By Dr. Bravious Kahyoza, PhD, Senior Economist at TICGL

As Tanzania’s national debt continues to climb, there has been increasing debate about the sustainability of our borrowing practices and their potential long-term effects on the economy.

The recent figures from the Controller and Auditor General (CAG), which show a significant increase in national debt—from Sh82.25 trillion in 2022/23 to Sh97.35 trillion in 2023/24—are a cause for concern.

However, while these numbers are alarming, the debate should focus not just on the figures themselves, but on sustainable solutions that will address the challenges of financing Tanzania’s development ambitions. One such solution lies in expanding and optimizing public-private partnerships (PPPs).

As the Economist, I have long advocated for the power of strategic partnerships between the public and private sectors as a viable alternative to heavy borrowing.

While Tanzania’s debt remains manageable in comparison to some of our East African neighbors, it is essential to explore ways to reduce our reliance on borrowing, especially for large-scale infrastructure projects.

Public-private partnerships offer a way to share the financial burden and bring in private sector expertise, technology, and efficiency.

This is a path that not only reduces the strain on public finances but also spurs economic growth in a sustainable manner.

Public-Private Partnerships as a Solution

Increasing capital through well-coordinated public-private partnerships can significantly enhance Tanzania's tax capacity, as many of these projects generate revenue.

Take, for example, the Kibaha-Chalinze road project, worth US$340 million, or the US$1 billion ring road construction project currently under way.

These initiatives, which fall under the PPPC’s oversight, demonstrate the power of combining public ambition with private sector efficiency.

By leveraging private sector resources and expertise, we can achieve faster, more cost-effective project delivery and ensure that critical infrastructure is built without overburdening the national treasury.

The fundamental strength of PPPs lies in their ability to mobilize private capital for public goods. When the private sector invests in infrastructure, it helps reduce government expenditure while also improving service delivery.

Projects are completed more efficiently and in shorter timelines, and, crucially, these projects generate ongoing revenue, which in turn supports economic growth.

As we look to the future, Tanzania’s goal of growing its economy from US$85 billion to US$700 billion is ambitious. Achieving this leap requires not just strategic borrowing and taxation but, more importantly, greater involvement of the private sector.

PPPs are the way forward if we are to meet our economic aspirations without falling into the trap of unsustainable borrowing.

The Case for Local Companies in PPPs

One of the key components of a successful PPP framework is the involvement of local companies. While foreign investment is crucial, it is important to prioritize local businesses in these partnerships.

This isn’t just a matter of political favoritism; it’s an economic strategy that benefits Tanzania as a whole. When local businesses are involved, the capital invested circulates within the country, generating a multiplier effect in our economy.

Unlike foreign investors, who often repatriate a significant portion of their earnings, domestic investors reinvest their profits locally, fostering job creation, innovation, and economic resilience.

The government has taken steps to ensure that local companies are given priority in PPP projects, particularly when competing with foreign firms. According to the law, local companies are given preference during project evaluations, not just for political reasons, but because they contribute to building a sustainable economy. When the economy is strengthened by domestic partnerships, we can reduce our dependence on external borrowing and create a more self-sufficient and resilient economy.

Anti-Corruption Measures for Greater Efficiency

A key factor in the success of public-private partnerships is transparency and accountability, which are critical in ensuring that projects are delivered on time, within budget, and without corruption. The fight against corruption is crucial to enhancing efficiency within government institutions.

Recent reports by CAG Charles Kichere highlighted the staggering inefficiencies in some of Tanzania’s parastatals, with a waste of Sh371.42 billion due to poor management and corruption. These losses undermine the effectiveness of our national budget and hamper our ability to invest in critical projects.

The government’s commitment to fighting corruption and improving efficiency will save valuable resources that can be redirected toward funding development initiatives, reducing our reliance on borrowing.

By implementing robust anti-corruption measures, we can ensure that Tanzania’s resources are used more effectively, which, in turn, will increase our capacity to finance projects through public-private partnerships and domestic revenue generation

Tanzania’s national debt is a significant challenge, but it is not an insurmountable one. By tapping into the potential of public-private partnerships, we can unlock new sources of funding, bring in private sector expertise, and build a stronger, more sustainable economy.

However, this must go hand in hand with efforts to combat corruption, prioritize local participation, and ensure that projects are efficiently managed. In this way, we can reduce our reliance on borrowing, build critical infrastructure, and pave the way for a prosperous future.

Balancing Ambition and Pragmatism in Tanzania's Inclusive Growth Agenda

Authored by Dr. Bravious Felix Kahyoza (PhD, FMVA, CP3P) and Amran Bhuzohera, this timely economic analysis examines President Samia Suluhu Hassan's November 14, 2025 Parliamentary Address launching Tanzania's 2025-2050 National Development Vision under the rallying slogan "Kazi na Utu, Tunasonga Mbele" (Work and Humanity, Moving Forward)—revealing both the transformative potential and implementation challenges of the administration's ambitious growth agenda.

With Tanzania's economy demonstrating resilient 5.6% growth in 2025 driven by record gold exports (USD 4.43 billion, +35.8% YoY) and tourism revenues (USD 3.92 billion), the President's vision targets accelerated expansion to over 7% by 2030 while creating 8.5 million jobs—a bold agendatempered by post-election violence costs (USD 200-300 million) and fiscal constraints (TZS 57 trillion budget with 15% debt servicing).

Key Economic Promises and Strategic Priorities

• Ambitious growth acceleration: Target GDP expansion from 5.6% (2025) to >7% by 2030, requiring average annual growth of 6.8%—supported by sectoral investments, resource-backed financing, and private sector mobilization aligned with IMF projections of 6% near-term growth.
• Agricultural transformation: Shift from subsistence to commercial farming under "Kilimo ni Biashara, Mkulima ni Mwekezaji" slogan, targeting 10% sector growth (from 4%) through irrigation expansion from 3.4 million to 5 million hectares, input subsidies, and value-chain integration.
• Tourism leadership: Leverage Tanzania's natural assets (Serengeti, coastal eco-tourism) to exceed 10% GDP contribution by 2030 (from 17.2% in 2025), building on strong recovery with 5.3 million visitors and positioning tourism as top foreign exchange earner.
• Manufacturing push: Accelerate industrial growth from 4.8% to 9% by 2030 through district-level parks, with flagship projects like Bagamoyo mega-park (100,000+ jobs), Kwala Industrial Park (500,000 jobs), and Buzwagi mining park (300,000 jobs).
• Infrastructure completion: Prioritize Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) extensions (Tabora-Kigoma, Tanga-Musoma), road networks, and BRT phases to reduce logistics costs 20-30% and unlock economic corridors—critical for AfCFTA integration.
• Mining sector expansion: Build on 10.1% GDP contribution by expanding exploration beyond 16% coverage, implementing critical minerals strategy (graphite, lithium), and establishing Sovereign Wealth Fund for intergenerational benefits.
• Youth empowerment centerpiece: Create dedicated Youth Ministry with TZS 200 billion initial fund for concessional loans, targeting 50% of 8.5 million jobs to address 15-26% effective youth unemployment (900,000 annual entrants vs. 50,000-60,000 formal jobs).
• Universal Health Insurance rollout: Launch UHI pilot within 100 days, integrating facilities digitally while banning body-withholding practices, alongside Muhimbili Hospital expansion (1,435 to 1,757 beds by 2030) and recruiting 5,000 health workers.

Economic Context and Performance Snapshot

The analysis situates promises against Tanzania's November 2025 economic realities:

Strengths:

• Robust baseline: 5.6% FY 2024/25 growth exceeding projections, with mining contributing 10.1% GDP (early achievement of 10% target)
• Export boom: Gold at USD 4.43 billion (+35.8% YoY) cushioning forex reserves at USD 6.5 billion; tourism surpassing gold as top earner
• Agricultural rebound: 6.8% Q3 growth despite El Niño disruptions, with 23.4% GDP contribution from sector employing 65% of workforce
• FDI momentum: Highest decade inflows at USD 1.7 billion (2025), up from USD 1.2 billion (2024), driven by mining/manufacturing

Vulnerabilities:

• Post-election instability: October 29, 2025 violence (hundreds dead, 12-hour curfew) causing USD 200-300 million economic losses and 10% FDI dip in Q3, potentially trimming 0.5-1% off growth
• Inflation pressures: October 2025 rate at 3.5% (highest since June 2023), with food prices up 7.4% from supply disruptions and commodity shocks
• Youth employment crisis: Official ILO rate at 3.5% masks reality of 15-26% effective unemployment including underemployment—critical demographic challenge
• Climate vulnerability: 2023-24 El Niño floods costing ~1% GDP (USD 500 million) in agricultural damages, with La Niña drought risks threatening 20-30% yield reductions

Feasibility Assessment:

The research employs quantitative metrics to evaluate implementation potential:

High Feasibility Elements:

• Policy continuity: Builds on Fifth Phase 80% project completion rates, with 70% of TZS 57 trillion budget allocated to infrastructure/social sectors
• Early momentum: 12,000 public sector jobs announced (Day 12)—7,000 teachers, 5,000 health workers—demonstrating rapid execution capacity
• Youth fund ROI: TZS 200 billion (0.35% of budget) targeting MSMEs (35% GDP contributors, 80% job creators) projects 15-25% annual returns, with 1:3 cost-benefit ratio potentially generating 50,000 new SMEs and 100,000 jobs by 2027

Moderate Challenges:

• Fiscal constraints: Budget covers core promises but leaves TZS 5-7 trillion gap for unbudgeted items without external borrowing
• Debt service burden: 15% of budget allocated to servicing, limiting discretionary spending despite manageable 40-45% debt-to-GDP ratio
• Implementation capacity: Historical 60-70% execution rates suggest realistic target of 70% promise delivery, with institutional delays historically slowing FDI absorption 25%

Critical Risks:

• Political reconciliation imperative: Enquiry Commission delays could prolong instability, with regional tensions disrupting East African trade (USD 100 million weekly losses during peak unrest)
• Corruption drag: 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index at 40/100 (ranking 87/180) inflates project costs 20-30%, requiring digital audit acceleration
• Skills mismatches: Only 20% youth trained for priority sectors (mining, manufacturing), with 70% VETA graduates unemployable in high-tech areas

Key Recommendations for Implementation Success

1. Accelerate Reconciliation (Critical - First 100 Days):

• Fast-track Enquiry Commission findings to address election violence, restore investor confidence, and prevent further 0.5-1% growth losses
• Launch cross-party parliamentary oversight with quarterly KPIs tracking job creation, infrastructure milestones, and budget execution

2. Bridge Skills-Jobs Gap (High Priority):

• Expand VETA-private sector partnerships (target: 50,000 apprenticeships with firms like Barrick Gold)
• Integrate STEM scholarships with sectoral needs (mining, manufacturing, digital economy)

3. Optimize Resource Mobilization (Continuous):

• Leverage resource-backed financing to cap debt below 45% GDP while attracting USD 2-3 billion annual greenfield investments
• Scale PPP funding to 60% for infrastructure (SGR, industrial parks), offloading TZS 10-15 trillion from budget

4. Strengthen Anti-Corruption Frameworks:

• Implement digital procurement covering 80% tenders by 2026, potentially saving USD 500 million annually through reduced leakages
• Enforce quarterly performance dashboards for parliamentary scrutiny

Impact Projections and Developmental Outcomes

If 70% of promises are delivered (realistic given historical benchmarks):

Short-Term (2026):

• +0.2-0.5% GDP boost from consumption effects of job creation and UHI pilot
• 10,000 new SMEs launched via youth fund disbursements (TZS 50 billion initial), offsetting election losses through localized recovery

Medium-Term (2027-2029):

• 4-5 million jobs created across sectors, reducing youth unemployment 2-3 percentage points
• Inflation stabilization below 4% through agricultural productivity gains and domestic manufacturing

Long-Term (2030):

• 1.5-2 million people lifted from poverty (reducing rate from 26% to <15%), assuming sustained 6-8% growth
• Per capita income rising to USD 1,500 (from USD 1,200), positioning Tanzania for upper-middle-income transition
• Top-50 Ease of Doing Business ranking attracting sustained FDI and anchoring Tanzania as EAC economic hub

Downside Scenarios:

• Failure to reconcile: Persistent instability could cap growth at 5.5%, limiting poverty reduction to 1 million people and stalling Vision 2050 trajectory
• Climate shocks without mitigation: Without irrigation scaling to 5 million hectares, droughts could reduce agricultural output 20-30%, undermining food security

Conclusion: Transformative Potential with Execution Imperative

President Hassan's "Kazi na Utu" agenda represents a decisive pivot toward human-centered economics, integrating microeconomic interventions (youth funds, SME support) with macroeconomic stability (debt management, inflation control). The 7/10 feasibility rating reflects strong fundamentals—policy continuity, sectoral alignment, early actions—tempered by political, fiscal, and capacity constraints.

The authors emphasize three critical success factors:

1. Political Unity: Rapid reconciliation is non-negotiable—every month of delay costs USD 25-30 million in lost economic activity and investor flight
2. Execution Excellence: Historical 60-70% delivery rates must improve to 70-80% through parliamentary oversight, digital dashboards, and PPP acceleration
3. Stakeholder Mobilization: Success requires whole-of-society approach—private sector (30% cost-sharing), civil society (transparency), and international partners (AfDB's USD 500 million green growth package)

By 2030, if reforms hold, Tanzania could achieve the "triple win" of inclusive growth (8.5 million jobs), fiscal sustainability (debt <45% GDP), and regional leadership (AfCFTA integration)—positioning the nation as a model for African agency in equitable development.

The ultimate choice is binary: "Tunasonga Mbele" (Moving Forward) through collective resolve, or risk stagnation amid unrealized potential. Parliament's oversight and citizen engagement will determine whether President Hassan's vision becomes transformative reality or unfulfilled promise.

📘 Read the Full Economic Analysis:
"Economic Analysis of President Samia Suluhu Hassan's 2025 Parliamentary Address: Balancing Ambition and Pragmatism in Tanzania's Inclusive Growth Agenda"
Authored by Dr. Bravious Felix Kahyoza (PhD, FMVA, CP3P) and Amran Bhuzohera
Published by TICGL | Tanzania Investment and Consultant Group Ltd
🌐 www.ticgl.com

A Quantitative Analysis for Equitable Allocation

TICGL’s Economic Research Centre has published a discussion paper authored by Dr. Bravious Felix Kahyoza PhD, FMVA, CP3P (braviouskahyoza5@gmail.com) and David Kafulila (davidkafulila0@gmail.com), presenting groundbreaking quantitative research on risk allocation in Tanzania’s Public-Private Partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects. The study highlights how inequitable risk distribution adversely affects project performance and long-term sustainability, while proposing data-driven strategies to strengthen infrastructure delivery and fiscal efficiency in alignment with Tanzania’s Vision 2025.

With his expertise in financial modeling, valuation, and PPP management, Dr. Kahyoza provides a rigorous analytical framework to guide policymakers and investors toward balanced risk-sharing mechanisms, fostering resilient and performance-driven PPP implementation across Tanzania’s infrastructure sector.

Dr. Bravious Felix Kahyoza, a certified expert in Financial Modeling & Valuation Analyst (FMVA) and Certified PPP Professional (CP3P). leverages his expertise in project feasibility, risk management, and investment performance to provide actionable insights for improving Tanzania’s PPP frameworks and advancing national development goals.

With an estimated USD 15 billion annual infrastructure gap and only 20 active PPP projects as of 2024, Tanzania faces a critical juncture in infrastructure development. The paper argues that systematic risk-sharing imbalances—where the public sector bears 60-70% of total risks versus the optimal 40-50% benchmark—are causing 70% project delays, 20-50% cost overruns, and high-profile failures like the USD 10 billion Bagamoyo Port project, threatening the nation's economic transformation goals.

Key Findings and Insights

• Severe risk allocation imbalance: Quantitative analysis of 200 stakeholders across 18 major PPP projects (2010-2025) reveals that the public sector disproportionately absorbs exogenous risks—65% of political risks and 45% of financial risks—while private partners control 75% of construction risks, creating systemic inefficiencies.
• High perceived risk severity: Political risks scored highest in stakeholder perceptions (mean μ=4.2/5 on Likert scale), followed by financial risks (μ=3.8/5), reflecting concerns about regulatory instability, election-cycle disruptions, and currency fluctuations that deter private investment.
• Performance correlation confirmed: Statistical analysis demonstrates a strong positive correlation between equitable risk sharing and project performance (r=0.65, p<0.001), with multiple regression analysis showing that each unit increase in sharing equity boosts performance by 0.42 units (β=0.42, p<0.001).
• Factor analysis validation: Exploratory factor analysis identified two distinct risk clusters explaining 62.4% of variance: Factor 1 (Exogenous Risks)—political and financial risks with loadings of 0.72-0.85; and Factor 2 (Endogenous Risks)—construction and operational risks with loadings of 0.68-0.76.
• Institutional moderation effect: Regulatory stability and institutional capacity significantly moderate risk-sharing effectiveness (moderation β=0.28, p<0.01), with stronger governance frameworks boosting performance benefits by 25% in energy versus transport sectors.
• Quantified project impacts: Current imbalances contribute to 70% of projects experiencing 10-30% delays, with construction sector delays and financial constraints exacerbated by misaligned incentives and inadequate contractual protections.
• Regression model strength: The study's multiple linear regression models explain 58-62% of performance variance (R²=0.58-0.62), providing robust evidence for policy interventions and confirming that optimized risk allocation could reduce cost overruns by 15-20%.
• Below global benchmarks: Tanzania's private sector risk absorption (45-55% average) falls significantly below global standards of 60-70% in developed markets and even trails other African contexts, indicating substantial room for improvement through institutional strengthening.

Structural Challenges and Root Causes

The research identifies multiple interconnected factors driving risk allocation imbalances in Tanzania's PPP ecosystem:

Institutional Capacity Gaps:

• Limited technical expertise among 70% of public negotiators in Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) at municipal level
• Weak contract enforcement mechanisms leading to opportunistic bargaining by private parties
• Inadequate feasibility analysis causing 40% of implemented concessions to exceed budget

Regulatory and Legal Weaknesses:

• Ambiguous dispute resolution clauses in the 2010 PPP Act (amended 2023) increasing public exposure during political cycles
• Lengthy approval processes through PMO-RALG and Attorney General causing up to 3-year preparation delays
• Absence of mandatory viability gap funding mechanisms to support demand-risk sharing

Financial Constraints:

• Public sector contingent liabilities reaching TZS 500 billion (USD 200 million) in unresolved court cases as of 2023
• Over-optimistic revenue projections without proper risk-adjusted discount rates
• Macroeconomic volatility (inflation, currency fluctuations) disproportionately absorbed through public guarantees

Information Asymmetries:

• Unequal access to project information favoring private contractors in contract negotiations
• Limited transparency in risk assessment methodologies
• Absence of standardized risk matrices tailored to Tanzanian context

Case Study Evidence:

• Bagamoyo Port PPP: USD 10 billion project halted due to unresolved revenue-sharing clauses and environmental risk allocation disputes
• Standard Gauge Railway (SGR): Government absorbed majority of financial burden from land acquisition disputes and currency fluctuations
• UTT Land Demarcation PPP: Three-year delay in Mtwara Mikindani due to bureaucratic approval bottlenecks

Data-Driven Recommendations for Equitable Risk Allocation

To transform Tanzania's PPP framework from its current state of systemic imbalance to a model of sustainable, equitable partnership, the paper proposes comprehensive, evidence-based reforms:

1. Legislative and Regulatory Reforms:

• Amend the PPP Act (2023) to mandate viability gap funding with public exposure capped at 40% of total project risks
• Establish quantitative risk allocation thresholds in PPP regulations: maximum 25% public share for political risks, 40-45% for financial risks
• Implement fast-track dispute resolution mechanisms with binding arbitration clauses to reduce legal contingent liabilities
• Harmonize with EAC protocols on cross-border infrastructure to attract USD 50 billion in regional FDI

2. Institutional Capacity Building:

• Launch mandatory training programs for 500+ public negotiators annually covering:
  • Advanced contract negotiation techniques
  • Risk quantification methodologies (factor analysis, regression modeling)
  • Financial modeling and feasibility analysis
  • Performance-based contract design
• Establish a PPP Centre of Excellence at University of Dar es Salaam for continuous skills development
• Deploy standardized risk matrices based on study findings for all new PPP tenders

3. Financial Mechanism Innovations:

• Create a Risk Mitigation Facility with USD 500 million capitalization to provide:
  • Currency hedging instruments (reducing forex exposure from 45% to 25%)
  • Political risk insurance through multilateral partnerships
  • Performance bonds and guarantees for private partners
• Implement performance-based payment structures linking disbursements to risk management KPIs
• Establish blended finance vehicles combining public resources, development finance, and commercial capital

4. Enhanced Project Preparation:

• Require comprehensive risk impact assessments using factor analysis for all projects exceeding USD 50 million
• Develop lifecycle risk allocation schedules adjusting sharing ratios across preparation, construction, operation, and transfer phases
• Mandate independent third-party risk audits before financial close
• Apply sensitivity analysis (bootstrapping with 1,000 resamples) to test risk scenarios

5. Transparency and Monitoring Systems:

• Deploy digital PPP management platforms for real-time risk tracking and performance monitoring
• Publish quarterly risk allocation reports showing actual vs. planned distributions
• Establish annual PPP performance audits measuring:
  • Timeline adherence (targeting 30% improvement)
  • Cost variance (reducing overruns from 20-50% to <10%)
  • Risk-sharing equity index (achieving 70-80 score on 0-100 scale)
• Create stakeholder feedback mechanisms to capture perception shifts

6. Sector-Specific Strategies:

• Transport sector: Implement demand-risk sharing mechanisms (60% private, 40% public) with minimum revenue guarantees for first 5 operational years
• Energy sector: Leverage higher regulatory stability to increase private risk absorption to 70-75%, using Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) as anchors
• Cross-sectoral: Develop insurance pools for force majeure events (10% shared allocation), reducing public contingent liabilities

Conclusion

Tanzania's PPP infrastructure program stands at a critical inflection point. The quantitative evidence presented in this study—drawn from rigorous statistical analysis of 200 stakeholders and 18 major projects—unequivocally demonstrates that current risk allocation patterns are unsustainable and systematically disadvantage the public sector while deterring private investment.

The authors emphasize that risk-sharing is not a zero-sum game but rather a strategic optimization challenge. The study's findings—particularly the 0.65 correlation between equitable sharing and performance and the 0.42 standardized regression coefficient—provide compelling evidence that properly balanced risk allocation can simultaneously:

• Reduce project delays by 15-30%
• Decrease cost overruns from 20-50% to below 10%
• Increase private sector confidence and participation
• Improve value-for-money outcomes for taxpayers
• Accelerate infrastructure delivery toward Vision 2025 goals

The research makes three vital contributions to PPP scholarship and practice:

Theoretical Advancement: By integrating Transaction Cost Theory with the World Bank Risk Allocation Framework and adding Tanzanian-specific moderators (institutional capacity, regulatory stability), the study extends global PPP theory into underrepresented African contexts—where only 12% of global PPP literature focuses despite disproportionate infrastructure needs.

Practical Tools: The study delivers actionable instruments including validated risk matrices, equitable sharing indices (0-100 scale), and performance prediction models that PPP practitioners can immediately deploy in project preparation and contract negotiation.

Policy Blueprint: The evidence-based recommendations provide a comprehensive reform roadmap for the Tanzanian government, addressing legislative gaps, capacity constraints, and financial mechanisms required to unlock the USD 15 billion annual infrastructure investment needed for middle-income country status.

By 2030, if these reforms are implemented, Tanzania could transform its PPP portfolio from 20 struggling projects to a robust pipeline of 50+ high-performing partnerships, positioning the nation as an East African leader in infrastructure finance and demonstrating that equitable risk-sharing is the foundation for sustainable public-private collaboration.

The study concludes with an urgent call to action: risk allocation reform is not optional—it is imperative for realizing Tanzania's development aspirations. Through data-driven policy, institutional strengthening, and transparent governance, Tanzania can turn PPP challenges into opportunities, converting its infrastructure gap into a catalyst for inclusive economic transformation.

📘 Read the Full Research Paper:
"Exploring the Dynamics of Risk Sharing in Tanzania's PPP Infrastructure Projects"
Authored by Dr. Bravious Felix Kahyoza (PhD, FMVA) and David Kafulila
Published by TICGL | Tanzania Investment and Consultant Group Ltd
🌐 www.ticgl.com

The United Republic of Tanzania's economy showcased a steady performance in the first quarter of 2025, with GDP growth rising to 5.4% from 5.2% in the same period of 2024, as detailed in the National Bureau of Statistics report. Key insights reveal the top contributors to this growth include Mining & Quarrying (15.4%), Agriculture (14.2%), Finance & Insurance (12.0%), Construction (11.3%), Manufacturing (10.4%), and Transport & Storage (9.3%). The strongest growth rates were observed in Electricity (19.0%), Mining (16.6%), Finance & Insurance (15.4%), and Education (8.6%), highlighting robust sectoral advancements. However, weaker performers such as Construction (slowed to 4.3%), Trade (fell to 3.5%), and Information & Communication (halved from 14.6% to 7.8%) indicate areas needing attention to sustain overall economic momentum.

1. Overall GDP

• Growth: Q1 2025 GDP grew by 5.4%, slightly higher than 5.2% in Q1 2024.
• Size: At constant 2015 prices, GDP rose to TZS 40.7 trillion from TZS 38.6 trillion in Q1 2024.

2. Primary Activities (40.7% of GDP)

• Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing:
  • Growth improved from 2.5% (2024) to 3.0% (2025).
  • Key drivers:
    • Paddy production rose by 9.6% (568.9k tons → 623.3k tons).
    • Wheat output jumped 29.4% (29.6k → 38.3k tons).
    • Oil seeds +5.5%, beans +0.9%.
  • Contribution: 14.2% of total GDP growth.
  • Share in GDP: 27.2%.
• Mining & Quarrying:
  • Explosive growth: 3.5% (2024) → 16.6% (2025).
  • Production surged in key minerals:
    • Gold +16.1% (13,610 kg → 15,797 kg).
    • Coal +19.1% (745k tons → 888k tons).
    • Mica +475.6%, Iron ore +256%, Phosphate +465%.
  • Contribution: largest, at 15.4% of total GDP growth.
  • Share in GDP: 11.0%.

3. Secondary Activities (21.4% of GDP)

• Manufacturing:
  • Growth: 5.8% → 7.2%.
  • Supported by increased production of consumer and industrial goods.
  • Contribution: 10.4% of growth.
  • Share in GDP: 6.8%.
• Electricity:
  • Massive jump: 7.6% → 19.0%.
  • Boosted by Julius Nyerere Hydropower Dam coming online.
  • Share in GDP: 0.2% (small, but impactful growth driver).
• Water Supply:
  • Growth: 3.1% → 4.2%, linked to production rising to 98.9m m³ (from 94.7m).
  • Share in GDP: 0.4%.
• Construction:
  • Slowed: 6.4% → 4.3%.
  • Still important with 11.3% contribution to GDP growth.
  • Supported by cement & iron-steel output.
  • Share in GDP: 12.7%.

4. Tertiary Activities (37.9% of GDP)

• Trade & Repair:
  • Decline in growth: 5.3% → 3.5%.
  • Impacted by moderate import and agriculture trade flows.
  • Share in GDP: 8.4%.
• Transport & Storage:
  • Growth: 5.7% → 6.5%, driven by cargo tonnage and SGR rail services.
  • Contribution: 9.3% of GDP growth.
  • Share in GDP: 7.2%.
• Financial & Insurance:
  • Growth: 14.9% → 15.4%.
  • Supported by:
    • Deposits up 18.5% (TZS 36.3T → 43.0T).
    • Loans up 14.7% (TZS 34.1T → 39.1T).
  • Contribution: 12.0%.
  • Share in GDP: 3.5%.
• Information & Communication:
  • Slowed sharply: 14.6% → 7.8%.
  • Still supported by mobile money, internet expansion & broadcasting.
  • Share in GDP: 1.6%.
• Education:
  • Growth: 5.5% → 8.6%, thanks to rising student enrollments.
  • Share in GDP: 2.2%.

Table 1: Sectoral Growth Performance and Contribution Analysis

The economic implications of Tanzania's sectoral growth and contributions in Q1 2025 are multifaceted, reflecting both strengths and challenges:

Tanzania's Q1 2025 GDP growth of 5.4% at constant 2015 prices, rising from TZS 38.6 trillion in Q1 2024 to TZS 40.7 trillion, signals a resilient and accelerating economy amid a global slowdown. This performance outpaces the revised global projection of 2.8% for 2025, influenced by U.S. tariff policies and trade tensions, as well as Sub-Saharan Africa's expected 3.8% growth. It also exceeds regional peers in the SADC (e.g., South Africa's 0.8%, Namibia's 2.7%) and aligns with strong EAC growth (Uganda at 8.6%, Rwanda at 7.8%). This implies sustained macroeconomic stability, potentially boosting investor confidence and supporting Tanzania's ambition to reach a USD 1 trillion economy by 2050 through structural reforms. However, reliance on public sector-driven growth could strain fiscal balances if external shocks like commodity price volatility or climate events intensify.

The growth trajectory suggests potential for full-year 2025 GDP expansion of 5.8-6.0%, driven by infrastructure and sectoral diversification, but it highlights vulnerabilities: inflation risks from rising energy and food costs, and the need for private sector-led reforms to enhance job creation, as agriculture employs 65% of the workforce yet grows modestly. Positive spillovers include improved foreign exchange reserves from mining exports and reduced energy imports due to hydropower advancements, potentially stabilizing the Tanzanian shilling.

Primary Sector Implications (40.7% of GDP)

Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing (27.2% share, 3.0% growth, 14.2% contribution): The sector's uptick from 2.5% in Q1 2024, fueled by paddy (+9.6% to 623.3k tons) and wheat (+29.4% to 38.3k tons), implies enhanced food security and rural income growth, supporting poverty reduction in a sector employing most Tanzanians. However, modest overall growth underscores challenges like weather dependency and low productivity, potentially exacerbating inequality if not addressed through investments in irrigation and value chains. Positive linkages to manufacturing (e.g., agro-processing) could amplify multiplier effects, but slower trade flows might limit export gains.

Mining & Quarrying (11.0% share, 16.6% growth, 15.4% contribution): Explosive growth from gold (+16.1% to 15,797 kg), coal (+19.1% to 888k tons), and surges in mica (+475.6%), iron ore (+256%), and phosphate (+465%) positions mining as the top growth driver, boosting export revenues (gold alone accounts for ~50% of non-traditional exports) and government royalties. Implications include stronger fiscal space for infrastructure, but risks of Dutch disease—where resource booms crowd out other sectors—and environmental concerns from expanded operations. This could attract FDI but heighten volatility tied to global commodity prices.

Secondary Sector Implications (21.4% of GDP)

Manufacturing (6.8% share, 7.2% growth, 10.4% contribution): Acceleration from 5.8% reflects increased production of consumer and industrial goods, signaling progress in industrialization under Tanzania's FYDP III. This implies job creation in urban areas and reduced import dependence, with linkages to agriculture (e.g., food processing) and mining (e.g., metal fabrication). However, energy-intensive industries benefit from electricity growth, potentially lowering costs and enhancing competitiveness.

Electricity (0.2% share, 19.0% growth): The massive jump, driven by the Julius Nyerere Hydropower Dam's commissioning, enhances energy security, reduces reliance on costly imports, and supports industrial expansion. Implications include lower electricity tariffs (potentially curbing inflation), improved manufacturing productivity, and export potential via regional grids, but risks from hydrological variability due to climate change.

Water Supply (0.4% share, 4.2% growth): Tied to production rising to 98.9 million m³, this suggests better urban access, aiding health and sanitation. Broader implications: Supports agriculture and manufacturing, but urban-rural disparities could persist without expanded infrastructure.

Construction (12.7% share, 4.3% growth, 11.3% contribution): Slowdown from 6.4% amid cement and iron-steel output growth indicates a maturing infrastructure cycle (e.g., SGR rail). This implies sustained employment in labor-intensive projects but potential fiscal pressure if public spending tapers. Positive: Multiplier effects on transport and real estate.

Tertiary Sector Implications (37.9% of GDP)

Trade & Repair (8.4% share, 3.5% growth): Decline from 5.3% due to moderate imports and agriculture flows suggests subdued consumer demand or supply chain issues, potentially signaling inflationary pressures or weaker external trade amid global tensions. Implications: Slower retail growth could limit informal sector jobs, but ties to agriculture imply recovery with better harvests.

Transport & Storage (7.2% share, 6.5% growth, 9.3% contribution): Driven by cargo and SGR services, this enhances logistics efficiency, reducing costs for exports and imports. Implications: Boosts trade competitiveness, tourism, and regional integration (EAC), with potential for more FDI in ports/rail.

Financial & Insurance (3.5% share, 15.4% growth, 12.0% contribution): Supported by deposits (+18.5% to TZS 43.0 trillion) and loans (+14.7% to TZS 39.1 trillion), this reflects deepening financial inclusion via mobile money and credit expansion. Implications: Stimulates investment across sectors, but rapid credit growth risks non-performing loans if economic shocks hit.

Information & Communication (1.6% share, 7.8% growth): Sharp slowdown from 14.6% despite mobile/internet expansion implies saturation or competition. Implications: Digital economy growth supports fintech and e-commerce, enhancing productivity, but slower pace could hinder tech-driven diversification.

Education (2.2% share, 8.6% growth): Rising enrollments signal human capital investment, implying long-term productivity gains and reduced inequality.

Key Insights and Broader Risks

Top contributors (mining 15.4%, agriculture 14.2%, finance 12.0%) highlight a balanced yet resource-heavy growth model, with strongest rates in electricity (19.0%) and mining (16.6%) pointing to infrastructure-led momentum. Weaker areas like construction (4.3%), trade (3.5%), and ICT (7.8%) suggest external vulnerabilities. Overall, this fosters employment (especially in services/mining), fiscal revenues, and poverty alleviation, but calls for diversification to mitigate climate risks, global trade disruptions, and debt sustainability. IMF recommendations emphasize reforms for private sector growth to sustain 6%+ annual expansion.

Strong Growth, Low Inflation, but Trade and Budget Deficits Persist

Zanzibar’s economy showed resilience in 2024, with real GDP growth rising to 6.8%, up from 5.1% in 2023, driven primarily by tourism and infrastructure investments like the SGR and port upgrades. Tourist arrivals surged to 2.2 million in 2025, supporting the services sector, while FDI jumped by 28.3% to USD 1.72 billion, fueling construction. Inflation remained stable at 3.4% in June 2025, down from 6.1% a year earlier, well within the BoT's 3–5% target. On the fiscal front, domestic revenue reached TZS 874.9 billion, covering 95.6% of public income, though a TZS 248.5 billion budget deficit persists. In trade, Zanzibar posted a goods trade deficit of USD 309.2 million, as exports fell 11.9% (led by a 27.2% decline in cloves) while imports rose 8.4%. Meanwhile, the financial sector expanded with credit to the private sector growing by 23.5% and bank deposits increasing by 12.1%, signaling deepening financial inclusion despite high lending rates (15.12%).

1. Real Sector Performance (GDP Growth)

The real sector encompasses economic activities producing goods and services, with GDP growth reflecting Zanzibar’s economic vitality.

• Real GDP Growth (2024):
  • Value: 6.8%, up from 5.1% in 2023.
  • Context: This aligns with earlier reports, such as a 7% growth in January–September 2024 and 7.2% in Q4 2024, driven by tourism and trade. The African Development Bank projects Zanzibar’s growth to exceed 6% in 2025, supported by tourism, construction, and real estate.
  • Drivers:
    • Industry Sector: Construction and manufacturing led growth, fueled by infrastructure projects like the Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) and port expansions. Construction benefits from public-private partnerships (PPPs) and foreign direct investment (FDI), with Tanzania’s FDI rising 28.3% to USD 1.72 billion in 2024.
    • Services Sector: Accommodation and food services, tied to tourism, were major contributors. Tourist arrivals reached 2,193,322 in 2025, up 10% from 1,994,242 in 2024, boosting hospitality. The Tanzania National Business Council projects tourism’s GDP contribution to reach 19.5% by 2025/26.
  • Implications: The 6.8% growth reflects Zanzibar’s economic resilience, driven by tourism and infrastructure. However, reliance on tourism (10% of GDP) and construction makes the economy vulnerable to external shocks, such as global tourism fluctuations or commodity price volatility. Diversification into manufacturing and agriculture, as outlined in Zanzibar’s USD 2 billion plan, is critical.
• Comparison with Mainland Tanzania:
  • Mainland Tanzania grew at 5.6% in 2024, projected at 6% in 2025, driven by agriculture, finance, and construction. Zanzibar’s higher growth (6.8%) reflects its tourism-led economy, but its smaller economic base (contributing ~3% to Tanzania’s GDP) limits its overall impact.

2. Inflation Trends

Inflation measures the rate of price increases, affecting purchasing power and economic stability.

• Headline Inflation:
  • 12-Month Average (June 2025): 3.5%.
  • June 2025 (Monthly): 3.4%, down from 6.1% in June 2024.
  • Context: Inflation eased from 5.1% in 2024 and 6.9% in 2023, with February 2025 at 4.8%. The National Bureau of Statistics reported 3.3% inflation in June 2025, driven by food price increases (e.g., finger millet at 7.0%). Zanzibar’s inflation remains below the 5% medium-term target set by the Bank of Tanzania (BoT) and aligns with East African Community (EAC) criteria.
  • Drivers:
    • Stabilized Food Prices: Declining food inflation (5.3% in April 2025) reflects improved agricultural output and stable global commodity prices.
    • Controlled Non-Food Prices: Transport costs moderated due to stable fuel prices, with energy inflation at 7.3% in April 2025, down from 9.3% in 2024.
  • Implications: Low inflation (3.4%) supports consumer purchasing power and aligns with the BoT’s 3%–5% target under its 2025–2030 Strategic Plan. However, food price volatility (e.g., finger millet) poses risks, particularly for low-income households, given Zanzibar’s 26.4% poverty rate. Continued monetary policy prudence (6% Central Bank Rate) is essential.
• Comparison with Mainland Tanzania:
  • Mainland Tanzania’s inflation was 3.2% in May 2025 and 3.1% in January 2025, slightly lower than Zanzibar’s 3.4%. Zanzibar’s higher inflation reflects its reliance on imported goods and tourism-driven demand.

3. Government Budgetary Operations (July 2024 – May 2025)

The government budget reflects fiscal policy, balancing revenues, grants, and expenditures to fund public services and development.

• Revenues and Grants:
  • Total: TZS 914.7 billion.
    • Domestic Revenue: TZS 874.9 billion (95.6% of total).
      • Tax Revenue: TZS 796.6 billion (86.9% of total).
      • Non-Tax Revenue: TZS 78.3 billion (8.6% of total).
    • Grants: TZS 39.8 billion (4.4% of total).
  • Context: Strong revenue performance aligns with Mainland Tanzania’s TZS 2,339.7 billion tax collection in May 2025, 4.1% above target. Zanzibar’s tax revenue reflects improved administration and compliance, supported by digital systems like the Tanzania Instant Payment System (TIPS). Grants, including TZS 185 billion from China for health and economic cooperation, bolster fiscal space.
  • Implications: High domestic revenue (95.6%) reduces grant dependency, but low grant inflows (4.4%) limit funding for development projects. Enhanced tax mobilization, as per MKUMBI II reforms, is critical.
• Expenditures:
  • Total: TZS 1,123.4 billion.
    • Recurrent Expenditure: TZS 744.7 billion (66.3% of total).
    • Development Expenditure: TZS 378.7 billion (33.7% of total).
  • Context: Expenditure aligns with revenue, reflecting fiscal prudence, as noted in the BoT’s mid-year review. Development spending supports tourism (TZS 359.9 billion budget for 2025/26) and infrastructure (e.g., Dodoma Transport Project). Recurrent spending covers wages and public services, critical for Zanzibar’s 9.3% unemployment rate.
  • Implications: The high recurrent share (66.3%) limits development funding, necessitating expenditure rationalization to meet Vision 2050 goals (e.g., 90% electricity access).
• Budget Deficit:
  • Deficit (Before Grants): TZS 248.5 billion.
  • Financing: Covered by domestic borrowing (e.g., TZS 625.5 billion mobilized in April 2025, including TZS 421.7 billion in Treasury bonds) and grants.
  • Context: Public debt remains sustainable with a moderate risk of distress, per the IMF’s 2024 Debt Sustainability Analysis. Zanzibar’s deficit aligns with Mainland Tanzania’s TZS 270.2 billion deficit in May 2025.
  • Implications: Domestic borrowing supports fiscal needs but increases debt servicing costs (TZS 640 billion in April 2025). Grants and FDI (USD 1.72 billion in 2024) are vital to reduce borrowing reliance.

4. Trade Performance (Goods Only)

Trade performance reflects Zanzibar’s external sector, focusing on goods exports and imports, with services (e.g., tourism) covered separately.

• Total Exports (Goods):
  • Value: USD 150.3 million, down from USD 170.6 million in 2024 (-11.9%).
  • Composition:
    • Cloves: USD 66.4 million (44.2% of exports), down from USD 91.2 million (-27.2%).
    • Seafood & Other Goods: USD 60.4 million (40.2% of exports).
    • Manufactured Goods: USD 23.5 million (15.6% of exports).
  • Context: The decline in clove exports reflects global market downturns, as noted in earlier reports. Seafood and manufactured goods growth aligns with diversification efforts under Zanzibar’s USD 2 billion plan. Total Tanzania exports (including Mainland) reached USD 16.1 billion in 2024, led by gold and tourism.
  • Implications: The 11.9% export drop, particularly in cloves, strains foreign exchange earnings, given cloves’ 90% production on Pemba. Diversification into seafood and manufacturing is promising but requires market expansion.
• Total Imports (Goods):
  • Value: USD 459.5 million, up from USD 423.7 million in 2024 (+8.4%).
  • Composition:
    • Capital Goods: USD 222.5 million (48.4% of imports).
    • Intermediate Goods: USD 141.4 million (30.8% of imports).
    • Consumer Goods: USD 95.6 million (20.8% of imports).
  • Context: Import growth reflects infrastructure projects (e.g., SGR, port expansions) and consumer demand, consistent with Mainland Tanzania’s capital goods imports. Zanzibar’s reliance on imported staples and petroleum products persists.
  • Implications: Rising imports, driven by capital goods, support industrialization but widen the trade deficit, straining reserves (USD 5,307.7 million, 4.3 months of import cover).
• Trade Deficit:
  • Value: USD 309.2 million, widened from USD 253.1 million in 2024 (imports USD 423.7 million – exports USD 170.6 million).
  • Context: The deficit reflects falling clove exports and rising capital goods imports, consistent with Tanzania’s overall current account deficit of USD 2,117.6 million.
  • Implications: The widened deficit pressures the Tanzanian Shilling (8% depreciation in 2023) and reserves. Export promotion (e.g., seafood, manufactured goods) and tourism (USD 3,934.5 million in receipts) are critical to offset deficits.

5. Financial Sector Performance

The financial sector supports economic activity through credit provision and deposit mobilization, critical for private sector growth.

• Credit to Private Sector (June 2025):
  • Value: TZS 747.7 billion, up 23.5% from June 2024.
  • Sectors:
    • Trade: 27.8% (TZS 207.9 billion).
    • Building & Construction: 20.2% (TZS 151.0 billion).
    • Personal Loans: 13.8% (TZS 103.2 billion).
    • Transport & Communication: 10.7% (TZS 80.0 billion).
  • Context: The 23.5% growth exceeds Mainland Tanzania’s 12.8% private sector credit growth in January 2025, driven by agriculture and SMEs. Zanzibar’s credit growth reflects tourism and construction demand, supported by the BoT’s 6% Central Bank Rate and TIPS (453.7 million transactions in 2024).
  • Implications: Robust credit growth (23.5%) supports SMEs and infrastructure, aligning with financial inclusion goals (87% adult target by 2030). However, the high trade and construction share risks overexposure if tourism slows.
• Deposit Mobilization:
  • Value: TZS 1,185.4 billion, up 12.1% from TZS 1,057.6 billion in June 2024.
  • Context: Growth aligns with Tanzania’s banking sector stability, with a 3.6% non-performing loan ratio in Q1 2025, below the 5% threshold. Mobile money transactions (TZS 198,859 billion in 2024) boost deposits.
  • Implications: Strong deposit growth (12.1%) reflects financial deepening, but high lending rates (15.12% in January 2025) may constrain borrowing. Digital platforms like TIPS enhance inclusion, supporting Vision 2050.

Summary Table: Key Economic Indicators for Zanzibar (Year Ending June 2025)

Key Takeaways and Policy Implications

1. Robust GDP Growth:
   • Zanzibar’s 6.8% growth in 2024, driven by tourism and construction, outpaces Mainland Tanzania (5.6%). Tourism (2.2 million arrivals) and infrastructure (e.g., SGR) are key drivers, but diversification into manufacturing and agriculture is needed to reduce tourism dependency (10% of GDP).
   • Policy: Implement Zanzibar’s USD 2 billion diversification plan to boost seafood and manufactured exports, aligning with Vision 2050.
2. Stable Inflation:
   • Inflation at 3.4% (June 2025) supports purchasing power, driven by stable food and fuel prices. However, food price volatility (e.g., 7.0% for finger millet) risks impacting the 26.4% poverty rate.
   • Policy: Enhance agricultural productivity and supply chain resilience to mitigate food price shocks, as per the Second Agriculture Sector Development Program.
3. Fiscal Prudence:
   • Strong domestic revenue (TZS 874.9 billion) reduces grant reliance, but the TZS 248.5 billion deficit requires sustained borrowing and grants. Development spending (33.7%) supports growth but is constrained by recurrent costs (66.3%).
   • Policy: Rationalize recurrent expenditure and leverage FDI (USD 1.72 billion in 2024) to fund infrastructure and tourism.
4. Trade Challenges:
   • The USD 309.2 million trade deficit, driven by a 27.2% drop in clove exports and 8.4% import rise, pressures reserves. Tourism receipts (USD 3,934.5 million) offset some losses, but goods exports need boosting.
   • Policy: Promote clove market recovery and expand seafood and manufacturing exports through trade agreements (e.g., AfCFTA).
5. Financial Sector Strength:
   • Credit growth (23.5%) and deposit mobilization (12.1%) reflect financial deepening, supported by digital payments (TIPS) and a stable banking sector (3.6% NPL ratio). High lending rates (15.12%) and trade/construction exposure pose risks.
   • Policy: Reduce lending rates and enhance SME financing, as per the BoT’s 2025–2030 plan, to sustain inclusion and growth.
6. Economic Context:
   • Regional Role: Zanzibar’s tourism and trade hub status supports growth, but its small GDP share (~3% of Tanzania’s USD 105.1 billion in 2022) limits impact.
   • Risks: Global commodity price volatility, tourism seasonality, and shilling depreciation (8% in 2023) pose challenges.
   • Opportunities: Vision 2050, MKUMBI II reforms, and digital financial inclusion (87% target) offer pathways to a USD 1 trillion economy.

Tanzania’s external debt has surged from 2,469.7 USD Million in December 2011 to 34,056 USD Million in March 2025, representing a 13.8-fold increase over 14 years, or an average annual growth rate of approximately 20.8%. This dramatic rise reflects a combination of economic, infrastructural, and policy drivers that have fueled borrowing to support Tanzania’s development ambitions. Below, I outline the key factors driving this growth, supported by figures and data from available sources, including the Bank of Tanzania and other economic analyses.

1. Economic Drivers

Tanzania’s economic growth and structural transformation goals have necessitated significant external borrowing to bridge fiscal deficits and finance development projects. Key economic factors include:

• Fiscal Deficits and Revenue Shortfalls: Tanzania’s fiscal deficit has consistently required external financing, as tax revenues (e.g., 13% of GDP in 2024) remain low compared to regional peers. The fiscal deficit was 3.8% of GDP in 2022/23, up from 3.4% in 2021/22, driven by increased public spending. To cover this, external debt rose to USD 34.1 billion (TZS 91.29 trillion at TZS 2,677/USD) by March 2025, with 78.3% held by the central government.
• Foreign Exchange Needs: A 2.6% shilling depreciation in 2024/25 and an 8% depreciation in 2023 increased the cost of servicing USD-denominated debt (67.7% of external debt, or USD 23.1 billion). Declining export revenues from commodities like coffee (-2%) and sugar (-1.5%) strained foreign exchange reserves, necessitating borrowing to maintain import cover (e.g., USD 5.7 billion, 3.8 months of imports in 2025).
• Economic Growth Ambitions: Tanzania’s GDP grew from USD 33.2 billion in 2011 to USD 75.5 billion in 2022, with projections of 5.6% growth in 2024 and 6% in 2025. This growth, driven by agriculture, manufacturing, and tourism, required external financing to sustain investments in productive sectors. For example, foreign direct investment (FDI) rose to USD 922 million in 2021, supporting projects like the Kabanga Nickel Project, which increased borrowing needs.

2. Infrastructural Drivers

Tanzania’s ambitious infrastructure agenda has been a primary driver of external debt growth, with significant borrowing to fund transformative projects in transport, energy, and urban development. Key projects include:

• Standard Gauge Railway (SGR): The SGR, a flagship project to connect Dar es Salaam to inland regions and neighboring countries, has been a major contributor to debt growth. The project’s cost, estimated at USD 7.6 billion for multiple phases, has been largely financed through external loans, particularly from China and multilateral institutions.
• Energy Infrastructure: Investments in energy, such as the 532 km gas pipeline from Mnazi Bay to Dar es Salaam (completed in 2015, costing USD 1.2 billion) and plans to increase electricity capacity to 10,000 MW by 2025, have driven borrowing. In 2013, 49.7% of electricity came from natural gas, and projects like the Ntorya gas field (projected to produce 40 million cubic feet/day by 2025) required external financing.
• Port and Transport Upgrades: The modernization of Dar es Salaam Port, including a USD 250 million investment by DP World (UAE) in 2023, and the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP, USD 5 billion), have increased external debt. These projects aim to position Tanzania as a regional trade hub.
• World Bank Financing: As of March 2025, 48% of the World Bank’s USD 10 billion portfolio in Tanzania supports infrastructure, including roads, railways, and power projects, significantly contributing to the external debt stock.

3. Policy Drivers

Government policies aimed at economic diversification, poverty reduction, and structural reforms have shaped borrowing patterns, with a focus on concessional and non-concessional loans. Key policy drivers include:

• Concessional Borrowing from Multilateral Institutions: Multilateral creditors account for 53.9% of external debt (USD 18.3 billion) as of January 2025, with the World Bank, IMF, and African Development Bank providing concessional loans. In 2021, the IMF provided USD 567.25 million in emergency assistance for COVID-19 recovery, and the 2022–2025 Extended Credit Facility (ECF) program unlocked USD 150 million in 2025 to support fiscal sustainability.
• Non-Concessional Borrowing: External non-concessional borrowing has risen to finance infrastructure, accounting for 36.3% of external debt (USD 12.4 billion) in January 2025. Commercial creditors, including Chinese loans for projects like the SGR, have driven debt growth, increasing exposure to higher interest rates.
• Vision 2025 and Development Goals: Tanzania’s Vision 2025 aims for a GDP growth rate of 8% annually, requiring investments in infrastructure, education, and health. The FY 2024/25 budget of TZS 49.35 trillion (USD 18.4 billion) included TZS 29.41 trillion (59.6%) from tax revenue, with the deficit financed by external borrowing. The planned 13.4% spending increase to TZS 57.04 trillion in FY 2025/26 further drives borrowing.
• Business Environment Reforms: Policies to improve the investment climate, such as tax code revisions and the creation of the Tanzania Investment Centre, have attracted FDI but also increased borrowing for co-financed projects. For example, Chinese investments in the Mchuchuma coal and Liganga iron ore projects (USD 3 billion) in 2011 required complementary government borrowing.

Quantitative Insights

• Debt Growth Trajectory:
  • 2011: USD 2,469.7 million (Bank of Tanzania).
  • 2019: USD 22.4 billion (40% of GDP, 6% YoY increase from 2018).
  • 2023: USD 32,090 million (disbursed, January 2025).
  • March 2025: USD 34,056 million, a 6.1% increase from January 2025 (USD 32,090 million).

• Debt-to-GDP Ratio: Rose from 32.68% in 2013 to 46.87% in 2023 (total public debt), with external debt at ~32-35% of GDP in 2025, assuming a GDP of ~USD 100 billion.
• Debt Composition (January 2025):
  • Multilateral: 53.9% (USD 18.3 billion).
  • Commercial: 36.3% (USD 12.4 billion).
  • Bilateral: 4.2% (USD 1.4 billion).
  • Export Credit: 5.6% (USD 1.9 billion).
• Debt Servicing: Absorbs ~40% of government expenditures, with external debt service estimated at USD 1-2 billion annually and domestic at TZS 5.31 trillion in 2025.

Challenges and Risks

• Exchange Rate Risks: With 67.7% of external debt in USD, the 2.6% shilling depreciation in 2024/25 increases servicing costs by approximately TZS 2.38 trillion for the USD-denominated portion.
• Global Economic Pressures: The IMF’s global growth forecast of 2.8% for 2025 and rising interest rates elevate borrowing costs, particularly for non-concessional loans.
• Fiscal Space Constraints: High debt servicing limits investments in social sectors, with 3% of GDP spent on debt servicing in 2024.
• COVID-19 Impact: Emergency borrowing, including USD 567.25 million from the IMF in 2021, contributed to debt spikes to address health and economic costs.

Conclusion

The 13.8-fold increase in Tanzania’s external debt from 2,469.7 USD Million in 2011 to 34,056 USD Million in March 2025 is driven by economic needs (fiscal deficits, foreign exchange shortages), major infrastructure projects (SGR, energy, ports), and policy choices favoring concessional and non-concessional borrowing to achieve Vision 2025 goals. While debt remains sustainable (moderate risk per IMF DSA), with a debt-to-GDP ratio of ~32-35%, challenges like shilling depreciation and high debt servicing costs underscore the need for prudent fiscal management and revenue mobilization.

This table consolidates the key figures driving Tanzania’s external debt growth, highlighting economic factors (fiscal deficits, GDP growth), infrastructure projects (SGR, energy, ports), and policy decisions (concessional and non-concessional borrowing). The 13.8-fold increase reflects Tanzania’s development ambitions, balanced by a sustainable debt-to-GDP ratio of ~32-35% in 2025.

Notes:

• Debt Growth: From 2,469.7 USD Million (2011) to 34,056 USD Million (Mar 2025), driven by fiscal deficits, infrastructure, and policy goals.
• Infrastructure Costs: SGR (USD 7.6 billion), gas pipeline (USD 1.2 billion), and port upgrades (USD 250 million) are major contributors.
• Debt Composition: Multilateral (53.9%, USD 18.3 billion), commercial (36.3%, USD 12.4 billion), bilateral (4.2%, USD 1.4 billion), export credit (5.6%, USD 1.9 billion) as of Jan 2025.
• Economic Context: GDP growth from USD 33.2 billion (2011) to ~USD 100 billion (2025) supports debt sustainability, but shilling depreciation (8% in 2023, 2.6% in 2024/25) increases servicing costs.
• Policy Impact: Vision 2025 and FY 2024/25 budget (TZS 49.35 trillion, USD 18.4 billion) drive borrowing, with 59.6% funded by taxes and the rest by loans.

By Dr. Bravious Kahyoza, PhD, Senior Economist at TICGL

Tanzania’s Vision 2050 marks a crucial transition from Vision 2025, positioning the country at a crossroads of opportunity and challenge. Vision 2025 set Tanzania on a path toward becoming a middle-income nation with a competitive economy, improved infrastructure, and enhanced governance.

However, despite significant government efaforts, many goals remained unfulfilled, particularly in poverty reduction and equitable development. When Vision 2025 was formulated twenty-five years ago, GDP per capita stood at $360. Today, it has risen to at least $1,500, reflecting a fourfold increase.

To sustain this momentum and quadruple per capita income over the next 25 years, Tanzania must achieve a per capita income of at least $8,600 by 2050. With an expected population of 116 million, this translates to a GDP of around $1 trillion, requiring economic growth from the current $85 billion.

A critical factor in reaching these goals is infrastructure development. Vision 2050 introduces broader goals, including industrialization, infrastructure development, and social inclusion. Achieving these targets necessitates addressing the shortcomings of Vision 2025, particularly in leveraging PPPs more effectively.

One major shortcoming of Vision 2025 was the limited impact on poverty reduction despite steady economic growth. Tanzania’s annual GDP growth rate averaged 6 percent, yet by the end of Vision 2025, 26.4 percent of the population still lived below the poverty line. This highlights the critical issue that economic growth alone does not guarantee improved living standards. The private sector’s potential, especially in rural areas, remained underutilized.

PPPs, identified as a development avenue under Vision 2025, often failed to deliver the intended impact. Large-scale PPP projects, such as the expansion of Dar es Salaam’s port and the Julius Nyerere Hydropower Project, contributed to national development but primarily benefited urban areas without adequately addressing poverty alleviation.

Critics argue that while these initiatives were significant, they failed to tackle systemic challenges in rural regions, where agriculture remains the backbone of the economy.Tanzania’s agriculture sector, employing more than 70 percent of the population, remained underfunded and technologically stagnant during Vision 2025.

Although PPPs could have facilitated modern technologies, improved irrigation systems, and better farming techniques, these initiatives were slow to materialize or failed to reach smallholder farmers.

Professor Damian Gabagambi, an expert in agricultural economics, asserts that Tanzania cannot become a global food production leader without transforming its agricultural practices. Achieving this demands investment in new technologies and political commitment to restructuring the sector for sustainability and resilience. Vision 2050 sets even more ambitious plans, aiming for upper-middle-income status with a GDP exceeding USD 1 Trillion and a per capita income of USD 7,000.

Minister of State for Planning and Investment, Prof. Kitila Mkumbo, has emphasized that Tanzania’s future depends on its ability to industrialize and create an inclusive, equitable society. For this to materialize, a thriving private sector is crucial, requiring improved infrastructure, predictable regulatory frameworks, and enhanced access to finance. Prof. Kitila Mkumbos stresses that Tanzania cannot attain upper-middle-income status without a robust private sector, which serves as the foundation for industrialization.

However, the Tanzanian private sector faces challenges such as inconsistent policy enforcement, limited capital access, and insufficient technical expertise. Addressing these barriers is essential for realizing Vision 2050’s objectives.

PPPs in Vision 2050 must extend beyond financial investments to an integrated approach where the private sector plays a role in education, healthcare, and agriculture.

Vision 2050 aims for universal healthcare access, requiring significant investment in infrastructure and human capital. To meet these goals, PPPs should engage the private sector in developing affordable healthcare solutions, including rural health centers.

Similarly, Tanzania’s education system, particularly in rural areas, demands PPPs to expand access to quality education and vocational training. A well-educated and healthy population is crucial for Tanzania’s transition into an industrialized economy.

Despite these ambitions, Vision 2050 faces significant challenges. The energy sector remains a major bottleneck, with per capita energy consumption at approximately 100 kWh, far below the target of 600 kWh by 2050.

South Africa, with an economy under $400 billion and a population similar to Tanzania’s, generates over 50,000 megawatts of electricity. In contrast, Tanzania currently produces less than 5,000 megawatts, meaning power generation must increase twelvefold in the next 25 years.

Meeting this goal requires substantial investment in renewable energy, infrastructure, and technology. While projects like the Julius Nyerere Hydropower Plant are promising, they are still in early stages. The private sector must play a central role in scaling up energy generation, distribution, and efficiency.

The success of Vision 2050 depends on Tanzania’s ability to maximize its private sector potential through strategic public-private partnerships.

While Vision 2025 laid the groundwork, it underscored the need for more inclusive and targeted economic growth. Addressing persistent challenges, from poverty to inadequate infrastructure, requires active private-sector engagement.

Vision 2050 provides a roadmap for a prosperous, industrialized, and equitable Tanzania, but achieving this vision necessitates fostering a conducive investment environment, adopting advanced technologies, and making bold, transformative investments in key sectors.

The future is promising if the right reforms are enacted and the country’s abundant resources are harnessed effectively.

Tanzania’s National Development Plan for 2025/26 outlines strategic priorities to sustain economic growth, enhance infrastructure, and improve social services. With a projected GDP growth of 6.0%, the plan emphasizes industrialization, investment, agriculture, and public-private partnerships (PPP) to drive development. Key focus areas include energy expansion, transport modernization, job creation, and food security, ensuring a resilient and self-sufficient economy while preparing for Vision 2050.

Key Highlights and Figures:

1. Economic Performance (2024/2025)

• Global Economy: Growth was 3.2% in 2024 and is projected to be 3.3% in 2025. Growth is slowing due to aging populations, reduced productivity in developed countries, and geopolitical tensions.
• Regional Economy:
  • SADC: Growth declined from 5.2% in 2023 to 5.1% in 2024, expected to reach 4.1% in 2025.
  • EAC: Growth slowed from 3.9% in 2023 to 3.4% in 2024, projected to recover to 5.7% in 2025.
• Tanzania’s GDP Growth:
  • Grew by 5.6% in 2024 (Jan-Sept) vs. 5.1% in 2023.
  • Expected to grow 6.0% in 2025 and 6.1% in 2026.
• Inflation:
  • Fell to 3.1% in 2024 (vs. 3.8% in 2023).
  • Tanzania’s inflation target is 3.0%-5.0%, within EAC limits (below 8%).

2. Development Achievements (2019/20 – 2024/25)

3. Budget for 2025/26

• Total Budget: TZS 57.04 trillion
• Development Budget: TZS 19.47 trillion (34.1% of total budget)
• Sources:
  • Domestic funds: TZS 13.32 trillion
  • External funding: TZS 6.15 trillion
• Private Sector Role: Emphasizing Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) to fund development projects.

4. Key Priority Areas for 2025/26

1. Competitive and Inclusive Economy – Infrastructure (transport, ICT, energy), improving business environment.
2. Manufacturing and Services – Boosting industrial productivity.
3. Investment and Trade – Improving regulatory frameworks, tax policies.
4. Human Development – Education, health, water, land planning, youth skill development.
5. Human Capital Development – Strengthening technical and vocational training.

5. Major Government Plans

• Malaria Eradication Campaign: Government to intensify control using locally produced chemicals.
• Reduced Foreign Aid Dependence: Strengthening AIDS Trust Fund, leveraging PPP models for funding.

The plan aligns with Tanzania’s Vision 2025 and is part of the Third Five-Year National Development Plan (2021/22 – 2025/26). The government aims to complete ongoing projects while preparing for Vision 2050. The focus remains on sustaining economic growth, improving social services, and enhancing private sector involvement.

Tanzania’s National Development Plan for 2025/26, outlining the country’s economic performance, achievements, budget allocations, and strategic priorities.

1. Economic Growth & Stability

• Tanzania’s economy is growing steadily, with GDP increasing from 5.1% in 2023 to 5.6% in 2024, and projected at 6.0% in 2025.
• Inflation has remained low and stable at 3.1%, which is within the government’s target range of 3.0% - 5.0%.
• The East African Community (EAC) and SADC economies are slowing due to inflation, global debt, and geopolitical instability, but Tanzania is expected to maintain growth.

2. Development Achievements (2019 – 2024/25)

The government has made significant progress in infrastructure, energy, agriculture, health, and education:

• Electricity production increased from 1,602 MW to 3,077 MW.
• Villages connected to electricity: 8,587 → 12,318 (100% target met).
• Food security remains strong (114% in 2019 → 128% in 2024).
• Tourism has recovered, with tourist numbers growing from 1.03 million (2019) to 4.24 million (2024), boosting foreign exchange earnings.
• Irrigated agriculture expanded to 983,466 hectares, supporting food production.

3. Budget Priorities for 2025/26

• The total budget is TZS 57.04 trillion, with 34.1% (TZS 19.47 trillion) dedicated to development projects.
• Funding sources:
  • TZS 13.32 trillion from domestic revenue.
  • TZS 6.15 trillion from external financing.
• Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) will be expanded to reduce dependence on foreign aid.

4. Key Priorities for 2025/26

• Infrastructure Development: Completion of SGR railway, road networks, ports, and energy projects.
• Agriculture & Food Security: Expanding irrigation, mechanization, and agribusiness investment.
• Industrialization & Investment: Encouraging local and foreign investment in manufacturing and services.
• Health & Education:
  • Expanding public health services and strengthening malaria eradication programs.
  • Enhancing vocational and technical training to improve youth employment.

5. Future Outlook

• Tanzania is on track to maintain strong economic growth and complete Vision 2025 goals before transitioning to Vision 2050.
• Self-sufficiency in key sectors like food, energy, and healthcare will be prioritized.
• Private sector involvement will be key to funding national projects through PPPs.

Overall Message

• Tanzania is making solid progress toward economic transformation and social development.
• The government is reducing dependency on foreign aid while boosting domestic investment.
• Key focus areas in 2025/26: Economic growth, infrastructure, agriculture, manufacturing, education, and healthcare.

Introduction
Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) are central to Tanzania’s strategy for achieving sustainable development and economic transformation. Through innovative financial models and collaboration, the government aims to address infrastructure, energy, and social challenges while leveraging private sector efficiency and capital. These partnerships are aligned with Tanzania’s Vision 2025, focusing on inclusivity and growth.

Development Budget and Cost-Sharing Model
From 2021/22 to 2024/25, Tanzania allocated 54.575 trillion TZS to development projects, with 33.794 trillion TZS sourced domestically. The government employs an 80-20 cost-sharing model, where 80% of project funding is contributed by the private sector, significantly reducing the government’s financial burden. This model not only minimizes upfront costs but also allocates risk, with the private sector absorbing potential project overruns.

The development plan is expected to create approximately 10,000 jobs, with 8,000 positions in the private sector. Moreover, it is anticipated to boost annual economic output by 1 trillion TZS, enhancing Tanzania’s position as a regional economic hub.

Major Projects and Their Impact

1. Infrastructure Development
   • The Standard Gauge Railway enhances regional connectivity, fostering trade and reducing transport costs.
   • The Kigongo-Busisi Bridge facilitates commerce in the Lake Zone by improving accessibility.
   • The Msalato International Airport expands international connectivity, promoting tourism and trade.
2. Energy Projects
   • The Julius Nyerere Hydropower Project, with a capacity of 2,115 MW, stabilizes Tanzania’s energy supply, supporting industrial growth.
   • Rural electrification initiatives aim to provide universal energy access, particularly benefiting underserved rural communities.
3. Social Investments
   Investments in education and healthcare infrastructure are improving access to essential services. The government’s commitment to fee-free basic education and enhanced healthcare services highlights its dedication to uplifting the quality of life for citizens.

The Julius Nyerere Hydropower Project alone is projected to generate 31.725 billion TZS in annual revenue, showcasing the financial efficiency of PPP initiatives.

Comparative Insights from Africa
Tanzania’s PPP model mirrors successful regional practices. For instance, Kenya’s Nairobi Expressway, funded 80% by the private sector, has significantly reduced traffic congestion while generating $25 million in annual toll revenue. Similarly, Rwanda’s Kigali Innovation City has created 50,000 digital jobs, boosting the country’s tech ecosystem. Morocco’s Noor Solar Power Complex demonstrates the environmental benefits of PPPs, powering two million homes and reducing carbon emissions by 760,000 tons annually.

These examples highlight the potential for Tanzania to replicate such successes, particularly in renewable energy, transportation, and technology sectors.

Recommendations for Strengthening Tanzania’s PPPs

1. Sectoral Priorities:
   Focus on critical areas such as transportation, renewable energy, water supply, and digital transformation to ensure long-term sustainability and social impact.
2. Regulatory Enhancements:
   Establish clear frameworks and standardized contracts to improve project consistency and build investor confidence.
3. Public Awareness:
   Engage communities through education campaigns on PPP benefits to foster acceptance and reduce resistance to development projects.
4. Risk Management:
   Allocate risks effectively between public and private partners, ensuring stability and balanced collaboration.

Conclusion
Tanzania’s strategic use of PPPs is transforming its economic landscape, fostering job creation, enhancing infrastructure, and improving access to essential services. Flagship projects like the Standard Gauge Railway and Julius Nyerere Hydropower Project underscore the potential of PPPs to drive economic growth and inclusivity. By addressing challenges such as regulatory gaps and expanding partnerships to sectors like healthcare and education, Tanzania can solidify its position as a regional leader in sustainable development.

As of September 2024, Tanzania's total external debt reached USD 32.89 billion, accounting for 73% of the country’s total national debt. The central government held the largest share of external debt at USD 25.43 billion (78.1%), with funds directed toward critical sectors like transport (21.5%) and social welfare (20.8%). Domestically, the government owed TZS 32.62 trillion, with Treasury bonds dominating at 78.9%. Despite strategic investments, reliance on the USD (67.4% of external debt) and limited funding for agriculture (5.1%) and tourism (1.6%) pose challenges to debt sustainability and inclusive economic growth.

1. External Debt

Key Figures

• Total External Debt Stock (Sept 2024): USD 32,890.0 million.
• Proportion of National Debt: 73%.
• Main Components:
  • Disbursed Outstanding Debt: USD 31,425.6 million.
  • Undisbursed Debt: USD 5,042.7 million.

Debt Stock by Borrowers

• Central Government: USD 25,428.6 million (78.1% of external debt).
• Private Sector: USD 5,993.2 million (21.9% of external debt).
• Public Corporations: USD 3.8 million (negligible share).

Use of Funds (Disbursed Outstanding Debt)

• Transport and Telecommunications: 21.5% – Largest allocation, highlighting the government's priority on improving connectivity and mobility.
• Social Welfare and Education: 20.8% – Significant focus on human capital development.
• Balance of Payments Support: 17.9% – Indicates reliance on external financing for stabilizing the country's foreign exchange reserves.
• Energy and Mining: 14.8% – Focus on infrastructure for energy and resource exploitation.
• Agriculture: 5.1% – Low share considering Tanzania's agriculture-driven economy.
• Industries: 3.7%.
• Finance and Insurance: 4.0%.
• Tourism: 1.6% – Surprisingly low given its economic importance.
• Real Estate and Construction: 4.8%.
• Other Uses: 5.8%.

Currency Composition

• US Dollar: 67.4% – Reflects high exposure to exchange rate fluctuations against the USD.
• Euro: 16.6%.
• Chinese Yuan: 6.3%.
• Other Currencies: 9.7%.

2. Internal (Domestic) Debt

Key Figures

• Total Domestic Debt Stock (Sept 2024): TZS 32,615.7 billion.
• Month-on-Month Change: Decreased by TZS 144.5 billion.
• Main Instruments:
  • Treasury Bonds: 78.9% – Dominates domestic debt instruments, preferred for their longer maturity periods.

Domestic Debt by Creditor

• Commercial Banks: 29.7% (TZS 9,678.8 billion) – Largest creditors, showing banking sector's key role in funding government activities.
• Bank of Tanzania: 20.5% (TZS 6,696.3 billion) – Central bank’s significant share indicates monetary policy alignment.
• Pension Funds: 27.6% (TZS 8,991.4 billion) – Reflects government reliance on long-term funds.
• Insurance Companies: 5.8% (TZS 1,904.2 billion).
• BOT’s Special Funds: 1.2% (TZS 389.0 billion).
• Others: 15.2% (TZS 4,956.0 billion) – Includes various smaller creditors.

Insights

1. Debt Composition: External debt forms a significant majority (73%), exposing the economy to foreign exchange risks, especially given the dominance of USD (67.4%).
2. Focus Areas of Debt Use: Prioritization of transport, telecommunications, social services, and energy aligns with Tanzania's development goals, though agriculture and tourism receive relatively smaller allocations.
3. Domestic Financing: Treasury bonds dominate, with commercial banks and pension funds as major participants, reflecting a stable domestic borrowing market.

The key insights into Tanzania's fiscal and economic dynamics:

1. Heavy Reliance on External Debt

• External Borrowing: Makes up 73% of total debt, indicating significant dependency on international sources for financing development projects and budgetary needs.
• Risks: High exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations, especially with 67.4% of external debt denominated in USD. Any depreciation of the Tanzanian shilling could increase the cost of servicing the debt.

2. Focused Use of Funds

• Priority Sectors:
  • Transport, telecommunications, and social welfare (education and health) receive a combined 42.3% of external debt funding. This reflects strategic efforts to improve infrastructure and human capital.
  • Energy and mining account for 14.8%, essential for supporting industrialization and reducing power shortages.
• Underfunded Areas:
  • Agriculture (5.1%) and tourism (1.6%) receive smaller shares, despite their significance in Tanzania's GDP and employment. This could suggest underprioritization of these critical sectors or reliance on other forms of financing for them.

3. Dominance of Treasury Bonds in Domestic Debt

• Treasury bonds constitute 78.9% of domestic debt, reflecting:
  • A preference for long-term instruments that reduce refinancing risks.
  • A relatively well-developed domestic bond market to absorb government debt.
• Impact: Stable borrowing through domestic sources reduces reliance on volatile external sources but concentrates risk within the local financial system.

4. Key Domestic Creditors

• Commercial Banks and Pension Funds: Together hold over 57% of domestic debt, showing reliance on institutional investors for funding.
• Central Bank Role: The Bank of Tanzania (20.5%) plays a critical role in supporting government borrowing, reflecting alignment with monetary policy goals.

5. Debt Sustainability and Macro Risks

• Short-Term Indicators: While the focus on productive sectors like transport and energy could boost long-term growth, the high proportion of debt (external and domestic) demands careful management to avoid repayment challenges.
• Diversification Needs: The small allocation to tourism and agriculture may limit potential contributions from these sectors, which are key to inclusive growth and export earnings.
• Debt Service Pressures: Heavy USD dependency can amplify costs if global financial conditions tighten (e.g., rising interest rates or strengthening dollar).

Key Messages

• Opportunities: Investment in infrastructure, energy, and education positions Tanzania for future economic growth.
• Challenges: Managing debt sustainability, diversifying financing sources, and balancing sectoral priorities remain crucial to minimize risks and maximize development impact.