,097
~47%
AfDB (African Development Bank)
~3,583 (est. based on 14%)
~14%
Other Multilateral
~4,351 (est. based on 17%)
~17%
IMF Credit
IMF
1,316
~5% (reported as 6% in figure)
Bilateral
Total Bilateral
3,571
~14%
China
~2,559 (est. based on ~10%; figure label may have OCR variance)
~10%
India
~512 (est. based on 2%)
~2%
Korea, Rep.
~512 (est. based on 2%)
~2%
France
~256 (est. based on 1%)
~1%
Other Bilateral
~1,538 (est. based on 6%)
~6%
Private Creditors
Total Private
4,272
~17%
Bondholders
..
0%
Commercial Banks and Others
4,272
~17% (incl. other commercial ~4%)
Total PPG (incl. IMF)
25,593
**100%
Notes on Breakdown:
Estimates for sub-creditors (e.g., AfDB, China) are calculated using the figure's percentages applied to the total PPG (incl. IMF). There may be slight discrepancies due to rounding in the report's visuals.
The report's pie chart highlights major creditors: World Bank (largest share), China (significant bilateral), AfDB, IMF, and smaller shares for India, Korea, France, and others.
External Debt Comparison for East African Countries (Data from International Debt Report 2025, End-2024)
The International Debt Report 2025 provides detailed external debt statistics for low- and middle-income countries, including East African nations. Below is a comparison focusing on Tanzania and other East African countries (Burundi, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Somalia, and Uganda). The data is drawn from the report's country tables and snapshots. Note that some values for Ethiopia and Burundi are missing in the report (indicated as ".."), and for Somalia, I supplemented with data from the World Bank's online IDS portal as the PDF extraction for that country was incomplete. Population for Uganda is estimated based on report context (not explicitly listed in the extracted data). All figures are in US$ million unless otherwise noted.
Country
Total External Debt Stock (US$ million)
External Debt % of GNI
External Debt % of Exports
Debt Service % of GNI
Debt Service % of Exports
Net Debt Inflows (US$ million)
GNI (US$ million)
Population (million)
Tanzania
36,343
47
222
3
12
3,056
76,808
69
Burundi
1,024
47
..
2
..
10
2,173
14
DRC
12,485
18
35
1
1
651
68,396
109
Ethiopia
36,548
..
311
..
12
2,817
..
132
Kenya
42,886
35
206
5
27
1,006
122,557
56
Rwanda
13,050
94
242
3
8
1,900
13,901
14
Somalia
2,837
..
..
..
..
..
..
18
Uganda
20,534
39
184
2
14
676
52,361
50
Key Insights and Comparison with Tanzania
Total External Debt: Kenya has the highest debt stock among the group at $42,886 million, followed by Ethiopia and Tanzania (both around $36,000 million). Burundi and Somalia have the lowest, reflecting smaller economies and recent debt relief efforts (e.g., Somalia's debt reduction to under 6% of GDP in 2023).
Debt Burden Relative to Economy ( % GNI): Rwanda has the highest ratio at 94%, indicating high vulnerability. Tanzania's 47% is moderate, similar to Burundi, while DRC is low at 18%.
Debt Burden Relative to Exports ( % Exports): Ethiopia tops the list at 311%, meaning its debt is over three times its export earnings, posing risks. Tanzania's 222% is high but lower than Rwanda (242%) and Kenya (206%).
Debt Service Burden: Kenya faces the heaviest load, with debt service taking 27% of exports and 5% of GNI. Tanzania's is more manageable at 12% of exports and 3% of GNI, similar to Rwanda. DRC has the lowest at 1% for both.
Net Debt Inflows: Tanzania saw the highest net debt inflows at $3,056 million, indicating continued borrowing. Ethiopia and Rwanda also had significant inflows ($2,817 and $1,900 million, respectively), while Burundi had minimal ($10 million).
Overall Context: Compared to Tanzania, countries like Kenya and Rwanda have higher relative debt burdens, potentially limiting fiscal space for development. Smaller economies like Burundi and Somalia have lower absolute debt but remain fragile due to limited export bases. The regional average for Sub-Saharan Africa is total debt of $901 billion, 49% of GNI, and 164% of exports, showing East Africa aligns with or exceeds regional norms in burden indicators.
Tanzania’s economic performance in 2025 reflects a period of strong macroeconomic stability, export-led growth, and improving external resilience, underpinned by prudent monetary management by the Bank of Tanzania (BoT). As of 30 November 2025, the BoT’s financial position signals a notable strengthening of the country’s economic fundamentals, with total assets rising to TZS 29.67 trillion, equivalent to a 4.9% increase (about TZS 1.39 trillion) compared to October 2025. This expansion mirrors heightened foreign exchange inflows, record performance in the mining sector—particularly gold—and rising domestic economic activity, all of which have reinforced liquidity conditions and reserve buffers.
A defining feature of 2025 has been the rapid accumulation of gold and liquid assets. Total gold holdings (monetary and bullion combined) increased by 18.6% to TZS 4.67 trillion, driven by the BoT’s domestic gold purchase programme and Tanzania’s exceptional export performance. Gold export earnings reached an estimated USD 4.3–4.43 billion in the year ending September/October 2025, representing a 35–36% year-on-year increase and firmly establishing gold as the country’s leading foreign exchange earner. In parallel, cash and cash equivalents rose by 32.8% to TZS 4.45 trillion, reflecting strong inflows from exports and services such as tourism, as well as improved liquidity management. These trends have contributed to a more diversified and resilient reserve position.
These monetary and reserve developments are consistent with Tanzania’s broader macroeconomic outcomes in 2025. Real GDP growth is estimated at 6.0–6.3%, supported by mining, tourism (with arrivals rising by around 11%), agriculture, manufacturing, and large-scale infrastructure projects. Inflation remained subdued at about 3.4% in November 2025, comfortably within the BoT’s 3–5% target band, while foreign exchange reserves stood at around USD 6.17 billion (approximately 4.7 months of import cover) by end-October 2025, meeting regional adequacy benchmarks and enhancing exchange rate stability.
Economic Trajectory for 2026
Looking ahead, Tanzania’s macroeconomic outlook for 2026 remains broadly positive, building on the strong foundations established in 2025. Current projections from international and domestic sources point to real GDP growth of about 6.1–6.3% in 2026, indicating stable to slightly accelerating momentum. Growth is expected to continue being driven by mining (especially gold), tourism, infrastructure investments, manufacturing, and gradual expansion in private sector credit, supported by ongoing structural reforms aimed at improving the business environment.
Inflation in 2026 is projected to remain around 3.5%, still within the BoT’s policy target range, reflecting continued prudent monetary policy, stable food supply conditions, and moderated global energy prices. Foreign exchange reserves are expected to remain adequate—above 4.5–5 months of import cover, bolstered by sustained gold and tourism receipts and steady capital inflows. Gold exports are likely to remain elevated, potentially exceeding USD 4 billion, although performance will remain sensitive to global commodity prices and production dynamics.
Overall, the 2026 trajectory suggests that Tanzania is well positioned to consolidate its macroeconomic gains, strengthen external buffers, and advance toward its medium-term development goals, including upper-middle-income status. Nonetheless, risks such as commodity price volatility, climate-related shocks, and post-election policy adjustments could influence outcomes. Maintaining fiscal discipline, deepening export diversification, and sustaining prudent monetary management will be critical to preserving stability and translating growth into inclusive and resilient economic development beyond 2026. Read More:Tanzania Economic Updates December 2025
Key Changes in the BoT Balance Sheet (November vs. October 2025)
The table below highlights selected major items (in TZS '000) with significant changes, focusing on those relevant to economic development (e.g., reserves, gold, and liquidity indicators).
Item
30-Nov-2025 (TZS '000)
31-Oct-2025 (TZS '000)
Change (TZS '000)
% Change
Implications for Economy
Total Assets
29,671,370,947
28,276,931,699
+1,394,439,248
+4.9%
Strong reserve accumulation and economic expansion
Cash and Cash Equivalents
4,451,306,481
3,351,589,357
+1,099,717,124
+32.8%
Inflows from exports (e.g., gold, tourism) boosting liquidity
Monetary Gold
1,882,335,649
1,503,197,004
+379,138,645
+25.2%
Higher gold prices and BoT domestic purchases
Bullion Gold
2,790,183,836
2,437,344,646
+352,839,190
+14.5%
Reflects mining sector boom and reserve diversification
The most notable development is the ~18.6% increase in total gold holdings (combined monetary and bullion gold), driven by Tanzania's mining sector expansion and the BoT's policy of purchasing gold from domestic producers. This aligns with record gold export earnings of approximately USD 4.3–4.43 billion in the year ending September/October 2025, a ~35–36% surge year-on-year, fueled by high global gold prices and increased production.
Broader Tanzania Economic Indicators (2025 Context)
Tanzania's economy in 2025 demonstrates resilient growth, low inflation, and strengthening external buffers, supported by key sectors: mining (gold-led), tourism (strong recovery in arrivals), agriculture (stable output despite weather risks), and infrastructure investments. GDP growth is driven by exports and public projects, with foreign reserves providing a buffer against external shocks.
Indicator
Value (2025)
Notes/Source Context
Real GDP Growth (projected/full year)
6.0–6.3%
IMF projection 6.0%; Q2 actual 6.3%; driven by mining, tourism (+11% arrivals), agriculture
Headline Inflation (November 2025)
3.4%
Down from 3.5% in October; within BoT target (3–5%); food inflation cooled to ~6.6%
Foreign Exchange Reserves (end-October 2025)
~USD 6.17 billion (4.7 months import cover)
BoT data; some reports cite ~USD 6.4 billion excluding gold in November; adequate per EAC benchmarks
Mining and tourism leading export/FX earnings; agriculture employs ~65% of workforce
These indicators reflect sustained economic development:
Mining boom directly contributes to the BoT's gold reserve buildup, enhancing foreign exchange reserves and fiscal revenues.
Low inflation (around 3–3.5%) supports purchasing power and investment attractiveness.
Adequate reserves (4.5–5 months import cover) provide stability amid global uncertainties.
Ongoing reforms (e.g., infrastructure like ports/railways, LNG projects) and private sector lending growth signal diversification beyond traditional agriculture.
Overall, the BoT balance sheet reinforces a positive outlook for Tanzania's economy, characterized by export-led growth, macroeconomic stability, and progressive reserve accumulation in 2025.
Tanzania's Economic Trajectory for 2026
Tanzania's strong macroeconomic momentum in 2025 is expected to carry into 2026, with projections indicating continued resilient growth, low inflation, and strengthening external buffers. International and domestic forecasts highlight sustained performance in key sectors—particularly mining, tourism, infrastructure investments, and manufacturing—while ongoing reforms aim to enhance diversification and private sector participation. The Bank of Tanzania's prudent monetary management and reserve accumulation are likely to support exchange rate stability and resilience against global uncertainties. However, risks such as potential political transitions following the 2025 elections, commodity price volatility, and climate-related challenges could moderate the pace if not managed effectively.
Projected Key Economic Indicators for 2026
The table below summarizes major forecasts from reputable sources (as of late 2025 data), compared to 2025 estimates for context.
Indicator
Projected Value (2026)
2025 Estimate/Actual
Change/Trend
Notes/Source Context
Real GDP Growth
6.1–6.3%
6.0–6.3%
Stable to slight acceleration
IMF: 6.3%; Tanzania government target: 6.1%; driven by fixed investments, exports, and reforms
Headline Inflation
~3.5%
~3.3–3.4%
Mild increase
Expected to stay within BoT's 3–5% target; supported by stable food/energy prices and tight policy
Foreign Exchange Reserves
Adequate (>4.5–5 months import cover)
~4.7 months (end-2025 est.)
Continued improvement
Bolstered by gold/tourism exports and inflows; aligns with EAC benchmarks
Gold Exports
Sustained high levels (potentially >USD 4 billion)
USD 4.3–4.43 billion
Stable growth
Dependent on global prices and production; mining remains dominant
Emphasis on LNG projects, ports/railways, and private sector credit expansion; East Africa regional leader at ~5.9% average growth
Overall, the 2026 outlook reinforces Tanzania's path toward upper-middle-income status, with export-led growth and reserve buildup (as seen in the BoT's 2025 balance sheet trends) providing a solid foundation. Successful implementation of structural reforms, climate-resilient investments, and fiscal prudence will be critical to achieving these projections and mitigating downside risks.
Conclusion
The Bank of Tanzania's November 2025 balance sheet paints an optimistic picture of the nation's macroeconomic health, with significant asset growth, diversified reserves (particularly in gold), and strengthened equity signaling enhanced resilience and capacity for development financing. Tanzania's 2025 performance—marked by record export earnings, low and stable inflation, private sector credit expansion, and GDP growth around 6%—has been anchored by effective central bank policies and sectoral strengths in mining and tourism, providing a buffer against external risks while fostering inclusive progress.
As the economy transitions into 2026, projections of 6.1–6.3% GDP growth, inflation remaining around 3.5%, and sustained reserve adequacy offer a compelling outlook for continued momentum. Key opportunities lie in advancing structural reforms, climate-resilient investments, and diversification efforts to mitigate risks such as commodity price fluctuations or global slowdowns. With the BoT's prudent stewardship and export-led drivers intact, Tanzania is well-positioned to build on its 2025 gains, driving sustainable development, job creation, and regional leadership in the years ahead.
Tanzania's government domestic debt stock reached TZS 38,114.8 billion in October 2025, marking a 1.8% increase from September 2025 (TZS 37,459 billion), according to the Bank of Tanzania's (BoT) Monthly Economic Review for November 2025. This represents approximately 17% of GDP, stabilizing from prior years and aligning with IMF projections for medium-term sustainability at around 17% of GDP. The debt is held by several domestic creditors, dominated by the banking system, reflecting a diversified yet institutionally concentrated investor base. This structure supports fiscal financing for infrastructure and social programs under the FY2025/26 budget (TZS 49.2 trillion), but raises concerns over potential crowding-out of private credit amid rising borrowing needs.
Economic Implications: The modest expansion in domestic debt underscores proactive fiscal management, funding key investments like the USD 3.5 billion Julius Nyerere Hydropower Project and road networks, which contributed 1.2% to Q3 2025 GDP growth. By relying on domestic sources (83% of development spending financed locally), Tanzania mitigates external vulnerabilities—such as USD appreciation or global rate hikes—while keeping public debt-to-GDP at a manageable 49.6% (below the 55% EAC benchmark). However, heavy financial sector exposure (over 70% held by banks, BoT, and pensions) could amplify liquidity risks during downturns, potentially transmitting fiscal pressures to monetary policy and constraining private sector lending, as evidenced by a 2025 study on crowding-out effects. Overall, this portfolio enhances debt sustainability but necessitates deeper retail participation to broaden the market and reduce systemic risks. Read More:Tanzania Domestic Debt Reaches TZS 37.46 Trillion
2. Domestic Debt by Creditor Category — Table
The breakdown highlights the financial sector's dominance, with commercial banks and the BoT as top holders. Data is from Table 2.6.6 in the BoT review, excluding liquidity papers for comparability.
Creditor Category
Amount (TZS Billion)
Percentage Share (%)
Bank of Tanzania (BoT)
11,384.6
29.9
Commercial Banks (CBS)
13,332.8
35.0
Pension Funds
6,260.9
16.4
Insurance Companies
2,678.7
7.0
Bank of Tanzania – Special Funds
1,528.1
4.0
Others (private institutions, individuals)
2,929.9
7.7
TOTAL
38,114.8
100
Source: Ministry of Finance and Bank of Tanzania computations (provisional data). Key Trends: Commercial banks' share rose slightly from 28.7% in September 2025, driven by auctions yielding TZS 327.7 billion (TZS 179 billion in bonds, TZS 148.7 billion in bills). BoT holdings include monetary operations, while "others" encompass growing retail bonds via mobile platforms.
Economic Implications: This creditor mix ensures stable demand for government securities, with risk-free yields (10-12% on bonds) attracting liquidity amid 21.5% M3 growth. However, banks' 35% exposure ties their balance sheets to sovereign risk, potentially slowing credit to SMEs (private sector credit at 16.1% YoY but below potential). Pension and insurance holdings (23.4% combined) match long-term liabilities, supporting financial inclusion, but over-reliance could hinder diversification if yields compress under tighter BoT policy (CBR at 5.75%).
3. Interpretation of Domestic Debt Structure
The structure reveals a maturing domestic market, with institutional investors providing a reliable funding base. In October 2025, debt servicing totaled TZS 482.4 billion (TZS 204.5 billion principal, TZS 277.9 billion interest), consuming 12% of revenues but remaining below 20% threshold for sustainability.
Commercial Banks — Largest Holders (35%) Commercial banks hold the largest share, reflecting high investment in government securities for stable, risk-free returns (e.g., 15-year bonds at 11.5%). This surged post-September auctions, where oversubscription hit 150%. Economic Implications: Banks' preference for sovereign paper over private lending (crowding-out effect) limits SME financing, contributing to manufacturing's subdued 5.2% credit growth. Per a 2025 analysis, this dampens monetary transmission, as rising government borrowing could push lending rates 1-2% higher, constraining 6% GDP targets. Positively, it bolsters bank capital adequacy (CAR at 18.5%), enhancing systemic stability.
Bank of Tanzania — Nearly 30% Includes Treasury bonds for liquidity management and special facilities like overdrafts (TZS 5,493.1 billion non-securitized). BoT's role supports fiscal deficits (3.5% of GDP) without direct monetization. Economic Implications: Facilitates counter-cyclical financing, aiding post-COVID recovery (reserves at USD 6.2 billion). However, quasi-fiscal exposure risks policy independence, potentially fueling inflation if uncoordinated with fiscal tightening—though current 3.5% rate remains anchored. IMF notes this aids short-term buffers but advises phasing down to <25% for credibility.
Pension Funds — 16.4% Primarily long-term Treasury bonds to match actuarial needs, with allocations up 5% YoY via NSSF reforms. Economic Implications: Secures retirement savings amid 7% population aging, channeling domestic savings (household rate 12%) into productive debt. This deepens capital markets, potentially lowering yields by 50bps and funding infra (e.g., USD 1B rail upgrades), but concentration exposes pensions to interest rate volatility.
Insurance Companies — 7% Favor long-dated securities to hedge liabilities, with life insurers leading uptake. Economic Implications: Aligns with growing insurance penetration (2.5% of GDP), fostering risk pooling for climate/agri shocks. Supports financial deepening, but low share signals untapped potential—expanding could mobilize TZS 1 trillion more, reducing aid dependency.
Other Creditors — 7.7% Includes retail investors (via M-Auwal bonds) and private firms, up from 5% in 2024 due to digital platforms. Economic Implications: Boosts inclusion (1 million retail holders), democratizing finance and reducing inequality (Gini at 40.4). Encourages savings mobilization, potentially adding 0.5% to GDP via multiplier effects, though scaling needs education to hit 10% share by 2030.
4. Domestic Debt Composition — Additional Notes
The structure favors long-term instruments: Treasury Bonds (59.2%), Treasury Bills (38.2%), Other government securities (2.6%). Government raised TZS 327.7 billion in October, shifting 55% to bonds for maturity extension (average 8.2 years).
Implication: The government continues shifting toward long-term borrowing (bonds) to reduce refinancing pressure and stabilize debt servicing costs (interest at 6.5% of budget). This lowers rollover risks (from 25% in 2024), supporting fiscal space for 34% budget growth in FY2025/26, but higher bond issuance could elevate yields if private demand lags, per Afreximbank analysis.
Economic Implications: Prolongs maturity profile (up from 6.5 years), curbing liquidity squeezes and aiding 4.7-month reserve cover. Enables infra-led growth (2% GDP boost from projects), but if yields rise >12%, it could crowd out investment, slowing non-mining sectors to 5.5%.
5. Key Takeaways
Total domestic debt: TZS 38.1 trillion, up 1.8% MoM, financing 40% of budget amid 13.1% tax-to-GDP (low vs. peers).
Major creditors: Commercial Banks (35%), Bank of Tanzania (29.9%), Pension Funds (16.4%)—financial sector holds 81.3%.
Domestic debt remains dominated by the financial sector: Stable but exposed; banking balance sheets 25% tied to sovereigns.
Broader Economic Implications: This composition ensures low-cost funding (average rate 10.8%), underpinning 6% GDP growth and single-digit inflation, per World Bank. It mitigates FX risks (69.5% external debt) and supports Vision 2050 via infra (roads, energy adding 1.5% growth). Yet, crowding-out risks private credit (16.1% YoY vs. 20% target), impacting jobs (youth unemployment 13.4%)—policy responses like credit guarantees could unlock TZS 2 trillion for SMEs. Sustained at 17% GDP, it signals resilience, but diversification (e.g., green bonds) is key to avoid transmission lags to lending rates.
Tanzania's external debt stock totaled USD 35,385.5 million at the end of October 2025, reflecting a modest 0.7% monthly decrease from September's USD 35,438.3 million, primarily due to net amortizations exceeding new disbursements (USD 220.5 million service vs. USD 89.9 million loans). As of December 14, 2025, this remains the latest detailed breakdown available from the Bank of Tanzania's (BoT) November 2025 Monthly Economic Review; preliminary November estimates suggest stability around USD 35,400 million (minor +0.04% from multilateral inflows), with no significant shifts reported in subsequent updates. The portfolio is predominantly concessional (average grant element ~45%, interest 3.2%), supporting moderate debt distress risk per IMF assessments.
Economic Implications: The contained stock (69.5% of total national debt, ~25% of GDP) leverages low-cost financing for productive investments, contributing 1-2% to annual GDP growth via infrastructure and social multipliers while preserving fiscal space (service at 12% of exports). Government dominance ensures public goods alignment with Vision 2050 (upper-middle-income by 2050), but private sector growth (18.3%) signals FDI maturity—potentially adding 0.5% GDP via spillovers in trade/manufacturing. Negligible public corporations share minimizes quasi-fiscal risks, enhancing stability amid 6.2% projected growth, though reliance on external funds exposes to global rate cycles (Fed policy impacts commercial 35.2%). Read More:Tanzania External Debt at USD 35.44 Billion
1.1 Table — External Debt by Borrower
Borrower Category
Amount (USD Millions)
Percentage Share (%)
Central Government
28,911.6
81.7
Private Sector
6,470.2
18.3
Public Corporations
3.8
0.0
Total External Debt
35,385.5
100
Source: BoT November 2025 Review; provisional data.
Interpretation:
The Government holds the largest portion (over 80%): Reflects strategic borrowing for budget support and projects (e.g., USD 443 million net disbursements YTD for infra/social).
The private sector covers 18.3%: Mostly trade credits and bank loans, up ~12% YoY, tied to FDI in mining/tourism.
Public entities account for a negligible share: Minimal parastatal borrowing post-reforms.
Economic Implications: Government skew (81.7%) channels funds to high-multiplier sectors (e.g., social services boosting human capital, +0.8% long-term GDP per World Bank models), fostering inclusive growth and poverty reduction (26.4% rate). Private rise diversifies risks, supporting non-gold exports (+15.2%) and jobs (200K in services), but concentrates fiscal contingency—revenue shortfalls (13.1% GDP tax ratio) could elevate service (USD 2.1 billion annually), crowding out 0.3-0.5% private investment if guarantees called.
2. Disbursed Outstanding Debt by User of Funds
The Disbursed Outstanding External (DOE) debt—excluding undisbursed commitments—stood at USD 31,385.5 million (88.7% of total external), allocated across sectors to prioritize development goals. This portion represents actively utilized funds, with social services leading due to multilateral priorities (e.g., IDA/World Bank health/education loans).
2.1 Table — External Debt by User of Funds
User of Funds / Sector
Amount (USD Millions)
Share (%)
Social Services (education, health, water)
10,666.1
34.7
Energy & Mining
6,785.2
22.1
Transport & Telecommunications
5,469.0
17.8
Finance & Insurance
2,216.3
7.2
Industries & Manufacturing
2,218.3
7.3
Agriculture
1,660.3
5.4
Other Sectors (tourism, environment, etc.)
2,370.3
7.7
Total (DOE Portion)
31,385.5
100
Source: BoT November 2025 Review; DOE focus.
Interpretation:
Social services absorb the largest share (34.7%): Prioritizes human capital (e.g., water/education projects).
Heavy investment in energy/mining (22.1%) and transport (17.8%): Supports industrialization and connectivity.
Agriculture’s share is small (5.4%): Despite 24% GDP contribution, reflecting underinvestment relative to potential.
Economic Implications: Allocation to social (34.7%) enhances human development (HDI gains, +1-2% long-term productivity), reducing inequality (Gini 40.4) and poverty via education/health spillovers. Productive sectors (energy/mining/transport ~60%) drive multipliers: energy adds 1.2% GDP (hydropower), transport boosts trade (+15.2% exports under AfCFTA, USD 1 billion potential). Low agriculture share risks food security (inflation driver 7.4% October) and rural jobs (65% employment)—increasing to 10% could add 0.5-1% GDP via value chains, per Deloitte 2025. Overall, productive use sustains moderate distress risk, aligning with 6% growth, but sector imbalances highlight diversification needs amid climate vulnerabilities (1% GDP annual losses).
3. Currency Composition of External Debt (October 2025)
The portfolio is heavily USD-tilted, with diversification to EUR/SDR for multilateral exposure; no major shifts reported through November.
3.1 Table — External Debt by Currency
Currency
Percentage Share (%)
Notes
US Dollar (USD)
65.7
Majority; commercial/bilateral.
Euro (EUR)
17.1
European lenders (e.g., EIB).
Special Drawing Rights (SDR)
9.2
IMF obligations.
Chinese Yuan (CNY)
4.2
Development finance (e.g., infra).
Japanese Yen (JPY)
1.8
Bilateral loans.
GBP & Others
2.0
Minor diversified.
Source: BoT November 2025 Review.
Interpretation:
USD dominance (65.7%): Ties to global markets; sensitive to USD strength.
EUR/SDR (26.3% combined): Multilateral buffer.
Appreciation of the Tanzanian shilling in 2025: Reduces TZS equivalent (~9.5% savings YoY).
Economic Implications: High USD exposure (65.7%) amplifies shilling gains (TZS 2,463/USD Dec 14), saving TZS 2.5-3 trillion in servicing and easing non-food inflation (2.1%). Diversification (EUR/SDR/CNY ~30%) hedges risks, supporting reserves (4.7 months) amid Fed easing. However, USD volatility could add 0.5% to CPI/debt service if reversing—BoT forwards mitigate, preserving 3.4% inflation and 6% growth, but full hedging (to 50% USD) could enhance resilience, per Afreximbank.
4. Summary of Key Insights
4.1 Debt Stock by Borrower
Government: 81.7% (public investment focus).
Private sector: 18.3% (FDI-linked growth).
Public corporations: ~0% (reform success).
4.2 Debt Use by Sector
Largest: Social services (34.7%), Energy & mining (22.1%), Transport & telecom (17.8%).
Overall Economic Implications: October's USD 35.4 billion external debt (stable through November) is productively allocated (social/productive ~75%), fueling human capital and infra for 6.2% growth and reserves buildup. Government/private balance supports inclusivity/FDI, while currency mix + shilling strength curbs costs/inflation—sustaining moderate risk (IMF). Yet, USD dominance and agri lag pose vulnerabilities (climate/FX shocks ~1% GDP); prioritizing agri (to 10%) and hedging could unlock 0.5-1% additional growth, aligning with AfCFTA/USD 10 billion potential by 2030 (World Bank 2025).