The Contribution of Microfinance Services to the Development of SMEs in Tanzania - TICGL | Tanzania Investment and Consultant Group Ltd

📄

Abstract & Key Findings

Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) play a critical role in financial inclusion by providing capital to Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs) in Tanzania. Despite their importance, MFIs face challenges such as high default rates, limited access to funding, regulatory barriers, and operational inefficiencies. This study examines the landscape of MFIs, their risk management strategies, loan portfolio allocations, and recommendations for strengthening financial access for MSEs.

30%

Trade & Retail — Largest Loan Sector

22%

Agriculture Loan Share

18%

Manufacturing Share

62%

Loans Below TZS 5 Million

49%

MFIs: Default Rate 5–10%

44%

MFIs Cite High Borrowing Costs

28%

See Govt-Backed Funding as Key

25%

Emphasise Digital Finance

Loan Portfolio by Business Sector

Distribution of MFI loan allocation across five key economic sectors (TZS 800 billion total)

MFI Default Rate Distribution

Percentage of surveyed MFIs reporting each default rate band (n = 410 MFIs)

Conclusion:

To enhance financial access, MFIs must adopt alternative credit scoring models, expand digital lending platforms, and strengthen public-private partnerships. Policymakers should consider tiered regulatory frameworks, interest rate flexibility, and credit guarantee programmes to support sustainable lending to MSEs.

Introduction

🎯

1. Introduction & Research Objectives

This research analyses the role of Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) in supporting Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs) in Tanzania. The study examines key factors such as the duration of MFI operations, the types of clients they serve, loan portfolio distribution, default rates, and challenges in accessing capital. Additionally, the research explores risk management strategies, regulatory challenges, financial products offered, and opportunities for enhancing MFI support for MSEs.

1.1 Specific Research Objectives

Assess the current landscape of MFIs in Tanzania, including their longevity and market reach.
Identify the major challenges MFIs face in financing and supporting MSEs.
Explore risk management techniques used by MFIs when lending to MSEs.
Evaluate the regulatory environment and its impact on MFI operations.
Recommend policy and operational strategies to strengthen MFI contributions to economic development.

🏦

1.2 Why MFIs Matter for Tanzania's MSEs

Microfinance Institutions play a crucial role in promoting financial inclusion and economic development in Tanzania. With traditional banks often hesitant to serve small businesses due to perceived risks, MFIs bridge the gap by providing accessible financial services to micro and small enterprises. According to the Tanzania National Bureau of Statistics (NBS, 2022), MSEs account for over 35% of Tanzania's GDP and provide employment to more than 5 million people.

35%+

MSE Contribution to GDP

5M+

People Employed by MSEs

Services Offered by MFIs to MSEs

💳 Micro-loans & Credit

Helping businesses expand and sustain operations through accessible, collateral-light credit facilities.

📚 Financial Literacy Training

Ensuring MSEs understand budgeting, loan management, and business planning fundamentals.

💰 Savings & Investment Products

Enabling small businesses to build financial resilience and invest in growth.

📱 Digital Financial Services

Mobile banking and digital payments to improve financial accessibility and reduce transaction costs.

⚖️

1.3 Key Challenges & Opportunities

Top Challenges Facing MFIs

Share of MFIs citing each challenge as a primary obstacle

Top Opportunities for MFI Growth

Percentage of MFIs identifying each growth avenue

1.3.1 Key Challenges

#	Challenge	% MFIs Affected	Impact	Indicator
1	High Default Rates	12%	Stricter lending conditions, higher interest rates	12%
2	High Operational Costs	17%	Limits rural expansion, raises interest rates	17%
3	Limited Access to Capital	25%	Restricts lending capacity and growth	25%
4	Regulatory Barriers	39%	Interest rate restrictions limit flexibility	39%
5	Limited Client Financial Literacy	22%	Loan mismanagement, increased defaults	22%

1.3.2 Opportunities for Growth

Opportunity	% MFIs	Description	Trend
Digital Financial Services	25%	Mobile banking, fintech partnerships, digital payments	▲ Rising
Government-Backed Loan Guarantees	31%	Credit guarantees to mitigate defaults and enhance lending	▲ Rising
Capacity Building & Financial Literacy	N/A	Expanding MSE education programmes on loan & digital finance	→ Stable
Fintech Strategic Partnerships	27%	MFI–fintech collaboration for risk assessment & credit scoring	▲ Rising
Regulatory Reforms	N/A	Flexible interest rate policies, reduced compliance costs	→ Proposed

Methodology

🔬

2. Methodology & Sample Design

This research utilised a quantitative survey approach to gather data on the operations, challenges, and opportunities faced by MFIs in Tanzania. Data was collected from November 2024 to January 2025, combining structured questionnaires with key informant interviews and secondary data from NBS, Bank of Tanzania (BoT), and TAMFI.

📋

Structured Surveys

Standardised questionnaires on MFI operations, loan portfolios, risk strategies and regulatory challenges.

🗣️

Key Informant Interviews

In-depth interviews with MFI managers and industry experts across Tanzania.

📰

Secondary Data Review

Reports from NBS (2022), Bank of Tanzania (2024), and TAMFI (2023) to contextualise findings.

🌍

Geographic Coverage

Dar es Salaam, Mwanza, Arusha, Dodoma, Mbeya, and Zanzibar — urban, peri-urban, and rural.

2.2 Sample Size & Distribution

MFI Sample by Years in Operation

420 MFIs surveyed — distributed by operational maturity

Sample by Client Type

Distribution of MFIs by primary client category

Category	MFI Count	Share (%)	Distribution
1 – 5 Years Operation	230	55%	55%
6 – 10 Years Operation	80	19%	19%
Less than 1 Year	90	21%	21%
Over 10 Years	20	5%	5%
Serves Micro-enterprises primarily		37%	37%
Mixed Client Base (Micro + Small)		39%	39%
Serves Small Enterprises		24%	24%

2.3 Study Limitations

🔍 Self-Reported Data

Survey responses may include bias. Secondary data from NBS, BoT and TAMFI used for validation.

🌱 Informal MFIs Excluded

Community savings groups and village lending schemes not fully included; findings apply to registered MFIs.

🏙️ Urban Bias

Higher participation from urban MFIs; unique rural challenges may not be fully captured.

📐 MSE Perspective Gap

Study focuses on MFIs; MSE client perspectives on service quality not extensively covered.

Findings & Analysis

📅

3.1 Years of Operation of MFIs

A majority of MFIs in Tanzania are relatively young, with over 76% (320 MFIs) having operated for 10 years or less. The largest category (55%) has been operating for 1–5 years, indicating rapid sector growth. Only 5% have been in existence for more than 10 years, highlighting that long-term sustainability remains a challenge.

MFIs Operating 10+ Years

55%

MFIs in Operation 1–5 Years

21%

MFIs Under 1 Year Old

19%

MFIs Operating 6–10 Years

MFI Sector Maturity Profile — Years in Operation

Distribution of 420 surveyed MFIs by operational age — indicates a young, rapidly expanding sector

3.1.2 Implications of MFI Experience

Dimension	Established MFIs (10+ yrs)	Young MFIs (<5 yrs)	Trend
Loan Default Rate	Below 5%	Up to 15%	▼ Higher Risk for Young MFIs
Investor Confidence	High — proven track record	Low — unproven viability	▲ Improves with age
Operational Costs	Lower — economies of scale	Higher — setup & hiring costs	▲ Decreases with experience
Regulatory Compliance	Resilient — adapted over time	Challenging — capital adequacy gaps	→ Policy support needed
Risk Assessment Quality	Strong frameworks	Underdeveloped	▼ Training gap critical

⚠️ Policy Implication: The dominance of young MFIs creates systemic risk. Targeted policies — including subsidised risk management training, mentorship from established MFIs, and access to affordable capital — are critical to improving sector sustainability.

👥

3.2 Type of Clients Served

Client segmentation directly influences lending strategies, risk management approaches, and overall financial sustainability. The majority of MFIs (39%) serve a mixed client base covering both micro and small enterprises, while 37% focus on micro-enterprises and 24% on small enterprises exclusively.

Client Category	MFIs (Frequency)	Share (%)	Typical Loan Size	Risk Profile	Distribution
Micro-enterprises	150	37%	Small, short-term	High Risk	37%
Mixed (Micro & Small)	160	39%	Varied	Medium Risk	39%
Small enterprises	100	24%	Larger, longer-term	Lower Risk	24%
Total	410	100%	—	—	—

Client Segmentation Breakdown

Share of MFIs by primary client category (n = 410)

Interest Rate vs Client Type (Conceptual)

Higher micro-enterprise risk means higher interest rates; small enterprise lending is more cost-efficient

How Client Segmentation Shapes Lending Strategy

📏 Loan Size

Micro-enterprises: Smaller amounts, shorter repayment. Small enterprises: Larger loans, longer terms for equipment and expansion.

🛡️ Risk Management

Micro: Group lending & peer guarantees. Small: Individual lending with collateral requirements.

💲 Interest Rates

Micro: Higher rates compensate for risk & admin cost. Small: Lower rates reflect larger loan sizes & efficiency.

🧰 Financial Products

Micro: Group loans, micro-loans, literacy programs. Small: Working capital, asset financing, trade credit.

🚧

3.3 Challenges in Providing Loans to MSEs

Despite their significance, MFIs face multiple barriers that hinder their ability to extend credit effectively. Research identified five major challenges in loan disbursement.

Main Barriers — MFIs in Providing Loans to MSEs

Frequency and percentage of each challenge across all surveyed MFIs (total response n = 1,220)

Challenge	Frequency	Share (%)	Key Impact	Priority
Insufficient Funds for Lending	300	25%	Leaves many MSEs unserved	CRITICAL
Lack of Collateral from Clients	290	24%	Forces higher rates, limits approval	CRITICAL
Limited Client Financial Literacy	270	22%	Leads to missed repayments	HIGH
High Operational Costs for Small Loans	210	17%	Reduces profitability & rural reach	HIGH
High Default Rates	150	12%	Stricter lending, higher interest rates	MEDIUM
Total	1,220	100%	—	—

🔑 Key Finding:

The top two barriers — insufficient lending funds (25%) and lack of collateral (24%) — together account for nearly half of all challenges. Addressing these through government-backed guarantee schemes and alternative collateral models would have the greatest impact on financial inclusion.

🛡️

3.4 Risk Management Strategies

Given the high-risk nature of lending to MSEs, MFIs implement various risk mitigation strategies. The most widely used is credit risk assessment and scoring (26%), followed by group lending and social collateral (23%).

Risk Mitigation Strategy Usage

Share of MFIs using each risk management approach (n = 1,080 responses)

Effectiveness vs Adoption Rate

Comparing how widely adopted each strategy is against its perceived effectiveness

Risk Strategy	Frequency	Share (%)	How It Works	Key Limitation	Trend
Credit Risk Assessment & Scoring	280	26%	Creditworthiness based on financial history & repayment behaviour	Limited MSE financial records	▲ Growing
Group Lending & Social Collateral	250	23%	Peer-guarantee groups share loan responsibility	Group conflicts can weaken model	→ Established
Strict Loan Monitoring & Follow-ups	200	19%	Regular visits & digital tracking of repayments	Raises operational costs for rural	▲ Digital shift
Loan Portfolio Diversification	180	17%	Spread exposure across sectors & geographies	Requires strong financial expertise	▲ Growing
Credit Guarantee Schemes	170	15%	Government / donor partial risk coverage	Bureaucratic delays, access issues	▲ Needed more
Total	1,080	100%	—	—	—

✅ Best Practice: The most effective approach for MFIs combines multiple strategies simultaneously — particularly integrating alternative data sources (e.g. mobile money transaction histories) into credit scoring models alongside group lending mechanisms.

📊

3.5 Loan Portfolio Allocation to MSEs

MFIs allocate their loan portfolios based on sectoral demand, risk assessment, and expected returns. The total MSE loan portfolio across surveyed MFIs stands at TZS 800 billion, with Trade & Retail taking the largest share at 30%.

TZS 250B

Trade & Retail — 30%

TZS 180B

Agriculture — 22%

TZS 150B

Manufacturing — 18%

TZS 120B

Services / ICT — 14%

TZS 100B

Construction — 12%

Loan Portfolio by Sector (TZS Billions)

Absolute value allocation across five economic sectors — TZS 800B total

Loan Size Distribution Among MSEs

62% of all loans fall below TZS 5 million — confirming micro-enterprise orientation

Business Sector	Allocation (TZS Bn)	Share (%)	Growth Driver	Trend
Trade & Retail	250	30%	Dominance of small trading businesses	→ Dominant
Agriculture & Agribusiness	180	22%	Government food security policy support	▲ Growing
Manufacturing & Processing	150	18%	Industrialisation & value-addition drive	▲ Rising
Services (Transport, ICT)	120	14%	Digital economy expansion	▲ Rising
Construction & Real Estate	100	12%	Urbanisation & infrastructure demand	→ Stable
TOTAL	800	100%	—	—

3.5.2 Loan Size Distribution

Loan Size (TZS)	Number of Loans	Share (%)	Typical Borrower	Distribution
< 2 Million	5,000	32%	Street vendors, market traders	32%
2 – 5 Million	4,500	30%	Small shop owners, small farmers	30%
5 – 10 Million	3,000	20%	Growing businesses, agribusiness	20%
10 – 20 Million	1,500	10%	Small enterprises, manufacturers	10%
> 20 Million	1,000	8%	Established SMEs, construction	8%
TOTAL	15,000	100%	—	—

📌 Key Trends in Loan Allocation:

1. Digital Lending is Rising: Mobile-based microloans are expanding through fintech partnerships with telecom companies — faster processing & repayment tracking. 2. Women-Owned Business Focus: Growing allocation to women-led businesses, reflecting inclusive finance policies. 3. Manufacturing on the Rise: Growing industrial loan share aligns with Tanzania's industrialisation goals.

Section 3.1

Years of Operation of MFIs

The duration of operation is a key proxy for stability and financial sustainability. Most MFIs in Tanzania are relatively young, with more than three-quarters having operated for 10 years or less — signalling a rapidly expanding but still maturing sector.

55%

Operate 1–5 years

21%

Less than 1 year

19%

6–10 years

Over 10 years

Distribution

MFI Age Profile (n=420)

Trend Analysis

Sectoral Impact by Operational Age

Years in Operation	No. of MFIs	Share
Less than 1 year	90	21%
1–5 years	230	55%
6–10 years	80	19%
Over 10 years	20	5%
Total	420	100%

The prevalence of young MFIs (76% operating ≤ 10 years) reflects Tanzania's rapidly expanding microfinance market. However, only 5% have survived more than a decade, underscoring long-term sustainability as a sector-wide challenge that requires targeted policy support.

📈

Access to Capital

MFIs with longer track records attract stronger investor confidence and better financing terms. Newer MFIs often struggle to access funding before proving financial viability.

⚙️

Operational Efficiency

Experienced MFIs benefit from economies of scale and streamlined lending processes. Newer entrants face higher administrative costs as they build client trust.

🏛️

Regulatory Resilience

MFIs that have survived over 10 years have demonstrated adaptability to regulatory changes — a key indicator of institutional health and long-term sustainability.

Section 3.2

Type of Clients Served

Client segmentation directly shapes an MFI's lending strategy, risk exposure, and financial product portfolio. The near-equal distribution across client types highlights the diversity of Tanzania's MFI landscape.

Client Segmentation

MFIs by Primary Client Category

Influence on Strategy

Lending Strategy by Client Type

Client Category	Frequency	Percentage
Micro-enterprises	150	37%
Mixed (Micro & Small)	160	39%
Small enterprises	100	24%
Total	410	100%

How Client Segmentation Influences Lending Strategies

🏪

Micro-Enterprise Focus (37%)

Higher risk profiles driven by irregular income and low financial literacy. MFIs use group lending and peer guarantee models to minimize defaults, and charge higher interest rates to offset costs.

🏢

Small Enterprise Focus (24%)

Better creditworthiness enables individual lending with collateral requirements. MFIs can offer lower interest rates as larger loans reduce per-unit administrative costs.

🔀

Mixed-Client Focus (39%)

The largest segment combines micro-loans, SME loans, working capital facilities and trade credit — diversifying both the product range and risk exposure of the institution.

Section 3.3

Challenges in Providing Loans to MSEs

MFIs face five key barriers that reduce their capacity to extend credit. Insufficient lending funds and lack of borrower collateral emerge as the dominant constraints, together accounting for nearly half of all reported challenges.

25%

Insufficient Funds

24%

Lack of Collateral

22%

Low Financial Literacy

17%

High Operational Costs

12%

High Default Rates

Key Lending Barriers

Main Challenges MFIs Face in Providing Loans to MSEs (n=1,220 responses)

Challenge	Frequency	Percentage	Key Impact
Insufficient funds for lending	300	25%	Limits credit supply; many MSEs left unserved
Lack of collateral from clients	290	24%	Blocks informal and women-led businesses
Limited client financial literacy	270	22%	Increases default and misuse of funds
High operational costs for small loans	210	17%	Reduces rural outreach; drives up interest rates
High default rates	150	12%	Strains liquidity and limits new disbursements
Total	1,220	100%

⚠️ Critical finding: The top two barriers — insufficient funds (25%) and lack of collateral (24%) — together explain why many creditworthy MSEs remain financially excluded. Addressing these requires systemic policy intervention, not just institutional adjustment.

Section 3.4

Risk Management Strategies

Given the high-risk profile of MSE lending, MFIs deploy a combination of strategies to manage credit risk. Credit scoring and group lending dominate, collectively accounting for nearly half of all reported approaches.

Strategy Prevalence

Risk Management Strategies Used by MFIs

Effectiveness Radar

Strategy Effectiveness vs Coverage

Risk Management Strategy	Frequency	Percentage
Credit risk assessment and scoring	280	26%
Group lending and social collateral	250	23%
Strict loan monitoring and follow-ups	200	19%
Loan portfolio diversification	180	17%
Credit guarantee schemes	170	15%
Total	1,080	100%

Best practice: MFIs with the lowest default rates consistently apply a combination of credit scoring, group lending, and strict monitoring — rather than relying on a single approach. A multi-strategy framework is the most effective risk mitigation model.

Section 3.5

Loan Portfolio Allocation to MSEs

With a total MFI loan portfolio of TZS 800 billion, trade and agriculture dominate allocations, reflecting Tanzania's economic structure. A shift toward manufacturing and digital lending is also underway.

TZS 800B

Total Loan Portfolio

30%

Trade & Retail

62%

Loans Below TZS 5M

32%

Loans Below TZS 2M

Sectoral Distribution

Loan Portfolio by Business Sector (TZS Billion)

Loan Size Distribution

MSE Loan Size Breakdown (n=15,000 loans)

Table 3.4: Loan Portfolio Allocation by Business Sector

Business Sector	Loan Allocation (TZS Billion)	Percentage
Trade & Retail	250	30%
Agriculture & Agribusiness	180	22%
Manufacturing & Processing	150	18%
Services (Transport, ICT)	120	14%
Construction & Real Estate	100	12%
Total	800	100%

Table 3.5: Loan Size Distribution Among MSEs

Loan Size (TZS)	Number of Loans	Percentage
< 2 Million	5,000	32%
2 – 5 Million	4,500	30%
5 – 10 Million	3,000	20%
10 – 20 Million	1,500	10%
> 20 Million	1,000	8%
Total	15,000	100%

Section 3.6

Default Rates for MSE Loans

Loan repayment performance varies significantly across MFIs, with the majority reporting moderate default rates. However, a substantial minority — more than one in four — face defaults above 10%, posing serious sustainability risks.

24%

Default < 5%

49%

Default 5–10%

27%

Default > 10%

Default Rate Distribution

MFI Default Rate Bands (n=420)

Causes of Default

Primary Drivers of MSE Loan Defaults

Key Causes of Default Among MSE Borrowers

1
Poor Financial Management
MSEs frequently mix personal and business finances, struggle with cash flow planning, and lack structured financial records — making meeting repayment deadlines difficult.
2
Limited Financial Literacy
Many borrowers misunderstand loan terms, interest rate structures, and penalty clauses — leading to unintentional defaults and disputes with MFIs.
3
Economic & Market Fluctuations
Seasonal revenue disruptions, supply chain volatility, and price shocks reduce business income below repayment thresholds — especially in agriculture and trade.
4
High Interest Rates
MFIs charge premium rates to compensate for operational costs and risk exposure. For thin-margin MSEs, cumulative interest obligations often exceed cash flow capacity.
5
Inadequate Risk Assessment
Incomplete financial histories, lack of collateral documentation, and limited credit scoring tools result in loans being extended to clients with insufficient repayment capacity.
6
External & Regulatory Barriers
Delayed payments from clients and government contracts, combined with licensing costs and tax burdens, compress disposable income available for loan repayment.

⚠️ 27% of MFIs face default rates above 10% — a threshold that strains liquidity, limits new loan disbursements, and reduces investor confidence. Without intervention, this segment risks institutional collapse.

Section 3.7

Challenges in Accessing Capital

Securing adequate funding is a persistent structural problem for Tanzanian MFIs. High borrowing costs and regulatory constraints are the dominant barriers, limiting the sector's ability to expand lending and reduce interest rates for MSE clients.

44%

Cite High Borrowing Costs

29%

Stringent Collateral Requirements

Capital Access Barriers

Key Challenges MFIs Face in Securing Funds

Role of Regulatory Policies in Financing Accessibility

📋

Licensing & Compliance Costs

Capital adequacy and reporting standards increase operating costs. Smaller MFIs often struggle to meet requirements, reducing their eligibility for external funding.

📊

Interest Rate Caps

Imposed caps limit MFI profitability and exclude high-risk borrowers, as MFIs cannot compensate for lending risks through flexible pricing.

🌍

Foreign Investment Restrictions

International investors face lengthy regulatory approvals. Delays discourage capital inflows that could significantly expand MFI lending capacity.

🏦

Central Bank Policies

Limited access to central bank refinancing forces costly commercial bank borrowing. Tight liquidity controls restrict expansion in underserved regions.

Section 3.8

Preferred Financing Options

MFIs rely on a mix of debt, equity, grants and retained earnings to fund their lending operations. Commercial bank loans dominate despite their high cost — reflecting limited availability of alternative financing.

Financing Mix

Preferred Financing Sources (n=430 MFIs)

Cost vs. Availability

Financing Source Trade-offs

Financing Option	Frequency	Percentage	Key Advantages
Commercial Bank Loans	160	40%	Readily available; consistently accessible but expensive due to high interest rates
Government & Donor Grants	120	30%	Low-cost funding; highly preferred but with inconsistent availability
Equity Investments	90	22%	Attracts long-term patient capital; requires profit-sharing arrangements
Retained Earnings	60	15%	Most sustainable source; but limited by operational profitability levels
Total	430	100%

Section 3.9 – 3.11

Regulatory Environment for MFIs

Tanzania's regulatory framework receives mixed reviews from MFIs. While a majority view it as broadly supportive, significant policy bottlenecks — particularly around interest rate flexibility and compliance burdens — constrain institutional growth.

Perceptions Survey

MFIs' View of Tanzania's Regulatory Landscape (n=420)

Key Bottlenecks

Regulatory Challenges Faced by MFIs

Table 3.9: MFI Perceptions of Regulatory Environment

Perception	Frequency	Percentage	Interpretation
Very Supportive	120	29%	Encourages growth with flexible policies
Somewhat Supportive	170	40%	Moderate support but with operational challenges
Neutral	70	17%	Neither strongly favorable nor restrictive
Somewhat Restrictive	40	10%	Regulations pose challenges requiring adjustment
Very Restrictive	20	5%	Stringent policies actively hinder MFI growth
Total	420	69% broadly supportive; 15% restrictive

Table 3.10: Regulatory Bottlenecks

Regulatory Challenge	Frequency	Percentage	Implications for MFIs
Limited interest rate flexibility	250	39%	Prevents risk-based pricing; reduces high-risk lending capacity
Extensive reporting requirements	140	22%	Increases administrative burden and operational costs
High compliance costs	130	20%	Reduces funds available for lending, especially for small MFIs
Strict licensing & registration	120	19%	Limits new market entrants; slows sector innovation
Total	640	100%

Recommended Regulatory Reforms (Table 3.11)

Regulatory Change	Frequency	Percentage	Expected Impact
More flexible lending guidelines	300	39%	Expands financial access for underserved MSEs; improves approval rates
Government-backed guarantees for MSE loans	240	31%	Reduces lending risks; enables more loans to MSEs with limited collateral
Streamlined reporting requirements	120	16%	Frees resources for service delivery; reduces administrative costs
Reduction in compliance costs	110	14%	Lowers barriers for smaller MFIs; promotes inclusive market growth
Total	770	100%

Sections 3.12 – 3.14

Financial Products & Service Gaps

Tanzania's MFIs are primarily loan-focused, with micro-loans and group loans accounting for 97% of all financial products. Critical non-lending services — savings accounts, insurance, and mobile banking — remain severely underdeveloped relative to MSE demand.

Products Offered

Financial Products Currently Offered by MFIs

Services Requested

Most Requested Financial Services by MSEs

Demand vs. Supply Gap Analysis (Table 3.13)

Financial Service	MSE Demand (%)	MFI Supply (%)	Assessment
Small Business Loans	60%	55%	Mostly Met More flexible products needed
Financial Literacy Training	21%	2%	Critical Gap MFIs must integrate structured programs
Savings & Investment Products	10%	2%	Underprovided Expansion needed urgently
Mobile Banking Options	9%	5%	Demand Exceeds Supply Mobile-first investment needed

Key Barriers to Expanding Financial Products (Table 3.14)

Barrier	Frequency	Percentage	Core Impact
High development & operational costs	230	31%	Prevents introduction of new products due to high administrative and tech expenses
Regulatory restrictions	230	31%	Capital requirements and licensing limit savings, insurance and fintech services
Lack of technical expertise	210	28%	Skill gaps in risk assessment, digital finance and product innovation
Limited client demand	70	9%	Low awareness and financial literacy reduce uptake of non-lending products
Total	740	100%

Section 3.15

Barriers to Digital Financial Integration

Digital financial services (DFS) hold transformative potential for Tanzania's MFI sector. However, infrastructure costs, security concerns and low digital literacy among clients are slowing the pace of adoption.

Digital Barriers

Primary Barriers to Digital Financial Integration (n=740 responses)

Barrier	Frequency	Percentage	Impact on Digital Integration
High costs of digital infrastructure	250	34%	Fintech platforms, mobile apps and cloud systems remain unaffordable for smaller MFIs
Data privacy & security concerns	200	27%	Cyber threats and weak data protection frameworks deter MSE adoption
Low digital literacy among clients	200	27%	Despite availability, MSEs lack skills to use mobile banking or digital loan tools
Regulatory barriers	82	11%	Strict licensing and KYC requirements slow digital onboarding
Total	740+	100%

🔒

Security & Trust Solution

Strengthen cybersecurity frameworks, enforce data protection laws, and launch client education programs on digital safety and fraud prevention.

💡

Infrastructure Cost Reduction

Partner with fintech firms to share technology costs; leverage cloud-based solutions and seek government subsidies or donor grants for digital platform adoption.

📱

Digital Literacy Programs

Launch targeted digital finance training for MSEs; develop simplified, user-friendly mobile banking apps with local language support and intuitive interfaces.

📜

Regulatory Sandbox

Advocate for streamlined compliance for digital MFIs; work with policymakers to create regulatory sandboxes that allow controlled testing of new digital financial services.

Sections 3.16 – 3.18

Training, Support & Loan Management Challenges

Financial literacy and business training are not luxuries — they are structural components of a sustainable MFI ecosystem. Yet gaps in delivery, reach and content quality remain significant obstacles.

Training Availability

MFIs with Training Programs

Training Types

Types of Training Offered by MFIs

Loan Management Challenges

MSE Difficulties in Managing Loans

Table 3.16: Training Program Availability

Training Status	Frequency	Percentage	Implications
Training programs already in place	290	73%	Majority of MFIs have active programs for financial literacy and business skills
Planning to introduce programs	90	23%	These MFIs recognise the need but lack implementation frameworks
No training programs offered	20	5%	Focus solely on financial services without capacity-building support
Total	400	96% offer or plan to offer training

Table 3.17: Types of Training Offered

Training Type	Frequency	Percentage	Impact on MSEs
Financial literacy & budgeting	280	35%	Teaches cash flow management, expense tracking, and sustainable fund allocation
Loan management & repayment	200	25%	Reduces defaults by improving understanding of repayment obligations and terms
Business planning & management	200	25%	Helps entrepreneurs develop strategic plans and make better investment decisions
Digital literacy	120	15%	Enables transition to mobile banking, digital payments and online loan management
Total	800	100%

Table 3.18: Challenges MSEs Face in Loan Management

Challenge	Frequency	Percentage	Impact on Repayment
Limited financial literacy	330	35%	Affects budgeting, planning and ability to track loan obligations
Poor cash flow management	330	35%	Results in irregular repayments and difficulty covering business expenses
Difficulty understanding loan terms	190	20%	Confusion over schedules, rates and penalties leads to unintentional defaults
Low digital skills	90	10%	Limits access to digital loan management tools and mobile repayment options
Total	940	100%

Section 3.19

Opportunities for Strengthening MFI Support

MFIs themselves identify four key pathways to enhance their impact on MSE development — government-backed funding, digital transformation, strategic partnerships, and expanded financial literacy programs.

Opportunity Landscape

Opportunities to Improve MFI Support for MSEs in Tanzania (n=1,140)

Opportunity	Frequency	Percentage	Expected Impact
Access to government-backed funding programs	320	28%	Provides MFIs with low-cost capital to expand lending to underserved MSEs
Expanding digital financial services	290	25%	Lowers transaction costs; improves accessibility for rural and informal MSEs
Forming partnerships with fintech providers	310	27%	Enables AI credit scoring, blockchain lending, and advanced risk management
Expanding financial literacy programs	220	19%	Reduces default rates; improves loan utilisation and business outcomes for MSEs
Total	1,140	100%

Section 4

Conclusion & Policy Recommendations

This study establishes that MFIs are critical but structurally constrained drivers of MSE development in Tanzania. Sustainable growth requires a coordinated response across three levels: institutional reform within MFIs, enabling regulatory changes, and broader stakeholder collaboration.

4.1 Summary of Key Findings

📋

Risk Management

A combination of credit scoring, group lending, portfolio diversification, and credit guarantee schemes are most effective in mitigating default risks.

💰

Loan Portfolio

Trade & retail (30%) and agriculture (22%) dominate allocations. Manufacturing and digital lending are growing in share.

🏦

Capital Access

44% cite high borrowing costs; 29% face stringent collateral requirements — both major barriers to expanding affordable lending services.

📜

Regulatory Constraints

Capital adequacy requirements, compliance costs, and interest rate caps limit operational flexibility and restrict financial innovation.

📚

Financial Literacy Gaps

MSE borrowers struggle with loan terms, cash flow management and digital tools — directly increasing default risks and loan misuse.

4.2 Recommendations for MFIs

For MFIs

Strengthen Credit Assessment

Integrate mobile money transaction histories as alternative credit data
Use AI-powered scoring to assess informal MSEs
Conduct rigorous pre-loan screening to improve repayment outcomes

For MFIs

Expand Financial Literacy

Offer mandatory budgeting and repayment workshops prior to loan disbursement
Develop simplified, jargon-free loan agreements
Provide post-disbursement advisory services to at-risk borrowers

For MFIs

Embrace Digital Transformation

Partner with telecoms to enable mobile-based loans and repayments
Invest in user-friendly digital platforms for underserved MSEs
Implement cloud-based systems to reduce operational overhead

4.2 Recommendations for Regulators

For Regulators

Flexible Interest Rate Policies

Implement risk-based pricing to allow MFIs to adjust rates by borrower profile
Encourage blended finance models with public-private subsidies
Review interest rate caps to reflect operational realities of MSE lending

For Regulators

Tiered Compliance Framework

Introduce differentiated requirements based on MFI size and risk exposure
Reduce licensing fees and fast-track approvals for new institutions
Implement digital submission systems to reduce reporting burden

For Regulators

Digital Regulatory Sandbox

Create controlled testing environments for new digital financial products
Streamline KYC processes to ease digital onboarding for MSEs
Establish transparent consultation processes before policy changes

4.2 Recommendations for Other Stakeholders

For Partners & Development Institutions

Public-Private Partnerships

Strengthen collaboration between MFIs, banks, and development finance institutions
Promote government-backed credit guarantee schemes to reduce MFI lending risks
Support blended finance models that combine grants with commercial capital

For Partners & Development Institutions

Support Digital Infrastructure

Invest in mobile banking infrastructure for underserved rural regions
Encourage fintech innovation through funding incentives and sandboxes
Develop shared platforms to reduce per-MFI digital investment costs

For Partners & Development Institutions

Strengthen MSE Capacity

Fund national financial literacy campaigns targeting MSE owners
Support women-led and youth-owned enterprises through targeted credit lines
Develop business incubator programs linked to microfinance access

✅ Way forward: By implementing these recommendations, Tanzania has the opportunity to build a more inclusive, efficient, and sustainable microfinance ecosystem — one where MFIs can serve as genuine growth engines for the country's 5 million+ MSE employees and the broader TZS economy.

Amran Bhuzohera

Senior Economist & Research Lead, TICGL

Research areas include public-private partnerships, SME development, inclusive banking, and microfinance policy in Tanzania. Managing Director of Tanzania Investment and Consultant Group Ltd. Contact: amran@ticgl.com | +255 768 699 002

References

Bibliography

Bank of Tanzania. (2024). Microfinance Sector Performance Report. Bank of Tanzania.
National Bureau of Statistics Tanzania. (2022). Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises Survey Report.
Kessy, S., & Urassa, G. (2020). The role of microfinance institutions in supporting small businesses in Tanzania. Journal of African Finance, 18(2), 45–62.
Nyamsogoro, G. (2017). Financial sustainability of rural microfinance institutions in Tanzania. African Journal of Economic Policy, 25(3), 78–91.
Tanzania Association of Microfinance Institutions (TAMFI). (2023). Annual Report on Microfinance Institutions in Tanzania.
Ministry of Finance and Planning. (2023). Microfinance Policy and Financial Inclusion Strategy in Tanzania.
GSMA. (2022). Mobile Money Adoption in Tanzania: Trends and Future Growth.
World Bank. (2023). Financial Inclusion and Digital Transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Abstract & Key Findings

1. Introduction & Research Objectives

1.1 Specific Research Objectives

1.2 Why MFIs Matter for Tanzania's MSEs

Services Offered by MFIs to MSEs

💳 Micro-loans & Credit

📚 Financial Literacy Training

💰 Savings & Investment Products

📱 Digital Financial Services

1.3 Key Challenges & Opportunities

1.3.1 Key Challenges

1.3.2 Opportunities for Growth

2. Methodology & Sample Design

Structured Surveys

Key Informant Interviews

Secondary Data Review

Geographic Coverage

2.2 Sample Size & Distribution

2.3 Study Limitations

🔍 Self-Reported Data

🌱 Informal MFIs Excluded

🏙️ Urban Bias

📐 MSE Perspective Gap

3.1 Years of Operation of MFIs

3.1.2 Implications of MFI Experience

3.2 Type of Clients Served

How Client Segmentation Shapes Lending Strategy

📏 Loan Size

🛡️ Risk Management

💲 Interest Rates

🧰 Financial Products

3.3 Challenges in Providing Loans to MSEs

3.4 Risk Management Strategies

3.5 Loan Portfolio Allocation to MSEs

3.5.2 Loan Size Distribution

Years of Operation of MFIs

Distribution

Trend Analysis

Access to Capital

Operational Efficiency

Regulatory Resilience

Type of Clients Served

Client Segmentation

Influence on Strategy

How Client Segmentation Influences Lending Strategies

Micro-Enterprise Focus (37%)

Small Enterprise Focus (24%)

Mixed-Client Focus (39%)

Challenges in Providing Loans to MSEs

Key Lending Barriers

Risk Management Strategies

Strategy Prevalence

Effectiveness Radar

Loan Portfolio Allocation to MSEs

Sectoral Distribution

Loan Size Distribution

Table 3.4: Loan Portfolio Allocation by Business Sector

Table 3.5: Loan Size Distribution Among MSEs

Default Rates for MSE Loans

Default Rate Distribution

Causes of Default

Key Causes of Default Among MSE Borrowers

Poor Financial Management

Limited Financial Literacy

Economic & Market Fluctuations

High Interest Rates

Inadequate Risk Assessment

External & Regulatory Barriers

Challenges in Accessing Capital

Capital Access Barriers

Role of Regulatory Policies in Financing Accessibility

Licensing & Compliance Costs

Interest Rate Caps

Foreign Investment Restrictions

Central Bank Policies

Preferred Financing Options

Financing Mix

Cost vs. Availability

Regulatory Environment for MFIs

Perceptions Survey