As Tanzania continues its journey toward economic self-reliance, the performance of the Tanzania Revenue Authority (TRA) has taken center stage in the country’s budget operations. With consistent improvements in tax collection and administrative reforms, TRA is emerging as the main engine of domestic revenue mobilization. But the key question remains: Can TRA revenues fully support Tanzania’s budget and eliminate the fiscal deficit?
From July 2024 to March 2025, TRA collected TZS 24.05 trillion, exceeding the target of TZS 23.21 trillion by TZS 0.84 trillion. This represents a performance rate of 103.62% and a 17% increase compared to the same period in 2023/24.
Projection: By June 2025, TRA is expected to collect over TZS 32 trillion, positioning it to potentially cover most of Tanzania’s recurrent budget.
In comparison, Tanzania typically receives about TZS 7–8 trillion annually in foreign aid and loans. TRA’s revenue is now 4–5 times greater, proving the growing power of domestic resource mobilization.
A closer look at January 2025 reveals the real weight of TRA revenues:
➤ Resulting Budget Deficit:
Deficit = Expenditure – Revenue
= TZS 3,576.1B – TZS 2,697.8B
= TZS 878.3 billion
Even though TRA slightly exceeded its tax collection target by 0.3%, it could not fully cover government spending. This left a financing gap of TZS 878.3 billion, highlighting ongoing fiscal pressure.
TRA’s improved performance is helping reduce the budget deficit. For example:
Still, to completely eliminate the deficit, either:
From Deficit to Surplus — What’s Required?
Let’s do the math:
So even with TRA’s strong performance, Tanzania still faces a potential shortfall of TZS 6–8 trillion annually, unless:
Only when total revenue exceeds expenditure will Tanzania begin to see a budget surplus.
Indicator | Value (2025) | Insight |
TRA Revenue (Jul–Mar) | TZS 24.05T | Surpassed target by 0.84T |
TRA Performance Rate | 103.62% | Up from ~98% last year |
Foreign Support | TZS 7–8T | TRA revenue is 4–5x higher |
Jan 2025 Tax Revenue | TZS 2.22T | Funded 62% of total spending |
Budget Deficit (Jan) | TZS 878.3B | Despite TRA’s good performance |
Potential Annual Overcollection | TZS 400–500B | Can cut deficit by over 50% |
The Tanzania Revenue Authority has undeniably become the pillar of fiscal sustainability. Its strong revenue performance is reducing Tanzania’s dependence on foreign aid and increasing its ability to fund development locally.
But as January’s numbers show, TRA alone is not yet enough to balance the budget. A comprehensive approach — combining efficient spending, improved non-tax revenues, and sustained tax reforms — is essential.
With smart fiscal management and continued TRA performance, Tanzania can achieve true budget independence — and perhaps, a future surplus.
Category | Indicator / Figure | Value (TZS) | Meaning / Insight |
TRA Revenue Performance | Revenue Collected (Jul–Mar 2024/25) | 24.05 trillion | TRA surpassed its 9-month target, showing strong domestic mobilization |
Revenue Target (Jul–Mar 2024/25) | 23.21 trillion | TRA exceeded by TZS 0.84T (performance rate of 103.62%) | |
Projected Annual TRA Revenue | 32 trillion | Expected to cover most recurrent expenditure if sustained | |
Year-on-Year Growth (Jul–Mar) | +17% | From TZS 20.55T (2023/24) to TZS 24.05T (2024/25) | |
4-Year Revenue Growth | +77% | From TZS 13.59T (2020/21) to TZS 24.05T (2024/25) | |
January 2025 Snapshot | Total Revenue (All sources) | 2,697.8 billion | 98.3% of target met — revenue collection was nearly on track |
TRA Tax Revenue | 2,222.3 billion | 82%+ of total revenue — TRA is the dominant revenue source | |
Non-Tax Revenue | 347.8 billion | Underperformed (vs target of 413.9B), contributing to fiscal pressure | |
Total Expenditure | 3,576.1 billion | Government spending exceeded revenue significantly | |
Recurrent Expenditure | 2,358.0 billion | Salaries, operations, interest — essential ongoing costs | |
Development Expenditure | 1,218.1 billion | Spent on infrastructure, education, health, etc. | |
Budget Deficit (Jan 2025) | 878.3 billion | Expenditure > Revenue; requires borrowing or donor support | |
TRA Impact on Budget Gap | Q3 Overperformance (TRA) | 100 billion | Exceeded Jan–Mar target — shows revenue strength |
Potential Annual Overperformance | 400–500 billion | If sustained, can reduce annual deficit by 50–60% | |
Budget Outlook (Annual) | Typical Govt Expenditure (Est.) | 38–40 trillion | Based on past spending patterns including development |
Expected TRA Revenue | 32 trillion | Still TZS 6–8 trillion short without other funding | |
Foreign Grants & Loans | 7–8 trillion | Currently filling the deficit — but declining long-term | |
Fiscal Implication | Deficit Still Exists? | Yes | Unless spending is reduced or other revenues increase |
Possibility of Surplus? | Not Yet | Requires higher total revenue or reduced expenditure |
Summary Insights from the Table
As of March 2025, Tanzania recorded 65.7 million mobile money accounts, showing a significant increase from 29.8 million in 2020 — a growth of 120% over five years. In the first quarter of 2025 alone, accounts grew from 64.3 million in January to 65.7 million in March, adding 1.3 million new users. The market is led by M-Pesa with over 26 million accounts, followed by Mixx by Yas (20.2 million) and Airtel Money (12.1 million). Transaction volumes also surged, reaching 10.3 billion in 2024, up from 3.8 billion in 2020, reflecting a 172% increase. These trends highlight the critical role mobile money plays in Tanzania’s growing digital and inclusive economy.
1. Mobile Money Accounts — January to March 2025
Month | Airtel Money | Halopesa | Mixx by Yas | T-Pesa | M-Pesa | Azam Pesa | Total Accounts |
January | 11,867,966 | 5,739,139 | 20,092,629 | 1,508,952 | 25,105,960 | 27,859 | 64,342,505 |
February | 12,077,797 | 5,830,634 | 20,182,931 | 1,508,952 | 26,903,563 | 38,399 | 66,542,276 |
March | 12,114,414 | 5,737,603 | 20,211,676 | 1,508,952 | 26,070,581 | 34,408 | 65,677,634 |
2. Mobile Money Subscriptions and Transactions (2020–2024)
Year | Mobile Money Accounts | Number of Transactions |
2020 | 29,881,617 | 3,774,769,212 |
2021 | 35,789,567 | 5,165,472,128 |
2022 | 43,652,872 | 6,237,498,175 |
2023 | 57,001,654 | 8,529,109,176 |
2024 | 63,189,100 | 10,274,612,156 |
1. Mobile Money is Strong and Still Growing in 2025
2. M-Pesa is the Market Leader, But Competition is Healthy
3. Massive 5-Year Growth in Financial Inclusion (2020–2024)
4. Mobile Money is Driving Tanzania’s Digital Economy
As of March 2025, Tanzania recorded 49.3 million internet subscriptions, up from 48.6 million in January, reflecting a 1.57% growth in just one quarter. The majority — over 99% — are mobile wireless connections, highlighting Tanzania’s status as a mobile-first digital economy. Fixed wireless and fixed wired lines accounted for less than 1% combined. In terms of market share, Vodacom led with 34.0%, followed by Yas (30.4%) and Airtel (21.8%), showing strong competition among service providers. The steady growth and mobile dominance indicate increasing digital adoption, especially through smartphones.
1. Monthly Internet Usage (Subscriptions) — January to March 2025
Month | Mobile Wireless | Fixed Wireless | Fixed Wired | Total Subscriptions |
January | 48,366,012 | 116,722 | 86,995 | 48,569,729 |
February | 48,430,510 | 128,809 | 90,248 | 48,649,567 |
March | 49,101,596 | 140,618 | 91,625 | 49,333,839 |
2. Share of Mobile Internet Subscriptions by Operator — March 2025
Operator | Market Share (%) |
Vodacom | 34.0% |
Yas | 30.4% |
Airtel | 21.8% |
Halotel | 10.4% |
TTCL | 3.4% |
1. Tanzania is a Mobile-First Internet Market
2. Internet Adoption Is Growing Steadily
3. Market Is Competitive, But Led by Key Players
4. Fixed Internet Still Needs Investment
Tanzania's internet landscape is mobile-driven, growing steadily, and highly competitive. While access is expanding, the next step is to broaden fixed internet coverage and ensure rural areas are connected just like urban centers.
As of March 2025, Tanzania reached 90.4 million mobile subscriptions, marking a significant growth of 76.5% from 51.2 million in 2020. In the most recent quarter alone (Jan–Mar 2025), subscriptions increased by 4.1%, up from 86.8 million in December 2024. Fixed lines remain minimal, at just 0.09% of total subscriptions. Vodacom leads the mobile market with 31.7% share, followed by Yas (28.7%) and Airtel (22.9%). Gender distribution is almost equal, with 51% male and 49% female users, while Dar es Salaam accounts for 18% of the national total, with 16.6 million mobile lines.
This table shows the monthly registration totals of mobile and fixed-line telephone subscriptions. Mobile lines dominate, accounting for over 99.9% of all subscriptions. There is consistent monthly growth, with a total increase of over 2.2 million new lines in the first quarter of 2025.
Month | Mobile Lines | Fixed Lines | Total Lines |
January | 88,092,790 | 79,040 | 88,171,830 |
February | 89,294,910 | 78,877 | 89,373,787 |
March | 90,298,941 | 79,054 | 90,377,995 |
This table represents the market share of Person-to-Person (P2P) mobile lines by telecom operator. Vodacom leads the market, followed closely by Yas and Airtel. TTCL, primarily a fixed-line service provider, has a small market share in mobile.
Operator | Number of P2P Lines | Share (%) |
Vodacom | 28,301,079 | 31.7% |
Yas | 25,656,420 | 28.7% |
Airtel | 20,444,505 | 22.9% |
Halotel | 13,200,102 | 14.8% |
TTCL | 1,725,612 | 1.9% |
Mobile phone ownership shows a nearly even gender distribution, with males slightly leading. This reflects relatively equal access to mobile services among Tanzanian men and women.
Gender | Number of P2P Lines |
Male | 45,914,447 |
Female | 43,413,271 |
This quarterly trend shows rapid and steady growth in mobile subscriptions. From June 2024 to March 2025, Tanzania added approximately 13.8 million new mobile lines, indicating strong market penetration and mobile service adoption.
Quarter Ending | Mobile Lines |
June 2024 | 76,535,958 |
Sept 2024 | 80,583,993 |
Dec 2024 | 86,769,161 |
March 2025 | 90,298,941 |
Over the five-year period, Tanzania saw nearly 70% growth in mobile subscriptions. The most significant increase occurred from 2022 to 2024, reflecting the effects of digital transformation, mobile money growth, and telecom competition.
Year | Mobile Lines |
2020 | 51,220,233 |
2021 | 54,044,384 |
2022 | 60,192,331 |
2023 | 70,215,144 |
2024 | 86,769,161 |
These figures reflect regional penetration of mobile communication services. Urbanized and economically vibrant regions like Dar es Salaam, Mwanza, and Arusha dominate due to high population density, better infrastructure, and business activity. This geographic concentration highlights opportunities for targeted telecom investments in less-served areas.
Rank | Region | Number of Mobile Lines |
1 | Dar es Salaam | 16,600,000 |
2 | Mwanza | 6,000,000 |
3 | Arusha | 5,400,000 |
4 | Mbeya | 5,200,000 |
5 | Dodoma | 4,800,000 |
6 | Morogoro | 4,300,000 |
7 | Tabora | 4,000,000 |
8 | Kilimanjaro | 3,100,000 |
9 | Tanga | 3,000,000 |
10 | Geita | 2,700,000 |
1. Rapid Growth in Mobile Connectivity
2. Fixed Lines Are Nearly Obsolete
3. Fair Gender Access
4. Intense Competition Among Mobile Operators
5. Strong Urban and Regional Disparities
6. Consistent Year-on-Year Growth
Policy & Business Implications
In 2024, global debt surged to an alarming USD 250 trillion, equal to 237% of global GDP, as reported by the IMF’s 2024 Global Debt Monitor. Of this, USD 98 trillion was public debt (94% of GDP), and over USD 150 trillion was private debt (143% of GDP). These high levels of global debt—especially in public finances—create ripple effects for low-income countries like Tanzania, which recorded a public debt of 43.3% of GDP in the same year. While Tanzania’s debt remains below the average for Low-Income Developing Countries (50% of GDP), increasing global borrowing costs, tighter financial conditions, and slowing global growth (expected to fall from 2.7% to 2.2% over the next five years) pose challenges. These pressures may raise Tanzania’s external debt servicing costs, limit access to affordable financing, and affect government spending and private sector credit growth.
1. Rising Global Public Debt Creates External Pressure
Implication:
As more countries compete for external financing, borrowing costs could rise for Tanzania, especially for external commercial debt. This could lead to higher debt servicing costs and reduce fiscal space for development spending.
2. Reduced Private Sector Borrowing Globally — Credit Squeeze Risk
Implication:
If global banks and investors become more risk-averse, Tanzania's private sector may face tighter access to credit — especially SMEs and startups that depend on microfinance or external funding.
3. Tight Global Financial Conditions — Impact on Debt Sustainability
Implication:
Tanzania may need to shift more toward concessional financing or domestic sources to avoid debt distress. Already, the country spends about 14–16% of government revenue on debt service, a figure that could increase if global rates stay high.
4. Risk of Slower Global Growth — Impacts on Tanzania’s Exports and Revenue
Implication:
Lower global demand could mean slower foreign exchange earnings, potentially weakening the shilling, reducing government revenue, and making external debt more expensive to repay.
Impact Area | What’s Happening Globally | Potential Effect on Tanzania |
Public Debt | ↑ USD 98T globally, 94% of GDP | ↑ Risk of tighter borrowing space, higher rates |
Private Sector Credit | ↓ Private debt globally to 143% of GDP | ↓ Credit access, especially for SMEs |
Interest Rates | ↑ Debt servicing costs rising globally | ↑ Tanzania’s external debt servicing burden |
Global Growth | ↓ Expected growth from 2.7% to 2.2% | ↓ Export demand, ↓ forex, ↑ fiscal pressure |
Category | Global Figures | Tanzania Figures |
Total Debt | USD 250 trillion (237% of global GDP) | — |
Public Debt | USD 98 trillion (94% of global GDP) | TZS 89.3 trillion (approx. USD 36B)¹ |
Private Debt | >USD 150 trillion (143% of global GDP) | — |
• Household Debt | USD 58.5 trillion (54% of global GDP) | — |
• Corporate Debt | USD 91.5 trillion (90% of global GDP) | — |
Tanzania Public Debt-to-GDP | — | 43.3% of GDP |
LIDC Average Public Debt | — | 50% of GDP |
Global Medium-Term Growth | ↓ from 2.7% to 2.2% (5-year forecast) | Risk of lower export demand |
Tanzania External Debt Service | — | ~USD 1.5 billion (FY2022/23) |
In 2024, global debt reached a staggering USD 250 trillion, equivalent to 237% of global GDP, according to the IMF’s 2024 Global Debt Monitor. Although this marks a slight decline from the previous year, the level remains significantly higher than the pre-pandemic ratio of 229% in 2019. The overall decline in global debt is mainly attributed to a drop in private debt, which fell by 2.8 percentage points to 143% of GDP, amounting to over USD 150 trillion. This includes household debt at 54% of GDP and non-financial corporate debt at 90% of GDP. Meanwhile, public debt rose by 2 percentage points to 94% of GDP, reaching USD 98 trillion, reflecting a return to its upward trajectory after the pandemic. The data highlights diverging debt trends across countries—with reductions in private debt seen in advanced economies and the US, while China and low-income developing countries experienced significant increases in both public and private debt levels.
Global Debt Overview (2024)
Private Debt
Public Debt
📌 Notable Highlights
1. The World Is Still Heavily in Debt
2. Private Sector Is Cleaning Up
3. Governments Are Borrowing More Again
4. Why Is Private Debt Falling?
5. Warnings & Opportunities
In short:
✅ Households and companies are being cautious
⚠️ Governments are borrowing more again
📉 Global debt is slowly improving, but risks remain
Global Debt Summary (2023/2024)
Category | Amount (USD) | % of Global GDP | Change from 2022 |
Total Global Debt | 250 trillion | 237% | ↓ 1 percentage point |
Private Debt (Total) | >150 trillion | 143% | ↓ 2.8 percentage points |
• Household Debt | — | 54% | ↓ |
• Non-Financial Corporate Debt | — | 90% | ↓ |
Public Debt (Total) | 98 trillion | 94% | ↑ 2 percentage points |
Debt by Region or Country (2023/2024)
Region/Country | Total Debt (% GDP) | Private Debt (% GDP) | Public Debt (% GDP) | Trend |
United States | 273% | 150% (↓ 6%) | 123% (↑ 3%) | Mixed |
China | 289% | 205% (↑ 7%) | 84% (↑ 7%) | Rising |
Advanced Economies (excl. US) | 268% | 165% (↓ 6%) | 103% (↓ 3%) | Declining |
Emerging Markets (excl. China) | 126% | 69% (stable) | 57% (↑ 2%) | Rising |
Low-Income Developing Countries | 88% | 38% (↓ 1%) | 50% (↑ 1.4%) | Rising |
Tanzania enters 2025/2026 with strong economic momentum, driven by projected GDP growth of 6.1% in 2025 and 6.4% in 2026, marking steady progress from 5.9% in 2024. Inflation remains contained at 3.2%–3.5%, ensuring price stability for consumers and businesses. Dynamic sectors such as ICT (13.5% growth by 2026), energy (12.0%), and mining (9.3%) are fueling economic transformation, while private sector credit is expanding robustly at over 20% annually. With public debt stabilized at around 46.5% of GDP and strong revenue performance (100%+ of targets), Tanzania is well-positioned for inclusive growth and investment expansion in key industries.
Tanzania's economy in 2025 is poised on solid footing, building on the steady momentum of previous years. With consistent policy direction and resilience across sectors, the country presents a compelling picture for investors, analysts, and business stakeholders.
Sector | 2020 | 2024 |
Agriculture & Agribusiness | 4.5% → 4.2% | |
Manufacturing & Industry | 4.0% → 5.0% | |
Mining & Extractives | 6.8% → 8.6% | |
Energy (Power & Gas) | 5.5% → 11.0% | |
ICT & Digital Economy | 8.5% → 12.5% | |
Tourism & Hospitality | -13.0% → 5.8% | |
Construction & Real Estate | 3.0% → 3.9% | |
Logistics & Transportation | 5.2% → 6.2% |
Top Performers: ICT, Energy, and Mining sectors drove 2024 growth, with ICT growing at a remarkable 12.5% and Energy at 11.0%, bolstered by digital transformation and energy infrastructure investments.
Trade Dynamics
Indicator | 2024 Change (%) |
Total Revenue | +5.6% |
Tax Revenue | +6.3% |
Expenditure | +5.7% |
Development Spending | +8.0% |
Budget Deficit | -1.8% of GDP |
Strong revenue collection (99.5% of target) and controlled deficit spending reflect fiscal discipline amid rising development investment.
Category | 2024 Inflation (%) |
Food & Beverages | 2.3% |
Transport | 3.5% |
Housing & Utilities | 2.8% |
The inflation structure indicates broad price stability, particularly in essential sectors.
Outlook
Tanzania heads into 2025 with strong momentum in ICT, energy, and industrial growth. Stable inflation, a healthy banking sector, and expanding infrastructure projects offer a conducive environment for private investment and business expansion.
📊 “Tanzania continues to set the pace in East Africa for diversified, resilient economic growth.”
Macroeconomic Forecast: Tanzania (2025–2026)
Indicator | 2024 | 2025 (Est.) | 2026 (Proj.) |
Real GDP Growth (%) | 5.9 | 6.1 | 6.4 |
Headline Inflation (%) | 3.0 | 3.2 | 3.5 |
BoT Policy Rate (%) | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Exchange Rate (TZS/USD, Dec) | 2,585 | 2,630 | 2,670 |
Public Debt (% of GDP, Nominal) | ~46.3 | 46.5 | 46.7 |
Public Debt (% of GDP, PV Terms) | 41.1 | 41.2 | 41.5 |
Domestic Revenue Collection (% of Target) | 99.5 | 100.0 | 100.2 |
Tax Revenue (% Above Target) | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.5 |
Sectoral Growth Forecast (% Change)
Sector | 2024 | 2025 (Est.) | 2026 (Proj.) |
Agriculture & Agribusiness | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.8 |
Manufacturing & Industrialization | 5.0 | 5.5 | 5.9 |
Mining & Extractives | 8.6 | 9.0 | 9.3 |
Energy (Power, Gas, Renewables) | 11.0 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
ICT & Digital Economy | 12.5 | 13.0 | 13.5 |
Tourism & Hospitality | 5.8 | 6.5 | 7.0 |
Construction & Real Estate | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Logistics & Transportation | 6.2 | 6.5 | 6.8 |
Trade Forecast (% Change)
Indicator | 2024 | 2025 (Est.) | 2026 (Proj.) |
Exports of Goods & Services | -1.5 | +6.0 | +8.5 |
Imports of Goods & Services | +6.4 | +7.0 | +7.2 |
Banking & Credit Forecast (% Growth)
Indicator | 2024 | 2025 (Est.) | 2026 (Proj.) |
Growth in Bank Deposits | 15.6 | 14.5 | 14.8 |
Growth in Bank Lending | 15.4 | 16.0 | 16.5 |
Private Sector Credit Growth | 21.2 | 20.0 | 21.5 |
Government Fiscal Operations (% Change)
Indicator | 2024 | 2025 (Est.) | 2026 (Proj.) |
Total Revenue Growth | +5.6 | +6.0 | +6.2 |
Tax Revenue Growth | +6.3 | +6.5 | +6.8 |
Total Expenditure Growth | +5.7 | +6.2 | +6.4 |
Development Expenditure Growth | +8.0 | +8.5 | +9.0 |
Overall Budget Deficit (% of GDP) | -1.8 | -1.9 | -2.0 |
Grants (% of Total Revenue) | ~1.2 | 1.1 | 1.0 |
Inflation Breakdown (% Change)
Category | 2024 | 2025 (Est.) | 2026 (Proj.) |
Food & Non-Alcoholic Beverages | 2.3 | 2.7 | 2.9 |
Transport | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.8 |
Housing, Water, Electricity, Gas & Fuel | 2.8 | 3.0 | 3.3 |
Overall CPI (Urban & Rural) | ~3.0 | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Stability, Growth & Sectoral Momentum
Macroeconomic Outlook
Sectoral Trends
Trade Dynamics
Financial Sector Confidence
Fiscal Responsibility
Cost of Living
Bottom Line
Tanzania in 2025/2026 is set for strong, inclusive, and sustainable growth, with opportunities in:
Employment Trends in Tanzania (2025-2030), Bridging the Formal and Informal Gap
Tanzania’s workforce is 71.8% informal (25.95 million workers) and 28.2% formal (10.17 million workers), highlighting a major divide in job security, wages, and social protection. While formal employment is projected to rise to 38% by 2030, barriers such as limited job availability (42%), skills mismatches (26%), and bureaucratic challenges (21%) slow the transition. This report explores the key trends, challenges, and opportunities in Tanzania’s employment landscape, emphasizing the role of industrialization, digital transformation, and policy reforms in shaping the future workforce.
Key Figures
Main Issues Breakdown
1. The Divide Between Formal and Informal Employment
2. Education and Employment Trends
3. Work Experience and Job Stability
4. Challenges in Informal Employment
5. Factors Encouraging Formalization
6. Digital Technology and Employment Growth
7. Job Creation by Sector
Policy Recommendations
To address these employment challenges, the report suggests:
Conclusion
The Tanzanian labor market is shifting towards more formalization, but challenges like bureaucracy, low education levels, and financial constraints remain. The digital economy and government policy reforms present new opportunities to increase formal employment and improve workforce stability.
Employment Trends by Sector in Tanzania (2025-2030)
Sector | Employment Share | Key Trends & Insights |
Agriculture | 28% | Largest employer but mostly informal; faces challenges like low wages, seasonal instability, and outdated methods. Modernization efforts could increase formalization and productivity. |
Manufacturing | 18% | Growing due to industrialization and special economic zones (SEZs); projected to create more formal jobs in food processing, textiles, and construction materials. |
Construction | 14% | Driven by infrastructure projects; employs both formal and informal workers, but many lack social protection and job stability. |
Small Business | 17% | 44% of informal jobs come from micro-enterprises, retail, and street vending; registration barriers slow formalization. |
Services | 14% | Includes tourism, finance, and logistics; a growing source of formal jobs, but requires skilled workforce. |
Technology/ICT | 9% | Fast-growing sector, creating new jobs in fintech, e-commerce, and software development; digital skills gap remains a challenge. |
Publish your research with TICGL Data Driven Centre
Introduction
In 2025,U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposed tariff hikes—including a staggering increase from 34% to 145% on Chinese imports and a flat 10% tariff on key trade partners such as the European Union (18.5% of U.S. imports), Japan (4.5%), Vietnam (4.2%), and India (2.7%)—have reignited fears of a global trade war. These tariffs affect over 60% of U.S. imports, threatening to reduce global trade growth by up to 1.5 percentage points and wipe out US$300–500 billion in trade value in 2025.
While the intention is to protect American industries, the ripple effects are expected to disrupt global supply chains, increase inflation in the U.S., and reduce market access for exporters across developing countries. Africa, with average import tariffs around 8%, may experience a 1–2% decline in export revenue, particularly in agriculture and textiles. In East Africa, countries like Kenya, Ethiopia, and Tanzania, which rely on apparel and commodity exports, face uncertain prospects as U.S. demand contracts and global trade flows reorient. For Tanzania, while direct U.S. exposure is limited, the indirect effects—such as reduced demand for coffee, tobacco, and minerals—may lead to a 0.3–0.5% drop in GDP growth and 1–2% export revenue loss.
🌍 Global
Trade Growth & Trends (2024–2025)
Tariff Trends
Key Issues
🌍 Africa
Tariff Trends
Trade Growth
Challenges
🌍 East Africa
East Africa isn't isolated in most figures but falls under Africa or Rest of Asia depending on the context. However, based on patterns:
Trade Position
Key Challenges
Tanzania-Specific Insights
Tanzania isn’t specifically mentioned in the report, but here are contextual implications:
Tariffs & Trade Policy
Impacts
Strategic Focus Areas
Indicator | Global | Africa | East Africa (Est.) | Tanzania (Est.) |
2024 Trade Value (US$) | $33 trillion | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Import Tariffs (avg.) | ~2% (dev’d) | ~8% | ~8% | ~8% |
Export Tariffs Faced | ~1.9% | ~3.9% | ~3.5–4% | ~4% |
Tariff on Agriculture (MFN avg.) | ~20% | High | High | High |
Tariff Peaks (15%+) in Food/Apparel | 8% of trade | Common | Common | Likely similar |
Intra-Regional Tariff Preference Margin | 4.6% (Africa) | 4.6% | ~4–5% | 4–5% (EAC) |
United States Trade Overview (2024–Q4 2024)
📦 Goods Trade
📈 Services Trade
⚖️ Trade Balance (Goods)
Trade Partner | Trade Balance (US$ Billion) | Change in Q4 |
China | -355 (deficit) | -14 |
European Union | -241 (deficit) | -12 |
Mexico | -178 (deficit) | -6 |
Viet Nam | -110 (deficit) | -5 |
Canada | -83 (deficit) | +5 |
Japan | -56 (deficit) | +2 |
India | -37 (deficit) | 0 |
🔄 Trade Dependence Patterns (2024 Trends)
👉 This shift reflects supply chain diversification (friendshoring/nearshoring), aiming to reduce reliance on China while increasing ties with ASEAN countries.
📉 Trade Risks for the U.S. (2025 Outlook)
📊 Sector-Specific Trade Involvement
U.S. trade deficits are high in:
Exports are strong in:
📊 Tariff Hike Summary (as proposed)
Country | Share of U.S. Imports | Previous Rate | Updated Rate | % Change in Tariff Burden |
China | 13.4% | 34% | 145% | +111 percentage points |
EU | 18.5% | 20% | 10% | -10pp (may lower?) |
Japan | 4.5% | 24% | 10% | -14pp |
Vietnam | 4.2% | 46% | 10% | -36pp |
South Korea | 4% | 25% | 10% | -15pp |
Taiwan | 3.6% | 32% | 10% | -22pp |
India | 2.7% | 26% | 10% | -16pp |
UK | 2.1% | 10% | 10% | No change |
Switzerland | 1.9% | 31% | 10% | -21pp |
Thailand | 1.9% | 36% | 10% | -26pp |
Malaysia | 1.6% | 24% | 10% | -14pp |
Brazil | 1.3% | 10% | 10% | No change |
1. 🧨 China: Shockwaves from 145% Tariff
2. 🔄 Redirection of Trade (Global Supply Chains)
3. 💰 Consumer Inflation in the U.S.
4. 📉 Global Trade Contraction
5. 🌍 Developing Countries at Risk
6. 💼 Business Uncertainty & Investment Drops
Sector | Expected Impact of Tariffs |
Electronics | Severe disruption; China, Taiwan, Korea hit |
Apparel | Vietnam, India, Bangladesh lose cost edge |
Automotive | EU, Japan, South Korea exports face more hurdles |
Agriculture | If retaliation hits, U.S. farmers may lose markets |
Machinery/Tools | Prices rise, sourcing shifts away from Asia |
Metric | Effect (2025 if implemented) |
Global Trade Growth | ↓ 1–1.5 percentage points |
U.S. Consumer Prices | ↑ short-term inflation |
China’s Export Surplus | ↓ significantly |
Global Supply Chain Stability | ↓ major disruptions |
Investment & FDI Flows | ↓ reduced investor confidence |
Developing Country Exports | ↓ unless they shift to non-U.S. markets |
🌍 GLOBAL LEVEL IMPACT
🔺 Key Figures
🔁 Trade Impact
🌍 AFRICA LEVEL IMPACT
📦 Africa–U.S. Trade Context
🔺 Effects on Africa
Impact Area | Expected Outcome |
Global trade slowdown | ↓ African export demand (esp. commodities) |
Tariff escalation on Asia | ↑ Temporary opportunity for African exports |
Global value chain shifts | ↑ Opportunity to plug into new niches, but limited by infrastructure |
Inflation in U.S. | ↓ Purchasing power, ↓ demand for African goods |
🧾 Estimated Figures
🌍 EAST AFRICA LEVEL IMPACT
📦 East Africa–U.S. Trade Context
🔺 Effects on East Africa
Area | Expected Impact |
Textile/apparel exports | Could gain from China's loss, but East Asia still dominates |
Agricultural exports | Remain vulnerable if U.S. demand falls |
Logistics and shipping | May suffer from weaker global trade flows |
AGOA Program | Still allows some duty-free access to U.S. |
🧾 Estimated Figures
📦 Tanzania–U.S. Trade Snapshot
🔺 Effects on Tanzania
Channel | Impact |
Export opportunities | Limited short-term benefit if AGOA remains |
U.S. imports (machinery) | ↑ Cost of imported machinery, industrial tools |
Export of value-added goods | Still limited by low capacity, tariffs won’t change much |
Global price shocks | ↓ Commodity prices due to lower global demand |
🧾 Estimated Figures
SUMMARY TABLE
Region | Key Exposure | Projected Trade Impact | GDP Effect |
Global | Value chains, consumer inflation | ↓ $300–500B in trade | ↓ 0.5–1.5% |
Africa | Commodity & textile exports, U.S. demand | ↓ up to 2% exports | ↓ 0.5–1% |
East Africa | Coffee, apparel exports (AGOA reliance) | Mixed (↓ demand, ↑ market share) | ↓ 0.5–1% |
Tanzania | Agriculture, minerals, imported machinery | ↓ 1–2% export revenue | ↓ 0.3–0.5% |
In February 2025, the Tanzania shilling remained broadly stable against the US dollar, with only a slight depreciation from TZS 2,560/USD in January to TZS 2,566/USD, marking a modest 0.23% change. Despite this, the interbank foreign exchange market saw a significant increase in activity, with traded volumes rising by 27.4% from USD 57.2 million to USD 72.9 million. This indicates growing demand for foreign currency—likely for imports or external payments—yet the limited impact on the exchange rate reflects strong macroeconomic management, sufficient forex reserves, and sustained confidence in the Tanzanian economy.
Tanzania Monthly Economic Review – March 2025, the Tanzania shilling (TZS) remained relatively stable against the US dollar (USD) in February 2025, with only slight depreciation observed.
Exchange Rate Movement:
Change:
➤ The shilling depreciated by TZS 6.00, equivalent to 0.23% over the month.
💡Interpretation: What Does This Mean?
Despite increased forex demand, the shilling held relatively firm, implying:
Month | TZS/USD Exchange Rate | Monthly Change | Forex Market Volume |
January 2025 | 2,560.00 | — | USD 57.2 million |
February 2025 | 2,566.00 | +0.23% | USD 72.9 million |
The Tanzania shilling remains broadly stable against the US dollar, with only slight depreciation in February 2025 despite increased foreign exchange market activity. This reflects confidence in macroeconomic fundamentals and effective monetary policy management by the Bank of Tanzania.
What It Tells Us:
✅ Bottom Line:
The slight movement in the exchange rate tells us the Tanzania shilling is stable and well-supported, even as demand for USD rises. This reflects sound economic management, confidence in the local currency, and a resilient foreign exchange system.