The Bank of Tanzania’s August 2025 review shows that Tanzania’s external debt stock stood at USD 32,955.5 million in June 2025, with the central government accounting for 85.4% (USD 28,133.7 million) and the private sector holding 14.6% (USD 4,820.6 million). By sectoral use, debt was mainly channeled into transport and telecommunications (28.6%), social welfare and education (18.5%), and energy and mining (16.7%), underscoring the focus on infrastructure and human capital development. In terms of currency composition, the debt portfolio remains highly exposed to the US dollar (69.8%), followed by the euro (18.1%), with smaller shares in the yen (5.4%) and yuan (3.2%). This structure highlights Tanzania’s reliance on public borrowing to fund long-term projects while emphasizing the importance of managing currency risk in debt servicing.
Details:
| Borrower | Amount (USD Million) | Share (%) |
| Central Government | 28,133.7 | 85.4 |
| Private Sector | 4,820.6 | 14.6 |
| Public Corporations | 1.3 | 0.0 |
| Total | 32,955.5 | 100 |
| Sector / Use of Funds | Share (%) |
| Transport & Telecommunications | 28.6 |
| Social Welfare & Education | 18.5 |
| Energy & Mining | 16.7 |
| Agriculture | 6.4 |
| Industries | 5.7 |
| Other Sectors | 24.1 |
| Total | 100 |
| Currency | Share (%) |
| US Dollar (USD) | 69.8 |
| Euro (EUR) | 18.1 |
| Japanese Yen | 5.4 |
| Chinese Yuan | 3.2 |
| Other | 3.5 |
| Total | 100 |
1. External Debt Stock by Borrower (June 2025)
2. Disbursed Outstanding Debt by Use of Funds (June 2025, % Share)
3. Disbursed Outstanding Debt by Currency Composition (June 2025, % Share)
Tanzania's engagement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has grown significantly in 2025, reflecting its strategic reliance on IMF financing. As of July 25, 2025, Tanzania's IMF credit outstanding reached TZS 3.65 trillion (USD 1,335,730,000), a 18.98% increase from TZS 3.07 trillion (USD 1,122,630,000) on June 30, 2025, based on an exchange rate of approximately TZS 2,735 per USD (sourced from recent web data on Tanzania shilling rates). This growth, driven by TZS 0.58 trillion in disbursements with no repayments, positions Tanzania as a key player in East Africa, holding 22.07% of the region's TZS 16.55 trillion in IMF credit. Across Africa, Tanzania ranks 11th out of 54 countries, contributing 1.30% to the continent's TZS 280.87 trillion total IMF credit outstanding. This analysis examines Tanzania’s position relative to East African peers and all African countries, highlighting its financial dynamics and regional significance.
Tanzania's IMF credit outstanding as of June 30, 2025, and July 25, 2025, in Tanzania Shillings (TZS), comparing its position among East African and all African countries. Tanzania’s credit growth reflects active IMF program participation, ranking it 2nd in East Africa and 11th across Africa. Significant disbursements and zero repayments underscore its reliance on IMF support, contributing notably to regional financing dynamics.
The following East African countries are included in the IMF credit dataset (converted to TZS using TZS 2,735 per USD):
| Metric | Tanzania Amount | East Africa Total | Tanzania's % |
| Outstanding 06/30/2025 | TZS 3.07 trillion | TZS 15.98 trillion | 19.21% |
| Total Disbursements | TZS 0.58 trillion | TZS 0.58 trillion | 100.00% |
| Total Repayments | TZS 0 | TZS 0.01 trillion | 0.00% |
| Outstanding 07/25/2025 | TZS 3.65 trillion | TZS 16.55 trillion | 22.07% |
African Countries Total
| Metric | Tanzania Amount | Africa Total | Tanzania's % |
| Outstanding 06/30/2025 | TZS 3.07 trillion | TZS 278.22 trillion | 1.10% |
| Total Disbursements | TZS 0.58 trillion | TZS 3.46 trillion | 16.86% |
| Total Repayments | TZS 0 | TZS 0.86 trillion | 0.00% |
| Outstanding 07/25/2025 | TZS 3.65 trillion | TZS 280.87 trillion | 1.30% |
Tanzania ranks 11th with TZS 3.65 trillion (1.30%).
Tanzania’s significant increase in IMF credit outstanding, from TZS 3.07 trillion to TZS 3.65 trillion between June 30 and July 25, 2025, signals a robust commitment to leveraging IMF financing to support economic development. The TZS 0.58 trillion in disbursements, representing 100% of East Africa’s IMF inflows during this period, suggests Tanzania is actively channeling these funds into priority areas. According to recent IMF reviews, Tanzania’s Extended Credit Facility (ECF) arrangements focus on fiscal consolidation, infrastructure development, and social programs to enhance economic resilience and reduce poverty. The absence of repayments indicates a strategy to maximize liquidity for ongoing projects, potentially in sectors like energy, transport, and agriculture, which are critical for Tanzania’s Vision 2025 development goals. However, this reliance on IMF credit, while boosting short-term growth, raises concerns about long-term debt sustainability, especially given Tanzania’s modest 1.30% share of Africa’s total IMF credit. Balancing these funds with domestic revenue mobilization and prudent fiscal management will be crucial to ensure sustainable economic progress.
Tanzania's Position
Notable Points
Regional Context
Tanzania’s IMF credit outstanding grew by 18.98% from TZS 3.07 trillion to TZS 3.65 trillion between June 30 and July 25, 2025, driven by TZS 0.58 trillion in disbursements and no repayments. Ranking 2nd in East Africa and 11th in Africa, Tanzania plays a pivotal regional role while maintaining a modest continental footprint. Its 100% share of East African disbursements underscores active IMF engagement, likely tied to economic stabilization or development goals. Continued monitoring of Tanzania’s IMF activities will be crucial for understanding its fiscal trajectory in East Africa and beyond.
| Member | Total IMF Credit Outstanding as of 06/30/2025 | Total Disbursements | Total Repayments | Total IMF Credit Outstanding as of 07/25/2025 |
| Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of | 366,158,000 | 0 | 0 | 366,158,000 |
| Albania | 40,657,506 | 0 | 0 | 40,657,506 |
| Angola | 2,750,091,673 | 0 | 28,208,333 | 2,721,883,340 |
| Argentina | 40,260,000,000 | 0 | 0 | 40,260,000,000 |
| Armenia, Republic of | 89,873,183 | 0 | 0 | 89,873,183 |
| Bangladesh | 2,922,634,500 | 0 | 0 | 2,922,634,500 |
| Barbados | 491,550,010 | 0 | 0 | 491,550,010 |
| Benin | 765,823,950 | 0 | 3,183,400 | 762,640,550 |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 47,559,375 | 0 | 0 | 47,559,375 |
| Burkina Faso | 342,002,000 | 0 | 2,253,000 | 339,749,000 |
| Burundi | 100,100,000 | 0 | 0 | 100,100,000 |
| Cabo Verde | 72,116,000 | 4,510,000 | 0 | 76,626,000 |
| Cameroon | 1,168,860,000 | 0 | 23,460,000 | 1,145,400,000 |
| Central African Republic | 236,885,500 | 0 | 6,931,600 | 229,953,900 |
| Chad | 454,915,000 | 0 | 6,309,000 | 448,606,000 |
| Colombia | 937,500,000 | 0 | 0 | 937,500,000 |
| Comoros | 23,447,940 | 0 | 0 | 23,447,940 |
| Congo, Democratic Republic of | 1,762,450,000 | 190,400,000 | 0 | 1,952,850,000 |
| Congo, Republic of | 353,160,000 | 0 | 3,240,000 | 349,920,000 |
| Costa Rica | 1,837,765,000 | 0 | 0 | 1,837,765,000 |
| Cote d'Ivoire | 3,104,687,108 | 0 | 0 | 3,104,687,108 |
| Djibouti | 31,800,000 | 0 | 0 | 31,800,000 |
| Dominica | 10,895,000 | 0 | 0 | 10,895,000 |
| Ecuador | 6,211,675,007 | 438,400,000 | 0 | 6,650,075,007 |
| Egypt | 7,497,485,852 | 0 | 74,623,333 | 7,422,862,519 |
| El Salvador | 172,320,000 | 0 | 0 | 172,320,000 |
| Equatorial Guinea | 51,496,501 | 0 | 0 | 51,496,501 |
| Eswatini, The Kingdom of | 9,812,500 | 0 | 0 | 9,812,500 |
| Ethiopia | 1,415,347,500 | 191,700,000 | 13,364,000 | 1,593,683,500 |
| Gabon | 414,512,500 | 0 | 0 | 414,512,500 |
| Gambia, The | 129,241,250 | 0 | 1,166,250 | 128,075,000 |
| Georgia | 370,416,667 | 0 | 0 | 370,416,667 |
| Ghana | 2,448,001,000 | 267,500,000 | 8,302,500 | 2,707,198,500 |
| Grenada | 18,600,000 | 0 | 200,000 | 18,400,000 |
| Guinea | 323,213,900 | 0 | 1,721,300 | 321,492,600 |
| Guinea-Bissau | 51,174,400 | 4,730,000 | 587,000 | 55,317,400 |
| Haiti | 173,013,750 | 0 | 0 | 173,013,750 |
| Honduras | 511,299,319 | 0 | 0 | 511,299,319 |
| Jamaica | 595,590,000 | 0 | 0 | 595,590,000 |
| Jordan | 1,530,513,418 | 0 | 0 | 1,530,513,418 |
| Kenya | 3,022,009,900 | 0 | 0 | 3,022,009,900 |
| Kosovo | 142,072,000 | 0 | 0 | 142,072,000 |
| Kyrgyz Republic | 74,422,400 | 0 | 0 | 74,422,400 |
| Lesotho | 11,660,000 | 0 | 0 | 11,660,000 |
| Liberia | 174,503,200 | 0 | 0 | 174,503,200 |
| Madagascar | 695,577,600 | 77,392,000 | 9,340,600 | 763,629,000 |
| Malawi | 296,056,000 | 0 | 0 | 296,056,000 |
| Maldives | 21,200,000 | 0 | 0 | 21,200,000 |
| Mali | 403,827,600 | 0 | 5,165,000 | 398,662,600 |
| Mauritania | 296,660,000 | 36,160,000 | 0 | 332,820,000 |
| Moldova, Republic of | 733,876,260 | 0 | 800,000 | 733,076,260 |
| Mongolia | 71,488,115 | 0 | 0 | 71,488,115 |
| Morocco | 937,500,000 | 0 | 0 | 937,500,000 |
| Mozambique | 545,280,000 | 0 | 0 | 545,280,000 |
| Myanmar | 258,395,000 | 0 | 21,533,750 | 236,861,250 |
| Namibia | 95,550,000 | 0 | 23,887,500 | 71,662,500 |
| Nepal | 380,165,000 | 0 | 0 | 380,165,000 |
| Nicaragua | 64,997,500 | 0 | 0 | 64,997,500 |
| Niger | 411,896,500 | 30,268,000 | 6,028,000 | 436,136,500 |
| North Macedonia, Republic of | 203,440,000 | 0 | 0 | 203,440,000 |
| Pakistan | 6,745,250,006 | 0 | 59,666,666 | 6,685,583,340 |
| Papua New Guinea | 725,130,000 | 0 | 0 | 725,130,000 |
| Paraguay | 0 | 146,000,000 | 0 | 146,000,000 |
| Rwanda | 606,757,500 | 0 | 4,005,000 | 602,752,500 |
| St. Lucia | 21,400,000 | 0 | 0 | 21,400,000 |
| St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 19,872,450 | 0 | 0 | 19,872,450 |
| Samoa | 16,200,000 | 0 | 0 | 16,200,000 |
| Sao Tome & Principe | 27,158,013 | 0 | 63,433 | 27,094,580 |
| Senegal | 1,003,723,612 | 0 | 10,787,500 | 992,936,112 |
| Serbia, Republic of | 949,460,000 | 0 | 0 | 949,460,000 |
| Seychelles | 106,579,000 | 0 | 272,500 | 106,306,500 |
| Sierra Leone | 325,840,900 | 0 | 3,999,500 | 321,841,400 |
| Solomon Islands | 6,989,433 | 0 | 0 | 6,989,433 |
| Somalia | 87,000,000 | 7,500,000 | 0 | 94,500,000 |
| South Africa | 381,400,000 | 0 | 0 | 381,400,000 |
| South Sudan | 246,000,000 | 0 | 0 | 246,000,000 |
| Sri Lanka | 1,446,746,184 | 254,000,000 | 9,991,166 | 1,690,755,018 |
| Sudan | 991,551,000 | 0 | 0 | 991,551,000 |
| Suriname | 430,700,000 | 0 | 0 | 430,700,000 |
| Tajikistan, Republic of | 139,200,000 | 0 | 0 | 139,200,000 |
| Tanzania | 1,122,630,000 | 213,100,000 | 0 | 1,335,730,000 |
| Togo | 292,730,000 | 44,040,000 | 2,517,000 | 334,253,000 |
| Tonga | 13,800,000 | 0 | 0 | 13,800,000 |
| Tunisia | 526,138,180 | 0 | 14,731,866 | 511,406,314 |
| Uganda | 992,750,000 | 0 | 0 | 992,750,000 |
| Ukraine | 10,800,391,676 | 0 | 0 | 10,800,391,676 |
| Uzbekistan, Republic of | 92,050,000 | 0 | 0 | 92,050,000 |
| Zambia | 992,860,000 | 0 | 0 | 992,860,000 |
| Total | 118,045,530,338 | 1,905,700,000 | 346,339,197 | 119,604,891,141 |
Tanzania’s external debt has shown a significant upward trend, reaching 35,039.8 USD Million in February 2025, up from 34,551.4 USD Million in January 2025, according to the Bank of Tanzania. This marks a month-on-month increase of approximately 488.4 USD Million or 1.41%. The external debt has grown steadily, averaging 20,062.78 USD Million from 2011 to 2025, with a record high of 34,936.5 USD Million in February 2025 and a low of 2,469.7 USD Million in December 2011. This reflects a substantial increase over the years, driven by investments in infrastructure, energy, and other development projects.
Tanzania’s external debt is a critical indicator of its economic position within Africa and East Africa. To provide a comprehensive understanding, let’s compare Tanzania’s external debt to other African and East African countries, analyze its debt-to-GDP ratio, and explore the factors contributing to its debt profile.
The provided data lists external debt for several African countries, with figures converted to USD Million where necessary for comparison. Using the most recent data from the table and supplementing with additional context:
Tanzania’s external debt of 34,056 USD Million (Mar 2025) places it among the top 10 African countries for external debt, behind economic giants like South Africa, Egypt, and Nigeria, but ahead of smaller economies like Rwanda and Burundi. This reflects Tanzania’s growing economic ambitions but also its increasing reliance on external financing.
Within East Africa, Tanzania’s external debt is significant but not the highest. Key EAC countries include:
Tanzania’s external debt is comparable to Kenya’s, positioning it as a major borrower in the EAC. However, its debt-to-GDP ratio and risk profile are more favorable than some peers, as discussed below.
Tanzania’s external debt-to-GDP ratio provides insight into its debt sustainability. In 2023, Tanzania’s public debt (including external and domestic) was 46.87% of GDP, with external debt accounting for approximately 70.4% of total public debt (2023 data). Assuming a nominal GDP of 78 USD Billion in 2023 (projected to grow to 105.1 USD Billion in 2022, adjusting for inflation and growth), the external debt of 34,056 USD Million in March 2025 translates to roughly 32-35% of GDP, depending on GDP estimates for 2025.
Tanzania’s external debt-to-GDP ratio of ~32-35% is moderate compared to peers, and its public debt-to-GDP ratio of 46.87% (2023) is below the regional benchmark of 55% for low-income countries, indicating sustainable debt levels. The IMF’s 2024 Debt Sustainability Analysis (DSA) classifies Tanzania’s risk of external debt distress as low, supported by prudent fiscal policies and concessional borrowing.
As of December 2019, Tanzania’s external debt was USD 22.4 Billion (40% of GDP), with the central government holding 78%, the private sector 21%, and public corporations 0.4%. The debt is primarily owed to:
By currency, 68.9% of external debt is denominated in USD, followed by the Euro, which reduces exposure to currency fluctuations but increases repayment burdens when the Tanzanian shilling depreciates (8% depreciation in 2023).
Tanzania’s external debt growth is driven by:
Tanzania’s external debt of 34,056 USD Million in March 2025 reflects its ambitious development agenda but remains sustainable, with a debt-to-GDP ratio of ~32-35% and low distress risk. Compared to African peers, Tanzania’s debt is moderate, and within East Africa, it competes closely with Kenya while outperforming smaller economies like Rwanda and Burundi. Continued fiscal discipline, concessional borrowing, and economic diversification will be key to maintaining debt sustainability.
| Country | External Debt (USD Million) | Reference Date | GDP (USD Billion, 2023 Est.) | Debt-to-GDP Ratio (%) | Notes |
| Tanzania | 34,056 | Mar 2025 | 78 | ~32-35 | Moderate debt, low distress risk |
| Kenya | 37,173 | Dec 2024 | 112 | ~33.2 | Slightly higher than Tanzania, larger economy |
| Rwanda | 7,916 | Dec 2023 | 14 | ~56.5 | Higher debt-to-GDP, smaller economy |
| Burundi | 650 | Dec 2024 | 2.6 | ~25.0 | Small economy, minimal debt |
| South Africa | 168,379 | Dec 2024 | 405 | ~41.6 | Highest debt in dataset, large economy |
| Egypt | 155,204 | Sep 2024 | 393 | ~39.5 | Significant debt, infrastructure-driven |
| Nigeria | 42,900 | Sep 2024 | 362 | ~11.8 | Lower ratio due to large GDP |
| Ghana | 28,300 | Dec 2024 | 76 | ~37.2 | Higher distress risk |
| Angola | 50,260 | Dec 2023 | 85 | ~59.1 | High debt, oil-dependent |
Notes:
As of December 2024, Tanzania’s external debt stood at TZS 79.72 trillion (USD 32.93 billion), with 67.8% (TZS 54.10 trillion) denominated in US dollars (USD). The Euro accounted for 16.2% (TZS 12.92 trillion), while the Chinese Yuan made up 6.4% (TZS 5.10 trillion). This heavy reliance on USD borrowing exposes Tanzania to exchange rate risks, where a 10% depreciation of the Tanzania Shilling (TZS) could increase debt servicing costs by TZS 5.41 trillion. To mitigate this risk, Tanzania must enhance foreign reserves, diversify its export earnings, and negotiate more concessional loans to maintain long-term debt sustainability
Tanzania’s external debt is held in multiple currencies, exposing the country to foreign exchange risks depending on fluctuations in the global market. As of December 2024, the total external debt stock stood at TZS 79.72 trillion (USD 32.93 billion), with the majority denominated in US dollars.
1. Currency Composition of External Debt (Percentage Share & TZS Value)
| Currency | Percentage Share (%) | Value in TZS (Trillion) |
| US Dollar (USD) | 67.8% | 54.10 trillion |
| Euro (EUR) | 16.2% | 12.92 trillion |
| Chinese Yuan (CNY) | 6.4% | 5.10 trillion |
| Other Currencies | 9.5% | 7.60 trillion |
| Total External Debt | 100% | 79.72 trillion |
2. Key Observations & Implications
✅ US Dollar Dominance (67.8%)
✅ Euro Loans (16.2%) Provide Some Diversification
✅ Chinese Yuan Exposure (6.4%) Reflects Infrastructure Financing Ties
✅ Other Currencies (9.5%) Reflect a Diverse Creditor Base
3. Exchange Rate Risks & Debt Management Strategy
⚠️ Tanzania is vulnerable to exchange rate movements, particularly in the USD-TZS exchange rate.
⚠️ If the Tanzania Shilling depreciates against the US dollar, debt servicing costs will increase, reducing fiscal space.
✅ Diversification into Euros and Chinese Yuan helps, but debt repayment strategies should factor in exchange rate risks.
Key Takeaways
📌 67.8% of Tanzania’s external debt (TZS 54.10 trillion) is in US dollars, making debt service costs dependent on USD-TZS fluctuations.
📌 Euro-denominated debt (16.2% or TZS 12.92 trillion) offers some diversification, while CNY exposure (6.4% or TZS 5.10 trillion) reflects infrastructure financing links with China.
📌 Government debt management strategies should focus on reducing currency risks by increasing TZS-denominated borrowing and hedging against USD volatility.
To maintain debt sustainability, Tanzania must closely monitor exchange rate movements, diversify borrowing sources, and prioritize revenue generation to offset repayment risks
1. Heavy Dependence on the US Dollar (67.8%) Increases Exchange Rate Risk
Implication:
⚠️ Tanzania is highly vulnerable to USD fluctuations, which could increase debt servicing costs and fiscal pressure.
✅ If the Shilling remains stable or strengthens, repayment costs will be lower.
2. Euro (16.2%) and Chinese Yuan (6.4%) Help Reduce USD Dependence
Implication:
✅ Having some debt in Euros and Yuan reduces USD reliance.
⚠️ However, fluctuations in these currencies could still affect repayment costs.
3. Exchange Rate Movements Can Impact Tanzania’s Fiscal Position
Implication:
⚠️ Tanzania must generate more export revenue in USD, EUR, and CNY to ease repayment pressures.
✅ Stable foreign exchange reserves help offset currency risks, ensuring the country meets its obligations.
4. Policy Actions Needed to Reduce Exchange Rate Risks
✅ Increase Local Currency Borrowing: More TZS-denominated debt would protect Tanzania from forex fluctuations.
✅ Enhance Foreign Currency Reserves: A stronger reserve position would act as a buffer against currency swings.
✅ Diversify Export Earnings: More revenue from gold, tourism, and agriculture will help Tanzania repay debts in USD, EUR, and CNY without depleting reserves.
✅ Negotiate for More Concessional Loans: More multilateral funding in low-interest, long-term debt can reduce reliance on expensive commercial borrowing.
Final Takeaway
📌 67.8% of external debt is in USD (TZS 54.10 trillion), making Tanzania vulnerable to currency depreciation risks.
📌 Euro (16.2%) and Chinese Yuan (6.4%) provide diversification, but they also come with their own exchange rate risks.
📌 The government must carefully manage forex reserves and export revenue to avoid debt distress.
While Tanzania’s debt remains manageable, exchange rate volatility could create future repayment challenges if not addressed through strong fiscal management and export-driven economic growth
In September 2024, Tanzania’s national debt reached USD 45.05 billion, with 73% held in external debt, underscoring the country’s reliance on foreign financing for development. This external debt, totaling USD 32.89 billion, exposes Tanzania to risks from global economic shifts, such as rising interest rates and currency fluctuations. The domestic debt, focused on long-term government securities, reflects a cautious approach to managing short-term financial pressures. As Tanzania strives to balance its funding needs with sustainable debt levels, a diversified financial strategy will be essential to maintain resilience and support continued economic growth.
In summary, Tanzania’s debt management strategy involves controlled domestic borrowing and careful external debt expansion, yet the high reliance on foreign debt remains a vulnerability. Prudent management of this debt mix will be essential to maintain economic resilience and avoid financial constraints.
In essence, while Tanzania is managing its debt prudently, particularly on the domestic front, the high reliance on external debt poses a risk if global conditions worsen. Ensuring a balance between funding needs and sustainable debt levels will be crucial for long-term fiscal health and economic stability.