Tanzania’s external debt has shown a significant upward trend, reaching 35,039.8 USD Million in February 2025, up from 34,551.4 USD Million in January 2025, according to the Bank of Tanzania. This marks a month-on-month increase of approximately 488.4 USD Million or 1.41%. The external debt has grown steadily, averaging 20,062.78 USD Million from 2011 to 2025, with a record high of 34,936.5 USD Million in February 2025 and a low of 2,469.7 USD Million in December 2011. This reflects a substantial increase over the years, driven by investments in infrastructure, energy, and other development projects.

Tanzania’s External Debt in Context

Tanzania’s external debt is a critical indicator of its economic position within Africa and East Africa. To provide a comprehensive understanding, let’s compare Tanzania’s external debt to other African and East African countries, analyze its debt-to-GDP ratio, and explore the factors contributing to its debt profile.

Comparison with African Countries

The provided data lists external debt for several African countries, with figures converted to USD Million where necessary for comparison. Using the most recent data from the table and supplementing with additional context:

• South Africa: 168,379 USD Million (Dec 2024) – The highest external debt in the dataset, reflecting South Africa’s position as one of Africa’s largest economies.
• Egypt: 155,204 USD Million (Sep 2024) – Another major economy with significant external borrowing, driven by infrastructure and energy projects.
• Angola: 50,260 USD Million (Dec 2023) – High debt due to oil-related investments and reliance on external financing.
• Nigeria: 42,900 USD Million (Sep 2024) – A major oil-producing nation with considerable external debt, though lower than Tanzania’s relative to GDP.
• Tanzania: 34,056 USD Million (Mar 2025) – Ranks among the top tier of African countries in terms of external debt, reflecting its ambitious development agenda.
• Ghana: 28,300 USD Million (Dec 2024) – Lower than Tanzania, but Ghana faces higher debt distress risks due to a higher debt-to-GDP ratio.
• Rwanda: 7,916 USD Million (Dec 2023) – An East African neighbor with significantly lower external debt than Tanzania.
• Kenya: 5,057 KES Billion (approx. 37,173 USD Million at an exchange rate of 1 KES = 0.00735 USD, Dec 2024) – Comparable to Tanzania, but slightly higher, reflecting Kenya’s larger economy.
• Burundi: 1,873,263 BIF Million (approx. 650 USD Million at an exchange rate of 1 BIF = 0.000347 USD, Dec 2024) – Significantly lower, reflecting Burundi’s smaller economy.

Tanzania’s external debt of 34,056 USD Million (Mar 2025) places it among the top 10 African countries for external debt, behind economic giants like South Africa, Egypt, and Nigeria, but ahead of smaller economies like Rwanda and Burundi. This reflects Tanzania’s growing economic ambitions but also its increasing reliance on external financing.

Comparison with East African Community (EAC) Countries

Within East Africa, Tanzania’s external debt is significant but not the highest. Key EAC countries include:

• Kenya: Approximately 37,173 USD Million (Dec 2024) – Slightly higher than Tanzania, driven by large infrastructure projects like the Standard Gauge Railway (SGR).
• Tanzania: 34,056 USD Million (Mar 2025) – A close second, with debt growth tied to infrastructure, energy, and mining investments.
• Rwanda: 7,916 USD Million (Dec 2023) – Much lower, reflecting Rwanda’s smaller economy and more cautious borrowing.
• Uganda: Data not provided, but recent estimates suggest around 20,000 USD Million (2023), lower than Tanzania due to a less diversified economy.
• Burundi: 650 USD Million (Dec 2024) – Minimal debt, constrained by its small economy and political instability.

Tanzania’s external debt is comparable to Kenya’s, positioning it as a major borrower in the EAC. However, its debt-to-GDP ratio and risk profile are more favorable than some peers, as discussed below.

Debt-to-GDP Ratio and Sustainability

Tanzania’s external debt-to-GDP ratio provides insight into its debt sustainability. In 2023, Tanzania’s public debt (including external and domestic) was 46.87% of GDP, with external debt accounting for approximately 70.4% of total public debt (2023 data). Assuming a nominal GDP of 78 USD Billion in 2023 (projected to grow to 105.1 USD Billion in 2022, adjusting for inflation and growth), the external debt of 34,056 USD Million in March 2025 translates to roughly 32-35% of GDP, depending on GDP estimates for 2025.

• Comparison with African Peers:
  • South Africa: External debt at 168,379 USD Million with a GDP of approximately 405 USD Billion (2023) yields a debt-to-GDP ratio of ~41.6%, higher than Tanzania.
  • Egypt: 155,204 USD Million with a GDP of 393 USD Billion (2023) results in a ratio of ~39.5%, also higher.
  • Nigeria: 42,900 USD Million with a GDP of 362 USD Billion (2023) gives a ratio of ~11.8%, significantly lower due to Nigeria’s larger economy.
  • Ghana: 28,300 USD Million with a GDP of 76 USD Billion (2023) results in a ratio of ~37.2%, indicating higher distress risk.
  • Rwanda: 7,916 USD Million with a GDP of 14 USD Billion (2023) yields a ratio of ~56.5%, much higher than Tanzania, indicating greater vulnerability.
• East African Context:
  • Kenya: 37,173 USD Million with a GDP of 112 USD Billion (2023) results in a ratio of ~33.2%, similar to Tanzania.
  • Rwanda: As noted, ~56.5%, significantly higher.
  • Burundi: 650 USD Million with a GDP of 2.6 USD Billion (2023) yields a ratio of ~25%, lower but less relevant due to its small economy.

Tanzania’s external debt-to-GDP ratio of ~32-35% is moderate compared to peers, and its public debt-to-GDP ratio of 46.87% (2023) is below the regional benchmark of 55% for low-income countries, indicating sustainable debt levels. The IMF’s 2024 Debt Sustainability Analysis (DSA) classifies Tanzania’s risk of external debt distress as low, supported by prudent fiscal policies and concessional borrowing.

Composition of Tanzania’s External Debt

As of December 2019, Tanzania’s external debt was USD 22.4 Billion (40% of GDP), with the central government holding 78%, the private sector 21%, and public corporations 0.4%. The debt is primarily owed to:

• Multilateral institutions: 46% (e.g., World Bank, IMF, African Development Bank)
• Commercial sources: 34%
• Export credit: 11%
• Bilateral institutions: 9% (e.g., China, India).

By currency, 68.9% of external debt is denominated in USD, followed by the Euro, which reduces exposure to currency fluctuations but increases repayment burdens when the Tanzanian shilling depreciates (8% depreciation in 2023).

Drivers of External Debt

Tanzania’s external debt growth is driven by:

1. Infrastructure Investments: Large-scale projects like the Standard Gauge Railway (SGR), Dar es Salaam Port expansion, and energy projects (e.g., gas pipeline from Mnazi Bay to Dar es Salaam) require significant borrowing.
2. Economic Diversification: Investments in mining (gold, nickel, graphite), manufacturing, and tourism to reduce reliance on agriculture.
3. COVID-19 Response: Non-concessional borrowing during the pandemic to support the economy, increasing debt levels.
4. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): FDI rose to USD 922 Million in 2021, with projects like the Kabanga Nickel Project requiring external financing.

Risks and Challenges

• Foreign Exchange Shortages: The Tanzanian shilling’s 8% depreciation in 2023 and 0.5% in 2022 increased debt servicing costs in local currency.
• Election-Related Pressures: The 2025 elections may increase fiscal spending, potentially pausing fiscal consolidation efforts.
• Global Economic Slowdown: Reduced tourism receipts and export demand could strain debt repayment capacity.
• Debt Service Burden: Debt service absorbs ~40% of government expenditures, limiting fiscal space for social spending.

Position in Africa and East Africa

• Africa: Tanzania ranks among the top 10 African countries for external debt, behind South Africa, Egypt, and Nigeria, but its moderate debt-to-GDP ratio and low distress risk make it a relatively stable borrower. Its diversified economy (agriculture, mining, tourism) and stable political environment enhance its attractiveness for FDI, unlike higher-risk countries like Ghana or Zambia.
• East Africa: Tanzania is a close second to Kenya in external debt, with a stronger growth outlook (6% projected GDP growth in 2025 vs. Kenya’s 5%). Its lower debt-to-GDP ratio compared to Rwanda and stable macroeconomic policies position it as a regional economic powerhouse, though Kenya’s larger economy gives it a slight edge.

Conclusion

Tanzania’s external debt of 34,056 USD Million in March 2025 reflects its ambitious development agenda but remains sustainable, with a debt-to-GDP ratio of ~32-35% and low distress risk. Compared to African peers, Tanzania’s debt is moderate, and within East Africa, it competes closely with Kenya while outperforming smaller economies like Rwanda and Burundi. Continued fiscal discipline, concessional borrowing, and economic diversification will be key to maintaining debt sustainability.

This table highlights Tanzania’s external debt of 34,056 USD Million (Mar 2025) as moderate within Africa, comparable to Kenya in East Africa, and sustainable relative to its GDP. Its debt-to-GDP ratio of ~32-35% is lower than peers like Rwanda (56.5%) and Angola (59.1%), positioning Tanzania favorably in terms of debt sustainability.

Notes:

• Tanzania: External debt increased from 34,551.4 USD Million (Jan 2025) to 35,039.8 USD Million (Feb 2025), with 34,056 USD Million reported for Mar 2025. Debt-to-GDP ratio estimated at 32-35% based on projected GDP growth to ~100 USD Billion by 2025.
• Kenya: Converted from 5,057 KES Billion using 1 KES = 0.00735 USD (Dec 2024).
• Burundi: Converted from 1,873,263 BIF Million using 1 BIF = 0.000347 USD (Dec 2024).
• GDP Estimates: Sourced from IMF/World Bank 2023 data, adjusted for inflation/growth where necessary.
• Debt-to-GDP Ratio: Calculated as (External Debt / GDP) * 100. Ratios are approximate due to varying reference dates and GDP projections.

Fixing Tanzania's Local Government PPP Projects Through Strategic Fiscal Reforms

TICGL’s Economic Research Centre has published a groundbreaking research paper authored by Dr. Bravious Felix Kahyoza PhD, FMVA, CP3P (braviouskahyoza5@gmail.com) and Amran Bhuzohera, which examines the budgetary deviations, implementation challenges, and allocation inefficiencies affecting Local Government Authority (LGA)-initiated Public-Private Partnership (PPP) projects in Tanzania between 2021/2022 and 2024/2025.

The study provides a detailed analysis of how financial misalignments and operational gaps hinder project performance and service delivery at the local level. Leveraging Dr. Kahyoza’s expertise in financial modeling, valuation, and PPP management, the paper offers evidence-based recommendations to strengthen fiscal discipline, enhance accountability, and improve the overall effectiveness of Tanzania’s decentralized PPP framework.

With 184 local councils serving as the primary initiators of PPP projects under the PPP Act of 2010 (amended 2023), these decentralized partnerships are essential for delivering infrastructure and services in housing, transportation, water, and health. However, the paper reveals that persistent fiscal constraints and institutional bottlenecks have undermined the PPP model's potential, threatening Tanzania's ability to meet its Development Vision 2025 goals.

Key Findings and Insights

• Massive budgetary shortfall: Across 32 analyzed LGA-led PPP projects, the total budgetary deviation reached 35.4% (TZS 6.53 trillion), with actual allocations totaling only TZS 11.92 trillion against planned budgets of TZS 18.45 trillion.
• High implementation shift rates: A staggering 56% of projects shifted away from the PPP model to traditional public funding or hybrid arrangements, primarily due to funding gaps (42%), regulatory delays (28%), and private sector reluctance (17%).
• Below-threshold allocations: The average allocation percentage stood at just 64.6%—falling short of the 70% viability threshold needed for sustainable PPP implementation. Health sectors were hit hardest with only 60.3% allocation, while transport managed 65.2%.
• Sectoral disparities: Social sectors like health (39.7% deviation) and education (37.5% deviation) faced the worst funding gaps, while flagship infrastructure projects in transport and energy received relatively better allocations due to national priority status.
• Fiscal federalism constraints: LGAs receive only 20% of national revenue through formula-based transfers (TZS 1.36 trillion in 2024/25), severely limiting their capacity to commit matching funds for PPP projects—well below the East African average of 40%.
• Peak crisis period: The fiscal year 2023/24 saw the highest deviation rate of 47.4% and shift incidence of 67%, driven by post-COVID inflation (4.2% CPI), rising interest rates (15%), and global economic shocks.

Policy Gaps and Opportunities

While Tanzania's Third National Five-Year Development Plan (FYDP III) for 2021/22–2025/26 and the National PPP Policy (2023) provide a robust legal and strategic framework, implementation gaps persist—particularly in sub-national fiscal allocation, procurement efficiency, and risk-sharing mechanisms.

Key structural constraints include:

• Severe under-allocation to LGA-initiated projects compared to national infrastructure priorities.
• Procurement approval delays averaging 9 months through the PPP Centre, discouraging private investor confidence.
• Limited LGA institutional capacity, with 70% of councils lacking adequate procurement and financial management expertise.
• Weak risk-sharing frameworks that fail to attract private sector participation, especially in social sectors.

Policy Recommendations

To unlock the transformative potential of LGA-led PPPs and save an estimated TZS 2.61 trillion through private sector leverage, the paper proposes a comprehensive reform agenda:

1. Ring-Fenced LGA Transfers: Earmark 25% of the annual development budget (e.g., TZS 1.41 trillion from 2025/26's TZS 5.65 trillion) exclusively for PPP matching funds, prioritizing high-deviation sectors like health and water to raise allocations to 75%.
2. Fast-Track Regulatory Approvals: Implement a digital approval portal through the PPP Centre with a 6-month cap on procurement processes, reducing regulatory delays by 30% and increasing project retention rates by 20%.
3. Sector-Specific Investment Incentives: Offer 10-year tax rebates for private investors in energy, water, and health PPPs to counter risk aversion and attract 20% more private capital into underserved sectors.
4. Mandatory Capacity-Building Programs: Establish compulsory training in procurement, risk assessment, and financial management for 70% of LGA councils (approximately 129 councils), funded through the Local Government Capital Development Trust Fund at TZS 500 billion annually.
5. Tripartite Oversight Mechanism: Create collaborative monitoring structures involving the Ministry of Finance, PPP Centre, and LGAs with annual performance audits aligned to FYDP III metrics, ensuring transparency and accountability.

Conclusion

Tanzania's Local Government Authorities hold immense potential as drivers of decentralized development through PPPs. However, without urgent fiscal reforms and institutional strengthening, the country risks losing trillions of shillings in private sector investment and falling short of its infrastructure development targets.

The authors emphasize that fixing LGA-led PPPs is not merely a budgetary exercise—it is a strategic imperative for inclusive growth, service delivery, and fiscal sustainability. With the proposed reforms, Tanzania can reduce budgetary deviations to 20-25%, increase allocation efficiencies to 75%, and position LGAs as catalysts for the PPP-driven transformation envisioned in Development Vision 2025.

By 2030, with well-implemented reforms, Tanzania could emerge as an East African leader in sub-national PPP governance, demonstrating how decentralized partnerships can bridge infrastructure gaps and empower local communities.

📘 Read the Full Research Paper:
"Local Government-Initiated Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Projects: Analyzing Budgetary Deviations, Allocations, and Implementation Shifts in Tanzania, 2021/2022–2024/2025"
Authored by Dr. Bravious Felix Kahyoza PhD, FMVA, CP3P (braviouskahyoza5@gmail.com) and Amran Bhuzohera
Published by TICGL | Tanzania Investment and Consultant Group Ltd
🌐 www.ticgl.com