TICGL

| Economic Consulting Group

TICGL | Economic Consulting Group
Can Tanzania Achieve Vision 2050 Without Major Tax System Reforms?
January 26, 2026  
Can Tanzania Achieve Vision 2050 Without Major Tax System Reforms? | TICGL Economic Analysis Can Tanzania Achieve Vision 2050 Without Major Tax System Reforms? A Comprehensive Data-Driven Analysis of Tanzania's Fiscal Challenges and Development Financing Published: January 2026 | Data Period: 2017-2025 with projections to 2050 | Analysis by: TICGL Economic Research Team 🚨 Critical […]
Can Tanzania Achieve Vision 2050 Without Major Tax System Reforms? | TICGL Economic Analysis

Can Tanzania Achieve Vision 2050 Without Major Tax System Reforms?

A Comprehensive Data-Driven Analysis of Tanzania's Fiscal Challenges and Development Financing

Published: January 2026 | Data Period: 2017-2025 with projections to 2050 | Analysis by: TICGL Economic Research Team

🚨 Critical Findings

  • Tax-to-GDP ratio stagnant at 11.5-12.8% while Vision 2050 requires 20%+
  • 71.8% of workforce in informal sector contributing minimal taxes despite 40-46% GDP share
  • Budget grew 66% (2020-2025) while tax revenue grew only 62% from lower base
  • TZS 15.5 trillion annual revenue loss from structural inefficiencies
  • Commercial borrowing doubled to 25.5% of budget at expensive 7-10% interest rates

Executive Summary

Tanzania's economy faces a critical fiscal challenge: while GDP has grown an impressive 78% from TZS 118.7 trillion (2017) to TZS 211.2 trillion (2025), the tax system has failed to capture proportional revenue. The tax-to-GDP ratio remains stubbornly flat at 11.5-12.8%, well below the Sub-Saharan African average of 16.5%.

This comprehensive analysis of eight years of fiscal data (2017-2025) reveals fundamental misalignments between economic growth, budget expansion, and revenue collection. The informal sector—representing 45-46% of GDP and employing 76% of the workforce—escapes taxation almost entirely, creating an annual revenue loss of approximately TZS 8-10 trillion.

The stark conclusion: Without major tax system reforms, Tanzania's Vision 2050 ambitions are unachievable. Current trajectory projects a debt crisis by 2028-2030, with fiscal deficits worsening from 2.6% to 4.0% of GDP despite economic growth.

Tanzania's Fiscal Landscape: Key Indicators (2025)

12.8%
Tax-to-GDP Ratio (Target: 20%)
71.8%
Informal Employment Share
62%
Domestic Revenue Coverage of Budget
TZS 15.5T
Annual Revenue Loss from Inefficiencies
0.88
Tax Buoyancy (Optimal: 1.0+)
4.0%
Fiscal Deficit as % of GDP
2.82M
Active Taxpayers (62M population)
25.5%
Commercial Borrowing Share of Budget

1. Economic Growth Performance (2017-2025)

YearReal GDP Growth (%)Nominal GDP (TZS Trillion)GDP (USD Billion)GDP Per Capita (USD)Inflation Rate (%)
2017-118.7~701,150-
20187.1124.0721,1653.5
20196.1134.5741,1803.4
20205.0145.4761,1903.3
20214.8156.2771,2003.7
20225.0170.8781,2204.3
20235.2188.8791,2403.8
2024 (Est.)5.5199.2831,2603.3
2025 (Proj.)6.0211.2871,2803.4

2. Tax Revenue Collection Trends (2018-2026)

Tax Revenue vs Budget Growth Comparison

Fiscal YearTotal Collection (TZS Trillion)Growth Rate (%)Tax-to-GDP Ratio (%)Target Achievement
2018/19~14.3-11.5-
2019/20~15.58.411.5-
2020/21~16.77.711.5-
2021/22~18.07.811.5-
2022/2319.6 / 24.14*8.911.5-11.7Achieved
2023/2421.7 / 27.64*10.7 / 14.5*11.5-12.1Achieved
2024/25 (Target)25.5 / 32.27*-12.8 / 12.5*In Progress
2025/26 (Projected)~27.05.912.8Projected

*Dual figures reflect different data sources - first from NBS/analytical reports, second from TRA official collections

⚠️ Critical Challenge: Stagnant Tax-to-GDP Ratio

Despite consistent absolute revenue growth averaging 8-10% annually, the tax-to-GDP ratio remained stubbornly flat at 11.5% for five consecutive years (2018-2022), showing only modest improvement to 12.8% by 2024/25. This is significantly below the Sub-Saharan Africa average of 16.5%, representing approximately TZS 6-8 trillion in foregone annual revenue.

Tax Buoyancy Problem: At 0.88, for every 1% GDP growth, tax revenue grows only 0.88%, indicating structural inefficiency in the tax system.

3. National Budget Evolution and Financing Gap (2020-2026)

Fiscal YearTotal Budget (TZS T)Budget (USD B)Growth Rate (%)Domestic Revenue (TZS T)Tax Share (TZS T)Revenue Coverage (%)Deficit (% GDP)
2020/2134.1~14.2-22.516.766%2.6
2021/2236.6~15.27.324.018.066%3.6
2022/2341.5~17.313.427.019.665%3.9
2023/2444.418.47.029.521.766%3.9
2024/2554.821.523.434.224.0-25.562%4.0
2025/26 (Proj.)56.522.23.136.027.064%4.0

⚠️ Widening Financing Gap

Six-Year Trend Analysis (2020/21 to 2025/26):

  • Budget increased by 66% (TZS 34.1T → 56.5T)
  • Tax revenue increased by 62% (TZS 16.7T → 27.0T)
  • Domestic revenue consistently covers only 62-66% of total budget
  • Budget deficit worsened from 2.6% to 4.0% of GDP
  • The absolute budget-revenue gap nearly doubled from TZS 11.6T to 20.6T

Critical Issue: Budget growth outpaces revenue growth, creating a structural fiscal deficit requiring increased borrowing (now 30-35% of budget) or donor funding, threatening long-term debt sustainability.

4. Budget Financing Structure Analysis

Budget Financing Sources (2023/24 vs 2024/25)

Financing Source2023/24 (TZS T)2023/24 Share (%)2024/25 (TZS T)2024/25 Share (%)Sustainability Risk
Tax Revenue21.748.9%24.0-25.543.8-46.5%Moderate-High
Non-Tax Revenue7.817.6%8.7-9.715.9-17.7%Low-Moderate
Total Domestic Revenue29.566.4%34.262.4%-
Foreign Grants~1.53.4%~1.01.8%High (declining)
Concessional Loans~5.512.4%~5.610.2%Moderate
Commercial Borrowing~7.917.8%~14.025.5%Very High
Total External Financing~14.933.6%~20.637.6%-
TOTAL BUDGET44.4100%54.8100%-

⚠️ Alarming Trend: Commercial Borrowing Surge

Most concerning trend: Commercial borrowing jumped from 17.8% to 25.5% of budget—more than doubling in absolute terms from TZS 7.9T to 14.0T. This carries high interest rates (7-10% vs. 1-3% for concessional loans), significantly increasing debt servicing costs and reducing fiscal space for development.

Key Risks:

  • Declining domestic revenue share: From 66.4% to 62.4%
  • Shrinking foreign grants: From 3.4% to 1.8%
  • External dependence increased: From 33.6% to 37.6%
  • Debt servicing consuming nearly 20% of revenue

5. The Informal Sector Challenge: Root Cause of Fiscal Gap

Informal Sector Impact on Tanzania's Economy

IndicatorFormal SectorInformal SectorImpact on Revenue
Share of GDP54-55%45-46%Massive revenue loss
Share of Employment24%76%Narrow tax base
Tax Compliance RateModerate-HighVery LowLow collections
Economic VisibilityTrackedLargely untrackedPlanning challenges
Business Registration RateLow (0.2 per 1000 pop.)UnregisteredEnforcement difficulty

💡 Quantifying the Informal Sector Revenue Loss (2024 Baseline)

Using Conservative Estimates:

  • Informal sector GDP: 42% of TZS 199.2 trillion = TZS 83.7 trillion
  • Potential revenue at 12% collection rate: TZS 10.0 trillion annually
  • Actual collection from informal sector: ~TZS 1.5-2.0 trillion
  • Annual revenue loss: TZS 8-8.5 trillion per year

What this lost revenue could fund:

  • Represents 15-18% of total national budget
  • Could fully fund development budget (currently ~32% of total) with surplus
  • Equivalent to entire health and education budget combined
  • Would reduce budget deficit from 4.0% to 0.5% of GDP
  • Cumulative loss 2018-2024: approximately TZS 40-50 trillion

6. Regional Comparison: Tanzania vs East African Peers

CountryTax-to-GDP Ratio (%)GDP Per Capita (USD)Informal Sector (% GDP)Revenue Performance
Tanzania11.7-12.81,20045-46Below potential
Kenya13.7-18.02,100~35Good
Rwanda15.0-16.3966~40Excellent
Uganda12.1-15.11,046~43Moderate
Burundi15.2-18.0238~38Good
EAC Average12.74---
LMIC Average14.51---
SSA Average16.5---

💡 Key Insight: Significant Revenue Underperformance

Tanzania collects 4-5 percentage points less than the Sub-Saharan Africa average. At current GDP levels (TZS 199.2 trillion in 2024), this represents approximately TZS 6-8 trillion in foregone annual revenue.

Even Rwanda, with lower GDP per capita (USD 966 vs Tanzania's USD 1,200), achieves a significantly higher tax-to-GDP ratio (15-16.3%), demonstrating that effective tax administration and formalization can overcome structural constraints.

7. Vision 2050 Projections: Required vs Current Trajectory

Business-as-Usual vs Vision 2050 Requirements

IndicatorCurrent (2024)Vision 2050 TargetRequired Annual GrowthGap Analysis
GDP (USD)85 billion1 trillion10%Current: 5.5% (Shortfall: 4.5%)
Tax Revenue (USD)10 billion140 billion~11%Current: ~8% (Shortfall: 3%)
Active Taxpayers2.82 million20+ million8% annuallyCurrently: Declining
Informal Sector Share46%<25%-1pp/yearCurrently: Stable

Revenue Gap Without Reform: Business-as-Usual Scenario (2025-2050)

YearProjected GDP (USD B)Tax Revenue at 13% (USD B)Required Revenue (USD B)Annual Gap (USD B)
20259011.713.51.8
203013016.926.09.1
203520026.050.024.0
204035045.587.542.0
205065084.5140.055.5

⚠️ Critical Conclusion

Without major reforms, Tanzania will collect only 60% of required revenue by 2050.

To achieve Vision 2050 goals, annual tax revenue must increase from current USD 10 billion to USD 140 billion (approximately TZS 350 trillion), requiring GDP growth to double from 5.1% to at least 10% annually—a feat that demands comprehensive structural transformation.

8. Data-Driven Reform Recommendations

Integrated Reform Package: Projected Outcomes (2025-2030)

Combined Reform Impact Projection

Reform Initiative2025 Impact (TZS T)2027 Impact (TZS T)2030 Impact (TZS T)Cumulative 6-Year (TZS T)Priority Level
Informal Sector Formalization+1.0+2.5+3.812.3CRITICAL
Tax Base Expansion+1.5+3.2+4.215.8CRITICAL
Tax Administration (TRA)+2.0+4.0+4.719.2HIGH
Tax Buoyancy Improvement+1.5+2.8+3.513.1CRITICAL
Sectoral Taxation+1.0+3.5+5.516.4HIGH
Budget Efficiency Gains+1.5+3.0+4.014.7HIGH
TOTAL POTENTIAL+8.5+19.0+25.7+91.5-

Priority 1: Formalize the Informal Sector CRITICAL - Highest Impact

Target: Reduce informal sector from 71.8% of workforce (40-46% GDP) to 50% workforce (30% GDP) by 2030

Potential Revenue Impact: +TZS 3.8 trillion annually by 2030 | Cumulative six-year gain: ~TZS 12.3 trillion

Recommended Actions:

  • Digital payment mandates for businesses >TZS 10M annual turnover
  • Simplified tax regime for SMEs (3-5% turnover tax)
  • Mobile money transaction taxation expansion (potential: TZS 1.2T from ~$50B annual transactions)
  • Business registration incentives (90-day tax holiday + simplified licensing)
  • Sector-specific presumptive taxes for agriculture and commerce

Priority 2: Broaden Tax Base and Improve Buoyancy CRITICAL

Target: Increase registered taxpayers from 2.82M to 8M by 2030; improve tax buoyancy from 0.88 to 1.05

Potential Revenue Impact: +TZS 4.2 trillion from new taxpayers + TZS 3.5T from buoyancy improvement = TZS 7.7T annually

Current Coverage Analysis:

  • Formal Employees: 8.5M potential, only 2.5M registered (29% coverage) → Target: 60% by 2030
  • SME Owners: 4M potential, only 0.2M registered (5% coverage) → Target: 30% by 2030
  • Professionals: 1.2M potential, only 0.1M registered (8% coverage) → Target: 50% by 2030
  • Commercial Agriculture: 2M potential, only 0.02M registered (1% coverage) → Target: 20% by 2030

Actions: Automated tax filing (e-TRA expansion), risk-based auditing, third-party data matching (banks, telcos, property registries), employer withholding enforcement for gig economy, property tax modernization

Priority 3: Increase Tax-to-GDP Ratio to Regional Standards

Pathway to 18% by 2030: From current 12.8% to 13.5% (2025) → 14.5% (2026) → 15.5% (2027) → 16.5% (2028) → 17.0% (2029) → 18.0% (2030)

Cumulative Additional Revenue (2025-2030): TZS 38.2 trillion

Benchmark: 18% target is ambitious but achievable with comprehensive reforms, aligning with Rwanda (15-16.3%) and approaching SSA average (16.5%)

Priority 4: TRA Quick Wins Package

Total Impact: +TZS 4.7T annually by 2027

Initiatives:

  • Risk-based audits (Evidence: 15% revenue increase in pilot) → +TZS 1.2T
  • Digital tax filing to 90% adoption → +TZS 0.8T
  • VAT refund backlog clearance (TZS 2T backlog) → +TZS 0.5T
  • Customs automation (reduce clearance from 7 to 2 days) → +TZS 0.7T
  • Third-party data integration (banks, telcos, utilities) → +TZS 1.5T

Priority 5: Sector-Specific Taxation Strategies

Agriculture Sector (26-28% GDP, ~8% tax contribution):

  • Current gap: Should contribute TZS 7-8T, contributes ~TZS 2T
  • Actions: Presumptive tax on commercial farmers (>10 acres or TZS 50M revenue), input subsidy tied to revenue declaration
  • Potential: +TZS 2.5T

Digital Economy (emerging, <1% tax contribution):

  • Mobile money: $50B transactions annually
  • Actions: Comprehensive digital service tax (2-3%), platform withholding (Uber, Jumia, etc.)
  • Potential: +TZS 1.2T

Real Estate/Property (5-7% GDP, ~3% tax contribution):

  • Actions: Digital land registry integration, annual property tax based on cadastral values
  • Potential: +TZS 1.8T

9. The Bottom Line: A Tale of Two Futures

❌ CURRENT TRAJECTORY (No Reform)

  • Tax-to-GDP stagnates at 13-14%
  • Fiscal deficit reaches 6-7% of GDP by 2030
  • Public debt breaches 60% of GDP by 2028 → debt crisis
  • Budget cuts to social services
  • Commercial borrowing costs consume 25% of revenue
  • Vision 2050: IMPOSSIBLE

✅ REFORM TRAJECTORY (Comprehensive Action)

  • Tax-to-GDP reaches 20% by 2035
  • Fiscal deficit declines to 1.5% of GDP by 2030
  • Public debt stabilizes at 45% of GDP
  • Development spending increases from 30% to 45% of budget
  • 85% domestic financing by 2035
  • Vision 2050: ACHIEVABLE

Final Answer: Je vinaendana? (Do they align?)

HAPANA KABISA. (Absolutely not.)

Tanzania's economic growth (78% in 8 years), budget expansion (66% in 6 years), and tax collection (62% in 8 years from very low base) are fundamentally misaligned because:

  1. The economy grows where taxes can't reach - 71.8% informal workforce, 40-46% informal GDP
  2. Budget ambitions exceed fiscal reality - 27.5% budget-to-GDP ratio with only 62% domestic coverage
  3. Tax system is structurally obsolete - designed for 1980s formal economy, not 2025 digital-informal reality
  4. The gap is accelerating, not closing - deficit from 2.6% to 4.0% GDP in 5 years

Nini kinapaswa kufanyika? (What should be done?)

Not incremental adjustments, but fundamental restructuring:

  • Make the invisible economy visible (formalization)
  • Make the tax system fit the economy (not vice versa)
  • Make budgets match realistic revenue capacity
  • Make this transformation THE national priority for 2025-2030

The data is unambiguous: Without comprehensive reform starting immediately, Tanzania will face a fiscal crisis by 2028-2030. With reform, Vision 2050 remains within reach. The choice is clear. The time is now. The data has spoken.

Tanzania Fiscal Analysis - Interactive Charts

Subscribe to TICGL Insights

Stay informed and gain the crucial information you need to make strategic decisions in Tanzania's vibrant market.
Subscription Form
crossmenu linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram