How Institutional Investors Dominate Tanzania’s Domestic Debt Market
April 10, 2025
As of February 2025, Tanzania’s government domestic debt stood at TZS 29.19 trillion, marking a monthly increase of TZS 195.7 billion (0.7%). The debt is largely held by institutional investors, with commercial banks accounting for 36.4%, followed by the Bank of Tanzania at 30.2%, and pension funds at 22.1%. Other creditors, including insurance companies (3.7%), […]
As of February 2025, Tanzania’s government domestic debt stood at TZS 29.19 trillion, marking a monthly increase of TZS 195.7 billion (0.7%). The debt is largely held by institutional investors, with commercial banks accounting for 36.4%, followed by the Bank of Tanzania at 30.2%, and pension funds at 22.1%. Other creditors, including insurance companies (3.7%), other official entities (4.2%), and individual investors (3.4%), make up a smaller share. This distribution reflects a stable and concentrated debt market, dominated by institutions seeking safe and long-term returns.
Tanzania’s domestic debt, focusing on government domestic debt by creditor category, as of February 2025.
Tanzania’s Domestic Debt Profile
1. Total Domestic Debt Stock
As of end-February 2025, the government’s domestic debt stock stood at TZS 29,191.6 billion (approximately USD 11.37 billion).
This marks a monthly increase of TZS 195.7 billion, equivalent to a 0.7% rise from January 2025.
The increase was primarily due to new issuances of Treasury bonds to finance government operations and refinance maturing obligations.
2. Domestic Debt by Creditor Category
Creditor Category
Share (%)
Commercial Banks
36.4%
Bank of Tanzania
30.2%
Pension Funds
22.1%
Insurance Companies
3.7%
Other Official Entities
4.2%
Retail Investors & Others
3.4%
What This Tells Us
Commercial Banks are the largest holders of government domestic debt, owning over one-third (36.4%). This reflects strong participation of banks in government securities due to safety and predictable returns.
The Bank of Tanzania (BoT) follows closely with 30.2%, indicating its supportive role in managing liquidity and stabilizing the market.
Pension Funds also play a significant role, holding 22.1% of domestic debt, which aligns with their long-term investment needs and provides the government with a stable source of funding.
The rest—insurance companies, other official entities, and individuals—collectively hold less than 12%, showing room for further market deepening and diversification.
Summary Insight
Tanzania’s domestic debt is largely held by institutional investors, ensuring stability and predictability in the debt market. The dominance of banks and pension funds also suggests that government securities are a preferred low-risk investment for major financial institutions.
Tanzania’s government domestic debt by creditor category:
What the Figures Reveal
Strong Institutional Demand The fact that commercial banks (36.4%), Bank of Tanzania (30.2%), and pension funds (22.1%) hold nearly 89% of all domestic debt shows that the government relies heavily on large institutional investors for its domestic financing needs. This provides predictability and low volatility in debt markets.
Government Debt is Seen as a Safe Haven The high concentration of debt in banks and pension funds suggests that government securities are considered low-risk, making them attractive for institutions managing long-term savings or liquidity buffers.
Limited Retail and Private Participation With only 3.4% of debt held by individuals and smaller investors, there's an opportunity to expand public participation in government securities through retail bonds and savings initiatives—potentially deepening the capital market.
Bank of Tanzania’s Support Role The central bank’s 30.2% stake also shows its key role in monetary operations, such as liquidity support and market stabilization, especially when commercial demand is weak or during refinancing periods.
🧾 Bottom Line:
Tanzania’s domestic debt market is stable, institutional-heavy, and closely tied to public finance management. However, to foster broader financial inclusion and capital market development, there’s space to diversify the creditor base beyond banks and pension funds.