In 2024, global debt surged to an alarming USD 250 trillion, equal to 237% of global GDP, as reported by the IMF’s 2024 Global Debt Monitor. Of this, USD 98 trillion was public debt (94% of GDP), and over USD 150 trillion was private debt (143% of GDP). These high levels of global debt—especially in public finances—create ripple effects for low-income countries like Tanzania, which recorded a public debt of 43.3% of GDP in the same year. While Tanzania’s debt remains below the average for Low-Income Developing Countries (50% of GDP), increasing global borrowing costs, tighter financial conditions, and slowing global growth (expected to fall from 2.7% to 2.2% over the next five years) pose challenges. These pressures may raise Tanzania’s external debt servicing costs, limit access to affordable financing, and affect government spending and private sector credit growth.

How Global Debt Trends Could Impact Tanzania's Economy and Public Debt

1. Rising Global Public Debt Creates External Pressure

• Global public debt reached USD 98 trillion (94% of global GDP in 2023/2024).
• Many low-income developing countries (LIDCs), including Tanzania, have seen public debt increase. LIDC public debt rose to 50% of GDP, the highest since early 2000s.
• Tanzania’s own public debt stood at about 43.3% of GDP in 2023/2024 (Bank of Tanzania data), below the LIDC average — but upward pressure is visible.

Implication:
As more countries compete for external financing, borrowing costs could rise for Tanzania, especially for external commercial debt. This could lead to higher debt servicing costs and reduce fiscal space for development spending.

2. Reduced Private Sector Borrowing Globally — Credit Squeeze Risk

• Global private debt fell to 143% of GDP, with household debt at 54% and corporate debt at 90%.
• In emerging and low-income economies, private debt growth has slowed or reversed.
• In Tanzania, private sector credit growth declined slightly in 2023/2024, and is mostly concentrated in trade, manufacturing, and personal loans.

Implication:
If global banks and investors become more risk-averse, Tanzania's private sector may face tighter access to credit — especially SMEs and startups that depend on microfinance or external funding.

3. Tight Global Financial Conditions — Impact on Debt Sustainability

• The IMF highlights that higher interest rates globally are not reducing debt levels significantly but are increasing servicing costs.
• Tanzania’s external debt service payments were over USD 1.5 billion in FY2022/23, and this will likely rise with any tightening in external financial markets.

Implication:
Tanzania may need to shift more toward concessional financing or domestic sources to avoid debt distress. Already, the country spends about 14–16% of government revenue on debt service, a figure that could increase if global rates stay high.

4. Risk of Slower Global Growth — Impacts on Tanzania’s Exports and Revenue

• Global medium-term growth expectations declined from 2.7% to 2.2% (5-year forecast).
• This implies reduced demand for Tanzanian exports such as minerals, tourism, and agricultural products.

Implication:
Lower global demand could mean slower foreign exchange earnings, potentially weakening the shilling, reducing government revenue, and making external debt more expensive to repay.

Summary for Tanzania:

Global vs. Tanzania Debt Figures (2023/2024)

What Tanzania Should Consider:

• Prioritize concessional borrowing and monitor external debt exposure.
• Strengthen domestic revenue mobilization to reduce dependency.
• Promote local financial inclusion and SME support to sustain private sector momentum.
• Maintain fiscal prudence to stay below LIDC risk levels (currently at 43.3% of GDP, still manageable).

Introduction

In 2025,U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposed tariff hikes—including a staggering increase from 34% to 145% on Chinese imports and a flat 10% tariff on key trade partners such as the European Union (18.5% of U.S. imports), Japan (4.5%), Vietnam (4.2%), and India (2.7%)—have reignited fears of a global trade war. These tariffs affect over 60% of U.S. imports, threatening to reduce global trade growth by up to 1.5 percentage points and wipe out US$300–500 billion in trade value in 2025.

While the intention is to protect American industries, the ripple effects are expected to disrupt global supply chains, increase inflation in the U.S., and reduce market access for exporters across developing countries. Africa, with average import tariffs around 8%, may experience a 1–2% decline in export revenue, particularly in agriculture and textiles. In East Africa, countries like Kenya, Ethiopia, and Tanzania, which rely on apparel and commodity exports, face uncertain prospects as U.S. demand contracts and global trade flows reorient. For Tanzania, while direct U.S. exposure is limited, the indirect effects—such as reduced demand for coffee, tobacco, and minerals—may lead to a 0.3–0.5% drop in GDP growth and 1–2% export revenue loss.

March 2025 Global Trade Update from UNCTAD, with analysis at the global, Africa-wide, East Africa, and Tanzania levels, including relevant figures.

🌍 Global

Trade Growth & Trends (2024–2025)

• Global trade reached US$33 trillion in 2024:
  • +3.7% growth overall.
  • +2% goods trade, +9% services trade.
  • Trade expanded by US$1.2 trillion: goods contributed US$500B, services US$700B.

Tariff Trends

• Agriculture: Highest average tariffs—~20% under MFN.
• Manufacturing: Moderate tariffs—~10% for 30% of trade; preferences apply to 70%.
• Raw materials: Over 80% duty-free; tariffs on the rest average 3.5%.

Key Issues

• Tariff escalation hinders value-added exports from developing countries.
• Tariff peaks (15%+) are common in sensitive sectors like agriculture and apparel.
• Protectionism and geoeconomic tensions are rising, especially between major economies (e.g., US-China).

🌍 Africa

Tariff Trends

• Africa imposes high tariffs: average ~8% on imports.
• African exports face lower tariffs in developed countries due to preferences.
• Intra-African trade benefits from 4.6% lower tariffs (regional integration).
• High tariffs remain in agriculture and manufacturing, especially on processed goods (e.g., food, apparel).

Trade Growth

• Africa’s intra-regional trade fell by 4% in Q4 2024, despite global growth.
• Africa’s export tariffs dropped slightly from 8.7% (2012) to 8.1% (2023), but still among the highest globally.

Challenges

• High tariffs and tariff escalation limit industrialization and competitiveness.
• Exports still centered around natural resources with low value addition.

🌍 East Africa

East Africa isn't isolated in most figures but falls under Africa or Rest of Asia depending on the context. However, based on patterns:

Trade Position

• East Africa faces:
  • High import tariffs (close to 8%),
  • Strong agriculture protection,
  • Less exposure to global manufacturing exports due to tariff escalation.
• Benefits from regional agreements (e.g., AfCFTA, EAC customs union).

Key Challenges

• Value addition in sectors like coffee, tea, textiles is limited due to high tariffs on processed goods.
• Still heavily reliant on exports of raw or semi-processed goods.

Tanzania-Specific Insights

Tanzania isn’t specifically mentioned in the report, but here are contextual implications:

Tariffs & Trade Policy

• Tanzania, as an EAC member, applies common external tariffs.
• Relies on tariffs for 10–30% of public revenue, similar to other developing countries.
• High tariffs on finished goods discourage local value addition.
• Opportunities lie in negotiating better access for processed exports (e.g., cotton textiles, coffee, cashew products).

Impacts

• Tariff escalation affects Tanzania’s ambition to industrialize.
• Agriculture and textiles—sectors where Tanzania has competitive potential—face tariff peaks in export markets.
• Preferential trade agreements (e.g., AGOA, EU GSP) offer limited but valuable export access.

Strategic Focus Areas

• Push for regional value chains (in agriculture, minerals).
• Improve trade facilitation and infrastructure to lower non-tariff barriers.
• Leverage AfCFTA to expand intra-African trade and reduce reliance on global markets with higher tariffs.

📊 Key Figures Table

United States' trade dynamics with other countries in the March 2025 UNCTAD Global Trade Update, including figures:

United States Trade Overview (2024–Q4 2024)

📦 Goods Trade

• Imports (Q4 2024): +6% annually, +1% quarterly
• Exports (Q4 2024): +2% annually, but -1% quarterly

📈 Services Trade

• Imports (Q4 2024): +8% annually, +4% quarterly
• Exports (Q4 2024): +8% annually, +1% quarterly

⚖️ Trade Balance (Goods)

• The U.S. continues to run the largest global trade deficit, reaching -US$355 billion with China alone in 2024.
• The deficit widened due to strong U.S. domestic demand and global supply chain sourcing.

🔁 Major U.S. Bilateral Trade Relationships (Goods, 2024)

These deficits reflect the U.S. importing more than exporting across these countries, especially in electronics, machinery, apparel, and consumer goods.

🔄 Trade Dependence Patterns (2024 Trends)

• U.S. dependence increased on:
  • Malaysia (+1.8%)
  • Viet Nam (+1.8%)
  • Taiwan Province of China (+1.5%)
• U.S. dependence decreased on:
  • China (–0.3%)
  • European Union (–0.2%)

👉 This shift reflects supply chain diversification (friendshoring/nearshoring), aiming to reduce reliance on China while increasing ties with ASEAN countries.

📉 Trade Risks for the U.S. (2025 Outlook)

• Rising geopolitical tensions and tariff increases, especially toward China.
• Trade policy shifts may cause:
  • Frontloading of shipments (before new tariffs).
  • Retaliatory tariffs by partners.
  • Disruptions in value chains for electronics, metals, and autos.

📊 Sector-Specific Trade Involvement

U.S. trade deficits are high in:

• Electronics & machinery
• Textiles & apparel
• Motor vehicles

Exports are strong in:

• Agricultural goods
• Aerospace
• Services (finance, ICT, intellectual property)

The proposed tariff hikes by Donald Trump—especially the massive increase on Chinese imports and widespread 10% blanket tariffs—would have major global economic consequences. What these tariffs mean, and how they could impact the global economy, trade flows, and developing countries:

📊 Tariff Hike Summary (as proposed)

Global Economic Effects of These Tariff Changes

1. 🧨 China: Shockwaves from 145% Tariff

• A tariff jump from 34% to 145% is trade war escalation.
• China’s export-heavy economy would face a massive revenue hit, especially in electronics, machinery, and consumer goods.
• Could trigger retaliatory tariffs from China, disrupting U.S. firms reliant on Chinese inputs.
• Major global value chains (e.g. Apple, auto, semiconductors) would be destabilized.
• Result: Global manufacturing slowdown, inflationary pressures in the U.S., and disruptions across Asia.

2. 🔄 Redirection of Trade (Global Supply Chains)

• With China hit hard, Southeast Asia (Vietnam, Malaysia, Thailand) may benefit as alternative suppliers—but:
  • They too face 10% tariffs, reducing their price advantage.
  • Smaller economies may struggle to scale fast enough, leading to supply bottlenecks.
• U.S. companies might reshore (bring back manufacturing), but this raises production costs.

3. 💰 Consumer Inflation in the U.S.

• Higher tariffs = higher import prices.
• U.S. businesses and consumers may face higher costs, especially in:
  • Electronics
  • Household goods
  • Clothing
• May reverse disinflation trends seen in 2024–Q1 2025.

4. 📉 Global Trade Contraction

• Based on 2024 trade data, global trade growth was already decelerating in Q4.
• New tariffs could cut global trade growth by up to 1–1.5 percentage points in 2025.
• UNCTAD warned about geoeconomic fragmentation—this could worsen it sharply.

5. 🌍 Developing Countries at Risk

• Countries like Vietnam, India, Malaysia, and Thailand depend on exports to the U.S.
• Even though tariffs are lower than for China, they still lose competitiveness.
• Africa and Latin America may not benefit much due to:
  • Low integration in electronics/GVCs
  • High internal trade barriers

6. 💼 Business Uncertainty & Investment Drops

• Firms facing sudden 10–100%+ tariff increases may delay:
  • Expansion
  • Investment in new plants/supply chains
• This slows global FDI flows, especially in emerging markets.

Estimated Sectoral Impacts

Conclusion: Likely Global Effects

Likely effects of Trump’s proposed tariff increases—particularly the massive 145% on China and 10% flat tariffs on key U.S. trade partners—broken down by:

🌍 GLOBAL LEVEL IMPACT

🔺 Key Figures

• Global trade value (2024): US$33 trillion
• Share of U.S. in global imports: ~13%
• Tariffs imposed on China: Raised from 34% to 145%
• New 10% blanket tariffs on 11 more countries covering ~45% of U.S. imports

🔁 Trade Impact

• Could reduce global trade growth by 1–1.5 percentage points.
• May result in US$300–500 billion in global trade losses by 2025.
• Consumer prices in the U.S. likely to rise (inflation rebound).
• Global supply chains will be reconfigured, disrupting:
  • Electronics
  • Apparel
  • Auto & machinery
• Services trade may stay resilient but also faces uncertainty due to retaliation risks.

🌍 AFRICA LEVEL IMPACT

📦 Africa–U.S. Trade Context

• Africa’s total trade with U.S. is relatively small (~2% of U.S. imports).
• Focused on raw materials (oil, metals), textiles, and agricultural exports.
• Top exporters: Nigeria, South Africa, Kenya, Ethiopia, Egypt.

🔺 Effects on Africa

🧾 Estimated Figures

• Africa’s trade may contract 1–2% due to ripple effects.
• African textile exports may benefit if AGOA preferences remain.
• South Africa could lose market share in metals and autos if retaliatory tariffs apply.

🌍 EAST AFRICA LEVEL IMPACT

📦 East Africa–U.S. Trade Context

• Key exporters: Kenya, Ethiopia, Uganda, Tanzania.
• Focus: coffee, tea, horticulture, garments (especially from Ethiopia and Kenya).

🔺 Effects on East Africa

🧾 Estimated Figures

• Kenya and Ethiopia could gain short-term apparel market share.
• But if U.S. demand weakens, export earnings may still fall 2–3%.
• Overall regional growth could be hit by 0.5–1% GDP decline due to lower trade income.

TANZANIA LEVEL IMPACT

📦 Tanzania–U.S. Trade Snapshot

• U.S. is not among top 5 trade partners.
• Key exports: coffee, tobacco, spices, textiles, minerals.
• Imports from U.S.: machinery, medical equipment, vehicles.

🔺 Effects on Tanzania

🧾 Estimated Figures

• Tanzania’s exports to U.S.: Likely unaffected directly (small share)
• But global slowdown could reduce export revenues by 1–2% (coffee, minerals)
• Capital goods (e.g., machines) could become 10–15% more expensive due to higher U.S. prices
• GDP growth may slow by 0.3–0.5 percentage points if global demand weakens

SUMMARY TABLE

Tanzania's external debt reached USD 33.91 billion in January 2025, placing it among the top 10 most indebted African countries. This marks a significant rise from USD 2.47 billion in 2011, reflecting increased borrowing for infrastructure and economic development. The central government holds 77.4% of the debt, with USD 185.4 million paid for debt servicing in December 2024. Despite this, Tanzania’s debt-to-GDP ratio remains at 47.2%, below the IMF’s 55% risk threshold. However, careful debt management is crucial to ensure economic stability and sustainable growth.

​As of January 2025, Tanzania's external debt stood at approximately USD 33,905.10 million, a slight decrease from USD 34,075.50 million in December 2024. This positions Tanzania among the top ten African countries with substantial external debt.​

Historical Context: Over the years, Tanzania's external debt has exhibited significant growth:​

• December 2011: USD 2,469.70 million​
• December 2023: USD 29,541.7 million ​
• November 2024: USD 33,137.7 million ​
• December 2024: USD 34,075.50 million​
• January 2025: USD 33,905.10 million​

Composition of External Debt: The central government holds the majority of this debt, accounting for approximately 77.4% as of December 2024. The remaining portion is attributed to the private sector. ​

Debt Service and Disbursements: In December 2024, Tanzania received external loan disbursements totaling USD 376.8 million, primarily allocated to the central government. During the same period, the country serviced its external debt with payments amounting to USD 185.4 million, which included USD 111.2 million in principal repayments and USD 74.2 million in interest payments. ​

Public Debt Relative to GDP: As of November 2024, Tanzania's total public debt, encompassing both external and domestic obligations, was USD 38,243.5 million. This figure represents approximately 47.2% of the nation's Gross Domestic Product (GDP). ​

International Financial Support: In December 2024, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) completed a review under the Extended Credit Facility arrangement with Tanzania, resulting in an immediate disbursement of about USD 148.6 million. Additionally, the IMF approved a disbursement of approximately USD 55.9 million under the Resilience and Sustainability Facility, totaling USD 204.5 million in financial support. ​

These figures underscore Tanzania's significant external debt position within Africa, highlighting the importance of ongoing fiscal management and international financial collaborations.

Top ten African countries with high external debt based on 2025 data:

1. South Africa – USD 176,314 million (Sep 2024)
2. Egypt – USD 155,204 million (Sep 2024)
3. Tunisia – TND 128,856 million (Sep 2024)
4. Mauritius – MUR 96,713 million (Dec 2024)
5. Angola – USD 50,260 million (Dec 2023)
6. Nigeria – USD 42,900 million (Sep 2024)
7. Namibia – NAD 36,036 million (Jun 2024)
8. Tanzania – USD 33,905 million (Jan 2025)
9. Malawi – MWK 5,887,049 million (Dec 2023)
10. Burundi – BIF 1,873,263 million (Dec 2024)

Tanzania’s external debt and its position among African countries with significant debt levels:

1. Tanzania’s Debt Growth is Significant

• Tanzania's external debt has increased dramatically from USD 2.47 billion in 2011 to USD 33.91 billion in January 2025.
• This consistent rise reflects increased borrowing for infrastructure, public services, and economic projects but also raises concerns about debt sustainability.

2. Tanzania is Among Africa’s Top 10 Most Indebted Countries

• At USD 33.91 billion, Tanzania ranks 8th in Africa for external debt.
• While this debt level is high, it is still lower than economies like South Africa (USD 176.3B), Egypt (USD 155.2B), and Nigeria (USD 42.9B).

3. Most of Tanzania’s Debt is Public

• 77.4% of Tanzania’s external debt is held by the central government, meaning the government is the primary borrower.
• This suggests reliance on international loans for development, infrastructure, and fiscal needs.

4. Debt Servicing is a Major Challenge

• In December 2024, Tanzania borrowed USD 376.8M but also had to repay USD 185.4M (including interest payments).
• This means that a significant portion of revenues is spent on debt servicing, which could limit spending on public services.

5. IMF and International Financial Support Play a Key Role

• The IMF provided USD 204.5M in December 2024 to support Tanzania’s financial stability.
• This suggests Tanzania relies on international financial institutions to manage its debt obligations and sustain economic programs.

6. Tanzania’s Debt-to-GDP Ratio is Still Manageable

• Tanzania’s total public debt (domestic + external) was USD 38.24 billion, accounting for 47.2% of GDP in November 2024.
• While below the IMF’s 55% risk threshold, continued borrowing without sufficient economic growth could lead to debt distress.

7. Comparison with Other African Countries

• South Africa and Egypt have the highest external debts, but their economies are larger and more diversified.
• Nigeria has slightly higher debt than Tanzania, but its economy benefits from oil revenues.
• Tanzania’s debt is higher than Malawi, Burundi, and Namibia, suggesting it is borrowing at a faster rate.

Final Conclusion

Tanzania's rising external debt reflects ambitious economic growth plans but also poses risks of debt distress if borrowing continues at this rate without sufficient revenue growth. Proper debt management, economic diversification, and increased exports are crucial to ensuring sustainability.

As of February 28, 2025, the Bank of Tanzania’s total assets grew by 3.18%, reaching TZS 26.05 trillion, up from TZS 25.24 trillion in January. This growth was driven by a 15% increase in cash reserves (TZS 6.05 trillion) and a 10.2% rise in foreign currency marketable securities (TZS 8.53 trillion). Meanwhile, equity surged by 15.3%, supported by a 16% rise in reserves (TZS 2.41 trillion). However, advances to the government declined by 17.1%, reflecting tighter monetary policy, while currency in circulation fell by 1.4%, signaling a possible shift towards digital transactions or inflation control measures.

1. Total Assets:

• Total: TZS 26.05 trillion (increased from TZS 25.24 trillion in January 2025, a 3.18% increase).
• Main Asset Components:
  • Cash & Cash Equivalent: TZS 6.05 trillion (+15% from January's TZS 5.26 trillion).
  • Foreign Currency Marketable Securities: TZS 8.53 trillion (up from TZS 7.74 trillion, +10.2%).
  • Advances to Governments: TZS 4.70 trillion (declined from TZS 5.68 trillion, -17.1%).
  • Gold Holdings: TZS 87.12 billion (up from TZS 82.18 billion, +6%).
  • Quota in IMF: TZS 1.35 trillion (increased from TZS 1.29 trillion, +4.7%).
  • Government Securities: TZS 2.00 trillion (slight decrease from TZS 2.04 trillion, -1.7%).
  • Loans & Receivables: TZS 1.01 trillion (+6.8% from TZS 946.97 billion).

2. Total Liabilities:

• Total: TZS 23.53 trillion (up from TZS 23.06 trillion, +2%).
• Major Liabilities:
  • Currency in Circulation: TZS 8.04 trillion (slight decrease from TZS 8.15 trillion, -1.4%).
  • Deposits (Banks & Non-Bank Financial Institutions): TZS 4.04 trillion (up from TZS 3.51 trillion, +14.8%).
  • Deposits (Others): TZS 2.95 trillion (down from TZS 3.10 trillion, -4.8%).
  • Foreign Currency Financial Liabilities: TZS 4.61 trillion (+1.1% from TZS 4.56 trillion).
  • IMF-related Liabilities: TZS 1.17 trillion (no change).
  • Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) Allocation: TZS 1.94 trillion (up from TZS 1.86 trillion, +4.7%).

3. Equity:

• Total: TZS 2.51 trillion (up from TZS 2.18 trillion, +15.3%).
• Breakdown:
  • Paid-up Capital: TZS 100 billion (unchanged).
  • Reserves: TZS 2.41 trillion (up from TZS 2.08 trillion, +16%).

Key Takeaways:

✅ Increase in Assets (+3.18%), driven by growth in foreign marketable securities, loans, and cash reserves.
✅ Increase in Liabilities (+2%), with a rise in bank deposits and foreign currency liabilities.
✅ Growth in Equity (+15.3%), mainly due to an increase in reserves.
⚠️ Decline in Advances to Government (-17.1%), indicating reduced central bank lending to the government.
⚠️ Slight decrease in Currency Circulation (-1.4%), potentially reflecting economic factors like lower cash demand.

Analysis of the Bank of Tanzania's Financial Position (As of 28 February 2025)

The financial statement shows key trends in Tanzania’s monetary system and economic conditions.

1. Financial Stability and Growth

✅ Total Assets Increased (+3.18%)

• The growth in total assets to TZS 26.05 trillion suggests a stronger financial position for the central bank.
• The rise in foreign currency marketable securities (+10.2%) indicates increased foreign reserves, which enhances Tanzania’s ability to manage external shocks.
• Higher cash reserves (+15%) signal stronger liquidity and better financial sector stability.

✅ Increase in Equity (+15.3%)

• A rise in reserves (+16%) suggests that the central bank has improved its capital buffer, making it more resilient against financial risks.

2. Monetary Policy Implications

⚠️ Decline in Advances to Government (-17.1%)

• A reduction in lending to the government means the Bank of Tanzania is possibly tightening its monetary policy, aiming to control inflation or reduce fiscal dependency on central bank funding.

⚠️ Decrease in Currency Circulation (-1.4%)

• A drop in money circulation could suggest:
  • Lower cash demand, possibly due to increased digital transactions.
  • Slower economic activity, as businesses and individuals hold less cash.
  • Efforts to control inflation by reducing excess liquidity in the economy.

✅ Increase in Bank Deposits (+14.8%)

• This indicates stronger banking sector liquidity, suggesting that banks have more funds available for lending to businesses and individuals, which can drive economic growth.

3. External Sector and IMF Involvement

✅ Increase in IMF Quota & Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) (+4.7%)

• Tanzania’s higher quota and SDRs mean increased access to IMF financial support if needed, enhancing the country’s external financial stability.

✅ Increase in Foreign Currency Liabilities (+1.1%)

• This could indicate external borrowing or obligations, possibly linked to foreign exchange market interventions or debt management.

4. Potential Risks & Considerations

⚠️ Reduction in Government Securities (-1.7%)

• This could signal lower investment in domestic government debt, potentially affecting fiscal financing.

⚠️ Deposits from Other Sources Dropped (-4.8%)

• A decrease in non-bank deposits might indicate lower private sector liquidity or withdrawals from certain institutional accounts.

Conclusion

✅ The Bank of Tanzania’s financial position is strong, with rising reserves, improved liquidity, and controlled government lending.
⚠️ However, the decline in cash circulation and advances to the government may indicate monetary tightening and a possible slowdown in cash-based economic activities.
💡 Recommendation: Monitor government borrowing and liquidity trends to ensure balanced growth without excessive tightening.

In January 2025, the Tanzanian Shilling traded at an average of TZS 2,454.04 per USD, reflecting a 1.37% depreciation from TZS 2,420.84 in December 2024. However, on an annual basis, the Shilling appreciated by 2.6%, showing long-term stability. Foreign exchange market activity declined, with transactions dropping from USD 95.7 million in December 2024 to USD 16.3 million, while the Bank of Tanzania intervened by selling USD 7 million to stabilize the currency. Despite short-term pressures, foreign exchange reserves rose to USD 5,323.6 million, covering 4.3 months of imports, ensuring continued exchange rate stability.

1. Exchange Rate Movement: Slight Depreciation in January 2025

• In January 2025, the Tanzanian Shilling traded at an average of TZS 2,454.04 per USD, compared to TZS 2,420.84 per USD in December 2024.
• This reflects a monthly depreciation of approximately 1.37%, meaning the Shilling weakened slightly against the US dollar.
• However, on an annual basis, the Shilling appreciated by 2.6% compared to January 2024.

What It Means:

✅ The Shilling remains relatively stable, with only a minor depreciation (1.37%) month-over-month.
✅ Annual appreciation (2.6%) suggests a stronger Shilling compared to early 2024, reflecting better forex reserves and trade performance.
⚠ The slight monthly depreciation indicates short-term pressures, possibly due to increased import demand or external debt repayments.

2. Foreign Exchange Market Activity: Declining Transactions

• Total forex market transactions dropped to USD 16.3 million in January 2025, from USD 95.7 million in December 2024.
• The Bank of Tanzania intervened by selling USD 7 million to stabilize the market and prevent excessive depreciation.

What It Means:

✅ Lower forex market activity suggests reduced speculative trading, contributing to exchange rate stability.
✅ Bank of Tanzania’s intervention helped control excessive depreciation, ensuring Shilling stability.
⚠ A decline in foreign exchange market transactions could indicate lower foreign investment or trade activity.

3. Foreign Exchange Reserves Support Stability

• Foreign exchange reserves stood at USD 5,323.6 million in January 2025, compared to USD 5,107.1 million in January 2024.
• These reserves are sufficient to cover 4.3 months of imports, exceeding the national benchmark of 4 months.

What It Means:

✅ Stronger forex reserves contribute to Shilling stability by ensuring the country can meet external obligations.
✅ Sufficient reserves reduce pressure on the Shilling, helping manage exchange rate fluctuations.

Summary of Key Trends

Economic Implications of Shilling Stability

🔹 Positive Signs:
✅ Annual appreciation (+2.6%) shows long-term strength of the Shilling.
✅ Sufficient foreign exchange reserves (USD 5.3 billion) provide stability.
✅ Bank of Tanzania’s intervention controlled excessive depreciation.

🔸 Challenges:
⚠ Short-term depreciation (-1.37%) suggests forex market pressure.
⚠ Declining forex market activity may indicate lower trade or investor participation.
⚠ Heavy reliance on USD (68.1% of external debt) increases exchange rate risks.

Key Insights from Tanzania’s Shilling Stability (January 2025)

1. The Shilling Depreciated Slightly in the Short Term (-1.37%)

• The exchange rate moved from TZS 2,420.84 per USD in December 2024 to TZS 2,454.04 per USD in January 2025, showing a 1.37% depreciation.
• This suggests increased demand for USD, possibly for imports, debt servicing, or foreign investment repatriation.
• The Bank of Tanzania sold USD 7 million to stabilize the exchange rate, preventing excessive depreciation.

What it Means:

✅ The depreciation is minimal, meaning the Shilling remains largely stable.
⚠ Increased USD demand could signal rising import costs or capital outflows.
✅ Central Bank intervention helped prevent sharp currency fluctuations.

2. Long-Term Strength: The Shilling Appreciated by 2.6% Year-on-Year

• Compared to January 2024, the Shilling strengthened by 2.6%, meaning it performed better than the previous year.
• This suggests stronger forex reserves, improved exports, or controlled inflation.

What it Means:

✅ Tanzania’s economy is stable enough to maintain long-term Shilling strength.
✅ A stronger Shilling benefits businesses by reducing the cost of imported goods and debt repayments.

3. Forex Market Activity Dropped Significantly

• Forex market transactions declined from USD 95.7 million in December 2024 to USD 16.3 million in January 2025.
• Lower trading volume suggests reduced foreign exchange demand from businesses and investors.

What it Means:

⚠ Reduced forex transactions could indicate lower trade activity or reduced foreign investment inflows.
✅ Lower speculation in the forex market contributes to exchange rate stability.

4. Strong Forex Reserves Support Stability

• Foreign exchange reserves stood at USD 5,323.6 million, enough to cover 4.3 months of imports, above the national target of 4 months.

What it Means:

✅ Sufficient reserves reduce exchange rate risks, ensuring the government can manage forex fluctuations.
✅ The Shilling has a strong backup, reducing the likelihood of a major devaluation.

Overall Economic Implications

🔹 Positive Signs:
✅ The Shilling remains stable overall, with only minor fluctuations.
✅ Long-term appreciation (+2.6%) shows economic resilience.
✅ Strong forex reserves (USD 5.3 billion) help maintain stability.

🔸 Challenges:
⚠ Short-term depreciation (-1.37%) could indicate temporary pressure on the currency.
⚠ Declining forex market transactions suggest lower trade or investor activity.
⚠ High USD-denominated debt (68.1%) makes the economy vulnerable to exchange rate fluctuations.

Borrowing Costs Remain High, Savings Offer Mixed Returns

In January 2025, Tanzania's lending interest rates remained high, with the overall lending rate at 15.73%, slightly up from 15.70% in December 2024. Meanwhile, the negotiated lending rate stood at 12.80%, indicating that creditworthy borrowers could secure better terms. On the savings side, the overall deposit rate declined slightly to 8.31%, but negotiated deposit rates increased to 11.80%, encouraging large-scale deposits. The interest rate spread narrowed to 5.63 percentage points from 6.68% in January 2024, suggesting increased competition in the banking sector and potential future adjustments in lending rates.

Lending Interest Rates (January 2025)

• Overall lending rate: 15.73% (up from 15.70% in December 2024)
• Negotiated lending rate: 12.80% (slightly down from 12.83% in December 2024)
• Short-term lending rate (up to 1 year): 15.70%

Deposit Interest Rates (January 2025)

• Overall deposit rate: 8.31% (down slightly from 8.33% in December 2024)
• Negotiated deposit rate: 11.80% (up from 10.39% in December 2024)
• 12-month fixed deposit rate: 10.08% (up from 9.62% in December 2024)
• Savings deposit rate: 2.97% (up from 2.84% in December 2024)

Interest Rate Spread

• The spread between short-term lending and deposit interest rates narrowed to 5.63 percentage points, down from 6.68 percentage points recorded in January 2024.

These figures indicate that lending rates remained stable with slight upward movement, while deposit rates showed mixed trends, with an increase in negotiated deposit rates. The interest rate spread narrowing suggests banks are slightly reducing the gap between borrowing and lending costs.

The interest rate trends from the Bank of Tanzania with key insights into the current monetary environment and the cost of borrowing and saving in Tanzania

Key Takeaways:

1. Lending Rates Remain High (15.73%)
   • This suggests that borrowing remains relatively expensive for businesses and individuals.
   • High lending rates could slow down investment and economic expansion if businesses find it costly to access credit.
   • However, the slight increase in the lending rate (from 15.70% to 15.73%) is minimal, meaning borrowing costs have remained stable.
2. Negotiated Lending Rates Are Lower (12.80%)
   • Businesses and high-value borrowers with good creditworthiness can negotiate better loan terms, meaning not all borrowers face the highest lending rates.
   • This indicates that banks are willing to offer flexible rates to attract quality borrowers.
3. Deposit Rates Show Mixed Trends
   • Overall deposit rate (8.31%) is slightly lower, meaning banks are not offering much incentive for savings.
   • Negotiated deposit rate (11.80%) is higher, which suggests that large depositors (e.g., institutional investors) can get better returns on deposits.
   • 12-month fixed deposit rate (10.08%) is rising, which encourages long-term savings.
4. Narrowing Interest Rate Spread (5.63%)
   • The difference between lending and deposit rates is reducing (from 6.68% in January 2024 to 5.63% in January 2025).
   • This suggests banks are offering slightly better rates to depositors while keeping loan rates stable.
   • A smaller spread can indicate increased competition among banks or policy measures to make credit more affordable.

Implications for the Economy

• For Borrowers:
  • Businesses still face high borrowing costs, which could slow expansion.
  • However, those with strong financial records can access cheaper loans.
• For Savers:
  • Higher negotiated deposit rates encourage large-scale savings.
  • Lower overall deposit rates mean small savers might not benefit much from interest earnings.
• For the Banking Sector:
  • The narrowing spread suggests competition among banks, which may lead to lower lending rates in the future.
  • Banks may need to balance between attracting deposits and maintaining profitability.

Tax policies significantly influence Tanzania’s investment climate, affecting both local and foreign investors. While taxation is crucial for government revenue, an overly complex and high tax regime can discourage investments, limit capital inflows, and slow economic growth. This article explores how tax laws shape investment trends in Tanzania, presenting key figures, challenges, and potential solutions.

Tanzania’s Tax System and Investment Trends

1. Corporate Tax Rates and Regional Comparison

Tanzania imposes a 30% corporate tax rate on resident companies, one of the highest in East Africa. In contrast:

• Kenya: 25%
• Rwanda: 28%
• Ethiopia: 25%

The high tax rate discourages investments, as seen in 2022 when Tanzania attracted only $922 million in Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), compared to Kenya’s $2 billion and Ethiopia’s $3.1 billion.

2. Tax Compliance and Bureaucracy

Tanzania ranks 163rd out of 190 countries in the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business Index (2020), reflecting long tax compliance procedures. Businesses spend an average of 240 hours per year filing tax documents, compared to 150 hours in Rwanda.

A survey conducted by TICGL in 2025 revealed:

• 72% of investors found Tanzania’s tax system too complex.
• 63% reported high corporate taxes as a barrier to business expansion.
• 55% believed frequent tax policy changes discouraged long-term investments.

3. Multiple Taxation and VAT Burden

Investors in Tanzania face multiple layers of taxation, including:

• Corporate tax (30%)
• Withholding tax (10-15%)
• Skills and Development Levy (4%)
• Value-Added Tax (VAT) (18%)

Tanzania’s VAT refund delays are a significant issue, with pending refunds amounting to TSh 1.4–1.5 trillion ($650 million) in 2025. Some businesses wait over 12 months for VAT refunds, severely affecting cash flow and expansion plans.

4. Case Studies: How Taxes Affect Investors

Mining Industry: Acacia Mining’s $190 Billion Tax Dispute

• In 2017, Tanzania’s Revenue Authority (TRA) imposed a $190 billion tax bill on Acacia Mining.
• The dispute lasted two years, causing a 70% stock price drop and a 30% decline in FDI in the mining sector.

Telecommunications: Vodacom Tanzania’s $2.5 Million Tax Case

• Vodacom was issued a TSh 5.8 billion ($2.5 million) tax bill in 2021, disrupting its planned 5G expansion.

Tourism Sector: Serena Hotels’ VAT Refund Issues

• Serena Hotels in Tanzania faced a two-year delay on VAT refunds worth TSh 2.1 billion ($900,000), leading to cash flow problems.

Recommendations for a Better Investment Climate

1. Lower Corporate Tax to 25%
   • Aligning with Kenya and Ethiopia could increase Tanzania’s FDI inflows.
2. Simplify Tax Compliance
   • Introduce a one-stop tax portal to reduce paperwork and compliance time.
3. Reduce VAT to 16%
   • This would enhance competitiveness and reduce operational costs for businesses.
4. Automate VAT Refund Processing
   • Ensuring refunds are processed within 30 days would improve business cash flow.
5. Introduce a 5-Year Tax Stability Framework
   • This would provide predictability and confidence for long-term investors.

Conclusion

Tanzania's current tax policies present significant barriers to investment. High corporate taxes, multiple taxation, VAT refund delays, and unpredictable policy changes discourage both local and foreign investors. If key reforms are implemented—such as lowering tax rates, simplifying compliance, and improving tax administration—Tanzania could increase FDI by 10-15% over the next five years, boosting economic growth and job creation.

The Bank of Tanzania's Statement of Financial Position as of January 2025 shows a 1.6% increase in total assets, reaching TZS 25.24 trillion from TZS 24.85 trillion in December 2024. This growth is driven by a 25.3% rise in government advances (TZS 5.67 trillion) and a 6.6% increase in foreign currency marketable securities (TZS 7.74 trillion), highlighting stronger financial buffers. However, currency in circulation declined by 6.0% (TZS 8.15 trillion), signaling possible shifts towards digital transactions or controlled liquidity. Meanwhile, foreign reserves improved, with gold holdings rising by 12.5% (TZS 82.18 billion) and Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) surging by 260% (TZS 27.48 billion), reflecting increased international financial support. Despite a 21.8% increase in equity (TZS 2.18 trillion), the central bank’s growing advances to the government raise concerns about fiscal sustainability.

Breakdown of the Bank of Tanzania Statement of Financial Position

1. Assets (Total: TZS 25.24 Trillion)

Assets grew from TZS 24.85 trillion (Dec 2024) to TZS 25.24 trillion (Jan 2025), an increase of TZS 393.5 billion.

Key Components of Assets:

• Cash and Cash Equivalent: Decreased from TZS 5.78 trillion to TZS 5.26 trillion (-8.9%).
• Holdings of Special Drawing Rights (SDRs): Increased significantly from TZS 7.64 billion to TZS 27.48 billion (+260%).
• Gold Reserves: Increased from TZS 73.08 billion to TZS 82.18 billion (+12.5%).
• IMF Quota: Grew from TZS 1.23 trillion to TZS 1.29 trillion (+4.8%).
• Foreign Currency Marketable Securities: Increased from TZS 7.26 trillion to TZS 7.74 trillion (+6.6%).
• Government Securities: Increased slightly from TZS 2.03 trillion to TZS 2.04 trillion.
• Advances to Government: Grew significantly from TZS 4.53 trillion to TZS 5.67 trillion (+25.3%).
• Loans and Receivables: Slight increase from TZS 940.37 billion to TZS 946.97 billion (+0.7%).
• Equity Investments: Increased from TZS 143.63 billion to TZS 150.39 billion (+4.7%).
• Inventories: Increased sharply from TZS 453.64 billion to TZS 561.78 billion (+23.8%).
• Deferred Currency Cost: Slight decrease from TZS 114.34 billion to TZS 112.07 billion (-2.0%).
• Other Assets: Dropped significantly from TZS 1.25 trillion to TZS 320.20 billion (-74.4%).
• Property, Plant & Equipment: Slight decrease from TZS 1.01 trillion to TZS 1.009 trillion.
• Lease & Intangible Assets: Minimal changes.

2. Liabilities (Total: TZS 23.06 Trillion)

Liabilities remained stable at TZS 23.06 trillion, with minor fluctuations.

Key Components of Liabilities:

• Currency in Circulation: Decreased from TZS 8.67 trillion to TZS 8.15 trillion (-6.0%).
• Deposits (Banks & Non-Banks): Increased from TZS 3.34 trillion to TZS 3.51 trillion (+5.1%).
• Other Deposits: Increased from TZS 2.82 trillion to TZS 3.10 trillion (+9.9%).
• Foreign Currency Financial Liabilities: Slight increase from TZS 4.51 trillion to TZS 4.56 trillion (+1.1%).
• BoT Liquidity Papers: Increased slightly from TZS 537.54 billion to TZS 547.39 billion.
• Provisions & Other Liabilities: Decreased from TZS 163.33 billion to TZS 133.64 billion (-18.2%).
• IMF Related Liabilities: Constant at TZS 1.17 trillion.
• SDR Allocations: Increased from TZS 1.77 trillion to TZS 1.86 trillion (+4.8%).

3. Equity (Total: TZS 2.18 Trillion)

Equity rose from TZS 1.79 trillion to TZS 2.18 trillion (+21.8%).

Key Components of Equity:

• Reserves: Increased significantly from TZS 1.69 trillion to TZS 2.08 trillion (+23.1%).
• Authorized & Paid-up Capital: Constant at TZS 100 billion.

Key Observations & Figures

1. Increase in Total Assets: TZS 393.5 billion (+1.6%).
2. Growth in Equity: TZS 389.9 billion (+21.8%) due to a rise in reserves.
3. Decrease in Currency in Circulation: TZS 519.2 billion (-6.0%).
4. Significant Increase in Advances to Government: TZS 1.15 trillion (+25.3%).
5. Surge in Special Drawing Rights (SDRs): TZS 19.8 billion (+260%).
6. Foreign Currency Marketable Securities Grew: TZS 480.6 billion (+6.6%).
7. Major Drop in Other Assets: TZS 931.1 billion (-74.4%).

The Bank of Tanzania's Statement of Financial Position (Jan 2025) reveals key insights into the country's monetary, fiscal, and financial stability

1. Monetary and Economic Trends

• Currency in Circulation Declined (-6.0%)
  → This could indicate reduced cash demand, possibly due to increased digital transactions, lower inflationary pressure, or economic slowdown affecting consumer spending.
• Increase in Foreign Currency Marketable Securities (+6.6%)
  → Suggests higher foreign reserves, improving exchange rate stability and economic resilience against external shocks.
• Growth in Gold Reserves (+12.5%)
  → Shows the Bank of Tanzania is strengthening its gold holdings as a hedge against currency fluctuations and inflation.
• Advances to Government Increased Sharply (+25.3%)
  → The government borrowed more from the central bank, likely for budget support, infrastructure projects, or debt servicing.
• Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) Surge (+260%)
  → The country received more IMF support, which could be used to boost reserves or finance balance-of-payments needs.

2. Financial Sector Stability

• Bank Deposits Increased (+5.1%)
  → Confidence in the banking sector is improving as financial institutions hold more deposits with the central bank.
• Reduction in Other Assets (-74.4%)
  → Suggests a shift in asset management, possibly due to debt repayments, asset reclassification, or balance sheet restructuring.
• Rise in Government Securities (+0.4%)
  → Indicates continued investment in domestic bonds, helping to finance government projects while maintaining liquidity.
• Growth in IMF-related Liabilities (+4.8%)
  → Reflects ongoing international obligations and external financing reliance.

3. Fiscal and Policy Implications

• Equity (Reserves) Increased (+23.1%)
  → The central bank is strengthening financial buffers, which enhances economic resilience.
• Foreign Currency Financial Liabilities Slightly Up (+1.1%)
  → Indicates controlled external debt exposure, ensuring manageable foreign obligations.
• Drop in Provisions & Other Liabilities (-18.2%)
  → May reflect reduced outstanding liabilities, signaling better financial discipline.

What It Means for Tanzania

1. The economy is stabilizing, but government borrowing is increasing.
   • The rise in advances to government suggests higher fiscal spending, which can stimulate economic growth but raises concerns about debt sustainability.
2. The central bank is strengthening reserves and foreign asset holdings.
   • Increased foreign securities, SDRs, and gold reserves show an effort to stabilize the Tanzanian shilling (TZS) and prepare for external shocks.
3. Monetary policies are shifting towards liquidity control and financial sector stability.
   • The reduction in currency circulation and rise in bank deposits indicate a move towards digital transactions and reduced inflationary pressure.
4. Increased IMF-related assets and liabilities show continued reliance on international financing.
   • This highlights Tanzania’s need for external support to balance fiscal and monetary policies.

Final Thought: Growth with Fiscal Caution

Tanzania’s financial position is improving, but government borrowing and external financing remain key risks. If these trends continue, careful monetary and fiscal management will be needed to sustain growth without increasing debt vulnerabilities.

Borrowing Patterns, Debt Service, and Sustainability Risks

As of December 2024, Tanzania’s total public debt stood at USD 46.6 billion, with external debt accounting for 70.7% (USD 32.9 billion). The government relied heavily on multilateral lenders (55.4%) and commercial loans (35.6%), increasing exposure to market-driven interest rates. While 21.2% of borrowed funds supported transport and telecommunications infrastructure, 19.4% was used for budget support, highlighting fiscal dependence on borrowing. With debt service payments reaching USD 185.4 million in December, managing repayment risks and prioritizing productive investments is crucial for long-term sustainability​

Debt Developments in Tanzania – December 2024

Tanzania’s total public debt stock reached USD 46,562.1 million at the end of December 2024, reflecting a 0.5% monthly increase. Of this, external debt accounted for 70.7% (USD 32,928.4 million), while domestic debt stood at TZS 32,649.3 billion. The rise in external debt was attributed to new disbursements amounting to USD 376.8 million, mainly to finance government projects and budgetary support​.

1. External Debt Stock and Composition

• Total external debt stock at the end of December 2024 was USD 32,928.4 million, reflecting a 1.8% decrease from USD 33,528.6 million in November 2024.
• The Central Government held 77.4% of the external debt (USD 25,488.3 million), while the private sector accounted for 22.6% (USD 7,436.4 million).
• The decrease in external debt was due to higher debt service payments (USD 185.4 million in December 2024), including USD 111.2 million in principal repayments​.

2. External Debt Stock by Creditor

Tanzania’s external debt is held by multilateral, bilateral, commercial, and export credit lenders. The composition as of December 2024 was as follows:

• Multilateral institutions (55.4%) remain the largest creditors, providing concessional loans with lower interest rates.
• Commercial loans (35.6%) have grown, increasing exposure to market-driven interest rates, which could raise debt service costs in the future.
• Bilateral and export credit debt (9.1%) mainly finances infrastructure projects​.

3. Disbursed Outstanding Debt by Use of Funds (Percentage Shares)

Tanzania’s external debt is allocated across various sectors, primarily transport, energy, social services, and budget support.

• The transport sector (21.2%) and energy (14.6%) received the largest funding, supporting infrastructure expansion projects.
• Social services (20.3%) include education and healthcare investments, improving human capital development.
• Budget support (19.4%) shows the government's reliance on external borrowing to cover fiscal gaps​.

Key Takeaways:

1. External debt dominates Tanzania’s public debt (70.7% of total debt).
2. Multilateral institutions are the main creditors (55.4%), but commercial loans (35.6%) are rising, increasing debt servicing risks.
3. Most funds go to transport (21.2%), social services (20.3%), and budget support (19.4%), reflecting a focus on infrastructure and fiscal stability.
4. The government must manage rising debt service payments (USD 185.4 million in December 2024) to ensure long-term sustainability.

With total public debt at USD 46.6 billion, debt sustainability remains a critical concern, requiring effective fiscal management and prioritization of productive investments​

The debt developments in Tanzania for December 2024 reveal key trends in borrowing patterns, creditor composition, and the sustainability of external debt.

These figures indicate both opportunities and risks for fiscal management and economic stability

1. External Debt Remains the Largest Share of Public Debt

• External debt accounts for 70.7% (USD 32.9 billion) of total public debt (USD 46.6 billion).
• The government is highly reliant on external borrowing, particularly from multilateral lenders (55.4%) and commercial lenders (35.6%).
• While multilateral loans are concessional (low interest, long-term), the growing share of commercial loans (USD 11.7 billion) exposes Tanzania to higher borrowing costs and foreign exchange risks.

Implication:
✅ Multilateral financing provides stable, low-cost funding.
⚠️ High commercial debt increases vulnerability to global interest rate changes, raising repayment costs.

2. Debt Service Obligations Are Increasing

• In December 2024, the government made debt service payments of USD 185.4 million, including USD 111.2 million in principal repayment.
• The growing debt requires more foreign exchange reserves for repayment, increasing exposure to shilling depreciation risks.

Implication:
⚠️ Future fiscal space may shrink as more funds are allocated for debt repayment instead of public services or development.
✅ If borrowed funds are well-invested, economic growth could offset repayment pressures.

3. Most Borrowed Funds Are Used for Infrastructure and Budget Support

• 21.2% of external debt funds are directed to transport and telecommunications, supporting infrastructure expansion (roads, railways, ports).
• 20.3% is allocated to social services (health & education), improving human capital.
• 19.4% goes to budget support, indicating the government’s reliance on borrowing to fund recurrent expenditures.

Implication:
✅ Investing in infrastructure can boost economic growth, improving debt repayment capacity.
⚠️ Using loans for budget support suggests fiscal weaknesses, as the government borrows to cover recurrent expenses instead of productive investments.

4. Debt Sustainability Risks and Management Needs

• Public debt reached USD 46.6 billion, requiring careful management to avoid over-indebtedness.
• The growing commercial loan share increases interest rate risks, requiring improved revenue mobilization to cover repayments.
• Tanzania’s debt remains below the IMF/World Bank risk threshold (55% of GDP), but a rising trend requires close monitoring.

What Needs to be Done?
🔹 Shift borrowing towards productive sectors (e.g., manufacturing, agriculture) to generate returns.
🔹 Reduce reliance on commercial loans and prioritize concessional financing.
🔹 Enhance revenue collection to reduce reliance on budget support loans.
🔹 Strengthen fiscal discipline to ensure borrowed funds are effectively utilized.

Overall Takeaway

📌 Tanzania’s external debt remains dominant (70.7%), with a shift toward commercial borrowing (35.6%).
📌 Debt service payments (USD 185.4 million) are rising, limiting future fiscal flexibility.
📌 Infrastructure investment (21.2%) supports economic growth, but reliance on budget support loans (19.4%) is a concern.
📌 Debt sustainability requires a shift to revenue-driven fiscal policies, careful borrowing, and economic diversification.

While Tanzania’s debt is still within manageable limits, a proactive approach is needed to prevent future fiscal risks​

Implications for Credit, Savings, and Economic Growth

In December 2024, Tanzania’s interest rates showed mixed movements, reflecting shifts in monetary policy and banking sector dynamics. The overall lending rate declined to 15.17% from 15.67%, making credit more affordable, while deposit rates rose to 8.33% from 8.18%, incentivizing savings. The spread between short-term lending and deposit rates narrowed to 6.12 percentage points, down from 7.02% in December 2023, signaling increased banking sector efficiency. These trends suggest a pro-growth monetary policy stance, aimed at boosting investment and economic activity while maintaining financial stability​

The interest rates in Tanzania, as reported in the Bank of Tanzania's Monthly Economic Review (January 2025), are as follows:

Lending and Deposit Interest Rates (December 2024)

1. Overall Lending Rate:
   • 15.17%, down from 15.67% in November 2024.
2. Negotiated Lending Rate:
   • 12.83%, up from 12.77% in November 2024.
3. Overall Deposit Rate:
   • 8.33%, up from 8.18% in November 2024.
4. Negotiated Deposit Rate:
   • 10.39%, up from 10.14% in November 2024.
5. Short-term Lending Rate (Up to 1 Year):
   • 15.74%, compared to 15.56% in November 2024.
6. Savings Deposit Rate:
   • 2.84%, up from 2.69% in November 2024.
7. 12-Month Time Deposit Rate:
   • 9.62%, slightly lower than 9.63% in November 2024.

Interest Rate Spread

• The spread between short-term lending and deposit rates narrowed to 6.12 percentage points from 7.02 percentage points in December 2023.

The changes in interest rates reflect key economic and monetary policy dynamics in Tanzania

1. Declining Lending Rates (15.17% from 15.67%)

• A lower lending rate means credit is becoming cheaper, making it easier for businesses and individuals to borrow.
• This suggests monetary easing, where the Bank of Tanzania (BoT) is supporting economic growth by making loans more accessible.
• The increase in negotiated lending rates (12.83%), however, indicates that some banks are charging higher rates based on risk assessment, suggesting credit risk concerns in certain sectors.

2. Rising Deposit Rates (8.33% from 8.18%)

• Higher deposit rates encourage savings, helping banks to attract more funds.
• The increase in negotiated deposit rates (10.39%) suggests that banks are competing more for deposits, possibly due to:
  • Higher demand for liquidity.
  • The need to fund loan growth.

3. Narrowing Interest Rate Spread (6.12% from 7.02%)

• A lower spread means the difference between lending and deposit rates is shrinking, which usually implies:
  • More efficiency in the banking system.
  • Increased competition among banks, forcing them to offer better rates to depositors while reducing borrowing costs.

4. Implications for the Economy

• Encourages borrowing: More businesses and individuals can take loans for investment and consumption.
• Supports economic growth: Easier access to credit can drive investments, job creation, and productivity.
• Sustains inflation stability: If lending is growing without excessive inflation, the economy can expand sustainably.
• Indicates liquidity adjustments: BoT is managing liquidity by influencing rates, ensuring banks have enough funds to lend.

Overall Takeaway

The trend suggests a pro-growth monetary policy stance, with lower borrowing costs stimulating economic activities, while banks adjust their deposit rates to maintain liquidity and profitability. However, higher negotiated lending rates in some cases suggest that banks remain cautious about credit risks in certain sectors.