TICGL

| Economic Consulting Group

TICGL | Economic Consulting Group
Tanzania External Debt 2026: Borrower, Use of Funds & Currency Mix | TICGL
TICGL Economic Research (TERI) — External Debt Brief Source: Bank of Tanzania & Ministry of Finance, Monthly Economic Review, June 2026
Tanzania Investment and Consultant Group Ltd · TICGL Economic

The Anatomy of Tanzania's External Debt: Borrower, Use of Funds & Currency Risk

USD 36.4 billion, 81 percent public, mostly financed by multilateral lenders and priced in US dollars. Here's exactly who Tanzania owes, what the money funded, and how exposed the country is to currency swings.

#ExternalDebt#MultilateralDebt#CurrencyRisk#DebtSustainability#BOP#DebtService
USD 36,446.8mTotal external debt, May-26
81.1%Share that is public debt
57.5%Multilateral creditor share
62.9%US-dollar denominated
USD 189.4mDebt service paid, May-26
Executive Summary

Tanzania's external debt in one page

Tanzania's external debt stock (public and private) eased slightly to USD 36,446.8 million at end-May 2026, from USD 36,506.1 million in April, as principal repayments (USD 140 million) outpaced new disbursements (USD 125.9 million). Public debt makes up 81.1 percent of the total, with central government the dominant on-shore borrower. Multilateral institutions remain by far the largest creditor group at 57.5 percent, ahead of commercial lenders at 36.4 percent. By use, balance-of-payments/budget support and transport & telecommunication together absorb 43.6 percent of disbursed debt, while the US dollar still accounts for nearly two-thirds of currency exposure — though that share has fallen almost 4 percentage points in a year as the portfolio diversifies.

USD 29,480.8m
Central government borrowing
USD 6,558.9m
Private-sector external debt
USD 20,946.3m
Owed to multilateral creditors
USD 13,279.7m
Owed to commercial lenders
USD 1,891.0m
Total external debt arrears
Section 1

External debt stock by borrower category

Central government remains overwhelmingly the largest borrower of external debt, though its stock has eased slightly since late 2025 as repayments outpaced new drawdowns. Private-sector external borrowing, by contrast, has grown steadily and touched a 13-month high of USD 6,558.9 million in May 2026. Public corporations, which held a small legacy balance, had fully cleared their external debt by January 2026.

Disbursed external debt by borrower, trend

USD million, May 2025 – May 2026

Borrower share, May 2026

Percent of disbursed outstanding external debt

Disbursed external debt by borrower category (USD million)
BorrowerMay-25Nov-25Apr-26May-26pShare May-26
Central government27,047.629,030.329,589.629,480.881.8%
Private sector5,851.25,645.86,519.06,558.918.2%
Public corporations3.83.80.00.00.0%
Total disbursed external debt32,902.634,679.936,108.636,039.7100%

Source: Ministry of Finance and Bank of Tanzania (Table A10, item 3: Disbursed external debt by borrower category). p = provisional data.

Section 2

External debt stock by creditor category

Alongside who borrows, it matters just as much who lends. Multilateral institutions — the World Bank's IDA, the African Development Bank and the IMF among them — supply well over half of Tanzania's external financing, offering longer maturities and softer terms than commercial markets. Commercial lenders are the second-largest source, at over a third of the portfolio, while bilateral and export-credit lines play a comparatively small role.

External debt stock by creditor category

USD million — May-25, Apr-26 and May-26 compared

Creditor share, May 2026

Percent of total external debt stock (incl. interest arrears)

External debt stock by creditor category (USD million)
CreditorMay-25ShareApr-26rShareMay-26pShare
Multilateral19,007.756.6%20,950.157.4%20,946.357.5%
  o/w Disbursed outstanding debt (DOD)18,973.920,926.420,922.6
  o/w Interest arrears33.823.823.7
Commercial12,086.236.0%13,319.036.5%13,279.736.4%
  o/w Interest arrears392.6269.4277.8
Bilateral1,426.04.2%1,561.54.3%1,558.54.3%
Export credit1,066.23.2%675.61.9%662.31.8%
Total external debt stock33,586.1100%36,506.1100%36,446.8100%

Source: Ministry of Finance and Bank of Tanzania (Tables 2.6.1 & 2.6.2). r = revised data; p = provisional data.

Concessionality check: With multilateral and bilateral creditors together holding 61.8 percent of external debt, Tanzania's external portfolio still leans concessional — a supportive factor for debt sustainability compared with peers more reliant on commercial Eurobond-style financing. Commercial creditors, however, carry the largest share of interest arrears (see arrears section below).
Section 3

Disbursed outstanding debt by use of funds

Just over 43 percent of Tanzania's disbursed external debt has gone into balance-of-payments/budget support and transport & telecommunication infrastructure — the two largest single uses. Social welfare and education absorbs a further 19.0 percent, and energy & mining 13.1 percent, reflecting the government's continued emphasis on human capital and infrastructure-led growth.

Use of funds, percentage share — May 2026

Percent of disbursed outstanding external debt

Use of funds, absolute value trend

USD million — top four uses, May-25 vs May-26

Disbursed outstanding debt by use of funds — percentage share & USD value
ActivityMay-25 (%)Apr-26 (%)May-26p (%)USD million, May-26
BoP & budget support20.721.921.87,873.7
Transport & telecommunication21.621.821.87,864.3
Social welfare & education20.418.919.06,849.5
Energy & mining12.913.113.14,718.3
Real estate & construction4.65.14.91,751.4
Agriculture5.15.15.31,902.6
Finance & insurance4.24.34.31,545.5
Industries3.63.73.71,320.2
Tourism1.81.71.7617.7
Other5.24.44.41,596.7
Total100.0100.0100.036,039.7

Source: Ministry of Finance and Bank of Tanzania (Table 2.6.3 & Table A10 item 5). p = provisional data.

Section 4

Disbursed outstanding debt by currency composition

The US dollar remains the anchor currency of Tanzania's external debt at 62.9 percent, though its share has slipped from 66.6 percent a year earlier. The Euro (15.6%) and Chinese Yuan (5.8%) make up the next largest exposures, while "other currencies" — including Special Drawing Rights and smaller bilateral-loan currencies — have nearly doubled their share, from 9.7 to 15.6 percent, pointing to gradual currency diversification in Tanzania's financing mix.

Currency composition, percentage share — May 2026

Percent of disbursed outstanding external debt

Currency composition, 12-month trend

USD million equivalent, May-25 to May-26

Disbursed outstanding debt by currency composition (% share)
CurrencyMay-25Apr-26rMay-26pChange (pp, YoY)
United States Dollar66.663.062.9-3.7
Euro17.315.815.6-1.7
Chinese Yuan6.45.85.8-0.6
Other currencies9.715.415.6+5.9
Total100.0100.0100.0

Source: Ministry of Finance and Bank of Tanzania (Table 2.6.4 & Table A10 item 4). r = revised data; p = provisional data.

FX risk lens: A weaker US-dollar concentration is generally positive for currency-risk diversification, but the near-doubling of "other currencies" is worth monitoring closely — TICGL recommends investors and policymakers request a currency-level breakdown from the Ministry of Finance to confirm which specific currencies are driving this shift.
Section 5

Disbursements, debt service & arrears

New disbursements slowed to USD 125.9 million in May 2026 — mostly to central government — against USD 189.4 million in debt service (USD 140 million principal, USD 49.4 million interest). Net flows on external debt were negative for the month, consistent with the small decline in the overall stock. Total external debt arrears stood at USD 1,891.0 million, with commercial creditors accounting for the lion's share.

Disbursements vs. debt service

USD million, monthly, May 2025 – May 2026

External debt arrears by creditor — May 2026

USD million, principal vs. interest

External debt arrears by creditor category, May 2026 (USD million)
CreditorPrincipalInterestTotalShare of total arrears
Commercial1,175.7277.81,453.576.9%
Bilateral198.080.6278.614.7%
Export credits105.325.2130.56.9%
Multilateral4.923.728.61.5%
Total external debt arrears1,483.9407.11,891.0100%

Source: Ministry of Finance and Bank of Tanzania (Table A10, items 6, 7 & 10).

TICGL Analysis

What this means for investors and policymakers

1. Concessional tilt supports sustainability

With 61.8% of external debt held by multilateral and bilateral lenders, Tanzania's average borrowing terms remain softer than a commercial-heavy portfolio — a structural cushion for debt-service costs even as global rates stay elevated.

2. Commercial arrears need attention

Commercial creditors hold just 36.4% of the debt stock but 76.9% of total arrears — signalling payment-timing strain specifically on commercial obligations that warrants closer cash-flow and hedging management.

3. Currency diversification is underway

The US-dollar share has fallen nearly 4 percentage points in a year. Combined with a strengthening shilling (+3.02% y/y against the dollar), this modestly eases near-term FX-translation risk on debt service.

Muhtasari kwa Kiswahili

Deni la Nje la Tanzania — Mkopaji, Matumizi na Sarafu, Mei 2026

Deni la nje la Tanzania (Serikali na sekta binafsi) lilifikia dola za Marekani milioni 36,446.8 mwishoni mwa Mei 2026, likishuka kidogo kutoka milioni 36,506.1 mwezi Aprili, kwani malipo ya mtaji (dola milioni 140) yalizidi mikopo mipya iliyopokewa (dola milioni 125.9). Asilimia 81.1 ya deni hili ni la Serikali, huku Serikali Kuu ikiwa mkopaji mkubwa zaidi (dola milioni 29,480.8), na sekta binafsi ikiwa na dola milioni 6,558.9.

Kwa upande wa wakopeshaji, taasisi za kimataifa (multilateral) kama Benki ya Dunia na Benki ya Maendeleo Afrika zinashikilia asilimia 57.5 ya deni la nje, zikifuatiwa na wakopeshaji wa kibiashara (asilimia 36.4), wakopeshaji wa nchi kwa nchi (bilateral, asilimia 4.3), na mikopo ya "export credit" (asilimia 1.8). Deni hili limetumika zaidi kwenye misaada ya bajeti na urari wa malipo nje (asilimia 21.8), usafirishaji na mawasiliano (asilimia 21.8), ustawi wa jamii na elimu (asilimia 19.0), na nishati na madini (asilimia 13.1).

Kwa sarafu, dola ya Marekani inaendelea kutawala kwa asilimia 62.9 ya deni la nje, ikiwa imeshuka kutoka asilimia 66.6 mwaka mmoja uliopita, huku sarafu nyingine (zisizo dola, euro au yuan) zikiongezeka kwa kasi kutoka asilimia 9.7 hadi asilimia 15.6 — ikionesha mwelekeo wa kutafuta vyanzo mbalimbali vya fedha. Malimbikizo ya madeni ya nje (arrears) yalifikia dola milioni 1,891.0, ambapo asilimia 76.9 ni ya wakopeshaji wa kibiashara pekee — eneo linalohitaji usimamizi makini wa fedha.

Maana yake: Muundo huu wa deni la nje — unaotawaliwa na wakopeshaji wa masharti nafuu (concessional) — ni jambo jema kwa uwezo wa Tanzania wa kulipa madeni yake, ingawa malimbikizo makubwa kwa wakopeshaji wa kibiashara na ongezeko la sarafu mbalimbali ni maeneo ambayo TICGL/TERI inapendekeza kufuatiliwa kwa karibu.

Zanzibar Economic Performance 2026: Inflation, Budget & Trade Data | TICGL
TICGL Economic Research (TERI) — Zanzibar Economic Brief Source: Bank of Tanzania & Office of the Chief Government Statistician, Zanzibar, June 2026
Tanzania Investment and Consultant Group Ltd · TICGL Economic

Zanzibar's Economy in 2026: Tourism and Cloves Power a Widening Surplus

Zanzibar's external surplus grew 21.2 percent on record tourist arrivals and a clove-export boom, even as inflation climbed to 5.5 percent and the government ran a TZS 175.7 billion fiscal deficit. Here's the full data picture for May 2026.

#Zanzibar#Tourism#CloveExports#Inflation#CurrentAccount#PublicFinance
5.5%Headline inflation, May-26
TZS 133.3bnGovt resources, May-26
TZS 175.7bnFiscal deficit, May-26
USD 864.8mCurrent account surplus
947,169Tourist arrivals (+21% y/y)
Executive Summary

Zanzibar's economy in May 2026, at a glance

Zanzibar's headline inflation rose to 5.5 percent in May 2026, from 4.2 percent a year earlier, as food prices (up 9.9% y/y) and fuel-linked transport costs (up 5.1% y/y) outweighed easing pressure elsewhere in the basket. On the fiscal side, the government collected TZS 133.3 billion against a monthly target of TZS 216.0 billion (61.7% achievement), while a TZS 309 billion expenditure programme — nearly 60 percent of it development spending — produced a TZS 175.7 billion deficit financed domestically. The external sector was the standout performer: Zanzibar's current account surplus grew 21.2 percent to USD 864.8 million in the year ending May 2026, powered by a 21 percent jump in tourist arrivals and an extraordinary clove-export boom that lifted goods exports more than twofold.

9.9%
Food inflation, May-26
2.1%
Non-food inflation, May-26
USD 1,639.7m
Exports of goods & services
USD 785.2m
Imports of goods & services
USD 41.5m
Clove export value, 2026
Section 3.1

Inflation: food and transport push prices higher

Zanzibar's headline inflation climbed to 5.5 percent in May 2026, up from 5.0 percent in April and 4.2 percent a year earlier — moving further from the very low readings seen in mid-2025. Food inflation eased slightly from April's 10.1 percent but, at 9.9 percent, remains the dominant driver, while non-food inflation has been trending up as fuel costs pass through into transport (5.1%) and restaurant & accommodation prices (7.4%).

Headline, food & non-food inflation

Percent, year-on-year — the three most recent readings

Inflation by CPI group — May 2026

Annual % change, all 13 basket groups

Zanzibar CPI by group (weight %, annual inflation %)
Group (weight %)May-25Apr-26May-26
Food & non-alcoholic beverages (41.9)4.59.99.7
Housing, water, electricity, gas (25.8)4.7-0.41.2
Transport (9.1)2.22.75.1
Furnishings & household maintenance (4.8)4.02.22.4
Information & communication (4.2)2.20.00.1
Clothing & footwear (6.3)5.11.51.6
Restaurants & accommodation (1.4)0.66.87.4
Alcoholic beverages & tobacco (0.2)-0.24.44.3
Personal care & social protection (1.7)4.91.90.8
Education (1.6)3.81.50.3
Recreation, sport & culture (1.1)4.62.62.6
Health (1.3)1.50.60.6
Insurance & financial services (0.5)0.00.00.0
Headline (100.0)4.25.05.5
Food (40.5)3.910.19.9
Non-food (59.5)4.41.12.1

Source: Office of the Chief Government Statistician, Zanzibar (Table 3.1.1). Base: July 2022 = 100.

Section 3.2

Government budgetary operations: revenue lags target, deficit widens

Zanzibar's government resource envelope reached TZS 133.3 billion in May 2026 — just 61.7 percent of the monthly target — with domestic revenue of TZS 129.5 billion (69.9% of target) and TZS 3.8 billion in grants. Tax revenue supplied 90.5 percent of domestic revenue, while non-tax collections of TZS 12.4 billion reached only 63 percent of target. Total expenditure of TZS 309 billion — 59.6 percent of it development spending — outpaced resources, producing an overall deficit of TZS 175.7 billion financed through domestic borrowing.

Government resources — May 2026

TZS billion, by revenue source

Government expenditure — May 2026

TZS billion, by spending category

Zanzibar government resources, May 2026 (TZS billion)
Source2025 Actual2026 Estimate2026 Actual% of target
Tax on imports26.330.822.773.7%
VAT & excise duties (local)39.764.646.672.1%
Income tax21.032.733.1101.2%
Other taxes19.237.414.739.3%
Non-tax revenue10.219.612.463.3%
Grants2.53.8
Total resource envelope216.0133.361.7%

Source: Ministry of Finance and Planning, Zanzibar (Chart 3.2.1, Chart 3.2.2). Other taxes include hotel and restaurant levies, tour operator levy, revenue stamps, airport/seaport service charges, road development fund and petroleum levy.

Watch this: Income tax is the only major revenue line ahead of target (101.2%), while imports-linked taxes and other levies fell well short — a pattern consistent with softer trade volumes weighing on collections even as tourism-linked income taxes outperform.
Section 3.3

External sector: a widening surplus built on tourism and trade

Zanzibar's current account surplus grew 21.2 percent to USD 864.8 million in the year ending May 2026, from USD 713.6 million a year earlier. Services exports — dominated by tourism — accounted for 96 percent of total goods-and-services exports, while a clove-export boom pushed goods exports up sharply despite the isles' persistently negative goods-trade balance.

Current account, year ending May

USD million, 2025 vs 2026p

Imports of goods by category

USD million, year ending May — capital imports more than doubled

Zanzibar current account summary (USD million, year ending May)
Item20252026p% change
Exports of goods33.467.2+101.2%
Imports of goods (fob)532.7660.1+23.9%
Goods account balance-499.3-592.9+18.7%
Services receipts1,299.41,572.5+21.0%
Services account balance1,198.71,447.5+20.8%
Goods & services balance699.3854.6+22.2%
Primary income balance12.78.8-31.2%
Secondary income balance1.51.5-3.2%
Current account balance713.6864.8+21.2%

Source: Tanzania Revenue Authority, banks and Bank of Tanzania computations (Table 3.3.1). p = provisional data.

Section 3.3 · Deep Dive

The clove-export boom driving goods exports

Clove export value jumped from just USD 3.3 million in the year ending May 2025 to an estimated USD 41.5 million in the year ending May 2026 — more than twelvefold — as both volumes (up roughly ninefold, to 6.4 thousand tonnes) and unit prices (up 36.2%, to USD 6,515.5 per tonne) rose sharply. Cloves alone now account for 61.7 percent of Zanzibar's total goods exports, overtaking manufactured goods and seaweed as the isles' leading export earner.

Goods exports by category

USD '000, year ending May — 2025 vs 2026p

Clove exports: value, volume & price

Indexed view — year ending May 2025 = 100

Zanzibar exports of goods by category (USD '000, year ending May)
Category20252026p% change
Cloves (traditional)3,314.541,508.4+1,152%
Manufactured goods15,200.610,886.2-28.4%
Other non-traditional exports10,043.812,463.1+24.1%
Seaweeds3,438.51,632.2-52.5%
Fish & fish products1,386.5752.7-45.7%
Total goods exports33,383.967,242.7+101.4%

Source: Tanzania Revenue Authority and Bank of Tanzania computations (Table 3.3.2). p = provisional data.

Diversification watch: While the clove boom is a welcome windfall, seaweed and fish-product exports both fell by more than 45 percent over the same period — a reminder that Zanzibar's non-clove export base still needs strengthening to avoid over-reliance on a single, price-volatile commodity.
TICGL Analysis

What this means for investors and policymakers

1. Tourism remains the anchor

With services making up 96% of Zanzibar's exports and tourist arrivals up 21% y/y, hospitality, transport and ancillary services remain the highest-conviction growth sectors for investors on the isles.

2. Clove windfall needs a strategy

A twelvefold jump in clove export value is a rare opportunity to build price-stabilisation and value-addition capacity (processing, branding) before the current price cycle normalises.

3. Revenue collection needs strengthening

At 61.7% of target, Zanzibar's resource envelope shortfall — especially in import-linked taxes and "other taxes" — points to room for improved compliance and administration to reduce reliance on domestic borrowing.

Muhtasari kwa Kiswahili

Uchumi wa Zanzibar — Mei 2026

Kiwango cha mfumko wa bei Zanzibar kiliongezeka hadi asilimia 5.5 mwezi Mei 2026, kutoka asilimia 4.2 mwaka mmoja uliopita, kikichangiwa zaidi na kupanda kwa bei za vyakula (asilimia 9.9) na gharama za usafirishaji (asilimia 5.1) kufuatia mtikisiko wa bei za mafuta duniani.

Kwa upande wa bajeti, Serikali ya Mapinduzi Zanzibar ilikusanya rasilimali za jumla ya shilingi bilioni 133.3 mwezi Mei 2026, sawa na asilimia 61.7 tu ya lengo la mwezi huo. Matumizi ya Serikali yalifikia shilingi bilioni 309, ambapo asilimia 59.6 ilielekezwa kwenye miradi ya maendeleo, hali iliyosababisha nakisi ya shilingi bilioni 175.7 iliyogharamiwa kwa mikopo ya ndani.

Upande wa biashara ya nje ndio uliofanya vizuri zaidi — ziada ya urari wa biashara wa nje (current account) iliongezeka kwa asilimia 21.2 hadi dola za Marekani milioni 864.8 kwa mwaka unaoishia Mei 2026, ikichagizwa na ongezeko la watalii kwa asilimia 21 (kufikia watalii 947,169) na ongezeko kubwa la mauzo ya karafuu nje — kutoka dola milioni 3.3 hadi dola milioni 41.5, sawa na ongezeko la zaidi ya mara kumi na mbili.

Maana yake: Utalii unaendelea kuwa nguzo kuu ya uchumi wa Zanzibar, na ongezeko la mauzo ya karafuu ni fursa kubwa ya kuongeza thamani ya mazao hayo. Hata hivyo, TICGL/TERI inashauri Serikali kuimarisha ukusanyaji wa mapato ya ndani ili kupunguza utegemezi wa mikopo katika kugharamia bajeti.

Tanzania External Sector Performance 2026: Current Account, Services Exports & Imports | TICGL
TICGL Economic · External Sector Monitor

Tanzania External Sector Performance: Current Account, Services Exports & Imports

A focused analysis of Tanzania's external sector for the year ending May 2026: the current account balance, services export receipts by category (travel, transport, other services), and services import payments — drawn from the Bank of Tanzania's June 2026 Monthly Economic Review.

📅 Period: Year ending May 2026 (with May 2026 monthly detail) 🏢 Source: Tanzania Revenue Authority, Banks & Bank of Tanzania 📋 Analysis by TICGL Economic Research
-USD 2,209.5m
Current Account Balance
Year ending May 2026
USD 8,051.5m
Services Receipts
+14.2% year on year
USD 3,370.1m
Services Payments
+8.3% year on year
+USD 4,681.4m
Net Services Surplus
Receipts minus payments
USD 5,538.8m
Gross FX Reserves
4.3 months import cover
Executive Summary

Tanzania's External Sector: The Year Ending May 2026 at a Glance

Tanzania's current account deficit widened to USD 2,209.5 million in the year ending May 2026, from USD 2,090.9 million a year earlier — a 5.7 percent increase — as elevated global freight and commodity prices, linked to the Middle East conflict, pushed import costs up faster than export earnings. The goods account deficit widened 18.8 percent to USD 5,410.6 million, even as goods exports grew a healthy 20.4 percent on the back of record gold receipts.

The bright spot was services trade: Tanzania is a consistent net exporter of services, and that surplus grew further in the year to May 2026. Services receipts rose 14.2 percent to USD 8,051.5 million, led by travel/tourism (USD 4,419.1 million, +9.5%) and transport services (USD 3,146.3 million, +16.0%), the latter reflecting Tanzania's growing role as a regional freight and logistics corridor. Services payments rose a more modest 8.3 percent to USD 3,370.1 million, driven mainly by higher freight payments (+17.9%) tied to the same global shipping cost pressures. The result: a net services surplus of USD 4,681.4 million, which continues to be one of the most important offsets to Tanzania's persistent goods trade deficit.

On the financing side, gross official foreign exchange reserves rose to USD 5,538.8 million, up from USD 5,136.7 million a year earlier, covering 4.3 months of projected imports — supported by strong export receipts (especially gold) and the Bank of Tanzania's continued gold purchase programme.

1. The Current Account

Tanzania's current account records all transactions in goods, services, primary income (investment income, compensation of employees) and secondary income (transfers) between residents and the rest of the world. In the year ending May 2026, the current account balance was a deficit of USD 2,209.5 million, 5.7 percent wider than the USD 2,090.9 million deficit recorded a year earlier.

-USD 2,209.5m
Current Account Balance (Year to May-26)
▼ widened 5.7% y/y
-USD 5,410.6m
Goods Account Balance
▼ deficit widened 18.8% y/y
+USD 4,681.4m
Services Account Balance
▲ surplus widened 18.8% y/y

Chart 1 — Current Account Components, Year Ending May (Millions of USD)

Source: Tanzania Revenue Authority, banks, and Bank of Tanzania calculations. p = provisional

Chart 2 — Current Account Balance: Monthly Snapshot (Millions of USD)

Source: Bank of Tanzania. Monthly figures are more volatile than the annual trend and should be read alongside the year-ending-May comparison above.
Table 1 — Current Account, Year Ending May (Millions of USD)
Item202420252026p% Change
Goods account (net)-6,058.3-4,555.6-5,410.618.8
  Exports (goods)7,758.79,654.711,627.920.4
  Imports (goods)13,817.014,210.217,038.519.9
Services account (net)4,174.63,939.64,681.418.8
  Services receipts6,499.47,051.58,051.514.2
  Services payments2,324.93,111.93,370.18.3
Balance on goods and services-1,883.7-615.9-729.218.4
Primary income account (net)-1,674.0-2,001.5-1,830.7-8.5
Secondary income account (net)649.7526.5350.4-33.4
Current account balance-2,907.9-2,090.9-2,209.55.7

The widening in the goods deficit was driven by import growth (19.9%) modestly outpacing export growth (20.4%) in absolute dollar terms — imports added USD 2,828.3 million over the year while exports added USD 1,973.2 million. Encouragingly, the primary income deficit narrowed 8.5 percent to USD 1,830.7 million, mainly reflecting lower interest payments to non-residents, partially offsetting the wider goods deficit. The secondary income surplus (largely remittances/personal transfers) fell 33.4 percent to USD 350.4 million.

↑ Back to top

2. Exports: Services Receipts by Category

Services receipts — Tanzania's earnings from selling services to non-residents — rose 14.2 percent to USD 8,051.5 million in the year ending May 2026, from USD 7,051.5 million a year earlier. Growth was led by travel and transport, Tanzania's two largest services export categories.

USD 4,419.1m
Travel (Tourism) Receipts
▲ +9.5% y/y
USD 3,146.3m
Transport Receipts
▲ +16.0% y/y
USD 486.1m
Other Services Receipts
▼ -2.3% y/y

Chart 3 — Services Receipts by Category, Year Ending May (Millions of USD)

Source: Banks and Bank of Tanzania computations. Other services include construction, insurance, financial, telecommunication, computer and information, charges for intellectual property, government, personal and other business services.

Chart 4 — Composition of Services Receipts, Year Ending May 2026p

Source: TICGL computations based on Bank of Tanzania data
Table 2 — Services Receipts by Category, Year Ending May (Millions of USD)
Category202420252026p% Change (2025→2026p)Share of Receipts, 2026p
Travel (Tourism)3,627.14,034.44,419.1+9.5%54.9%
Transport2,284.52,519.53,146.3+16.0%39.1%
Other services587.8497.7486.1-2.3%6.0%
Total services receipts6,499.47,051.58,051.5+14.2%100.0%

Travel receipts grew broadly in line with visitor numbers: international tourist arrivals rose 5.9 percent to 2,298,900 in the year ending May 2026, with average spending per visitor also edging higher. Transport receipts — largely freight earnings from goods in transit through Tanzanian ports and corridors to neighbouring landlocked countries — grew faster still at 16.0 percent, underscoring Tanzania's expanding role as a regional trade and logistics hub even as global shipping costs rose. On a monthly basis, total services receipts were broadly flat at USD 647.5 million in May 2026 compared with the same month a year earlier.

↑ Back to top

3. Imports: Services Payments by Category

Services payments — what Tanzania pays non-residents for services — rose 8.3 percent to USD 3,370.1 million in the year ending May 2026, from USD 3,111.9 million a year earlier. Unlike receipts, payments are dominated by transport (freight) costs rather than travel.

USD 1,691.8m
Transport Payments
▲ +16.8% y/y
USD 976.9m
Other Services Payments
▼ -2.7% y/y
USD 701.3m
Travel Payments
▲ +6.4% y/y

Chart 5 — Services Payments by Category, Year Ending May (Millions of USD)

Source: Banks and Bank of Tanzania computations. Other services include construction, insurance, financial, telecommunication, computer and information, government, personal and other business services.

Chart 6 — Composition of Services Payments, Year Ending May 2026p

Source: TICGL computations based on Bank of Tanzania data
Table 3 — Services Payments by Category, Year Ending May (Millions of USD)
Category202420252026p% Change (2025→2026p)Share of Payments, 2026p
Transport1,265.31,449.11,691.8+16.8%50.2%
Other services679.81,003.9976.9-2.7%29.0%
Travel379.7658.9701.3+6.4%20.8%
Total services payments2,324.93,111.93,370.1+8.3%100.0%

The rise in transport payments (freight costs) of 16.8 percent was consistent with — and largely explained by — the elevated goods import bill and higher global shipping costs arising from disruption to Gulf shipping routes and the Strait of Hormuz. On a monthly basis, services payments amounted to USD 278.8 million in May 2026, up from USD 267.0 million in May 2025, again largely reflecting higher freight payments.

↑ Back to top

4. Net Services Balance by Category

Comparing receipts and payments category by category shows exactly where Tanzania's services trade surplus comes from — and where it is most exposed to rising global costs.

Chart 7 — Net Services Balance by Category, Year Ending May 2026p (Millions of USD)

Source: TICGL computations (Services receipts minus services payments), based on Bank of Tanzania data.
Table 4 — Net Services Balance by Category, Year Ending May 2026p (Millions of USD)
CategoryReceiptsPaymentsNet Balance
Travel (Tourism)4,419.1701.3+3,717.8
Transport3,146.31,691.8+1,454.5
Other services486.1976.9-490.8
Total services account8,051.53,370.1+4,681.4
Key insight: Travel (tourism) is by far Tanzania's most profitable services category, generating a net surplus of USD 3,717.8 million — more than 6 times receipts from transport net of its costs. "Other services" (construction, insurance, financial, telecom, IT and business services) is the only category running a net deficit, at -USD 490.8 million, indicating Tanzania remains a net importer of these professional and technical services.
↑ Back to top

5. Foreign Exchange Reserves: The Financing Context

Despite the wider current account deficit, Tanzania's external buffers strengthened. Gross official foreign exchange reserves rose to USD 5,538.8 million at end-May 2026, from USD 5,136.7 million a year earlier, sufficient to cover 4.3 months of projected imports of goods and services — above the national adequacy threshold. This buildup was underpinned by strong export receipts, particularly gold, and the Bank of Tanzania's continued gold purchase programme, which helped cushion the impact of the wider current account deficit on reserve accumulation.

↑ Back to top

Muhtasari kwa Kiswahili

Katika mwaka unaoishia Mei 2026, nakisi ya urari wa malipo ya kawaida (current account) ya Tanzania iliongezeka hadi Dola za Marekani milioni 2,209.5, kutoka Dola milioni 2,090.9 mwaka uliopita, kutokana na gharama kubwa za uagizaji bidhaa nje ikilinganishwa na kasi ya ukuaji wa mauzo nje.

Hata hivyo, sekta ya huduma iliendelea kuwa nguvu kubwa ya uchumi wa nje: mapato ya huduma (services receipts) yaliongezeka kwa asilimia 14.2 hadi Dola milioni 8,051.5, yakiongozwa na utalii (Dola milioni 4,419.1, ongezeko la asilimia 9.5) na usafirishaji (Dola milioni 3,146.3, ongezeko la asilimia 16.0). Idadi ya watalii wa kimataifa iliongezeka kwa asilimia 5.9 hadi watalii 2,298,900.

Kwa upande wa malipo ya huduma (services payments), Tanzania ilitumia Dola milioni 3,370.1, ongezeko la asilimia 8.3, likichangiwa zaidi na ongezeko la gharama za usafirishaji wa mizigo (freight) kwa asilimia 16.8, kutokana na changamoto za usafirishaji duniani. Kwa ujumla, Tanzania inaendelea kuwa na ziada kubwa katika biashara ya huduma — ziada ya wavu (net surplus) ya Dola milioni 4,681.4 — huku utalii ukiwa chanzo kikuu cha faida hii, na huduma nyingine (kama ujenzi, bima, fedha na TEHAMA) pekee ndizo zenye nakisi.

Akiba ya fedha za kigeni iliongezeka hadi Dola milioni 5,538.8, ikitosha kugharamia uagizaji wa bidhaa na huduma kwa miezi 4.3, ikisaidiwa na mauzo makubwa ya dhahabu nje ya nchi.

Kwa uchambuzi zaidi wa kina kuhusu fursa na changamoto za kisera zinazoathiri ushindani wa nje wa Tanzania, soma makala kamili ya TICGL: What's Next for Tanzania's Economy?

Primary source: Bank of Tanzania, Monthly Economic Review, June 2026 (Section 2.7 — External Sector Performance; Table 2.7.1 Current Account; Table 2.7.3 Services Receipts by Category; Chart 2.7.5 Service Payments), ISSN 0856-6844, www.bot.go.tz, compiled with data from the Tanzania Revenue Authority and commercial banks. Analysis and commentary by TICGL Economic Research. All 2026 figures are provisional (p) and subject to revision. This page covers the current account, services export receipts and services import payments only; goods trade detail, external debt and reserves management are addressed in separate TICGL analyses.

Tanzania Central Government Revenue & Expenditure — April 2026 Budget Analysis | TICGL
TICGL Economic · Public Finance Monitor

Tanzania Central Government Revenue & Expenditure — April 2026

A focused analysis of Tanzania's central government budgetary operations for April 2026: revenue collected by source, expenditure by category, and how actual performance compares against budget targets — drawn from the Bank of Tanzania's June 2026 Monthly Economic Review (cheques-issued basis, Tanzania Mainland).

📅 Reporting month: April 2026 🏢 Source: Ministry of Finance & Bank of Tanzania 📋 Analysis by TICGL Economic Research
TZS 3,112.0bn
Central Govt Revenue
107.2% of April target
TZS 3,457.2bn
Total Expenditure
83.5% of April target
TZS 2,690.6bn
Tax Revenue
110.2% of target
TZS 760.6bn
Development Expenditure
only 52.5% of target
TZS -214.9bn
Balance Before Grants
vs -1,111.0bn estimated
Executive Summary

Central Government Budgetary Operations: April 2026 at a Glance

Tanzania's central government outperformed its revenue target in April 2026, collecting TZS 3,111.97 billion against a monthly target of TZS 2,902.66 billion — 7.2 percent (TZS 209.3 billion) above target. The overperformance was driven almost entirely by tax revenue, which came in at TZS 2,690.63 billion, 10.2 percent above target, powered by taxes on imports (117.3% of target) and income tax (114.5% of target). Non-tax revenue was the one soft spot, collecting TZS 421.34 billion against a TZS 461.43 billion target — 8.7 percent short.

On the spending side, total central government expenditure of TZS 3,457.22 billion was 16.5 percent below the TZS 4,139.26 billion estimate for the month. Recurrent expenditure (wages, interest, and other recurrent costs) was executed close to plan at TZS 2,696.64 billion, but development expenditure was severely under-executed — only TZS 760.58 billion of a planned TZS 1,448.48 billion was spent (52.5% execution), largely because foreign-financed development projects disbursed just TZS 137.69 billion of a TZS 607.49 billion estimate. The combination of strong revenue collection and restrained (particularly development) spending narrowed the fiscal balance before grants to a deficit of TZS 214.93 billion in April, well inside the TZS 1,110.96 billion deficit that had been projected.

1. Central Government Revenue — April 2026

Central government revenue reached TZS 3,111.97 billion in April 2026, equivalent to 96.0 percent of total government revenue (which also includes Local Government Authority own-source collections of TZS 130.32 billion) and 7.2 percent above the monthly target. Tax revenue continued to perform strongly, reflecting ongoing improvements in tax administration and compliance.

TZS 3,112.0bn
Central Govt Revenue
▲ 7.2% above target
TZS 2,690.6bn
Tax Revenue
▲ 10.2% above target
TZS 421.3bn
Non-Tax Revenue
▼ 8.7% below target

Chart 1 — Central Government Revenue by Source, April 2026 (Billions of TZS)

Source: Ministry of Finance and Bank of Tanzania computations (Table A2, cheques issued). 2026 actual figures are provisional.
Table 1 — Central Government Revenue by Source, April 2026 (Billions of TZS)
Revenue SourceApril 2026 EstimateApril 2026 ActualVariance% of Target
Taxes on imports904.551,060.67+156.12117.3%
Sales/VAT and excise on local goods612.06585.43-26.6395.6%
Income taxes741.58849.32+107.74114.5%
Other taxes183.03195.21+12.18106.7%
Tax revenue subtotal2,441.232,690.63+249.40110.2%
Non-tax revenue461.43421.34-40.0991.3%
Central government revenue2,902.663,111.97+209.31107.2%
LGA own sources125.65130.32+4.67103.7%
Total revenue (incl. LGAs)3,028.303,242.29+213.99107.1%
Key insight: Taxes on imports (TZS 1,060.67bn) was the single largest revenue line in April 2026, overtaking income tax (TZS 849.32bn) — together these two lines contributed nearly 62 percent of central government revenue. VAT/excise on local goods was the only tax category to miss its target.
↑ Back to top

2. Central Government Revenue — Cumulative FY2025/26 (July 2025–April 2026)

Looking at the ten months to April 2026, central government revenue totalled TZS 33,294.80 billion (actual), ahead of the cumulative estimate of TZS 31,402.19 billion, and tracking toward the full-year budget of TZS 36,857.73 billion.

Chart 2 — Central Government Revenue: Full-Year Budget vs. Cumulative Performance (Billions of TZS)

Source: Ministry of Finance and Bank of Tanzania computations. Cumulative = July 2025–April 2026.
Table 2 — Revenue: Annual Budget vs. Cumulative Outturn, July 2025–April 2026 (Billions of TZS)
Revenue Item2025/26 Full-Year BudgetCumulative EstimateCumulative Actual% of Cumulative Target
Taxes on imports11,562.979,603.0710,271.66107.0%
Sales/VAT and excise on local goods7,016.475,592.615,395.2596.5%
Income taxes11,367.889,113.5411,163.31122.5%
Other taxes4,887.701,931.791,897.9798.3%
Tax revenue32,176.0026,241.0128,728.19109.5%
Non-tax revenue4,681.735,161.184,566.6188.5%
Central government revenue36,857.7331,402.1933,294.80106.0%
LGA own sources1,680.511,402.341,353.5796.5%
Total revenue (incl. LGAs)40,466.1332,804.5334,648.37105.6%

Income tax has been the standout cumulative performer, running 22.5 percent above the ten-month target and already exceeding 98 percent of the full-year budget with two months of the fiscal year remaining — a sign that either economic activity or compliance is significantly outperforming the assumptions used to set the 2025/26 budget. Non-tax revenue and "other taxes" are the two areas trailing target on a cumulative basis.

↑ Back to top

3. Central Government Expenditure — April 2026

Total central government expenditure (cheques issued) was TZS 3,457.22 billion in April 2026, against an estimate of TZS 4,139.26 billion — 83.5 percent budget execution. Recurrent expenditure was executed almost exactly to plan, while development expenditure fell well short.

TZS 3,457.2bn
Total Expenditure
▼ 83.5% of target
TZS 2,696.6bn
Recurrent Expenditure
▲ 100.2% of target
TZS 760.6bn
Development Expenditure
▼ only 52.5% of target

Chart 3 — Central Government Expenditure by Category, April 2026 (Billions of TZS)

Source: Ministry of Finance and Bank of Tanzania computations. 2026 actual figures are provisional.
Table 3 — Central Government Expenditure, April 2026 (Billions of TZS)
Expenditure CategoryApril 2026 EstimateApril 2026 ActualVariance% of Target
Wages and salaries1,100.161,134.39+34.23103.1%
Interest payments — domestic311.98304.24-7.7497.5%
Interest payments — foreign301.80226.05-75.7574.9%
Interest payments subtotal613.79530.29-83.4986.4%
Other goods, services and transfers976.841,031.96+55.12105.6%
Recurrent expenditure2,690.782,696.64+5.86100.2%
Development expenditure — local840.98622.89-218.1074.1%
Development expenditure — foreign607.49137.69-469.8022.7%
Development expenditure & net lending1,448.48760.58-687.9052.5%
Total expenditure4,139.263,457.22-682.0483.5%
Key insight: Foreign-financed development spending was the weakest link, executing at just 22.7 percent of its April target — a shortfall of TZS 469.8 billion in a single month. Recurrent spending, by contrast, was fully executed, with wages and other recurrent transfers slightly overshooting plan.
↑ Back to top

4. Central Government Expenditure — Cumulative FY2025/26 (July 2025–April 2026)

Cumulative expenditure for the ten months to April 2026 stood at TZS 38,792.07 billion, against a ten-month estimate of TZS 40,402.96 billion (96.0% execution) and a full-year budget of TZS 48,774.99 billion.

Chart 4 — Expenditure: Full-Year Budget vs. Cumulative Performance (Billions of TZS)

Source: Ministry of Finance and Bank of Tanzania computations. Cumulative = July 2025–April 2026.
Table 4 — Expenditure: Annual Budget vs. Cumulative Outturn, July 2025–April 2026 (Billions of TZS)
Expenditure Item2025/26 Full-Year BudgetCumulative EstimateCumulative Actual% of Cumulative Target
Wages and salaries10,917.4710,890.0010,976.94100.8%
Interest payments (domestic + foreign)6,493.725,600.394,679.5983.6%
Other goods, services and transfers7,088.619,103.639,968.60109.5%
Recurrent expenditure31,281.2625,594.0125,625.13100.1%
Development expenditure — local12,117.8310,066.4410,193.05101.3%
Development expenditure — foreign5,375.904,742.512,973.9062.7%
Development expenditure & net lending17,493.7314,808.9513,166.9488.9%
Total expenditure48,774.9940,402.9638,792.0796.0%

On a cumulative basis, the shortfall is concentrated in foreign-financed development expenditure, running at just 62.7 percent of its ten-month target — a persistent pattern rather than a one-month event, pointing to structural disbursement delays from external development partners rather than a single-month anomaly. Locally-financed development spending and recurrent expenditure have both tracked at or slightly above plan.

↑ Back to top

5. Fiscal Balance: Revenue Minus Expenditure

Because revenue outperformed target while expenditure — particularly development spending — under-executed, the fiscal balance before grants improved markedly relative to plan in April 2026: a deficit of TZS 214.93 billion actual, against an estimated deficit of TZS 1,110.96 billion. The same pattern holds cumulatively for the ten months to April 2026.

Chart 5 — Central Government Revenue vs. Expenditure, April 2026 & Cumulative FY2025/26 (Billions of TZS)

Source: TICGL computations based on Ministry of Finance and Bank of Tanzania data (Table A2).
Table 5 — Fiscal Balance Before Grants (Billions of TZS)
PeriodTotal Revenue (incl. LGAs)Total ExpenditureBalance Before Grants
April 2026 — Estimate3,028.304,139.26-1,110.96
April 2026 — Actual3,242.293,457.22-214.93
Cumulative Jul-25–Apr-26 — Estimate32,804.5340,402.96-7,598.43
Cumulative Jul-25–Apr-26 — Actual34,648.3738,792.07-4,143.71
Full-Year 2025/26 Budget40,466.1348,774.99-8,308.86

The cumulative fiscal balance before grants (-TZS 4,143.71 billion) is currently running at roughly half the size of the estimated ten-month deficit (-TZS 7,598.43 billion) — a combination of stronger-than-budgeted revenue collection and slower-than-planned execution of foreign-financed development projects. This figure excludes grants and cash/other adjustments, which further affect the final overall balance and its financing.

↑ Back to top

6. Budget Execution Scorecard — April 2026 (% of Monthly Target Achieved)

The chart below ranks each major revenue and expenditure line by how close actual April 2026 performance came to its monthly target (100% = on target).

Chart 6 — Budget Execution Rate by Line Item, April 2026 (% of Target)

Source: TICGL computations based on Ministry of Finance and Bank of Tanzania data. Bars above 100% indicate over-performance (green for revenue, amber caution for expenditure over-runs); bars below 100% indicate under-performance.

Chart 7 — Composition of Central Government Expenditure, April 2026 Actual

Source: TICGL computations based on Table A2 (Ministry of Finance / Bank of Tanzania)
↑ Back to top

Muhtasari kwa Kiswahili

Mwezi Aprili 2026, Serikali Kuu ya Tanzania ilikusanya mapato ya Shilingi bilioni 3,111.97, sawa na asilimia 107.2 ya lengo la mwezi lililokuwa Shilingi bilioni 2,902.66. Ukusanyaji huu mzuri ulichangiwa zaidi na kodi za uagizaji bidhaa nje ya nchi (asilimia 117.3 ya lengo) na kodi ya mapato (asilimia 114.5 ya lengo), huku mapato yasiyo ya kikodi pekee yakishindwa kufikia lengo (asilimia 91.3 tu).

Kwa upande wa matumizi, Serikali ilitumia jumla ya Shilingi bilioni 3,457.22, sawa na asilimia 83.5 tu ya lengo la Shilingi bilioni 4,139.26. Matumizi ya kawaida (mishahara, riba na uendeshaji) yalitekelezwa karibu kikamilifu (asilimia 100.2), lakini matumizi ya maendeleo yalisuasua sana, yakifikia asilimia 52.5 tu ya lengo — hasa kutokana na miradi ya maendeleo inayofadhiliwa na wahisani wa nje kutolewa kwa kiwango cha asilimia 22.7 pekee ya lengo la mwezi huo.

Kwa mtazamo wa miezi kumi (Julai 2025 hadi Aprili 2026), mapato ya Serikali Kuu yalifikia Shilingi bilioni 33,294.80, yakizidi lengo la kipindi hicho, huku matumizi yakiwa Shilingi bilioni 38,792.07, chini kidogo ya lengo. Hali hii ilipunguza pengo la nakisi ya bajeti (kabla ya misaada) hadi Shilingi bilioni 4,143.71, ikilinganishwa na nakisi iliyokadiriwa ya Shilingi bilioni 7,598.43.

Kwa uchambuzi zaidi wa kina kuhusu changamoto za kisera zinazoathiri utekelezaji wa miradi ya maendeleo na malengo ya Dira 2050, soma makala kamili ya TICGL: What's Next for Tanzania's Economy?

Primary source: Bank of Tanzania, Monthly Economic Review, June 2026 (Table A2 — Central Government Operations, Cheques Issued, Tanzania Mainland), ISSN 0856-6844, www.bot.go.tz, using Ministry of Finance data. Analysis and commentary by TICGL Economic Research. All April 2026 and cumulative FY2025/26 actual figures are provisional and subject to revision. This page covers central government revenue and expenditure only; financing (foreign and domestic borrowing), grants, debt, inflation, monetary policy and external sector data are addressed in separate TICGL analyses.

Tanzania Financial Markets Review June 2026: Government Securities & Interbank Cash Market Analysis | TICGL
TICGL Economic • Financial Markets Watch

Tanzania Financial Markets Review — June 2026

A TICGL deep-dive into Tanzania's financial markets, based on the Bank of Tanzania Monthly Economic Review (June 2026 issue) — with primary focus on the Government securities market (Treasury bills & bonds) and the interbank cash market, alongside the inflation and monetary policy backdrop that shapes them for May 2026.

📅 Published: 11 July 2026 🏛️ Source: Bank of Tanzania Monthly Economic Review, June 2026 ✍️ By TICGL Research Desk

Executive Summary

Tanzania's financial markets in May 2026 reflected ample banking-system liquidity and a Bank of Tanzania holding steady on policy amid a difficult external backdrop shaped by the Middle East conflict and elevated oil prices. Headline inflation edged up to 4.2 percent, staying comfortably inside the national, EAC and SADC convergence bands, while the Bank held its Central Bank Rate at 5.75 percent for a third consecutive quarter. The Government securities market saw short-term paper heavily oversubscribed even as yields continued to ease, while the interbank cash market saw lower turnover and softer rates — both consistent with comfortable bank liquidity positions.

Headline Inflation (May 2026)
4.2%
▲ from 4.0% in Apr-26
Central Bank Rate
5.75%
Held for Q4 2025/26
7-Day IBCM Rate (avg)
5.92%
Within ±150bps corridor
Overall T-Bills Yield
4.74%
▼ from 5.06% in Apr-26
Overall IBCM Rate
6.14%
▼ from 6.26% in Apr-26
M3 Money Supply Growth
25.2%
▲ from 22.0% in Apr-26
Private Sector Credit Growth
23.2%
vs 23.6% in Apr-26
TZS/USD Exchange Rate (avg)
2,616.88
+3.02% y/y appreciation
  • Government securities market: Two Treasury bills auctions (combined tender TZS 498.1bn) attracted bids of TZS 1,330.3bn — over 2.6x oversubscribed — while 15- and 20-year Treasury bonds drew TZS 324.9bn in bids against a TZS 401.8bn tender, pointing to soft demand at the long end even as short-term yields fell.
  • Interbank cash market (IBCM): Total transactions eased to TZS 1,732.7bn from TZS 2,567.8bn in April, with 7-day tenor transactions dominating at 63.8% of volume; the overall IBCM rate slipped to 6.14% from 6.26%, tracking comfortably within the Bank's policy corridor.
  • Monetary policy transmission: The narrowed ±150bps CBR corridor is working as intended — the 7-day IBCM rate averaged 5.92% in May, staying tightly anchored around the 5.75% policy rate.
  • Exchange rate: The shilling depreciated marginally month-on-month to an average of TZS 2,616.88/USD in May 2026, but strengthened by 3.02% on an annual basis — a reversal from the 3.82% depreciation recorded a year earlier.

1. Inflation Developments

Headline inflation rose to 4.2 percent in May 2026, from 4.0 percent in April 2026 and 3.2 percent a year earlier, remaining within the national target band and the SADC/EAC convergence benchmarks. The increase was driven mainly by the pass-through of elevated global fuel prices to transport costs — transport inflation jumped to 11.9 percent in May from 9.2 percent in April. Core inflation (excluding unprocessed food and energy) rose to 3.4 percent, remaining the principal contributor to headline inflation at 2.6 percentage points. Food inflation eased marginally to 5.6 percent as staple crop prices stabilised, while energy, fuel and utilities inflation moderated to 5.0 percent even though retail pump prices stayed elevated on Gulf-conflict disruption to global oil markets.

Chart 1: Tanzania Inflation Trend — Headline, Food, Energy & Core (Jan 2025 – May 2026)

Source: National Bureau of Statistics; Bank of Tanzania computations.
Table 1: Inflation Development — Selected Groups (Annual % Change)
Main GroupWeight (%)May-25Apr-26May-26
All items (headline inflation)100.03.24.04.2
Food and non-alcoholic beverages28.25.65.75.6
Core inflation73.92.13.13.4
Non-core inflation26.15.66.36.3
Energy, fuel and utilities5.76.15.35.0
Transport14.11.79.211.9
Housing, water, electricity, gas & other fuels15.13.41.70.7
Services37.21.04.04.7
Goods62.84.24.04.0
Source: National Bureau of Statistics and Bank of Tanzania computations (Table 2.1.1, BOT MER June 2026).
TICGL take: With headline inflation still well inside target and adequate domestic food supply plus fuel subsidies (introduced April–May 2026) cushioning cost pressures, the Bank of Tanzania retains room to keep policy accommodative. The key watch-item is transport/energy pass-through if the Strait of Hormuz disruption persists.

2. Monetary Policy Stance

At its April 2026 meeting, the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) maintained the Central Bank Rate (CBR) at 5.75 percent for the quarter ending June 2026, balancing inflation and growth risks amid heightened Middle East geopolitical tensions. The CBR corridor was narrowed to ±150 basis points (from ±200bps) to sharpen policy transmission. The 7-day interbank cash market rate averaged 5.92 percent in May — comfortably inside the corridor — confirming effective transmission of the policy signal. The Bank continued to inject liquidity mainly via reverse repo operations, with sales rising to TZS 399.5 billion in May from TZS 379.7 billion in April, underscoring an accommodative posture in support of credit growth.

Chart 2: Extended Broad Money (M3) & Private Sector Credit — Outstanding Stock

Source: Bank of Tanzania and banks (Table A3).

Chart 3: Brent Crude Oil Price — Monthly Average (USD/barrel)

Source: World Bank Commodity Markets; U.S. EIA (Table A8).

3. Financial Markets Deep Dive: Government Securities & Interbank Cash Market

This section is TICGL's primary focus for the June 2026 review cycle: a detailed look at the two markets that most directly signal domestic liquidity conditions and the cost of government borrowing — the Government securities market (Treasury bills and bonds) and the Interbank cash market (IBCM).

3.1 Government Securities Market

In May 2026, the Government securities market performed satisfactorily. Short-term securities registered high oversubscription, more than offsetting undersubscription at the longer end of the yield curve, in line with adequate liquidity in the banking system.

Table 2: May 2026 Auction Results Summary
InstrumentTender Size (TZS bn)Bids Received (TZS bn)Successful (TZS bn)Subscription RateWeighted Avg. Yield
Treasury Bills (combined, 2 auctions)498.11,330.3499.8267%4.74% (from 5.06% in Apr-26)
Treasury Bonds — 15-year165.5324.9 (combined)235.1 (combined)81% (combined)10.39%
Treasury Bonds — 20-year236.310.43%
Source: Bank of Tanzania (Section 2.4, BOT MER June 2026). The 15- and 20-year bond tenders were combined at TZS 401.8bn against TZS 324.9bn in bids and TZS 235.1bn allotted.

Chart 4: Treasury Bills Yields by Tenor (Weighted Average Yield, %) — Mar 2025 to May 2026

Source: Bank of Tanzania (Table A4: Interest Rates Structure).

Chart 5: Treasury Bonds Yield to Maturity by Tenor (%) — Mar 2025 to May 2026

Source: Bank of Tanzania (Table A4: Interest Rates Structure).

Chart 6: Tanzania Government Securities Yield Curve — Snapshot, May 2026

Source: Bank of Tanzania (Table A4).
Table 3: Treasury Bills & Bonds Weighted Average Yields (%), Selected Months
TenorMay-25Sep-25Jan-26Mar-26Apr-26May-26
35-day T-bill6.506.205.364.203.813.23
91-day T-bill7.506.815.734.234.023.78
182-day T-bill8.246.565.855.695.465.23
364-day T-bill8.925.996.215.805.725.63
Overall T-bills rate8.896.035.895.215.064.74
2-year bond12.0812.1710.058.368.368.36
5-year bond12.9412.4810.5410.549.549.54
10-year bond14.2613.7411.3011.309.409.40
15-year bond14.6313.9112.0810.7810.7810.39
20-year bond15.1113.5512.0210.7110.7110.43
25-year bond15.2913.1913.1911.9911.9911.99
Source: Bank of Tanzania (Table A4: Interest Rates Structure, BOT MER June 2026).
TICGL take: The short end of the curve has fallen sharply — the overall T-bills rate has more than halved from 8.89% in May 2025 to 4.74% in May 2026 — reflecting ample liquidity and strong appetite for short-dated paper. The long end has also compressed materially (25-year bonds from 15.29% to 11.99%), but oversubscription at the short end versus undersubscription at longer tenors signals investors still prefer to stay short given global uncertainty. This is a favourable window for government to term out short-dated domestic debt, and for private issuers benchmarking against the sovereign curve.

3.2 Interbank Cash Market (IBCM)

The Interbank Cash Market continued to facilitate liquidity distribution among banks, with total market transactions of TZS 1,732.7 billion in May 2026, down from TZS 2,567.8 billion in April. Transactions with a 7-day maturity continued to dominate, accounting for 63.8 percent of total volume. The overall IBCM rate eased slightly to 6.14 percent from 6.26 percent in April 2026, tracking within the Bank's ±150bps CBR corridor and confirming smooth policy transmission.

Chart 7: Interbank Cash Market Rates — Overnight, 2–7 Day & Overall (%) — Mar 2025 to May 2026

Source: Bank of Tanzania (Table A4: Interest Rates Structure).

Chart 8: IBCM Total Transactions vs. Reverse Repo Sold (TZS bn) — Apr vs May 2026

Source: Bank of Tanzania (Section 2.2 & 2.4).

Chart 9: IBCM Volume Share by Maturity — May 2026

Source: Bank of Tanzania (Chart 2.4.2).
Table 4: Interbank Cash Market Rates by Maturity (%)
MaturityMar-26Apr-26May-26
Overnight6.176.155.94
2 to 7 days6.256.185.96
8 to 14 days6.536.336.48
15 to 30 days6.856.796.58
31 to 60 days7.206.926.79
61 to 90 days8.507.126.79
91 to 180 days8.078.777.27
Overall IBCM rate6.326.266.14
Source: Bank of Tanzania (Table A4). REPO rate held at 5.75%; Reverse REPO rate at 5.75%; Lombard rate at 7.75% throughout the period.
Table 5: Reverse Repo Operations (TZS billion)
PeriodReverse Repo Sold
April 2026379.7
May 2026399.5
Source: Bank of Tanzania (Section 2.2, Chart 2.2.2).
TICGL take: Lower IBCM turnover alongside a slightly lower overall rate suggests banks entered May 2026 with more comfortable liquidity buffers, reducing the need for interbank borrowing even as the Bank kept injecting liquidity through reverse repos. The dominance of 7-day tenor transactions (63.8% of volume) is consistent with banks managing statutory reserve requirements around the CBR corridor rather than taking directional liquidity positions.

3.3 Interbank Foreign Exchange Market (IFEM)

Liquidity conditions in the IFEM remained adequate in May 2026, supported by seasonal currency inflows, particularly from gold exports. Total market turnover rose to USD 119.3 million from USD 64.6 million in April, and the Bank intervened by auctioning USD 44 million (up from USD 15.3 million), in line with its Foreign Exchange Intervention Policy. Despite higher forex liquidity, the shilling depreciated marginally month-on-month, trading at an average of TZS 2,616.88/USD versus TZS 2,612.46/USD in April — though it strengthened 3.02% on an annual basis, a turnaround from 3.82% annual depreciation a year earlier.

Chart 10: TZS/USD Exchange Rate — End of Period, May 2025 to May 2026

Source: Bank of Tanzania (Table A10).
Table 6: IFEM Snapshot — April vs May 2026
IndicatorApr-26May-26
Total market turnover (USD million)64.6119.3
BOT net auction/sale (USD million)15.344.0
Weighted average exchange rate (TZS/USD)2,612.462,616.88
Source: Bank of Tanzania (Section 2.4, Chart 2.4.3).

Muhtasari kwa Kiswahili

Ripoti ya Kila Mwezi ya Kiuchumi ya Benki Kuu ya Tanzania (BOT) ya Juni 2026 inaonesha kuwa mfumuko wa bei nchini Tanzania uliongezeka hadi asilimia 4.2 mwezi Mei 2026, kutoka asilimia 4.0 mwezi Aprili, ukisukumwa hasa na ongezeko la bei za mafuta duniani kufuatia mgogoro wa Mashariki ya Kati. Hata hivyo, kiwango hicho bado kiko ndani ya lengo la Taifa na vigezo vya EAC na SADC.

  • Sera ya fedha: Benki Kuu iliendelea kutunza Kiwango cha Riba cha Benki Kuu (CBR) katika asilimia 5.75 kwa robo ya mwaka inayoishia Juni 2026.
  • Soko la Hatifungani za Serikali: Dhamana za muda mfupi (Treasury bills) ziliendelea kupokelewa vizuri sana na wawekezaji (ombi la TZS bilioni 1,330.3 dhidi ya lengo la TZS bilioni 498.1), huku riba (yield) ikiendelea kushuka hadi wastani wa asilimia 4.74. Hatifungani za muda mrefu (miaka 15 na 20) zilipokea maombi kidogo zaidi ya lengo.
  • Soko la Fedha baina ya Benki (Interbank Cash Market): Miamala ilipungua hadi TZS bilioni 1,732.7 kutoka TZS bilioni 2,567.8 mwezi Aprili, huku riba ya jumla ikishuka hadi asilimia 6.14. Miamala ya siku 7 iliendelea kutawala soko, ikichukua asilimia 63.8 ya miamala yote.
  • Soko la Fedha za Kigeni baina ya Benki (IFEM): Mzunguko wa fedha za kigeni uliongezeka hadi Dola milioni 119.3 kutoka Dola milioni 64.6 mwezi Aprili, huku Shilingi ikishuka kidogo hadi wastani wa TZS 2,616.88 kwa Dola moja, lakini ikiimarika kwa asilimia 3.02 ukilinganisha na mwaka jana.

Kwa uchambuzi wa kina zaidi kuhusu mapengo ya kisera yanayozuia uchumi wa Tanzania kufikia thamani ya Dola trilioni 1 ifikapo 2050, soma makala maalum ya TICGL: What's Next for Tanzania's Economy?

Primary source: Bank of Tanzania, Monthly Economic Review, June 2026 (covering data through May 2026). Compiled, analysed and contextualised by the TICGL Research Desk (Tanzania Investment and Consultant Group Ltd / Tanzania Economic Research Institute). Figures marked "p" are provisional and "r" are revised, per BOT convention. This page is for general information purposes and does not constitute investment advice.
Tanzania Lending & Deposit Interest Rates Analysis – May 2026 | TICGL
TICGL Economic • Interest Rate Watch

Tanzania Lending & Deposit Interest Rates Analysis — May 2026

A focused TICGL analysis of Tanzania's bank interest rate structure: overall and negotiated lending rates, lending rates by tenor, deposit rates by tenor, and the interest rate spread — based on Bank of Tanzania data through May 2026.

📅 Published: 12 July 2026 🏛️ Source: Bank of Tanzania Monthly Economic Review, June 2026 ✍️ By TICGL Research Desk

Executive Summary

Tanzania's bank interest rate structure held broadly stable through May 2026, with modest declines across both lending and deposit rates. The overall lending rate was little changed at 15.32 percent (from 15.33% in April), while the negotiated rate for prime customers eased more sharply to 11.90 percent from 12.56 percent — a signal that banks are competing harder for their best borrowers even as headline pricing stays flat. On the deposit side, the overall time deposit rate eased to 8.43 percent from 8.54 percent, while the negotiated deposit rate moderated to 11.25 percent. The resulting short-term interest rate spread narrowed to 5.22 percentage points, from 5.50 points in April 2026 — the tightest spread recorded since at least March 2025, pointing to gradually improving intermediation efficiency in the banking sector.

Overall Lending Rate
15.32%
vs 15.33% in Apr-26
Overall Time Deposit Rate
8.43%
▼ from 8.54% in Apr-26
Short-Term Interest Spread
5.22 pts
▼ from 5.50 pts in Apr-26
Negotiated Lending Rate
11.90%
▼ from 12.56% in Apr-26
Negotiated Deposit Rate
11.25%
▼ from 11.37% in Apr-26
Savings Deposit Rate
2.85%
▼ from 2.91% in Apr-26
12-Month Deposit Rate
10.17%
▲ from 9.81% in Apr-26
Long-Term Lending (3–5yr)
14.43%
▼ from 14.56% in Apr-26
  • Lending rates: Short-term lending (up to 1 year) eased to 15.38% while medium-term (1–2 year) lending actually rose to 17.11% from 17.19% — the highest tenor on the curve — reflecting banks pricing in duration risk more aggressively than short-dated risk.
  • Deposit rates: The 12-month deposit rate rose to a 15-month high of 10.17%, even as the overall (blended) time deposit rate fell — suggesting banks are paying up more selectively for longer-dated, stickier deposits while short-tenor deposit pricing eased.
  • Spread compression: The lending-deposit spread has now narrowed for two consecutive months (5.85 → 5.50 → 5.22 percentage points since March 2026), consistent with the Bank of Tanzania's accommodative liquidity stance feeding through to cheaper credit intermediation.
  • Negotiated vs. posted rates: The gap between the overall lending rate (15.32%) and the negotiated lending rate (11.90%) has widened to 3.42 percentage points — the largest gap in the 15-month series — underscoring how much more competitively banks price loans for their strongest corporate and prime clients versus posted/list rates.

1. Lending Interest Rates by Tenor

Tanzania's overall lending rate stood at 15.32 percent in May 2026, essentially flat month-on-month. Beneath that headline figure, however, the lending curve by tenor tells a more nuanced story: short-term lending (up to 1 year) eased to 15.38%, medium-term (1–2 year) lending climbed to a series-high 17.11%, medium-term (2–3 year) lending eased slightly to 15.60%, long-term (3–5 year) lending fell to 14.43%, and term loans over 5 years eased to 14.08%. This "hump" in the middle of the curve — where 1–2 year money is priced above both shorter and longer tenors — suggests banks see the greatest duration/credit risk in that medium horizon.

Chart 1: Tanzania Lending Rates by Tenor (%) — March 2025 to May 2026

Source: Bank of Tanzania (Table A4: Interest Rates Structure).
Table 1: Lending Interest Rates by Tenor (%), Selected Months
TenorMay-25Sep-25Jan-26Mar-26Apr-26May-26
Short-term (up to 1 year)15.9615.5215.4915.4515.3115.38
Medium-term (1–2 years)16.3516.2616.7316.5317.1917.11
Medium-term (2–3 years)15.2415.1914.9715.3115.6315.60
Long-term (3–5 years)14.1914.2614.0513.9514.5614.43
Term loans (over 5 years)14.1714.6614.2414.3013.9614.08
Overall lending rate15.1815.1815.1015.1115.3315.32
Source: Bank of Tanzania (Table A4: Interest Rates Structure, BOT MER June 2026).
TICGL take: The medium-term (1–2 year) segment is now the most expensive tenor on the lending curve at 17.11% — over 250 basis points above the overall average. For businesses planning working-capital or asset-financing facilities, structuring around shorter (≤1 year, rolled over) or longer (3–5 year) tenors may currently offer materially better pricing than 1–2 year facilities.

2. Deposit Interest Rates by Tenor

The overall time deposit rate eased to 8.43 percent in May 2026 from 8.54 percent in April. Within the deposit ladder, shorter tenors softened — the 1-month rate fell to 8.34% and the 3-month rate rose to 10.52% (its highest point in the 15-month series) — while the 12-month rate climbed to 10.17%, its highest level since at least March 2025. The savings deposit rate, which anchors the bottom of the curve, eased to 2.85%.

Chart 2: Tanzania Deposit Rates by Tenor (%) — March 2025 to May 2026

Source: Bank of Tanzania (Table A4: Interest Rates Structure).
Table 2: Deposit Interest Rates by Tenor (%), Selected Months
TenorMay-25Sep-25Jan-26Mar-26Apr-26May-26
Savings deposit rate2.522.922.942.892.912.85
1-month deposit10.479.658.968.659.068.34
2-month deposit9.259.289.569.349.678.65
3-month deposit9.859.619.439.569.0110.52
6-month deposit9.8210.1210.2010.5110.359.87
12-month deposit9.729.849.709.609.8110.17
24-month deposit7.497.637.117.038.207.69
Overall time deposit rate8.588.508.338.338.548.43
Source: Bank of Tanzania (Table A4: Interest Rates Structure, BOT MER June 2026).
TICGL take: Savers locking in 12-month deposits are now earning materially more (10.17%) than those on shorter 1- or 2-month placements (8.34% / 8.65%) — the widest 12-month vs. 1-month premium since early 2025. For treasury and cash-management decisions, this favours term deposits over rolling short-tenor placements at the margin.

3. Interest Rate Spread Analysis

The short-term interest rate spread — defined by the Bank of Tanzania as the short-term (up to 1 year) lending rate less the 12-month deposit rate — narrowed to 5.22 percentage points in May 2026, from 5.50 points in April and 5.85 points in March. This is the narrowest spread recorded in the current data series, and reflects both softer short-term lending pricing and a simultaneously higher 12-month deposit rate.

Chart 3: Overall Lending vs. Overall Deposit Rate, and Spread (Percentage Points) — March 2025 to May 2026

Source: Bank of Tanzania (Table A4); spread computed by TICGL as Overall Lending Rate minus Overall Time Deposit Rate.
Table 3: Short-Term Interest Rate Spread (%), Dec 2025 – May 2026
IndicatorDec-25Jan-26Feb-26Mar-26Apr-26May-26
Short-term lending rate (up to 1 year)15.4615.4915.4115.4515.3115.38
12-month deposit rate9.589.709.829.609.8110.17
Short-term interest spread5.885.795.595.855.505.22
Source: Bank of Tanzania (Table 2.3.1, BOT MER June 2026).
TICGL take: A narrowing spread is a favourable signal for financial intermediation efficiency — it means the "wedge" banks charge between what they pay savers and what they charge borrowers is shrinking, benefiting both sides of the balance sheet. If sustained, this trend should support both credit access for businesses (23.2% private sector credit growth was recorded in May 2026) and better returns for term depositors.

4. Negotiated Rates: Prime Client Pricing

Negotiated rates — the pricing banks offer their strongest, highest-volume clients — moved in opposite directions from posted rates in May 2026. The negotiated lending rate fell sharply to 11.90 percent from 12.56 percent in April, its lowest level in the 15-month series, while the negotiated deposit rate eased to 11.25 percent from 11.37 percent. The gap between the overall (posted) lending rate and the negotiated lending rate has widened to 3.42 percentage points, the widest gap recorded since March 2025 — evidence of intensifying competition among banks for prime corporate borrowers even as list pricing for the broader market stays essentially flat.

Chart 4: Negotiated Lending Rate vs. Negotiated Deposit Rate (%) — March 2025 to May 2026

Source: Bank of Tanzania (Table A4: Interest Rates Structure).
Table 4: Overall vs. Negotiated Lending & Deposit Rates (%), Selected Months
IndicatorMay-25Sep-25Jan-26Mar-26Apr-26May-26
Overall lending rate15.1815.1815.1015.1115.3315.32
Negotiated lending rate12.9912.8412.2512.2112.5611.90
Overall time deposit rate8.588.508.338.338.548.43
Negotiated deposit rate10.6411.0511.7411.5711.3711.25
Source: Bank of Tanzania (Table A4: Interest Rates Structure, BOT MER June 2026).
TICGL take: Note the crossover: since around late 2025, the negotiated deposit rate (11.25% in May) has moved above the negotiated lending rate (11.90% is only marginally above it) — large depositors with negotiating power are earning nearly as much as prime borrowers are paying. This compression matters for corporate treasury strategy: businesses with strong banking relationships should actively negotiate rather than accept posted/list pricing on both sides of the balance sheet.

5. Foreign Currency Lending & Deposit Rates

Foreign currency (largely USD-denominated) lending and deposit rates remain structurally lower than their TZS counterparts, reflecting the absence of currency depreciation risk premium for lenders and the global USD rate environment. The overall foreign currency lending rate stood at 8.72 percent in May 2026, while the foreign currency overall time deposit rate was 4.47 percent — both up modestly from April.

Chart 5: TZS vs. Foreign Currency Overall Lending Rate (%) — March 2025 to May 2026

Source: Bank of Tanzania (Table A4: Interest Rates Structure, Section B: Foreign Currency).
Table 5: Foreign Currency Interest Rates (%), Selected Months
IndicatorMay-25Sep-25Jan-26Mar-26Apr-26May-26
FX savings deposit rate1.330.980.771.221.681.06
FX overall time deposit rate3.653.944.184.264.414.47
FX 12-month deposit rate4.104.613.824.354.835.59
FX overall lending rate8.818.438.578.708.968.72
Source: Bank of Tanzania (Table A4: Interest Rates Structure, Section B).
TICGL take: The TZS–USD lending rate differential remains wide (15.32% vs. 8.72%, a gap of roughly 6.6 percentage points), which continues to make foreign-currency borrowing attractive for importers and dollar-revenue businesses — provided they can manage the associated exchange rate risk, especially with the shilling's recent mild depreciation trend on a month-on-month basis.

6. May 2026 Rate Ladder Snapshot

The chart below consolidates the full lending and deposit rate ladder as it stood at the end of May 2026, giving a single-glance view of where funding and credit costs sit across the maturity spectrum.

Chart 6: Tanzania Lending & Deposit Rate Ladder — Snapshot, May 2026

Source: Bank of Tanzania (Table A4, BOT MER June 2026).
Policy backdrop: This rate structure sits against a Central Bank Rate held at 5.75% and a 7-day interbank cash market rate averaging 5.92% in May 2026 — meaning banks' overall lending rate carries a spread of roughly 9.6 percentage points over the policy rate, while the overall deposit rate sits only about 2.7 points above it. For a fuller picture of the monetary policy and money-market backdrop shaping these numbers, see TICGL's companion analysis on Tanzania's Government securities and interbank cash markets.

Muhtasari kwa Kiswahili

Ripoti ya Kila Mwezi ya Kiuchumi ya Benki Kuu ya Tanzania (BOT) ya Juni 2026 inaonesha kuwa riba za mikopo na amana za benki nchini Tanzania ziliendelea kuwa tulivu mwezi Mei 2026, huku kukiwa na upungufu mdogo katika pande zote mbili.

  • Riba ya mikopo kwa ujumla: Ilibaki karibu bila mabadiliko kwa asilimia 15.32, kutoka asilimia 15.33 mwezi Aprili.
  • Riba ya mikopo iliyojadiliwa (negotiated) kwa wateja wakubwa: Ilishuka kwa kiasi kikubwa hadi asilimia 11.90 kutoka asilimia 12.56, ikionesha ushindani mkubwa baina ya benki kuvutia wateja wazuri.
  • Riba ya amana kwa ujumla: Ilishuka hadi asilimia 8.43 kutoka asilimia 8.54, ingawa riba ya amana za miezi 12 iliongezeka hadi asilimia 10.17 — kiwango cha juu zaidi katika miezi 15 iliyopita.
  • Pengo la riba (interest rate spread): Pengo baina ya riba ya mikopo ya muda mfupi na riba ya amana za miezi 12 lilipungua hadi pointi 5.22, kutoka pointi 5.50 mwezi Aprili — hii ni ishara nzuri ya kuboreka kwa ufanisi wa upatanishi wa kifedha (intermediation) katika sekta ya benki.
  • Riba za fedha za kigeni: Riba ya mikopo kwa dola ilikuwa asilimia 8.72, ikiendelea kuwa chini sana ukilinganisha na riba ya mikopo kwa Shilingi (asilimia 15.32).

Kwa uchambuzi wa kina zaidi kuhusu soko la fedha la Tanzania (Government Securities Market na Interbank Cash Market), soma makala shirikishi ya TICGL: Tanzania Financial Markets Review — June 2026. Na kwa mapengo ya kisera yanayozuia uchumi wa Tanzania kufikia thamani ya Dola trilioni 1 ifikapo 2050, soma: What's Next for Tanzania's Economy?

Primary source: Bank of Tanzania, Monthly Economic Review, June 2026 (covering data through May 2026), Table A4: Interest Rates Structure and Table 2.3.1: Lending and Deposit Interest Rates. Compiled, analysed and contextualised by the TICGL Research Desk (Tanzania Investment and Consultant Group Ltd / Tanzania Economic Research Institute). The interest rate spread series in Chart 3 is computed by TICGL (Overall Lending Rate minus Overall Time Deposit Rate) using official BOT source data; Table 3's "short-term interest spread" reproduces BOT's own published definition and figures. This page is for general information purposes and does not constitute investment or financial advice.
What's Next for Tanzania's Economy? The Policy Gaps Delaying the $1 Trillion Vision | TICGL
🔬 TICGL Policy Research  |  Dira 2050 Analysis  |  June 2026

What's Next for Tanzania's Economy?
The Policy Gaps Keeping $1 Trillion Out of Reach by 2050

Tanzania's Dira 2050 sets an inspiring $1 trillion GDP target by 2050. But critical economic policy gaps — in taxation, private sector development, industrialisation, and fiscal management — mean the realistic timeline is closer to 2058–2062. This is the full TICGL assessment.

$91.8B
Tanzania GDP 2025
$1T
Dira 2050 Target
5.9%
Current Real Growth
10.2%
Growth Rate Needed by 2050
2058–62
TICGL Central Estimate
70M
Population Today
📅 Published: June 30, 2026 🏛️ TICGL Economic Research 📄 Source: Dira 2050 (June 2025) & Budget Speech FY2026/27 🇹🇿 Tanzania Economy

Tanzania in Numbers — Where We Stand, Where We Must Go

A snapshot of Tanzania's economic reality in 2026, the ambition of Dira 2050, and the hard arithmetic sitting between them. Every figure here points to a specific policy gap examined in detail below.

$91.8B
GDP 2025 (Nominal)
TZS 234.1 Trillion
Need 10.9× growth to reach $1T
5.9%
Real GDP Growth 2025
FY2026/27 target: 6.3%
4.3pp below required pace
13.1%
Tax-to-GDP Ratio
SSA average: 16%
6.1pp below middle-income norm
$1,277
GNI Per Capita (2023)
Target: $7,000 by 2050
18.2% of target achieved
8.1%
Manufacturing Share of GDP
Target for industrialisation: 25%+
17pp industrialisation gap
45–55%
Informal Economy Share
Large share of workers untaxed
Largest single policy gap
TZS 62.33T
FY2026/27 Budget
+10.3% vs prior year
74.2% self-financed
31.4%
Wage Bill Increase (2026/27)
TZS 10.13 trillion total
Crowding out development spend
~130M
Population by 2050 (est.)
Currently 70M; growing 2.9%/yr
$7,692 per capita if $1T reached
4,522 MW
Power Generation Capacity
Target: 15,000 MW by 2050
30% of target — energy gap real
3.4%
Avg Inflation (Jul–Apr 2026)
Within 3–5% target band ✓
Macro stability maintained
TZS 114T
Total Government Debt (Mar 2026)
39.6% of GDP
Rising faster than GDP growth

📊 TICGL Verdict: The $1 Trillion Milestone Is a 2058–2062 Story, Not 2050

At Tanzania's current real GDP growth rate of 5.9%, the $1 trillion milestone arrives around 2065. Closing the gap to 2050 requires a growth rate of 10.2% nominal per year — nearly double the current pace. This is not a failure of vision; it is a gap in execution. Five structural policy gaps — detailed below — are the primary reasons Tanzania is on a 2058–2062 trajectory rather than a 2050 one. Closing even three of these gaps could advance the timeline by a decade.

2065
At current 5.9% pace
2058–62
TICGL Central Estimate
2054–56
If 8% sustained reform
2050
Dira target (needs 10.2%)

The 5 Critical Economic Policy Gaps

These are the structural deficits — documented, measurable, and currently unresolved — that explain why Tanzania's growth rate is running at 5.9% instead of the 10.2% required to hit $1 trillion by 2050. Each gap has a name, a number, and a policy prescription.

💸

Gap 1: Narrow Tax Base — Government Taxing Depth, Not Breadth

CRITICAL

Tanzania's tax-to-GDP ratio of 13.1% is among the lowest in Sub-Saharan Africa and far below the 17–20% range associated with sustainable middle-income investment. Worse, the FY2026/27 budget's revenue measures overwhelmingly fall on existing formal-sector taxpayers — motorcycles, petroleum, EAC tariffs — rather than pulling the informal 45–55% into the tax net.

Current Tax/GDP 13.1%
SSA Average 16%
Middle-Income Norm 18–20%
FY2026/27 Target 13.7%
What must change:
  • Mandatory digital payment enforcement to formalise the informal economy
  • Property tax reform and LGA own-source revenue systems
  • Presumptive tax expansion for small traders with simplified compliance
  • MKUMBI reforms must go beyond fee cuts to full regulatory simplification
🏭

Gap 2: Industrialisation Deficit — Manufacturing Cannot Drive Growth at 8.1% of GDP

CRITICAL

Every $1 trillion economy in history was built on a strong manufacturing base. Tanzania's manufacturing sector contributes only 8.1% of GDP — a figure that has barely moved in a decade. Structural transformation from agriculture-dependent growth to industry-driven growth is the single biggest determinant of whether Tanzania hits $1T in 2050 or 2065.

Manufacturing / GDP (2025) 8.1%
Required for $1T economy 22–28%
Manufacturing growth rate 8.0% p.a.
Power availability (gap) 4,522 / 15,000 MW
What must change:
  • SEZs and industrial parks with reliable power, logistics, and fast customs
  • Julius Nyerere HPP (2,115 MW) must be complemented by solar and gas capacity
  • Value-addition mandates for mineral exports (lithium, graphite, gold)
  • Aggressive import substitution in edible oils, textiles, pharmaceuticals
🏦

Gap 3: Private Sector Crowding-Out — Government Borrows Where Business Should Invest

HIGH

Tanzania's government domestic borrowing competes directly with private sector credit. Treasury bills and bonds yield risk-free returns of 8–12%, making commercial lending to SMEs economically unattractive for banks. The result: private investment remains below 22% of GDP — far short of the 30–35% needed to sustain 8%+ growth. PPP projects exist on paper but almost none have reached financial close.

Private Investment / GDP ~22%
Required for transformation 30–35%
PPP projects at fin. close ~0 (2025)
SME access to credit (est.) Limited
What must change:
  • First bankable PPP projects must reach financial close — not just signing ceremonies
  • Domestic debt maturity extension to reduce roll-over pressure on short-term rates
  • Credit guarantee schemes for manufacturing and agri-processing SMEs
  • DSE capital market deepening — listed instruments beyond government bonds
👔

Gap 4: Informal Economy — 45–55% of Output Is Outside the Formal System

CRITICAL

Between 45–55% of Tanzania's economic activity occurs in the informal sector — outside formal registration, taxation, regulation, and social protection. This is not merely a revenue problem. It means most Tanzanian workers cannot access formal credit, pension coverage, or health insurance, and most Tanzanian businesses cannot scale because they cannot access capital markets. Informality is the deepest structural barrier to the $1 trillion economy.

Informal economy share 45–55%
Formal employment rate ~20%
Dira 2050 formal emp. target 50% by 2050
Digital payment adoption Growing (TWIGA mandate)
What must change:
  • Digital payment mandate enforcement across transport, hospitality, trade
  • Single business registration reducing multi-step licensing barriers
  • Formalisation incentives: tax holidays for first 3 years of formal registration
  • Mobile-first NHIF & NSSF enrolment for informal workers
📉

Gap 5: Fiscal Composition — Rising Wage Bill Is Eating Development Expenditure

HIGH

The FY2026/27 wage bill of TZS 10.13 trillion (+31.4% YoY) is now the fastest-growing line in the budget. As recurrent expenditure expands, development/capital expenditure — the investment that builds the infrastructure Tanzania needs for sustained 8–10% growth — is being crowded out. A government that spends 16.3% of its budget on salaries but only 3.7% on capital investment cannot build a $1 trillion economy.

Wage bill 2026/27 TZS 10.13T (+31.4%)
Development expenditure TZS 2.33T (–1.9%)
Interest payments TZS 6.86T
Wage + interest share of budget ~27.5%
What must change:
  • Wage bill growth must be capped at GDP growth rate — not 5× GDP growth rate
  • Development expenditure must be ring-fenced at minimum 20% of total budget
  • PPP and blended finance must replace direct government capital spending
  • External debt concessional terms must be preserved to reduce interest bill
🎓

Gap 6: Human Capital Mismatch — Skills Not Aligned with the Economy Tanzania Needs

HIGH

Tanzania's Human Capital Index score of 0.39 means a child born today will reach only 39% of their productive potential as an adult. The education system produces graduates strong in theoretical knowledge but weak in the applied STEM, digital, and technical skills that manufacturing, digital economy, and green technology sectors require. 43% of Tanzania's population is under 15 — this demographic window is also a demographic risk if skills development stalls.

Human Capital Index score 0.39 (SSA avg: 0.40)
Secondary completion rate ~30% (Form IV)
STEM graduates / year Insufficient for industry
Digital literacy (2025 est.) ~35% (target: 70%)
What must change:
  • VETA expansion and mandatory technical/vocational pathway alongside academic
  • University-industry partnership mandates for applied research
  • STEM enrollment parity for girls — closing the gender gap in technical fields
  • Digital skills curriculum from primary school level upward
🔴 The Combined Effect: Why These Gaps Add Up to a 10-Year Delay

Each policy gap individually costs Tanzania approximately 0.5–1.5 percentage points of potential GDP growth per year. Together, the six gaps identified above account for the difference between Tanzania's actual 5.9% growth trajectory and the 8–10% trajectory needed to hit $1 trillion by 2050–2056. Closing all six simultaneously — through sustained political will across multiple election cycles — would close the decade gap. Closing three or four would still advance the timeline from 2062 to roughly 2055–2057. The FY2026/27 Budget takes meaningful steps on digitisation and the business environment, but leaves the wage bill, formal employment rate, and manufacturing investment largely unaddressed.

The Growth Arithmetic: When Does $1 Trillion Actually Arrive?

Five growth scenarios projected to 2065. The vertical red line marks the Dira 2050 deadline. The key question: which scenario Tanzania's policy reforms can credibly sustain.

Tanzania GDP Trajectory 2025–2065 — Five Policy Scenarios
Nominal GDP (USD Billions). Closing the policy gaps above shifts Tanzania from the red line (5.9%) toward the blue line (10.2%). TICGL central estimate: the gold zone (7–7.5%), reaching $1T around 2058–2062.
ScenarioAvg Real GrowthGDP 2030GDP 2040GDP 2050Year $1T ReachedPolicy Gaps ClosedStatus
Current Trend5.9%$122B$215B$380B~2065None / minimal15 yrs late
FYDP IV Target7.0%$129B$253B$497B~20601–2 gaps partially~10 yrs late
TICGL Central Estimate7.5%$132B$272B$561B~2058–20622–3 gaps partially8–12 yrs late
Reform Acceleration8.0%$135B$292B$631B~2054–20563–4 gaps closed4–6 yrs late
East Africa Frontier9.0%$141B$335B$793B~20524–5 gaps closed~2 yrs late
Dira 2050 Required10.2%$149B$391B$1,000B2050All 6 gaps closedOn Target
Historical Real GDP Growth Rate (2015–2026)
Tanzania has never sustained above 7.2% — the 10.2% required by Dira 2050 is historically unprecedented for this economy.
Tax-to-GDP: Tanzania vs Benchmarks (2018–2027)
Tanzania's tax ratio is closing the gap slowly — but at this pace reaches 18% around 2035, not 2030 as needed.

Population Dynamics: 70 Million Today, ~130 Million by 2050

Tanzania's population is both its greatest asset and its most demanding arithmetic challenge. More workers means more output potential — but only if the economy generates formal jobs. More mouths means more pressure on education, healthcare, and infrastructure.

Tanzania Population Projection 2025–2055
UN variant projections. Medium variant shows ~130M by 2050 — the key denominator for per capita income calculations.
GDP Per Capita Across Growth Scenarios (2025–2060)
At 10.2% growth, per capita income hits $7,692 by 2050 (exceeds the $7,000 target). At 5.9%, per capita in 2050 is only ~$2,976.
YearPopulation (M)GDP @5.9% ($B)GDP @7.5% TICGL ($B)GDP @10.2% ($B)Per Capita @10.2%Per Capita @7.5%vs $7,000 Target
202567.5$91.8$91.8$91.8$1,360$1,36019%
203077.5$122$132$149$1,922$1,70327%
203590.1$163$186$243$2,697$2,06539%
2040104.8$217$263$397$3,788$2,51054%
2045117.2$290$371$648$5,530$3,16579%
2050130.0$387$523$1,000$7,692$4,023110% / 57%
2055137.0$517$737$5,38077%
2058–2062142.0~$617~$940–$1,000B~$6,900~$1T TICGL est.
✅ The Per Capita Arithmetic Works — But Only If GDP Gets There

At TICGL's central estimate (7.5% growth, $1T around 2060), per capita income at that point would be approximately $6,900–$7,200 — essentially meeting the Dira 2050 $7,000 per capita target, just 8–12 years late. The population math is not Tanzania's enemy: at ~140 million by 2060, $1 trillion still delivers upper-middle-income per capita. The sole constraint is GDP growth acceleration. Every percentage point of real growth added to the annual trajectory advances the $1 trillion date by approximately 2–3 years.

FY2026/27 Budget: Does It Address the Policy Gaps?

The FY2026/27 Budget (TZS 62.33 trillion, presented June 11 2026) is explicitly framed as Dira 2050's first annual fiscal instrument. How well does it address the six policy gaps identified above?

Budget Revenue Composition FY2026/27 (TZS Trillion)
Total planned revenue: TZS 46.79T. Tax revenue dominates; aid declining sharply (–39.1%).
Expenditure Breakdown FY2026/27 — The Composition Problem
Wage bill is the largest single item and fastest-growing. Capital/development expenditure at only TZS 2.33T — the lowest relative share in years.
Budget Trend: Revenue vs Expenditure vs Capital Spend (FY2022/23–FY2026/27, TZS Trillion)
While total budget and revenue both grow steadily, capital/development expenditure is stagnating — the fiscal composition gap is widening.
Policy GapBudget 2026/27 ResponseKey MeasureTICGL Gap Assessment
Gap 1: Narrow Tax BasePartial — mostly depth not breadthDigital payment mandate (TWIGA), 374 fees abolished (MKUMBI I)Promising start, not transformative
Gap 2: IndustrialisationPartial — tariff protection & energyJNHPP commissioning (2,115 MW), edible oil tariff (35%), SGR operationalInfrastructure good; SEZ policy missing
Gap 3: Private Sector Crowding-OutMinimal — PPP still at 0 financial closePPP Framework mentioned; no specific project at financial closeUnaddressed — critical gap
Gap 4: Informal EconomyMeaningful — digital mandate enforcedTransport, schools, hospitality & agri digital payment mandateBest measure in budget — if enforced
Gap 5: Wage Bill / Fiscal CompositionNone — worsened in 2026/27Wage bill +31.4%; capital spend –1.9%; no structural reform signalGap widened this year
Gap 6: Human Capital SkillsPartial — VETA & student loansTZS 1.58T education spending; 284,487 student loans; VETA expansionInvestment up, curriculum reform needed
⚠️ Budget Score: 2 Gaps Partially Addressed, 1 Worsened, 1 Unaddressed, 2 Partially Touched

The FY2026/27 Budget is a credible first step toward Dira 2050, particularly in its self-financing ambition (74.2% domestic revenue) and the digital payment formalisation mandate. But it does not yet constitute the structural reform programme needed to close the decade gap to 2058–2062. The wage bill explosion (+31.4%) and the absence of any PPP financial close are the two most concerning signals: they suggest government is still the economy's primary actor rather than its enabler — precisely the pattern Dira 2050 is designed to change.

Dira 2050: The Vision Architecture Behind the Numbers

Understanding what Tanzania has committed to — and why the commitment is structurally sound, even if the pace is insufficient.

🏛️

Foundation: Governance, Peace & Security

Rule of law, democratic institutions, anti-corruption, accountable civil service, and regional peace diplomacy. The environment without which no growth scenario is credible.

  • Judicial independence & anti-corruption
  • Strong, revenue-capable local governments
  • Accountable public service delivery
📈

Pillar 1: Strong, Inclusive & Competitive Economy

Macro stability, fiscal sustainability, diversified revenue, enabling investment environment, strong private sector, and EAC/SADC integration.

  • Tax-to-GDP to 18–20% by 2040
  • PPP & capital markets development
  • Ease of doing business: Top 3 in Africa
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦

Pillar 2: Human Capability & Social Development

Quality education from early childhood, universal health coverage, social protection for all, affordable housing, and a skilled, motivated workforce.

  • Life expectancy target: 75 years
  • Formal sector employment: 50% by 2050
  • Gender parity: 85% gap closure
🌿

Pillar 3: Environmental Conservation & Climate Resilience

Sustainable management of Tanzania's exceptional biodiversity, wetlands, water resources, pollution control, and climate adaptation strategies.

  • 32% of land protected
  • Carbon markets participation
  • Climate resilience across all sectors

Enablers: Energy, Transport, Digital, S&T

JNHPP (2,115 MW) commissioned; SGR Dar–Dodoma operational; digital payments expanding; science and technology investment growing. These are the brightest policy signals in the current budget.

  • Power target: 15,000 MW by 2050
  • SGR: Dar–Mwanza full completion
  • Digital literacy: 70% by 2050
🏗️

Transformation Sectors: 9 Priority Areas

Agriculture, tourism, manufacturing, construction, mining, blue economy, sports & creative, financial services, and services — each targeted for structural transformation to 2050.

  • Agriculture: 26.5% of GDP → modernised
  • Tourism: 25% of export earnings
  • Mining: lithium, graphite, gold value-add

Progress Dashboard: How Far Has Tanzania Come?

Where Tanzania stands today relative to key Dira 2050 targets — and relative to what Dira 2025 promised. Progress bars show % completion toward the 2050 target.

Economic Targets — Progress vs 2050

GDP: $91.8B / $1,000B 9.2% of target
Per Capita: $1,277 / $7,000 18.2%
Tax-to-GDP: 13.1% / 18% needed 73%
Manufacturing / GDP: 8.1% / 25%+ 32%
Formal Employment: ~20% / 50% 40%
Budget Self-Financing: 74.2% / 90%+ 82%
Power Capacity: 4,522 / 15,000 MW 30%
Private Investment / GDP: 22% / 33% 67%

Human Development — Progress vs 2050

Life Expectancy: 68 / 75 years 91%
Primary Enrolment: 98% / 100% 98%
Secondary Completion: ~30% / 90% 33%
Rural Water Access: 79.9% / 100% 80%
Digital Literacy: ~35% / 70% 50%
Poverty Rate: 25.1% → 0% (reverse) 65%
Human Capital Index: 0.39 / 0.70+ 56%
Gender Parity Closure: ~40% / 85% 47%

The Road Ahead: Key Milestones 2026–2062

A realistic sequencing of what must happen — and when — for Tanzania to close the gap between the 2050 vision and the 2058–2062 reality.

Tanzania GDP Milestone Chart 2025–2060 — Stacked Growth Scenarios
Columns show cumulative GDP by year across three scenarios. The $1T line is crossed by the 10.2% scenario at 2050, the 8% scenario around 2054–2056, and the 7.5% TICGL central estimate around 2058–2062.
2026–2031 — FYDP IV: Critical Foundation Years
The growth rate achieved in this 5-year period determines everything. If Tanzania averages 7.5%+ and closes gaps 1, 4, and 6 (tax base, informality, skills), the 2058–2062 estimate improves. If it averages 5.9%, the 2065 scenario hardens. SGR Dar–Mwanza completion, JNHPP power expansion, and digital payment enforcement are the three measurable tests. GDP must reach $130–150B by 2031.
2032–2036 — FYDP V: The Private Sector Must Lead
By 2032, PPP projects must be at financial close — not just MOU stage. Manufacturing's share of GDP must be rising toward 14–16%. Private investment must exceed 27% of GDP. Tax-to-GDP must cross 15%. This is the inflection window: if reform momentum holds, Tanzania accelerates from 7% to 8%+. If not, the 2065 trajectory solidifies. Population: ~88M. GDP target at 8%: $200–220B.
2037–2041 — FYDP VI: Manufacturing & Digital Economy Scale
If FYDP V reforms held, Tanzania enters FYDP VI as a genuinely diversifying economy. Manufacturing at 18–20% of GDP. Digital economy contributing 10%+. Formal employment crossing 35%. Tax-to-GDP at 16–17%. This is the phase where the growth compounding effect becomes dramatic — each year of 8% growth adds more absolute dollars than the previous decade. Population: ~105M. GDP target range: $280–350B.
2042–2046 — FYDP VII: The Demographic Dividend Peaks
Tanzania's working-age population share peaks around 2040–2050, creating the maximum opportunity for demographic dividend. If the education and formalisation reforms of FYDP V–VI have held, this is when productivity growth accelerates most sharply. Tourism revenues should be triple 2025 levels. Mining value-addition (lithium, graphite for EV batteries) generating major export earnings. Population: ~118M. GDP must be in the $400–550B range.
2047–2050 — Dira 2050 Deadline: Reality Check
At this moment, Tanzania's GDP will most likely be in the $600–800B range — impressive, transformative, upper-middle-income territory — but not yet $1 trillion. Per capita income will be $5,000–$6,500. This is still a remarkable achievement: Tanzania will have transformed. The $1T milestone is close, not failed. The Dira 2050 framework will likely be extended or succeeded by a new plan completing the final lap.
2058–2062 — TICGL Central Estimate: $1 Trillion Arrives
Under the TICGL 7.5% central scenario, Tanzania crosses $1 trillion between 2058 and 2062. Population ~140–145M. Per capita income ~$7,000–$7,500 — meeting the Dira 2050 per capita target even if the GDP deadline was missed by roughly a decade. Tanzania will be East Africa's largest economy and a genuine continental economic powerhouse. The vision will have been achieved — on a slightly extended timeline driven by the policy gaps identified in this analysis.
🇹🇿

Muhtasari wa Kiswahili — Je, Tanzania Itafikia $1 Trilioni Miaka 10 Baada ya 2050? Mapungufu ya Sera Ndiyo Jibu

Tatizo la msingi ni nini? Tanzania inalenga kufikia uchumi wa dola trilioni moja ($1T) ifikapo mwaka 2050, kama ilivyowekwa katika Dira ya Taifa ya Maendeleo 2050. Lakini TICGL inaona kwamba kwa kasi ya ukuaji wa sasa ya asilimia 5.9, lengo hilo linaweza kufikiwa tu karibu mwaka 2065. Hata kama Tanzania itaongeza kasi hadi asilimia 7.5–8 kwa mwaka — ambayo ni kasi inayohitaji mageuzi makubwa ya kisera — bado tutafika $1 trilioni kati ya mwaka 2058 na 2062. Hii ni miaka 8 hadi 12 baada ya lengo la Dira 2050.

Mapungufu 6 ya sera ndiyo chanzo cha ucheleweshaji: Uchambuzi wa TICGL unaonyesha mapungufu sita makubwa ya kisera ambayo ndiyo yanayotuzuia kufikia uchumi wa $1 trilioni kwa wakati: (1) Kodi ndogo — uwiano wa kodi na pato la taifa ni asilimia 13.1 tu dhidi ya wastani wa SSA wa asilimia 16; (2) Viwanda duni — sekta ya viwanda inachangia asilimia 8.1 tu ya pato la taifa; (3) Sekta binafsi kukandamizwa — serikali inakopa sana katika soko la fedha ikiipokonya sekta binafsi nafasi ya kukopa na kuwekeza; (4) Uchumi usiofaa (informal sector) — asilimia 45–55 ya uchumi haijaingia kwenye mfumo wa kodi na huduma rasmi; (5) Bajeti isiyo na usawa — mishahara inaongezeka kwa asilimia 31.4 huku matumizi ya maendeleo yakipungua; na (6) Ujuzi usiokidhi — mfumo wa elimu hauzalishi wahitimu wenye ujuzi wa viwanda, teknolojia na dijitali.

Bajeti ya 2026/27 inasema nini kuhusu mapungufu haya? Bajeti ya TZS trilioni 62.33 inashughulikia mapungufu mawili kwa kiasi fulani: utekelezaji wa malipo ya kidijitali (yanayoweza kupunguza uchumi usiorasmi) na uwekezaji wa elimu (TZS trilioni 1.58). Lakini mapungufu mazito zaidi yanabaki: hakuna mradi hata mmoja wa PPP uliofika hatua ya kukopeshwa fedha; bill ya mishahara imeongezeka kwa kasi ya mara tano ya ukuaji wa uchumi; na hakuna mkakati mahsusi wa kuongeza sehemu ya viwanda katika pato la taifa.

Je, idadi ya watu itakuwa tatizo? Hapana — hesabu za watu hazifanyi lengo kuwa gumu zaidi. Watu milioni 130 mwaka 2050 wakigawanywa na $1 trilioni = dola $7,692 kwa kila mtu, ambayo inazidi lengo la Dira 2050 la dola $7,000. Tatizo si idadi ya watu — ni ukuaji wa uchumi. Kila asilimia moja ya ukuaji wa ziada kwa mwaka inapelekea kufikia $1T miaka 2–3 mapema zaidi.

Hitimisho la TICGL: Dira 2050 ni dira nzuri na yenye mantiki. Malengo yake yanashikamana kisayansi. Lakini kwa kasi ya sasa ya utekelezaji wa sera, Tanzania itafikia uchumi wa dola trilioni moja kati ya mwaka 2058 na 2062 — miaka kama 10 baada ya lengo. Kufunga mapungufu mitatu au minne ya sera iliyotambuliwa hapo juu — hasa kodi, viwanda, na PPP — kunaweza kuhamisha tarehe hiyo hadi 2054–2056. Dira 2050 siyo ndoto isiyowezekana; ni ndoto inayohitaji kasi ya ziada katika utekelezaji wa kila bajeti ijayo.

Tanzania's Real Problem Is Structural, Not Taxes | TICGL Economic Research 2026
TICGL Economic Research · April 2026

Tanzania's Real Problem Is Structural,
Not a Matter of Taxes

A comprehensive, data-driven analysis synthesising two TICGL research series: Tanzania's deep-rooted structural constraints across key economic sectors, and why raising taxes alone is demonstrably insufficient for Tanzania's development. The diagnosis is unambiguous — Tanzania sits in a structural trap that higher tax rates cannot unlock.

📊 TICGL Economic Research Unit 📍 Dar es Salaam, Tanzania 📅 Published: April 11, 2026 📚 Sources: World Bank · IMF · FYDP IV · OECD · TRA · TISEZA ⏱ ~18 min read
13.1%
Tax-to-GDP Ratio
TRA FY2024/25
30%
Corporate Income Tax
TRA · Highest in EAC
55%
Economy Informal (GDP)
FYDP IV Baseline 2023
94.2%
Informal Employment
FYDP IV 2026
16.4%
Private Credit / GDP
IMF / World Bank 2023
USD 183B
FYDP IV Investment Target
FYDP IV 2026–2031

Two Research Series. One Unambiguous Diagnosis.

TICGL has published two complementary research series that together make a single, compelling empirical case: Tanzania's development challenge is fundamentally structural — and the instinct to solve it through higher taxes is not only insufficient, it risks compounding the structural trap.

Tanzania is trapped in a low-productivity, high-informality, commodity-dependent, under-financed equilibrium — and a higher Corporate Income Tax rate cannot escape a structural trap. Only structural reform can.

— TICGL Economic Research Unit, synthesising FYDP IV Analysis & Enabler State Research, 2026

⚠️ The Structural Trap Defined

Tanzania's 13.1% Tax-to-GDP ratio sits below the 15% minimum threshold for basic state functions — yet TRA has exceeded revenue targets by over 103% for two consecutive years. The problem is not collection efficiency. It is the narrow tax base and insufficient private sector depth — both products of structural failure, not insufficient tax rates. Raising rates on an already-burdened narrow base is a symptom-treatment, not a cure.

❌ The Wrong Diagnosis
  • Tanzania's fiscal problem is that taxes are too low
  • Higher CIT rates will generate more development revenue
  • TRA collection efficiency is the binding constraint
  • More tax revenue → more public investment → growth
  • The 55% informal economy is a tax compliance problem
  • Sector-level interventions alone can fix the gaps
✓ What the Data Actually Show
  • Tanzania's fiscal problem is the narrow taxable base — a structural fact
  • CIT at 30% is already highest in EAC; it deters the investment that would broaden the base
  • TRA exceeds targets by 103% — collection is not the bottleneck
  • Private credit at 16.4% of GDP is the binding constraint on productive investment
  • 94.2% informal employment is a structural labour market failure, not a compliance issue
  • Cross-cutting structural problems require simultaneous, systemic reform

Tanzania's Seven Core Structural Challenges — FYDP IV's Own Admission

FYDP IV is unusual among Tanzania's development plans in the candour of its self-diagnosis. Section 2.7 (Theory of Change) explicitly names seven structural development challenges. These are not risks to manage — they are the structural reality at the moment FYDP IV launches. Critically, the same challenges were identified in FYDP I, II, and III — all unresolved at entry to FYDP IV.

Key Analytical Finding

The fact that these seven structural challenges persist at the entry point of FYDP IV — having been identified in every prior five-year plan — is itself the most important structural finding of this analysis. They represent Tanzania's structural equilibrium, not temporary setbacks.

#ChallengeDomainKey Evidence / IndicatorPrimary Sectors Affected
SP-1Low ProductivityAcross Productive SectorsTotal factor productivity growth has been insufficient; Tanzania lags well behind regional comparators in agriculture, manufacturing, and servicesAll Sectors
SP-2Limited IndustrialisationIndustrial StructureManufacturing at only 7.3% of GDP, growth at 4.8% — Tanzania remains a raw commodity exporter despite three FYDPs targeting industrialisationManufacturing, Mining, Agriculture
SP-3Weak Value ChainsEconomic IntegrationAgriculture-agro-processing linkages fragmented; mining-manufacturing disconnected; supply chains import-dependentAgriculture, Manufacturing, Mining, Tourism
SP-4Infrastructure ConstraintsPhysical CapitalElectricity: 4,032 MW for 65M people; paved roads: 8.6%; high logistics dwell times; digital gapsEnergy, Transport, All Sectors
SP-5Environmental PressuresSustainability85% of farmland rain-fed; hydro drought risk; deforestation; desertification; coastal asset vulnerabilityAgriculture, Energy, Tourism
SP-6InformalityEconomic StructureInformal economy: 55% of GDP (2023); target 29% by 2031; informal employment: 94.2% of total workforceAll Sectors — Especially Agriculture, Trade
SP-7Governance & Implementation GapsInstitutionalFYDP III budget execution at 67%; fragmented MDA mandates; PPP frameworks exist but not operationalisedAll Sectors — Meta-Constraint
Structural Challenge Severity — Cross-Sectoral Impact Score
Score 1–10 derived from FYDP IV evidence; higher = more economically damaging
Source: TICGL analysis of FYDP IV (January 2026), Dar es Salaam
Challenge Domain Distribution
How Tanzania's seven core structural challenges span different domains
Source: FYDP IV Section 2.7 — Theory of Change, TICGL mapping
🔴 The 3-Plan Persistence Problem

These seven structural challenges were identified in FYDP I (2011–2016), FYDP II (2016–2021), FYDP III (2021–2026), and now FYDP IV (2026–2031). FYDP III achieved 5.5% growth against an 8% target, with budget execution at only 67%. The failure to break these structural constraints across 15 years of planning is the most important evidence that Tanzania's problem is deep-structural — not a matter of insufficient tax revenue.

Structural Baselines vs. FYDP IV 2030/31 Targets — Complete Gap Analysis

For many indicators, the required change is 2× to 5× the current level — compressing into five years what would typically take 15–25 years in comparable economies. This table reveals the structural distances that must be bridged through policy, investment, and institutional reform. No amount of tax collection can substitute for closing these gaps.

Sector / DomainIndicatorBaseline (2023–25)FYDP IV Target (2031)Gap / Change Required
Economic GrowthGDP Real Growth Rate5.5% (2024 actual)10.5%×1.9 acceleration
Agriculture (26.3% GDP)Post-Harvest Losses35%10%−25pp reduction
AgricultureAgriculture Credit Share14.9% (2023)20%+5.1pp
AgricultureAgriculture Real Growth Rate4.1% (2024)10%×2.4 faster
Energy (Cornerstone)Installed Electricity Capacity4,032 MW (2025)15,000 MW×3.7 expansion
EnergyRural Household Electrification36% (2025)42.8%+6.8pp
EnergyRenewable Energy Share<2% of mix≥40%×20+ scale-up
FinanceDFI Capital Base (% GDP)0.4% (2024)≥1.25%×3.1 increase
FinanceMSMEs with Active Formal Loans19% (2023)≥40%×2.1 expansion
FinanceRural Population with Microfinance19% (2023)≥80%×4.2 expansion
Human CapitalWorkforce with High Skills3%12%×4 increase
Human CapitalWorkforce with Low Skills84%55%−29pp reduction
InvestmentFDI InflowsUSD 1,717.6M (2024)USD 8,366M×4.9 increase
Trade & ExportsManufactured Goods Export Share18.6% (non-traditional)29.59%+11pp
InformalityInformal Economy (% of GDP)55% (2023)29%−26pp in 5 years
Structural Distance to Target — How Far Is Tanzania From FYDP IV Goals?
Current baseline as % of 2031 target (100% = target already achieved). Shorter bars = larger structural gap.
GDP Real Growth Rate (5.5% → 10.5%)52% of target
Electricity Capacity (4,032 MW → 15,000 MW)27% of target
MSMEs with Formal Loans (19% → 40%)48% of target
Rural Microfinance Access (19% → 80%)24% of target
DFI Capital Base / GDP (0.4% → 1.25%)32% of target
Renewable Energy Share (<2% → 40%)5% of target
FDI Inflows (USD 1.72B → USD 8.37B)21% of target
High-Skills Workforce Share (3% → 12%)25% of target
Agriculture Real Growth Rate (4.1% → 10%)41% of target
Informality Reduction (55% GDP informal → 29%)0% progress recorded
Source: FYDP IV (January 2026) baseline and target data; TICGL structural gap analysis. Informality progress indicator reflects no meaningful reduction since FYDP III.
GDP Growth: Historical Performance vs. FYDP IV Required Trajectory
Actual growth across FYDP I–III vs. the step-change ambition of FYDP IV
Source: AfDB, IMF WEO 2025; FYDP III actuals; FYDP IV 10.5% target
Energy Capacity: Current Baseline vs. 2031 Target
Tanzania must expand from 4,032 MW to 15,000 MW — a 3.7× expansion in 5 years
Source: FYDP IV Energy Sector targets; TANESCO 2025 baseline
Financial Inclusion Gaps: Baseline vs. 2031 Target (%)
Key financial sector indicators showing the structural depth of Tanzania's credit exclusion
Source: Bank of Tanzania; World Bank 2023; FYDP IV Financial Sector targets
Private Sector Credit as % of GDP — Tanzania vs. Comparators (2023)
Private credit is among the strongest predictors of long-run growth — Tanzania is critically behind
Source: World Bank WDI 2023; IMF Article IV 2024; AfDB 2023

Why Raising Taxes Alone Cannot Fix Structural Problems

The global empirical record is unambiguous: no developing country has achieved structural transformation primarily through tax increases. Countries that have done it — Singapore, Rwanda, Ireland, Estonia, Mauritius, Vietnam, South Korea, Georgia — did so by enabling private capital, not extracting more from a narrow base.

30%
Tanzania CIT — Highest in EAC region
TRA 2024
103%
TRA collection target exceeded for 2 consecutive years
TRA Annual Reports 2024/25
16.4%
Private Credit / GDP — Well below SSA & global peers
IMF 2023
14%
Senior management time on regulations vs. 8% SSA average
IMF Enterprise Survey 2023
141st
Tanzania — World Bank Ease of Doing Business Rank (2020)
World Bank 2020
13.1%
Tax-to-GDP — Below 15% basic-state-function threshold
TRA FY2024/25
📌 The IMF's Own Finding

The IMF's 2025 Selected Issues Paper on Tanzania provides the most rigorous econometric evidence to date: cumbersome tax administration, limited access to finance, and limited access to transport are statistically significantly associated with lower total factor productivity (TFP) in Tanzania's manufacturing sector. Tanzania's regulatory burden is not a nuisance — it is measurably destroying economic value. The solution is structural, not fiscal.

● Pattern 1
The 15% Threshold Rule

A Tax-to-GDP of ~15% is often cited as the minimum for basic state functions. Beyond this threshold, higher ratios do not automatically translate into faster per-capita GDP growth in developing contexts. Many high-tax developing countries show weaker private-sector dynamism. Tanzania is below this threshold — but the solution is to grow the base, not the rate.

Higher CIT Rate Reduced Investment Narrower Base Less Revenue
● Pattern 2
CIT Reductions Deliver Growth Multipliers

Corporate Income Tax rate reductions and targeted incentives — SEZs, preferential regimes — have repeatedly delivered higher FDI inflows, private credit expansion, and GDP growth multipliers far exceeding the initial revenue loss. Ireland: 32% → 12.5% CIT, and corporate tax revenues increased dramatically. Rwanda: 15% preferential CIT, 7–9% sustained growth.

Lower CIT More Investment Broader Base More Revenue
● Pattern 3
Private Credit & FDI Are the Real Growth Engines

Domestic credit to the private sector and FDI inflows are stronger predictors of long-term growth than raw tax collection. Singapore: >150% private credit/GDP. South Korea: ~176%. Tanzania: 16.4%. Every percentage point increase in private credit/GDP has a measurable multiplier effect on job creation, tax revenue, and GDP.

Tanzania 16.4% vs Singapore >150% vs S. Korea ~176%
Corporate Tax Rates vs. Average Annual GDP Growth
Lower CIT correlates consistently with stronger private investment and growth
Source: OECD, World Bank, IMF 2023–2024. Tanzania CIT 30% with 5.7% growth lags peers with lower CITs.
Tanzania Real GDP Growth — Historical Trend & Projection
Growth has been stable but structurally below the transformation potential required
Source: African Development Bank, IMF WEO October 2025. 2025–2026 are IMF/AfDB projections.

Cross-Sector Structural Problem Matrix — Severity Across 5 Key Sectors

The defining characteristic of Tanzania's structural problems is not that they exist within individual sectors — it is that the same underlying structural constraints recur across every sector simultaneously. This means sector-by-sector interventions, however well-designed, will be insufficient unless the cross-cutting structural roots are addressed.

RefStructural ProblemAgricultureIndustry / MfgEnergyFinanceEconomy-Wide
SP-1Energy Deficit & UnreliabilityCriticalCriticalCriticalHighHigh
SP-2Finance Shallowness & Credit ExclusionCriticalCriticalHighCriticalCritical
SP-3Skills Mismatch & Human Capital DeficitCriticalCriticalHighHighHigh
SP-4Informality (94.2% Informal Employment)CriticalCriticalMediumCriticalCritical
SP-5Infrastructure Gaps (Transport, Logistics, Digital)HighCriticalCriticalHighHigh
SP-6Institutional Weakness & Regulatory FragmentationCriticalCriticalHighHighCritical
SP-7Commodity Export Dependence & Low Value AdditionHighCriticalMediumMediumCritical
SP-8Import Dependence for Inputs & Capital GoodsHighCriticalHighCriticalHigh
SP-9Climate Vulnerability & Environmental DegradationCriticalMediumCriticalHighMedium
SP-10Implementation & Coordination FailureCriticalCriticalCriticalCriticalCritical
Structural Problem Pervasiveness — Count of "Critical" Ratings Across All Sectors
Higher bars = more cross-cutting structural blockage. SP-10 (Implementation Failure) and SP-2 (Finance) are the most pervasive.
Source: TICGL cross-sector severity mapping based on FYDP IV sectoral analysis (January 2026)

The Mutual Reinforcement Traps — Why Three FYDPs Could Not Break Them

Tanzania's structural problems do not operate independently. They form a self-reinforcing system that makes each problem harder to solve precisely because the others remain unresolved. This is the defining characteristic of a structural trap — and it is why three consecutive five-year plans have failed to break it.

● Critical Linkage 1
Energy Deficit → Manufacturing Stagnation

Energy is the primary input constraint for manufacturing. Without reliable, affordable power, factories cannot operate competitively, investment in productive capacity is discouraged, and manufacturing productivity gains are structurally blocked. Tanzania's 7.3% manufacturing share of GDP after three FYDPs targeting industrialisation is the result.

4,032 MW deficit Factory costs up Investment deters Mfg stagnates
● Critical Linkage 2
Finance Shallowness → Skills Deficit → Low Productivity

Shallow financial markets mean insufficient long-term credit for industrial investment; without investment, firms cannot adopt productivity-enhancing technology; without technology, demand for high-skilled workers does not emerge; without demand for skills, the education system does not supply them. A cascading structural chain.

Credit at 16.4% GDP No tech investment Skills stagnate Low productivity
● Critical Linkage 3 — Self-Reinforcing Loop
Informality → Finance Exclusion → Informality

Informal enterprises have no credit history, no collateral, and no formal cash flows — making them unbankable. Without bank credit, they cannot invest in productivity or formalise. Without formalisation, they remain excluded from the financial system. This is a structural chicken-and-egg trap. With 94.2% informal employment, this loop affects virtually the entire Tanzanian workforce.

94.2% informal No credit access Can't formalise Stays informal
● Critical Linkage 4
Commodity Dependence → Fiscal Volatility → Underinvestment

Tanzania's exports are dominated by gold, agricultural commodities and minerals — all price-takers in global markets. When commodity prices fall, the government cuts capital budgets. When they rise, the pressure to diversify reduces. This creates a self-sustaining commodity dependence cycle that no tax rate increase can interrupt.

Commodity exports Price volatility Cut capex No diversification
● Critical Linkage 5
Institutional Weakness → Plan Underperformance → Credibility Loss

FYDP III achieved 5.5% growth against an 8% target. Budget execution at 67%. PPP frameworks exist but not operationalised. Each failed plan makes the next harder to credibly implement: investors become sceptical, development partners reduce budget support, and public confidence weakens. The 67% execution rate is the meta-structural constraint on FYDP IV.

67% execution Targets missed Credibility lost Next plan harder
● High Linkage 6
Climate Vulnerability → Agricultural Instability → Reform Disruption

85% of Tanzanian farmland is rain-fed. When droughts occur, agricultural output falls, food prices rise, the current account deteriorates, fiscal pressure mounts, and political pressure shifts to subsidies rather than structural reform. Climate shocks derail structural transformation with regularity — a growing risk under FYDP IV's 2026–2031 window.

85% rain-fed Drought hits Food inflation Reform deferred
Structural Problem Interconnection — How Central Is Each Problem to the Trap?
Times each structural problem appears in mutual reinforcement chains — higher = more central to Tanzania's structural trap
Source: TICGL mutual reinforcement mapping; FYDP IV sectoral analysis 2026
🔴 The Structural Trap Analytical Conclusion

Tanzania's structural problems form an interlocking web. Solving any single problem in isolation does not break the trap — because the other problems immediately re-constrain the solution. Breaking the trap requires simultaneous progress on energy, finance, skills, informality, and institutional capacity. No tax rate increase addresses any of these five dimensions. FYDP IV's sequencing and prioritisation of structural reforms is therefore more important than the individual targets — or revenue targets — themselves.

What 8 Global Economies Prove: Enabler Over Tax Collector

Every country that has achieved sustained structural transformation did so by positioning government as an enabler of private capital, not a rate-maximising tax collector. The data from Singapore, Rwanda, Ireland, Estonia, Mauritius, Vietnam, South Korea, and Georgia give a clear, unambiguous answer to Tanzania's policy question.

CountryTax-to-GDPCIT RateAvg. GDP GrowthPrivate Credit/GDPKey EnablerStatus
🇹🇿 Tanzania13.1%30% Highest EAC5.3–5.7%16.4% Critical gapLimited — regulatory burden high; 266 parastatals competing with private sector⚠ Needs Reform
🇸🇬 Singapore13.6%17% + exemptions4–5%+>150% ★ World-classSEZ incentives, territorial tax, world-class logistics, zero capital gains✅ Model Example
🇷🇼 Rwanda15.7%15% preferential / 28% standard7–9%RisingRwanda Development Board, low corruption, business climate reforms✅ African Benchmark
🇮🇪 Ireland~22%12.5% effectiveHigh / EU-leadingExtremely HighDeliberate low-CIT strategy since 2003; pharma & tech FDI magnet✅ Model Example
🇪🇪 Estonia~20–22%0% on reinvested profitsAbove EU avg.HighDistribution-only CIT + world-leading e-governance; zero paper bureaucracy✅ Digital Leader
🇲🇺 MauritiusModerate15% flat rate4–5%HighFreeport/export incentives, 100% foreign ownership, zero capital gains✅ Africa's #1
🇻🇳 Vietnam~18–20%10–20% (SEZ preferential)6–7%Very HighDoi Moi reforms + massive SEZ incentives; Samsung, Intel, Nike anchors✅ Manufacturing Hub
🇰🇷 South Korea~28–29% (now)25% (now — rose AFTER transformation)Historical miracle~176%Private chaebols first; tax rose ONLY AFTER private sector was built📘 Historical Lesson
🇬🇪 Georgia~24%15%Sustained post-reformGrowingRose Revolution 2003: 21 taxes → 5; radical simplification + anti-corruption✅ Reform Model
Corporate Income Tax Rates — Tanzania vs. 8 Comparators (%)
Tanzania's 30% CIT is one of the highest among its development peers
Source: OECD Revenue Statistics 2024; national tax authorities. Tanzania highlighted in red.
Average Annual GDP Growth vs. CIT Rate — 8 Countries + Tanzania
Countries with lower CITs and stronger private enablement consistently grow faster
Source: World Bank WDI 2023; IMF WEO 2024; AfDB Economic Outlook 2024
✅ The South Korea Sequencing Lesson — Most Important for Tanzania

South Korea's Tax-to-GDP rose from ~10–12% to ~28% over four decades — but it rose because the private sector was built first. Tanzania must learn this sequencing: Enable the private sector → broaden the base → collect higher revenues as a consequence of growth, not as a precondition for it. No successful developing economy has ever reversed this sequence and succeeded.

Not a single developing-country success story relied primarily on tax increases without simultaneous private-sector reforms. Enable first. Collect second.

— TICGL Research synthesis of OECD, World Bank, IMF global evidence, 2026

Chanzo cha Utafiti Huu — Source Research Articles

Utafiti Huu Unatokana na Makala Mbili za TICGL

This synthesis research draws directly from two original TICGL publications. For deeper reading, primary data, additional charts, and full citations — access both source articles below. Tunakushukuru kwa kusoma; tafadhali tembelea makala asili kwa maelezo zaidi.

📊 TICGL Research · FYDP IV Cross-Sectoral Analysis

Tanzania's Deep-Rooted Structural Constraints Across Key Economic Sectors

A comprehensive analysis of structural problems persisting across Agriculture, Manufacturing, Energy, Finance, and Governance — and the threats they pose to FYDP IV's USD 183 billion transformation agenda (2026/27–2030/31).

FYDP IV Analysis 5 Sectors 10 Structural Problems Published March 2026
Soma Makala Asili →
📈 TICGL Research · Tax Policy & Enabler State Analysis

Why Raising Taxes Alone Is Insufficient for Tanzania's Development

Empirical evidence from 8 global economies demonstrates that the path to sustainable development requires government to act as an enabler of private sector growth — not merely as a tax collector.

8 Country Evidence Tax Policy FDI & SEZ Reform Published April 2026
Soma Makala Asili →

Tanzania's SEZ & EPZ Framework — The TISEZA 2025 Revolution

Tanzania's Special Economic Zones have the architecture of an enabler state — but implementation gaps have historically limited their potential. TISEZA's 2025 reforms are producing dramatic, measurable results: proof that structural reform — not tax increases — drives the transformation Tanzania needs.

37%
FDI Projects Growth Year-on-Year
TISEZA Q1 2025/26 Bulletin
1,053%
EPZ/SEZ Jobs Surge in Q1 2025/26
TISEZA Quarterly Bulletin
204%
EPZ/SEZ Turnover Jump to US$127.53M
TISEZA 2025
212,293
Total Jobs Created in 2024 — Highest Since 1991
TISEZA / TIC 2024
✅ The TISEZA Reform Proof Point

Parliament passed the Tanzania Investment and Special Economic Zones Authority (TISEZA) Act No. 6 of 2025 in February 2025, merging TIC and EPZA into a single streamlined authority. The first full quarter produced extraordinary results: FDI projects up 37%, EPZ/SEZ jobs surging 1,053%, turnover jumping 204%. These are not incremental improvements — they are the structural reform model working in real time. No tax rate change produced these results.

SEZ Employment — Tanzania Historical vs. Global Peers at Peak Year (2008)
Tanzania's SEZ job creation has historically lagged peers dramatically; TISEZA reforms are accelerating catch-up
Source: Charter Cities Institute 2024; UNCTAD; TISEZA 2025
Tanzania EPZ/SEZ Exports as % of National Exports — Historical Trend
SEZ exports have grown from negligible to a meaningful share — but still well below potential
Source: TISEZA; EPZA historical reports; TICGL analysis 2025

Tanzania's EPZ/SEZ Offer vs. Global Best Practice

Incentive AreaTanzania EPZ/SEZ (Current)Vietnam SEZ (Benchmark)Rwanda / Mauritius Best PracticeGap Assessment
Corporate Tax Holiday10-year holiday on CIT10–15 year holiday + 50% reduction afterRwanda: up to 7-year + 15% preferential⚠ Competitive — needs extension
VAT on Raw MaterialsExemptExemptExempt✅ On par
Import Duty on Capital GoodsExemptExemptExempt✅ On par
Withholding TaxExempt (10-year holiday)Exempt during holidayMauritius: 0% on most distributions⚠ Mauritius more attractive long-term
Foreign Worker PermitsUp to 10 non-citizens; max 8-year work permitsUnrestricted for key roles in SEZsRwanda: No quota for priority sector investors❌ Restrictive — deters skills transfer
Land Access / TenureLand bank; 99-year leases (2023 policy)50–75 year lease, clear title systemMauritius: 60-year leases + investor protection⚠ Improving — disputes affect ~20% projects
One-Stop CentreTISEZA OSFC launched 2025; 2,695 consultations Q1Fully digital, <5 days registrationRwanda: <6 hours company registration🔄 Improving — cut from 60→30 days
Infrastructure in Zones10 of 14 parks still in development; Bagamoyo started Dec 2025Full infrastructure standard in all SEZsMauritius Freeport: world-class logistics❌ Critical gap — biggest investor constraint
Customs ProcessingOn-site customs inspectionOn-site + pre-clearance48-hour clearance target⚠ Adequate — needs digitisation upgrade
🌊
Game Changer · Bagamoyo Eco Maritime City

The Infrastructure Anchor Tanzania Always Needed

After a decade-long delay, the Bagamoyo Eco Maritime City SEZ port construction commenced in December 2025. Spanning 1,000+ hectares on the Indian Ocean coast, the SEZ is designed to add up to 20 million tons of annual cargo capacity — positioning Tanzania as East Africa's maritime gateway. Combined with the standard-gauge railway reducing freight costs by 40%, this represents the most significant enabling infrastructure investment in Tanzania's post-independence history.

1,000+ hectares 20M ton/yr target Started Dec 2025 SGR: −40% freight costs

Tanzania's FDI Revolution — What the Data Reveals

Tanzania's FDI story in 2024 is one of the most striking in Sub-Saharan Africa — a 400%+ surge driven entirely by enabling policy reforms, not tax changes. This directly validates the structural argument: when government removes friction, private capital responds.

400%+
FDI Surge: USD 1.3B (2023) → USD 6.56B (2024)
TICGL FDI Analysis 2025
901
FDI Projects Registered in 2024
TIC / TISEZA 2024
28.3%
East Africa's Fastest FDI Growth Rate (Regional avg: 12%)
TICGL 2024
377
Manufacturing FDI Projects Leading All Sectors (2023)
TIC / TISEZA 2023
USD 1.36B
FDI in Q3 of 2024/25 alone
TISEZA Q3 2024/25
#1
Africa's Leading Destination — World Travel Awards 2025
World Travel Awards 2025
Tanzania FDI Inflows — Historical Trajectory & 2024 Surge (USD Billions)
FDI surged 400%+ from 2023 to 2024 following the Investment Act 2022, TISEZA formation, and land lease reform
Source: TICGL FDI Analysis 2025; TIC; UNCTAD. 2024 figure includes TIC-registered project capital (901 projects).
Tanzania FDI Capital by Sector — 2024 Registered Projects (USD Billions)
Manufacturing, transport and energy dominate — all enable private-sector-led productive capacity
Source: TICGL / TISEZA 2024 registered project data.
✅ The Proof Point: What Drove the FDI Surge?

Tanzania's FDI surge did not come from raising the Corporate Income Tax. It came from: (1) Tanzania Investment Act 2022; (2) National Land Policy 2023 — 99-year leases; (3) Electronic Investment Window reducing registration from 60 to 30 days; (4) Formation of TISEZA in 2025. Every major driver was a regulatory/facilitation reform — not a tax rate change.

FDI Inflows: Tanzania vs. EAC Comparators — 2023 vs. 2024 (USD Billions)
Tanzania surged to lead East Africa in FDI growth — driven by structural enabling reforms, not tax changes
Source: UNCTAD; AfDB Economic Outlook 2024; TICGL FDI Analysis 2025.

The Regulatory Burden — Tanzania's Hidden Implicit Tax on Private Investment

Beyond the formal 30% Corporate Income Tax, a cumbersome regulatory environment functions as an additional implicit tax — reducing productivity, deterring investment, and inflating the cost of doing business. The IMF's 2025 Selected Issues Paper provides econometric proof.

❌ Tanzania's Current Constraints
  • 14% of senior management time on regulations vs. 8% SSA average (IMF Enterprise Survey 2023)
  • 34% of firms report power outages as a major constraint (World Bank Enterprise Survey 2023)
  • 141st out of 190 — Tanzania's last World Bank Ease of Doing Business ranking (2020)
  • Tax administration cited as top barrier to firm productivity — IMF SIP 2025
  • Only 45% of mainland population connected to electricity
  • Land disputes affect ~20% of investment projects
  • 266 public parastatals competing with sovereign credit guarantees
✅ What Enabler States Deliver
  • Rwanda: <6 hours company registration (Rwanda Development Board)
  • Estonia: Zero paper bureaucracy — all government services 100% digital
  • Singapore: 1–3 days business registration; ranked #1 globally in EoDB for over a decade
  • Georgia: 5 taxes down from 21 post-2003 reform
  • Vietnam: SEZ investors get on-site all-government services — customs, permits, banking in zone
  • Mauritius: 100% foreign ownership, no capital gains tax, no dividend tax
  • Ireland: Consistent, predictable rule of law — zero retroactive investment contract changes

Business Environment Constraint Priority — Tanzania 2025

Constraint AreaTanzania SeverityImpact on TFPFirms AffectedReform Priority
Tax Administration ComplexityCriticalStatistically Significant Negative (IMF SIP 2025)Majority of formal firms🔴 Urgent
Access to Finance / CreditCriticalStatistically Significant Negative (IMF SIP 2025)~70% of SMEs🔴 Urgent
Transport / Logistics AccessHighStatistically Significant Negative (IMF SIP 2025)Rural & agro-firms especially🔴 Urgent
Electricity / Power OutagesHighNegative (non-parametric evidence)34% of firms report as major issue🟡 High
Regulatory Burden / LicensingHighNegative (non-parametric evidence)14% management time consumed🟡 High
Land Acquisition & TitleModerate-HighReduces investment certainty~20% of investment projects🟡 High
Corruption / Facilitation PaymentsImprovingNo significant regression evidence (2023)TI score improved 86% since 2001🔵 Continue Progress
Trade & Cross-Border ObstaclesModerateReduces export competitivenessExport-oriented firms🟡 High
Regulatory Compliance Burden — Management Time on Regulations (%)
Tanzania's 14% vs. SSA average 8% represents a 6pp productivity gap — a hidden implicit tax on every productive business
Source: IMF Enterprise Survey 2023; World Bank Enterprise Survey 2023; TICGL compilation

From Tax Collector to Enabler State — A Data-Driven Policy Roadmap

Drawing on the 8-country evidence base and Tanzania's own structural baseline, this roadmap outlines specific, sequenced reforms with measurable targets at each stage.

01
Immediate Priority · 0–12 Months

Reform Corporate Tax: Target 20–25% CIT with Broad Preferential Regime

Reduce the standard CIT from 30% to 20–25%, bringing Tanzania in line with regional peers. Simultaneously, expand preferential CIT rates (15%) for priority sectors: agro-processing, manufacturing, ICT, and renewable energy. Revenue cost will be recovered within 2–3 years through an expanded tax base — as demonstrated in Ireland (2003), Rwanda, and Vietnam.

CIT → 20–25%Priority sectors: 15%SEZ post-holiday: ≤15%FDI response: 6–18 months
02
Short-Term · 6–24 Months

Accelerate TISEZA & SEZ Infrastructure — Complete the Bagamoyo Catalyst

TISEZA has demonstrated proof-of-concept: 1,053% surge in SEZ jobs in one quarter. Priority: complete Bagamoyo Eco Maritime City on schedule, electrify all 14 EPZ/SEZ parks, reduce company registration to under 5 days (from 30), implement digital customs clearance. Tanzania's SEZ exports were only 2.5% of national exports in 2016 — they should reach 10–15% within a decade if infrastructure constraints are resolved.

Registration → <5 daysAll 14 parks poweredBagamoyo Phase 1: 2027
03
Medium-Term · 1–3 Years

Resolve the Private Credit Gap — Double Private Sector Credit to GDP

Tanzania's private sector credit at 16.4% of GDP is one of the most binding constraints on growth. IMF confirms access to finance is the single biggest productivity constraint for Tanzanian manufacturers. Required: expand credit bureau coverage, establish collateral registry legal framework, reduce NPL thresholds, promote SME development finance. Target: private credit/GDP to 30–35% within 5 years.

Private credit → 30–35% GDPCollateral registry: 2026
04
Medium-Term · 2–4 Years

Slash the Regulatory Burden — Implement Blueprint for Regulatory Reform II at Speed

Tanzania's MKUMBI II reform blueprint exists — but implementation has been described as "incremental." Target: reduce senior management time on regulations from 14% to below the SSA average of 8% within 3 years. Digitise all government-business interactions, establish firm timelines with automatic approval if deadline is missed.

Mgmt time → <8%All biz services digital by 2027
05
Structural · 3–7 Years

Restructure Public Spending — Shift from Recurrent to Capital & Human Capital

Tanzania's recurrent spending consumes 58–70% of the budget — leaving too little for education (3.3% of GDP vs. UNESCO benchmark of 4–6%) and health (1.2% of GDP vs. WHO benchmark of 5%). The IMF benchmarking shows Tanzania needs a 14pp increase in private sector participation in education and 23pp in health.

Education → 4.5% GDPHealth → 2.5% GDPRecurrent share → <55%
06
Long-Term · 5–10 Years — The Revenue Reward

Broaden the Tax Base — Not the Rates

Once private sector activity has expanded and regulatory friction reduced, the natural result is a broader tax base. With nominal GDP at TZS 275 trillion in 2026, each 1pp increase in the tax-to-GDP ratio represents TZS 2.75 trillion in revenue. The goal is 16–18% tax-to-GDP through a broader base — not higher rates on the existing narrow base.

Tax-to-GDP → 16–18% by 2030Via broader base, not higher rates
Enabler State Roadmap — Key Metric Targets vs. Current Status
TICGL projection based on Rwanda, Vietnam and Ireland reform trajectories. Current = 2025; Target = 2030 aspirational benchmark.
Targets are TICGL analytical estimates. Sources: IMF WEO 2025; World Bank; TISEZA; TRA; MoFP.

Frequently Raised Objections — Data-Driven Responses

A rigorous response to the most common counter-arguments against the enabler-state model for Tanzania.

The Choice Before Tanzania — Enable First, Collect Second

Tanzania stands at a genuine inflection point. The enabling reforms of 2022–2025 have already triggered a measurable private investment response. The question is whether Tanzania will consolidate this momentum or retreat toward higher rates on a narrow base.

The Enabler State Virtuous Cycle — Growth, Revenue & Private Investment
Stylised projection based on Tanzania's data and Rwanda/Ireland/Vietnam trajectories
Source: TICGL Research Unit 2026. Illustrative projection. Rwanda: 7–9% sustained growth corridor. Ireland: CIT reduction led to higher corporate tax revenues within 5 years.
Finding 01

Tanzania's Structural Constraints Are Real and Documented

Ten structural constraints across five sectors form an interlocking trap persisting across three FYDPs. FYDP IV's own Theory of Change acknowledges this. The diagnosis is not contested.

Finding 02

No Tax Rate Increase Can Address a Structural Trap

Higher CIT rates cannot build energy infrastructure. They cannot formalise 94.2% informal employment. They cannot deepen private sector credit from 16.4% to 35% of GDP. Only structural reform can.

Finding 03

Tanzania's Own 2024 Data Prove the Enabler Model Works

FDI surged 400%. EPZ/SEZ jobs surged 1,053%. 212,293 jobs — highest since 1991. Not one result came from a tax rate change. All came from structural enabling reforms.

"

Tanzania's Vision 2050 goal of an industrialised, upper-middle-income economy will not be achieved by raising the Corporate Income Tax from 30% to anything higher. It will be achieved by reducing it, completing Bagamoyo, fixing the private credit market, and trusting the private sector to be the engine of structural transformation.

— TICGL Economic Research Unit, April 2026

Serikali lazima iwe enabler — si mkusanyaji wa kodi tu.

The data are clear. The path is proven. The time is now.

📚 Soma Zaidi — Read the Original TICGL Research

Want the Full Data, Charts & Detailed Analysis?

Access both original TICGL research articles that power this synthesis — complete with additional charts, extended methodology, primary data tables, and sector-specific deep dives.

📊 Tanzania's Deep-Rooted Structural Constraints → 📈 Why Raising Taxes Alone Is Insufficient →
Tanzania National Debt Analysis 2026 | BOT Monthly Economic Review | TICGL
BOT Monthly Economic Review · March 2026

Tanzania National Debt:
Deep-Dive Analysis — February 2026

A comprehensive breakdown of Tanzania's total national debt of USD 51.1 billion — covering external obligations, domestic instruments, creditor structures, currency composition and debt-service trajectories as reported by the Bank of Tanzania.

📅 Reference Period: February 2026 🏦 Source: Bank of Tanzania ✍️ Analysis: TICGL Research 📍 Dar es Salaam
Total National Debt
$51.1B
USD Millions · Feb 2026
▼ 0.2% MoM
External Debt Stock
$35.9B
70.2% of total debt
▼ 0.1% MoM
Domestic Debt Stock
TZS 38.8T
≈ USD 15.3B
▲ 0.5% MoM
Multilateral Share
57.8%
Of external debt stock
Largest creditor category
USD Dominance
66.0%
Currency composition
Euro: 17.7%
National Debt Overview

Tanzania's total national debt — comprising both external and domestic obligations — stood at USD 51,112.8 million at end-February 2026, reflecting a marginal contraction of 0.2% from January 2026.

Total Debt (Feb 2026)
$51,112.8M
National debt stock, USD millions
External Debt Share
70.2%
of total national debt
Domestic Debt Share
29.8%
of total national debt
MoM Change
▼ 0.2%
vs. January 2026
Key Context: Tanzania's national debt split of 70.2% external / 29.8% domestic reflects the country's continued reliance on concessional external financing to fund infrastructure and development programmes. The slight overall contraction in February 2026 was driven primarily by a small decline in the external debt portfolio.
Total Debt Composition
Feb 2026 · USD Millions

Source: Ministry of Finance & Bank of Tanzania

Total Debt Stock — Monthly Trend
Feb 2025 – Feb 2026 · USD Millions

Source: Bank of Tanzania, Table A10

External Debt Analysis

Tanzania's external debt (public and private combined) reached USD 35,859.1 million at end-February 2026 — a decline of 0.1% from January 2026. Central government accounts for the dominant share at 82.7%.

External Debt Stock
$35,859.1M
End Feb 2026 (provisional)
Public Debt Share
82.7%
Central government
Private Sector Share
17.3%
Of external debt
Disbursements (Feb)
$83.8M
Mainly central govt
Debt Service (Feb)
$98.9M
Principal + Interest
External Debt Stock by Borrower
USD Millions · Feb-25 vs Jan-26 vs Feb-26
Borrower CategoryFeb-25 (USD M)Share %Jan-26 (USD M)Share %Feb-26 (USD M)Share %
Central Government26,394.480.5%29,687.282.7%29,640.482.7%
Disbursed Outstanding (DOD)26,317.180.3%29,606.982.5%29,560.282.4%
Interest Arrears77.30.2%80.30.2%80.20.2%
Private Sector6,389.919.5%6,204.717.3%6,218.717.3%
Disbursed Outstanding (DOD)5,827.217.8%5,770.316.1%5,774.316.1%
Interest Arrears562.81.7%434.31.2%444.51.2%
Public Corporations3.80.0%0.00.0%0.00.0%
Total External Debt32,788.0100%35,891.9100%35,859.1100%

Source: Ministry of Finance and Bank of Tanzania · p = provisional data

External Debt Trend — Monthly
Feb 2025 – Feb 2026 · USD Millions (Selected months)

Source: Bank of Tanzania, Table A10

Creditor Composition

Multilateral institutions remain the dominant creditors at 57.8% of the external debt stock, followed by commercial lenders at 35.7%. Bilateral creditors account for just 4.4%.

Creditor Composition — Feb 2026
Percentage share of external debt stock
Multilateral57.8% · $20,730.5M
Commercial35.7% · $12,818.5M
Bilateral4.4% · $1,581.3M
Export Credit2.0% · $728.8M
External Debt by Creditors — Detail
USD Millions
CreditorFeb-25Jan-26Feb-26Share %
Multilateral18,366.120,788.220,730.557.8%
DOD18,335.120,765.120,707.657.7%
Interest Arrears31.023.222.90.1%
Bilateral1,349.51,591.61,581.34.4%
Commercial11,918.012,786.312,818.535.7%
DOD11,557.712,427.912,452.934.7%
Interest Arrears360.3358.4365.61.0%
Export Credit1,154.5725.7728.82.0%
Total32,788.035,891.935,859.1100%

Source: Ministry of Finance and Bank of Tanzania

Debt by Borrower Category

Central government dominates at 82.7% of total external debt. The private sector's share has slightly declined while public corporations now hold zero outstanding external debt.

Borrower Share Evolution — Feb 2025 to Feb 2026
Percentage share of disbursed outstanding debt

Source: Ministry of Finance and Bank of Tanzania

Notable: Public corporations (TANESCO, ATCL, TRC, TPA, TFC and DAWASA) now hold zero outstanding external debt as at February 2026, compared to USD 3.8 million in February 2025 — reflecting debt clearance efforts within state-owned enterprises.
Currency Composition of External Debt

The US Dollar dominates Tanzania's external debt currency mix at 66.0%, followed by the Euro at 17.7% and Chinese Yuan at 6.5%. This concentration creates exchange-rate sensitivity.

Currency Breakdown — Feb 2026
% share of disbursed outstanding debt
🇺🇸 US Dollar66.0% · $23,317.8M
🇪🇺 Euro17.7% · $6,255.8M
🇨🇳 Chinese Yuan6.5% · $2,306.3M
🌐 Other Currencies9.8% · $3,454.6M
Currency Composition Trend
% share — Feb 2025 vs Jan 2026 vs Feb 2026
CurrencyFeb-25Jan-26Feb-26
US Dollar67.6%65.9%66.0%
Euro16.7%17.7%17.7%
Chinese Yuan6.3%6.5%6.5%
Other9.3%9.8%9.8%
Total100%100%100%

Source: Ministry of Finance and Bank of Tanzania

Disbursed Outstanding Debt by Use of Funds

BoP & budget support and transport/telecommunications jointly account for over 44% of total disbursed external debt. Social welfare and education holds a significant 19.3% share.

Use of Funds — Percentage Share
Feb 2025 vs Feb 2026 (Provisional)

Source: Ministry of Finance and Bank of Tanzania

Use of Funds — Detailed Breakdown
% share of disbursed outstanding debt
ActivityFeb-25 (%)Jan-26 (%)Feb-26 (%)Change
BoP & Budget Support20.922.622.5+1.6pp YoY
Transport & Telecommunication21.221.821.9+0.7pp YoY
Social Welfare & Education20.019.419.3−0.7pp YoY
Energy & Mining13.112.012.0−1.1pp YoY
Real Estate & Construction4.84.94.9+0.1pp YoY
Finance & Insurance4.53.53.5−1.0pp YoY
Agriculture4.85.35.3+0.5pp YoY
Industries3.63.73.7+0.1pp YoY
Tourism1.61.81.8+0.2pp YoY
Other5.54.94.9−0.6pp YoY
Total100.0100.0100.0

pp = percentage points · Source: Ministry of Finance and Bank of Tanzania

Domestic Debt Analysis

Tanzania's domestic debt stock reached TZS 38,781.7 billion at end-February 2026, a 0.5% monthly increase. Treasury bonds dominate at 80.8% of total domestic debt, held predominantly by commercial banks and pension funds.

Domestic Debt Stock
TZS 38.8T
End Feb 2026 (provisional)
Treasury Bonds Share
80.8%
Of government securities
MoM Change
+0.5%
vs. January 2026
Govt Securities Issued
TZS 621.9B
In February 2026
Debt Servicing (Feb)
TZS 875.2B
Principal + Interest
Domestic Debt by Borrowing Instrument
TZS Billions · Feb 2026 (Provisional)
InstrumentFeb-25 (TZS B)Feb-26 (TZS B)Share %
Government Bonds27,073.731,333.280.8%
Treasury Bills1,847.41,653.04.3%
Government Stocks187.1135.70.4%
Tax Certificates0.10.10.0%
Overdraft (Non-Securitised)4,887.55,659.614.6%
Total34,014.138,781.7100%

Source: Ministry of Finance and Bank of Tanzania

Domestic Debt by Creditor Category
TZS Billions · Feb 2026 (Provisional)
HolderFeb-25 (TZS B)Feb-26 (TZS B)Share %
Commercial Banks9,791.410,834.327.9%
Pension Funds9,097.210,463.927.0%
Bank of Tanzania6,847.57,468.419.3%
Others5,872.87,273.818.8%
Insurance1,852.31,983.55.1%
BOT Special Funds552.7757.82.0%
Total34,014.138,781.7100%

Source: Ministry of Finance and Bank of Tanzania

Domestic Debt Stock — Historical Trend
TZS Billions · Feb 2018 – Feb 2026

Source: Ministry of Finance

Commercial Banks & Pension Funds collectively hold 54.9% of Tanzania's domestic debt — TZS 21,298.2 billion — underscoring the banking sector's key role as a financing conduit for government operations and the importance of pension fund governance in debt sustainability.
Debt Service Flows — February 2026

In February 2026, Tanzania's external debt service totalled USD 98.9 million while domestic debt servicing reached TZS 875.2 billion. Net external flows remained positive at USD 48.4 million.

External Debt Service — Feb 2026
USD Millions
Total Service
$98.9M
Feb 2026
Principal
$35.4M
Repayments
Interest
$63.5M
Payments

Source: Bank of Tanzania, Table A10

Domestic Debt Service — Feb 2026
TZS Billions
Total Service
TZS 875.2B
Feb 2026
Principal
TZS 472.2B
Repayments
Interest
TZS 403.0B
Payments

Source: Bank of Tanzania

External Debt Service — Monthly Trend
USD Millions · Feb 2025 – Feb 2026 (Selected Months)

Source: Bank of Tanzania, Table A10

Historical Debt Trend — Tanzania

Tanzania's external debt has grown significantly over the decade, rising from USD 20.5 billion in 2018 to USD 35.9 billion in February 2026 — an increase of approximately 75% over eight years.

Annual External & Domestic Debt Stock
USD Millions · Annual Data (Selected Economic Indicators)
YearExternal Debt (USD M)Domestic Debt (TZS B equiv.)Disbursed (USD M)Interest Arrears (USD M)
201820,503.013,74218,765.11,737.9
201921,920.914,06920,029.31,891.7
202022,952.714,64420,958.41,994.3
202125,519.315,87423,250.92,268.4
202227,832.522,15925,392.82,439.7
202330,252.727,26727,889.32,363.4
202431,950.931,73930,416.11,534.8
2025p34,765.334,01434,053.0712.3
Feb 2026p35,859.138,78235,334.4~525

Source: Bank of Tanzania Selected Economic Indicators (Table A1) & Table A10 · p = provisional

Positive Trend: Despite rising debt levels, interest arrears have declined sharply from a peak of USD 2,439.7 million in 2022 to approximately USD 524.7 million in February 2026 — a 78% reduction — signalling improved debt management discipline and timely servicing by the Government of Tanzania.
Tanzania Financial Markets 2026: Government Securities & Interbank Cash Market | TICGL
T-Bill WAY (Feb-26)
5.68%
Overall Weighted Avg Yield
▼ −21bps MoM
T-Bill Tender (Feb-26)
1,061.4B
TZS · Total bids received
2.4x oversubscribed
T-Bill Successful Bids
431.1B
TZS · vs Offer 440.9B
97.8% of offer
15-Yr Bond WAY
10.78%
Feb-26 · Down from 12.08%
▼ −130bps
25-Yr Bond WAY
11.99%
Feb-26 · Down from 13.19%
▼ −120bps
IBCM Total Volume
2,796.5B
TZS · Feb-26
▼ from 2,868.9B
IBCM Overall Rate
6.34%
Feb-26 · Eased
▼ from 6.40% Jan-26
7-Day IBCM Share
63.5%
of total activity
Dominant tenor

GOVERNMENT SECURITIES — TREASURY BILLS

Tanzania's Treasury bill market was characterised by persistent oversubscription in February 2026, reflecting robust investor appetite driven by stable macroeconomic conditions. The Bank conducted two auctions with a combined tender size of TZS 440.9 billion, attracting total bids of TZS 1,061.4 billion — a tender-to-offer ratio of approximately 2.4x. The surge in demand compressed the overall weighted average yield (WAY) further to 5.68 percent from 5.89 percent in January 2026, continuing a structural downward trend from the 11.93 percent recorded in February 2025.

Treasury Bill · Combined Feb-26
All Tenors Combined
OFFER (TZS B)440.9
TENDER (TZS B)1,061.4
SUCCESSFUL (TZS B)431.1
BID-TO-OFFER RATIO2.41x
OVERALL WAY (%)5.68
PREV MONTH WAY (%)5.89
CHANGE (BPS)▼ −21bps
T-Bill · 35-Day
35-Day Treasury Bill
YIELD JAN-26 (%)5.36
YIELD FEB-26 (%)4.75
CHANGE (BPS)▼ −61bps
YIELD FEB-25 (%)6.50
YoY CHANGE (BPS)▼ −175bps
T-Bill · 91-Day
91-Day Treasury Bill
YIELD JAN-26 (%)5.73
YIELD FEB-26 (%)4.97
CHANGE (BPS)▼ −76bps
YIELD FEB-25 (%)7.76
YoY CHANGE (BPS)▼ −279bps
T-Bill · 182-Day
182-Day Treasury Bill
YIELD JAN-26 (%)5.85
YIELD FEB-26 (%)5.85
CHANGE (BPS)→ 0bps
YIELD FEB-25 (%)8.20
YoY CHANGE (BPS)▼ −235bps
T-Bill · 364-Day
364-Day Treasury Bill
YIELD JAN-26 (%)6.21
YIELD FEB-26 (%)6.20
CHANGE (BPS)▼ −1bps
YIELD FEB-25 (%)11.99
YoY CHANGE (BPS)▼ −579bps
// AUCTION OVERSUBSCRIPTION ANALYSIS — Treasury Bills (Feb-26)
TENDER vs OFFER RATIO (All T-Bills) 2.41x OVERSUBSCRIBED
0Offer: TZS 440.9BTender: TZS 1,061.4B →
BOND TENDER vs OFFER (15+25-Yr Combined) 6.95x OVERSUBSCRIBED
0Offer: TZS 399.5BBids: TZS 2,778.1B →
// T-BILL WAY TREND — Jan-25 to Feb-26
Overall Weighted Average Yield (%) · Monthly
// AUCTION PERFORMANCE — Offer vs Tender vs Successful (TZS B)
Feb-25 to Feb-26 · Monthly
// T-BILL YIELDS BY TENOR — Monthly Trend (Jan-25 to Feb-26)
Weighted Average Yield (%) for 35, 91, 182, 364-Day Treasury Bills

// TABLE A4 — TREASURY BILL RATES (Selected Months)

% per annum · Source: Bank of Tanzania MER March 2026
TenorJan-25Feb-25Mar-25Apr-25Jun-25Aug-25Oct-25Dec-25Jan-26Feb-26YoY Δ (bps)
35-Day6.506.506.506.506.506.505.645.385.364.75▼ −175
91-Day7.767.767.427.507.507.366.085.935.734.97▼ −279
182-Day8.208.208.208.478.247.465.925.915.855.85▼ −235
364-Day12.6311.9910.118.928.926.796.456.246.216.20▼ −579
Overall WAY12.5111.9310.108.868.896.836.255.875.895.68▼ −625
Source: Table A4 — Interest Rates Structure · Bank of Tanzania MER March 2026 · bps = basis points

GOVERNMENT SECURITIES — TREASURY BONDS

The Bank conducted auctions for 15-year and 25-year Treasury bonds in February 2026, offering a combined tender size of TZS 399.5 billion. These attracted exceptional demand with bids worth TZS 2,778.1 billion — a 6.95x oversubscription ratio — of which TZS 520.2 billion were successful. Weighted average yields to maturity fell sharply: the 15-year bond to 10.78 percent and the 25-year bond to 11.99 percent.

Treasury Bond · Feb-26 Combined
15-Year & 25-Year
COMBINED OFFER (TZS B)399.5
TOTAL BIDS (TZS B)2,778.1
SUCCESSFUL (TZS B)520.2
BID-TO-OFFER RATIO6.95x
Treasury Bond · 15-Year
15-Year Government Bond
WAY TO MATURITY (%)10.78
PREV MONTH (%)12.08
FEB-25 (%)15.76
YoY CHANGE (BPS)▼ −498bps
MoM CHANGE (BPS)▼ −130bps
Treasury Bond · 25-Year
25-Year Government Bond
WAY TO MATURITY (%)11.99
PREV MONTH (%)13.19
FEB-25 (%)15.84
YoY CHANGE (BPS)▼ −385bps
MoM CHANGE (BPS)▼ −120bps
// BOND YIELDS BY TENOR — Monthly Trend (Jan-25 to Feb-26)
2-Yr, 5-Yr, 10-Yr, 15-Yr, 25-Yr · % per annum
// BOND AUCTION: OFFER vs BIDS vs SUCCESSFUL (TZS B)
Monthly Bond Issuance for Financing · Feb-25 to Feb-26

// TABLE A4 — TREASURY BOND RATES (Selected Months)

% per annum · Source: Bank of Tanzania MER March 2026
TenorJan-25Feb-25Apr-25Jun-25Aug-25Oct-25Dec-25Jan-26Feb-26YoY Δ (bps)
2-Year Bond11.6412.5512.0812.0812.1710.0510.0510.0510.05▼ −250
5-Year Bond12.4112.4113.1412.9413.1810.5410.5410.5410.54▼ −187
7-Year Bond9.719.719.719.719.719.719.719.719.71→ 0
10-Year Bond14.0814.0814.2614.2613.7412.4512.4511.3011.30▼ −278
15-Year Bond15.7615.7614.6314.6313.9112.0812.0812.0810.78▼ −498
20-Year Bond15.7115.2815.1114.5014.5013.5512.0212.0212.02▼ −326
25-Year Bond15.8415.8415.8414.8014.4213.1913.1913.1911.99▼ −385
Source: Table A4 — Interest Rates Structure · Bank of Tanzania MER March 2026 · bps = basis points

TANZANIA YIELD CURVE

The Tanzania government securities yield curve has undergone dramatic bull-flattening over the past twelve months. Short-end yields have collapsed by over 600 basis points while long-end yields have declined 300–500 basis points, reflecting improving macroeconomic conditions, strong liquidity in the banking system, and BoT monetary policy anchoring via the 5.75% Central Bank Rate.

// TANZANIA SOVEREIGN YIELD CURVE — Three-Period Comparison
Feb-25 · Jan-26 · Feb-26 · % per annum · All Tenors from 35-Day to 25-Year
// CURRENT YIELD SNAPSHOT — February 2026 · % per annum
35-Day
4.75
T-Bill
▼ −175bps YoY
91-Day
4.97
T-Bill
▼ −279bps YoY
182-Day
5.85
T-Bill
▼ −235bps YoY
364-Day
6.20
T-Bill
▼ −579bps YoY
2-Year
10.05
T-Bond
▼ −250bps YoY
5-Year
10.54
T-Bond
▼ −187bps YoY
7-Year
9.71
T-Bond
→ 0bps
10-Year
11.30
T-Bond
▼ −278bps YoY
15-Year
10.78
T-Bond
▼ −498bps YoY
20-Year
12.02
T-Bond
▼ −326bps YoY
25-Year
11.99
T-Bond
▼ −385bps YoY
CBR (Policy)
5.75
BoT Anchor
Q1 2026
Source: Table A4 · Bank of Tanzania MER March 2026 · CBR = Central Bank Rate (held at 5.75% for Q1 2026)

INTERBANK CASH MARKET

The interbank cash market (IBCM) continued to facilitate shilling liquidity trading among banks in February 2026. Total transaction value decreased slightly to TZS 2,796.5 billion from TZS 2,868.9 billion. The market remained dominated by 7-day transactions at 63.5 percent of total activity. The overall IBCM rate eased to 6.34 percent from 6.40 percent, consistent with adequate banking system liquidity and the CBR anchor of 5.75 percent.

Total Volume (Feb-26)
2,796.5B
TZS · ▼ from 2,868.9B Jan-26
7-Day Share
63.5%
Dominant tenor · Short-term preference
Overall IBCM Rate
6.34%
▼ from 6.40% Jan-26
Overnight Rate
6.01%
▼ from 6.13% Jan-26
7-Day Rate
6.31%
▼ from 6.34% Jan-26
Policy Rate (CBR)
5.75%
Q1 2026 · IBCM spread: +59bps
// IBCM TOTAL VOLUME & RATE TREND (Jan-25 to Feb-26)
TZS Billions (LHS) · Rate % (RHS)
// IBCM TRANSACTION STRUCTURE — Feb-26
Share by Tenor: 7-Day vs Overnight vs Other
// IBCM 7-DAY RATE vs CBR POLICY RATE — Jan-25 to Feb-26
% per annum · Upper Band (+2pp) & Lower Band (−2pp) shown

// TABLE A4 — INTERBANK CASH MARKET RATES (Jan-25 to Feb-26)

% per annum · Source: Bank of Tanzania MER March 2026
TenorJan-25Feb-25Apr-25Jun-25Aug-25Oct-25Dec-25Jan-26Feb-26MoM Δ (bps)
Overnight7.697.877.907.936.156.456.006.136.01▼ −12
2–7 Day7.748.027.987.966.526.296.306.346.31▼ −3
8–14 Day8.518.628.088.126.716.926.266.746.83▲ +9
15–30 Day8.588.778.376.956.877.076.407.066.96▼ −10
31–60 Day9.038.008.538.536.907.287.207.237.00▼ −23
61–90 Day6.757.009.119.149.149.148.119.967.00▼ −296
91–180 Day7.8710.4212.0012.007.009.758.896.757.00▲ +25
181+ Day10.9310.9310.9310.9310.9310.9310.9310.9312.00▲ +107
Overall IBCM Rate7.808.068.007.946.486.386.296.406.34▼ −6
Source: Table A4 — Interest Rates Structure · Bank of Tanzania MER March 2026 · bps = basis points
// REVERSE REPO RATE

The reverse repo rate was maintained at 5.75% throughout January and February 2026, aligned with the CBR. BoT used reverse repo operations to absorb excess shilling liquidity and steer the 7-day IBCM rate within the ±2 percentage point corridor around the CBR (3.75%–7.75%). The IBCM rate of 6.34% sits comfortably within this band, confirming the effectiveness of the current monetary policy transmission mechanism.

LENDING & DEPOSIT RATE STRUCTURE

Commercial bank interest rates remained broadly stable in February 2026, with the overall lending rate virtually unchanged at 15.11 percent. Negotiated rates for prime customers continued to compress, while the short-term interest rate spread narrowed to 5.59 percentage points — the tightest in the observed period.

// LENDING & DEPOSIT RATES — Monthly Trend (Jan-25 to Feb-26)
% per annum · Overall Lending, Negotiated Lending, Time Deposit, Negotiated Deposit
// SHORT-TERM INTEREST RATE SPREAD (Feb-25 to Feb-26)
Difference between 1-Year Lending and Deposit Rates (pp)

// TABLE 2.3.1 — LENDING AND DEPOSIT INTEREST RATES (Selected Months)

% per annum · Source: Banks and Bank of Tanzania Computations
Rate TypeFeb-25Mar-25Apr-25Dec-25Jan-26Feb-26MoM Δ (bps)
// LENDING RATES
Overall Lending Rate15.1415.5015.1615.2415.1015.11▲ +1
Short-Term Lending (Up to 1 Yr)15.7715.8316.1515.4615.4915.41▼ −8
Negotiated Lending Rate13.4212.9412.8812.3812.2512.19▼ −6
// DEPOSIT RATES
Savings Deposit Rate2.982.862.893.022.942.98▲ +4
Overall Time Deposit Rate8.138.007.828.368.338.32▼ −1
12-Month Deposit Rate9.488.149.279.589.709.82▲ +12
Negotiated Deposit Rate11.4010.3510.5211.6611.7411.48▼ −26
Short-Term Interest Rate Spread6.297.696.885.885.795.59▼ −20
Source: Table 2.3.1, Banks and Bank of Tanzania Computations · bps = basis points · pp = percentage points

TICGL MARKET ANALYSIS

TICGL's independent financial market intelligence for Tanzania's government securities and interbank markets — February 2026.

// FIVE KEY MARKET SIGNALS — TICGL RESEARCH

1. Historic Yield Compression: Short-End Has Repriced by Over 600bps. The 364-day T-bill yield has fallen from 11.99 percent (February 2025) to 6.20 percent (February 2026) — a 579 basis point decline in twelve months. The overall T-bill WAY dropped from 11.93 percent to 5.68 percent over the same period. This is among the most aggressive short-end repricing episodes in Tanzania's recent market history. Drivers include the BoT's shift to an interest-rate based monetary policy framework, excess banking system liquidity, and strong domestic investor demand for government paper.

2. Bond Market Oversubscription at 6.95x — A Structural Demand Signal. The extraordinary bid-to-offer ratio of 6.95x for the 15/25-year bond auction in February 2026 — with TZS 2,778.1 billion in bids against a TZS 399.5 billion offer — signals a deep structural demand imbalance for long-duration Tanzania sovereign debt. Pension funds, insurance companies, and commercial banks are competing aggressively for limited supply. TICGL expects the government will capitalise on this demand to gradually extend the yield curve beyond 25 years.

3. Yield Curve Inversion Alert: 7-Year Bond at 9.71% vs 15-Year at 10.78%. The 7-year government bond yields 9.71 percent — lower than the 10-year (11.30%), 15-year (10.78%), and 20-year (12.02%) bonds. This local inversion at the 7-year point is technically unusual and may reflect illiquidity in that specific tenor rather than a macroeconomic signal. The BoT may wish to conduct targeted 7-year reopening auctions to normalise the mid-curve.

4. IBCM Liquidity is Adequate — But Duration Preference is Telling. The 63.5% dominance of 7-day transactions in the IBCM reflects banks' preference for short-term liquidity management — a sign of tactical, rather than structural, liquidity needs. The overall IBCM rate of 6.34% sits 59 basis points above the CBR of 5.75%, well within the ±200bps policy corridor.

5. Interest Rate Spread Compression Creates Opportunity for Borrowers. The short-term interest rate spread narrowed to 5.59 percentage points in February 2026 — the tightest in the observed period. This compression benefits creditworthy private sector borrowers who can negotiate preferential lending rates. For TICGL's private sector clients, this creates a window to restructure existing debt at lower rates ahead of anticipated monetary policy easing cycles in 2026.

crossmenu linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram