Tanzania’s financial transactions landscape is undergoing a significant digital transformation, with Electronic Fund Transfers (EFT) surging by 44.7% in volume from 14.57 million in 2020 to 21.08 million in 2024, while cheque transactions continue to decline. The value of EFT transactions grew by 77%, reaching TZS 16,769.88 billion in 2024, signaling a strong shift toward digital payments. Conversely, TZS cheque usage dropped by 36% in volume and 17% in value, while USD cheque transactions plummeted by 44% in volume and 35.7% in value over the same period. This trend reflects the increasing adoption of faster, more secure electronic payment methods, reducing reliance on traditional cheques in Tanzania's financial system.
The data from Electronic Fund Transfers (EFT), Tanzanian Shilling (TZS) cheque transactions, and United States Dollar (USD) cheque transactions highlight key shifts in Tanzania's financial landscape, indicating a preference for digital payments while traditional cheque usage declines.
1. Electronic Fund Transfers (EFT): Strong and Consistent Growth
What It Means:
✅ Rising preference for digital payments as more businesses and individuals shift from paper-based payments to electronic fund transfers.
✅ Higher transaction values indicate increased economic activity, financial inclusion, and confidence in digital banking infrastructure.
2. TZS Cheque Transactions: Steady Decline
What It Means:
✅ Paper-based payments are rapidly declining, as businesses and individuals move towards faster, more efficient digital alternatives.
✅ Reduced cheque dependency indicates financial sector modernization, possibly driven by regulatory support and increased banking efficiency.
3. USD Cheque Transactions: Sharpest Decline
What It Means:
✅ Foreign currency cheque usage is declining even faster than local cheque transactions, signaling an even greater shift towards electronic payments in international trade and finance.
✅ Declining USD cheque usage could indicate improved international banking channels, such as wire transfers, mobile money, and SWIFT transactions.
The trends in TACH transactions clearly show that Tanzania is moving towards a digital payment ecosystem. Electronic Fund Transfers (EFT) are rising, while cheque transactions (both TZS and USD) are declining. This shift suggests:
The data from Electronic Fund Transfers (EFT), Tanzanian Shilling (TZS) cheque transactions, and United States Dollar (USD) cheque transactions highlight key shifts in Tanzania's financial landscape, indicating a preference for digital payments while traditional cheque usage declines.
1. Electronic Fund Transfers (EFT): Strong and Consistent Growth
| Year | Volume of Transactions (Million) | Value of Transactions (TZS Billion) | % Increase/Decrease in Volume | % Increase/Decrease in Value |
| 2020 | 14.57 | 9,479.10 | 54% | 57% |
| 2021 | 15.58 | 10,694.45 | 7% | 13% |
| 2022 | 16.81 | 12,079.17 | 8% | 13% |
| 2023 | 19.05 | 14,422.41 | 13% | 19% |
| 2024 | 21.08 | 16,769.88 | 11% | 16% |
Key Takeaways:
✅ Transaction volume grew by 44.7% from 14.57 million in 2020 to 21.08 million in 2024.
✅ Transaction value surged by 77% from TZS 9,479.10 billion to TZS 16,769.88 billion.
✅ The growth rate remained positive every year, with strong double-digit increases in 2023 and 2024.
What It Means:
2. TZS Cheque Transactions: Steady Decline
| Year | Volume of TZS Cheques Processed | Value of Transactions (TZS Billion) | % Increase/Decrease in Volume | % Increase/Decrease in Value |
| 2020 | 651,829 | 2,118.08 | 18% | 26% |
| 2021 | 604,367 | 2,025.61 | (7%) | (4%) |
| 2022 | 546,620 | 1,977.71 | (10%) | (2%) |
| 2023 | 485,972 | 1,893.47 | (11%) | (4%) |
| 2024 | 418,388 | 1,758.04 | (14%) | (7%) |
Key Takeaways:
❌ Cheque volume dropped by 36% from 651,829 in 2020 to 418,388 in 2024.
❌ Cheque value declined by 17%, from TZS 2,118.08 billion to TZS 1,758.04 billion.
❌ The decline accelerated over time, with 14% fewer cheques in 2024 compared to 2023.
What It Means:
3. USD Cheque Transactions: Sharpest Decline
| Year | Volume of USD Cheques Processed | Value of Transactions (USD Million) | % Increase/Decrease in Volume | % Increase/Decrease in Value |
| 2020 | 113,643 | 238.22 | (42%) | (43%) |
| 2021 | 97,545 | 219.24 | (14%) | (8%) |
| 2022 | 107,497 | 238.96 | 10% | 9% |
| 2023 | 88,041 | 192.41 | (18%) | (19%) |
| 2024 | 63,244 | 153.04 | (28%) | (20%) |
Key Takeaways:
❌ USD cheque volume declined by 44% from 113,643 in 2020 to 63,244 in 2024.
❌ USD cheque value dropped by 35.7%, from USD 238.22 million to USD 153.04 million.
❌ The biggest single-year decline happened in 2024, with a 28% drop in volume and 20% drop in value.
What It Means:
The TACH transaction trends from 2020 to 2024 clearly show Tanzania’s transition towards a digital payment ecosystem:
✅ Electronic Fund Transfers (EFT) are rapidly increasing, showing confidence in digital banking.
❌ Cheque transactions (both TZS and USD) are steadily declining, highlighting the phasing out of paper-based payments.
Tanzania's merchant ecosystem has experienced remarkable growth, with the number of registered merchants rising from 33,037 in 2020 to over 1.3 million in 2024. This rapid expansion has driven a surge in transactions, increasing from 24 million in 2020 to over 329 million in 2024, with transaction values soaring from TZS 1.62 trillion to TZS 26.9 trillion over the same period. Dar es Salaam leads in merchant adoption, contributing significantly to the rise in digital payments, followed by Mwanza and Mbeya. These figures highlight the increasing role of merchants in Tanzania’s digital economy, reflecting broader economic growth and financial inclusion.
The data in Annex K: Merchant Statistics provides a detailed breakdown of merchant distribution, transaction volume, and transaction value across different regions of Tanzania for the years 2020 to 2024.
1. Merchant Distribution
2. Number of Merchant Transactions
3. Merchant Transaction Value
Summary Insights:
Table 1: Merchant Distribution by Region
| Region | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| Arusha | 2,973 | 7,785 | 18,278 | 36,673 | 67,336 |
| Dar es Salaam | 13,164 | 36,109 | 105,306 | 180,165 | 394,863 |
| Dodoma | 1,313 | 6,309 | 15,402 | 30,631 | 58,941 |
| Geita | 454 | 2,770 | 9,759 | 19,179 | 35,497 |
| Iringa | 559 | 4,060 | 8,483 | 15,215 | 33,360 |
| Kagera | 378 | 6,998 | 12,101 | 21,464 | 44,355 |
| Kaskazini Pemba | 8 | 34 | 999 | 368 | 1,486 |
| Kaskazini Unguja | 111 | 235 | 2,098 | 1,061 | 3,226 |
| Katavi | 326 | 987 | 2,925 | 4,563 | 8,554 |
| Kigoma | 444 | 5,179 | 13,839 | 14,940 | 31,712 |
| Kilimanjaro | 1,642 | 8,320 | 12,911 | 19,926 | 44,968 |
| Kusini Pemba | 41 | 169 | 1,101 | 415 | 1,388 |
| Kusini Unguja | 40 | 123 | 1,160 | 559 | 1,988 |
| Lindi | 153 | 1,393 | 3,770 | 4,140 | 8,459 |
| Manyara | 114 | 1,504 | 4,436 | 9,887 | 13,716 |
| Mara | 413 | 2,236 | 8,988 | 13,927 | 29,940 |
| Mbeya | 1,883 | 10,674 | 23,077 | 44,175 | 94,163 |
| Mjini Magharibi | 2,343 | 4,003 | 18,532 | 10,209 | 27,833 |
| Morogoro | 1,338 | 6,002 | 16,277 | 28,367 | 52,738 |
| Mtwara | 246 | 2,114 | 5,302 | 8,902 | 15,678 |
| Mwanza | 1,587 | 7,944 | 36,877 | 63,074 | 117,530 |
| Njombe | 329 | 1,931 | 3,841 | 10,831 | 19,885 |
| Pwani | 413 | 2,618 | 10,026 | 17,091 | 33,347 |
| Rukwa | 296 | 1,883 | 3,296 | 7,189 | 12,397 |
| Ruvuma | 384 | 2,592 | 4,530 | 9,320 | 18,087 |
| Shinyanga | 380 | 2,176 | 10,203 | 20,398 | 35,879 |
| Simiyu | 114 | 1,402 | 5,161 | 7,004 | 13,469 |
| Singida | 162 | 968 | 4,946 | 10,846 | 16,459 |
| Songwe | 164 | 2,087 | 1,170 | 838 | 7,294 |
| Tabora | 197 | 2,198 | 11,895 | 24,411 | 34,510 |
| Tanga | 1,068 | 9,309 | 17,288 | 21,578 | 48,745 |
| Total Merchants | 33,037 | 142,112 | 393,977 | 657,346 | 1,327,803 |
Merchant Transactions by Region (Number of Transactions)
| Region | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| Arusha | 753,592 | 1,372,266 | 4,190,860 | 8,055,971 | 8,464,127 |
| Dar es Salaam | 3,506,577 | 7,841,631 | 48,847,682 | 98,355,252 | 122,845,440 |
| Dodoma | 359,252 | 1,367,740 | 5,727,773 | 10,083,117 | 10,359,721 |
| Geita | 1,341,507 | 1,477,261 | 5,041,646 | 7,398,425 | 8,230,650 |
| Mbeya | 4,223,663 | 4,756,927 | 14,990,053 | 23,902,598 | 26,986,815 |
| Mwanza | 3,312,505 | 3,714,814 | 17,815,125 | 34,106,218 | 32,319,729 |
| Tanga | 159,005 | 1,965,165 | 12,191,987 | 16,546,162 | 14,750,619 |
| Total Transactions | 24,015,142 | 36,838,882 | 166,436,008 | 301,212,217 | 329,423,002 |
Merchant Transaction Value (TZS Billion)
| Region | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
| Arusha | 82.72 | 202.51 | 436.63 | 706.13 | 2,748.92 |
| Dar es Salaam | 435.01 | 1,070.68 | 4,081.32 | 5,973.45 | 8,834.36 |
| Dodoma | 18.45 | 126.55 | 374.61 | 556.11 | 831.28 |
| Geita | 47.87 | 64.62 | 225.79 | 351.92 | 437.03 |
| Mbeya | 199.22 | 365.02 | 909.69 | 1,395.64 | 1,808.80 |
| Mwanza | 155.53 | 238.82 | 968.97 | 1,734.45 | 2,329.92 |
| Tanga | 5.82 | 216.34 | 751.07 | 694.30 | 716.02 |
| Total Value | 1,622.59 | 3,794.77 | 12,103.43 | 17,918.12 | 26,919.33 |
Remittance flows play a pivotal role in Tanzania's economic landscape, contributing $757 million in inward remittances in 2024, equivalent to 1.0% of GDP. While the country lags behind regional peers such as Kenya and Uganda, these private transfers offer a stable source of foreign exchange and household income. With modest outward remittances of $161 million, Tanzania remains a net recipient, highlighting opportunities to strengthen diaspora engagement and leverage remittances for sustainable development. This comparative regional analysis underscores the untapped potential to enhance financial inclusion, promote labor mobility, and foster economic resilience.
Inward Remittance Flows:
Tanzania ranks lower in absolute remittance inflows compared to Kenya and Uganda but surpasses Rwanda and Burundi. The proportion of remittances relative to GDP (1.0%) suggests moderate reliance compared to Kenya (4.6%) or Uganda (2.6%).
Outward Remittance Flows:
Tanzania's outward remittances are moderate among East African peers, with higher outflows than Kenya but lower than Uganda.
Insights and Context:
Tanzania’s strategic focus could involve:
1. Diaspora Contributions
2. Limited Reliance Compared to Neighbors
3. Outward Remittances: Evidence of Regional Integration
This indicates regional and global labor market integration, although the scale of outflows remains modest compared to inflows.
4. Economic Development Indicator
Regional Position
Policy and Strategy Implications
What It Tells About Tanzania's Future
The remittance data suggests Tanzania has untapped potential to: